The Contemporary English Version, or CEV, has helped many of us
understand more about the KJV’s biases, but the fact that they too participated
in the slaughter of the Greek word “adelphos” just as the “TEV” version did,
makes them lower than low. Not only do
these jew-inspired or jew-controlled “translators” contribute to the HATE of
the true brethren of Rebeca’s womb, to the HATE of the sheer concept of racial
purity, to the HATRED of the White Race [even by self-HATING “whites” ], but by
changing such a fundamental principle under God’s LAW, they blaspheme the Word
of God:
1 John
4:20 But if we
say we love God and don't love each other, we are liars. We cannot see God. So
how can we love God, if we don't love the people we can see?
<<<If we say we love God but hate others
we are liars>>>
<<<St
John said, "If we say we love God, but hate others,
we are liars. For we cannot love God, whom we have not seen, if we do not love others,
whom we have seen."(1 John 4:20 TEV)>>>
THAT is blasphemy. But the CEV
compounds the error when it shows its own IDIOCY, it’s own PREJUDICES, its own
AMORALITY, when they are finally FORCED to admit that “adelphos” DOES mean
brother in verses where they just can’t force the word “others” to fit. Out of 346 occurrences of “adelphos” in the
“new” testament, even they translate it as “brother” or “brothers” 95 times,
but NEVER as “brethren” :
Matthew
1:2 From
Abraham to King David, his ancestors were: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Judah and his
brothers (Judah's sons were Perez and Zerah, and their mother was Tamar),
Hezron; Ram, Amminadab, Nahshon, Salmon, Boaz (his mother was Rahab), Obed (his
mother was Ruth), Jesse, and King David.
Isn’t it nice that they didn’t call his brothers just “others” in this
verse );
So now it’s time to set the record straight. This is how that HATE mongers’ words must
read:
<<<If we say we love God but hate
[brethren of Rebeca’s womb] we are liars>>>
What worse HATRED of the Word of God could there be than to claim that
God LIED when He promised Jacob his descendants would be a multitude like the
sands by the sea, when He promised Abraham an everlasting covenant through
Jacob, that Jesus LIED when He said He came ONLY for the House of Israel, that
every nigger IS an heir and NO White man is, that the ONLY Israelites today are
either jews or “spiritual” Israelites [neither of whom are what God promised]?
John Knight
From:
HistoricalFiguresFanClub@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:HistoricalFiguresFanClub@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jacob
Israel
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2008 12:51 PM
To: Jacob Israel
Cc: jewsareedom@yahoogroups.com; christiandentity@yahoogroups.com;
thespiritofjacob@yahoogroups.com; TWOMIFTG@yahoogroups.com;
davidicke2@yahoogroups.com; identity@yahoogroups.com;
hilloftorah@yahoogroups.com; israeliteidentity@yahoogroups.com;
Israelites@yahoogroups.com; houseisrael@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [HistoricalFiguresFanClub] Re: "adelphos" is BROTHER,
never "other", and NOT nigger
NOTE that the KJV itself translated "adelphos" as "brethren" 226 times, "brother" 113 times, brother's 7 times and NEVER "other", putting a LIE to every WORD ever spoken by a kikeaholic FOREVER.
John Knight
-----
Original Message -----
From: Jacob Israel
To: Jacob Israel
Sent: Sunday, September
28, 2008 12:41 PM
Subject: "adelphos"
is BROTHER, never "other", and NOT nigger
<<<Kind of contradicting
yourself, JK, aren't you? Why would I stand
behind something that's a "PROVEN LIE"? That would make no
sense at all.>>>
No
translator in the WORLD, no Greek speaker in the WORLD, no Koine Greek scholar
in the WORLD, agrees with you kikeaholics that the GREEK word
"adelphos" EVER means "other". They ALL know it means
ONE thing, "brother", and SPECIFICALLY one from the same WOMB [in
this case, the womb of Rebakah, whose descendants BOTH Paul and Jesus refer to
as "begotten of the spirit"]:
G80
ἀδελφός
adelphos
ad-el-fos'
From G1 (as a connective particle) and
δελφύς delphus (the womb); a brother
(literally or figuratively) near or remote (much like [H1]): - brother.
"Adelphos"
is NEVER EVER translated by ANYBODY as "other", EVER, not even
by the KJV which your "church" had [or CLAIMS to have had] control
over for more than to MILLENNIA now.
G80
ἀδελφός
adelphos
Total KJV Occurrences: 346
brethren, 226
Mat_1:2, Mat_1:11, Mat_4:18, Mat_4:21, Mat_5:47, Mat_12:46-49 (4), Mat_13:55,
Mat_19:29, Mat_22:24-25 (2), Mat_23:8, Mat_25:40, Mat_28:10, Mar_3:31-34 (4),
Mar_10:29-30 (2), Mar_12:20, Luk_8:19-21 (3), Luk_14:12, Luk_14:26,
Luk_20:28-29 (3), Luk_21:16, Luk_22:32, Joh_2:12, Joh_7:3, Joh_7:5, Joh_7:10,
Joh_20:17, Joh_21:23, Act_1:14, Act_1:16, Act_2:29, Act_2:37, Act_3:17,
Act_3:22, Act_6:3, Act_7:2, Act_7:13, Act_7:23, Act_7:25-26 (2), Act_7:37,
Act_9:30, Act_10:23, Act_11:1, Act_11:12, Act_11:29, Act_12:17, Act_13:15,
Act_13:26, Act_13:38, Act_14:2, Act_15:1, Act_15:3, Act_15:7, Act_15:13,
Act_15:22-23 (3), Act_15:32-33 (2), Act_15:36, Act_15:40, Act_16:2, Act_16:40,
Act_17:6, Act_17:10, Act_17:14, Act_18:18, Act_18:27, Act_20:32, Act_21:7,
Act_21:17, Act_22:1, Act_22:5, Act_23:1, Act_23:5-6 (2), Act_28:14-15 (2),
Act_28:17, Act_28:21, Rom_1:13, Rom_7:1, Rom_7:4, Rom_8:12, Rom_8:29, Rom_9:3,
Rom_10:1, Rom_11:25, Rom_12:1, Rom_15:14-15 (2), Rom_15:30, Rom_16:14,
Rom_16:17, 1Co_1:10-11 (2), 1Co_1:26, 1Co_3:1 (2), 1Co_4:6, 1Co_6:5, 1Co_6:8,
1Co_7:24, 1Co_7:29, 1Co_8:12, 1Co_9:5, 1Co_11:1-2 (2), 1Co_11:33, 1Co_12:1,
1Co_14:6, 1Co_14:20, 1Co_14:26, 1Co_14:39, 1Co_15:1, 1Co_15:6, 1Co_15:50,
1Co_15:58, 1Co_16:11-12 (2), 1Co_16:15, 1Co_16:20, 2Co_1:8, 2Co_8:1, 2Co_8:23,
2Co_9:3, 2Co_9:5, 2Co_11:9, 2Co_13:11, Gal_1:2, Gal_1:11, Gal_3:15, Gal_4:12,
Gal_4:28, Gal_4:31, Gal_5:11, Gal_5:13, Gal_6:1, Gal_6:18, Eph_6:10, Eph_6:23,
Phi_1:12, Phi_1:14, Phi_3:1, Phi_3:13, Phi_3:17, Phi_4:1, Phi_4:8, Phi_4:21,
Col_1:2, Col_4:15, 1Th_1:4, 1Th_2:1, 1Th_2:9, 1Th_2:14, 1Th_2:17, 1Th_3:7,
1Th_4:1, 1Th_4:10 (2), 1Th_4:13, 1Th_5:1, 1Th_5:4, 1Th_5:12, 1Th_5:14,
1Th_5:25-27 (3), 2Th_1:3, 2Th_2:1, 2Th_2:13, 2Th_2:15, 2Th_3:1, 2Th_3:6,
2Th_3:13, 1Ti_4:6, 1Ti_6:1-2 (2), 2Ti_4:21, Heb_2:11-12 (2), Heb_2:17, Heb_3:1,
Heb_3:12, Heb_7:5, Heb_10:19, Heb_13:22, Jam_1:2, Jam_1:16, Jam_1:19, Jam_2:1,
Jam_2:5, Jam_2:14, Jam_3:1, Jam_3:10, Jam_3:12, Jam_4:11, Jam_5:7, Jam_5:9-10
(2), Jam_5:12, Jam_5:19, 2Pe_1:10, 1Jo_2:7, 1Jo_3:13-14 (2), 1Jo_3:16, 3Jo_1:3,
3Jo_1:5, 3Jo_1:10, Rev_6:11, Rev_19:10 (2), Rev_22:9
brother, 113
Mat_4:18, Mat_5:21-24 (5), Mat_7:4, Mat_10:2 (2), Mat_10:21 (2), Mat_12:50,
Mat_14:3, Mat_17:1, Mat_18:15 (2), Mat_18:21, Mat_18:35, Mat_22:24-25 (3),
Mar_1:16, Mar_1:19, Mar_3:17, Mar_3:35, Mar_5:37, Mar_6:3, Mar_6:17, Mar_12:19
(3), Mar_13:12 (2), Luk_3:1, Luk_3:19, Luk_6:14, Luk_6:42 (2), Luk_12:13,
Luk_15:27, Luk_15:32, Luk_17:3, Luk_20:28 (3), Joh_1:40-41 (2), Joh_6:8,
Joh_11:2, Joh_11:19, Joh_11:21, Joh_11:23, Joh_11:32, Act_9:17, Act_12:2,
Act_21:20, Act_22:13, Rom_14:10 (2), Rom_14:15, Rom_14:21, Rom_16:23, 1Co_1:1,
1Co_5:11, 1Co_6:6 (2), 1Co_7:12, 1Co_7:15, 1Co_8:11, 1Co_8:13 (2), 1Co_16:12,
2Co_1:1, 2Co_2:13, 2Co_8:18, 2Co_8:22, 2Co_12:18, Gal_1:19, Eph_6:21, Phi_2:25,
Col_1:1, Col_4:7, Col_4:9, 1Th_3:2, 1Th_4:6, 2Th_3:6, 2Th_3:15, Phm_1:1,
Phm_1:7, Phm_1:16, Phm_1:20, Heb_8:11, Heb_13:23, Jam_1:9, Jam_2:15, Jam_4:11
(2), 1Pe_5:12, 2Pe_3:15, 1Jo_2:9-11 (3), 1Jo_3:10, 1Jo_3:12, 1Jo_3:14-15 (2),
1Jo_3:17, 1Jo_4:20-21 (3), 1Jo_5:16, Jud_1:1, Rev_1:9
brother’s, 7
Mat_7:3, Mat_7:5, Mar_6:18, Luk_6:41-42 (2), Rom_14:13, 1Jo_3:12
John
Knight
ps--thanks,
AGAIN, for this great demonstration of how GOOD your "church" is
at BRAINWASHING--yours has been completely, totally,
irreversibly flushed out.
-----
Original Message -----
From: Faith
Full
To: Jacob Israel
Cc: JPB ; Jacob Israel ; Virginia F. Raines ; EVEB DEMIAN ; mamzers@yahoogroups.com ; jewsareedom@yahoogroups.com ; thespiritofjacob@yahoogroups.com ; davidicke2@yahoogroups.com ; identity@yahoogroups.com ; christiandentity@yahoogroups.com ; hilloftorah@yahoogroups.com ; israeliteidentity@yahoogroups.com ; Israelites@yahoogroups.com ; houseisrael@yahoogroups.com ; TWOMIFTG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September
28, 2008 12:16 AM
Subject: [Israelites] Re: God
hates Esau and niggers
Kind of contradicting yourself, JK, aren't
you?
Why would I stand behind something that's a
"PROVEN LIE"? That would make no sense at all.
I stand behind the truth - which you have
blinded yourself to.
And excuse me, but we Catholics are not into
hating others. That's strictly your domain - as you have so often said.
On
Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Jacob Israel <ji@blackexile.com>
wrote:
<<<I stand by what I
said previously. >>>
Of
course you stand by it--you filthy pagans stand by ANYTHING that's a PROVEN
LIE, just because you KNOW it's a LIE. And of course the pagan debunked
will jump right off the cliff with you. But NO translator agrees with you
foolish PAGANS that the word "adelphos" means "other"
rather than "brother"--and we know why you stick with the LIE--it
blows your entire White-HATING pagan religion:
1Jn
4:20
(ASV)
If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for
he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, cannot love God whom he
hath not seen.
(BBE)
If a man says, I have love for God, and has hate for his brother,
his words are false: for how is the man who has no love for his brother whom
he has seen, able to have love for God whom he has not seen?
(DRB)
If any man say: I love God, and hateth his brother; he is a liar. For he
that loveth not his brother whom he seeth, how can he love God whom he
seeth not?
(GB)
If any man say, I loue God, and hate his brother, he is a liar: for how can he that loueth
not his brother
whom he hath seene, loue God whom he hath not seene?
(KJV)
If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom
he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
(KJV+)
IfG1437 a manG5100 say,G2036 I loveG25 God,G2316 andG2532 hatethG3404 hisG848 brother,G80
he isG2076 a liar:G5583 forG1063 he that lovethG25 notG3361 hisG848 brotherG80
whomG3739 he hath seen,G3708 howG4459 canG1410 he loveG25 GodG2316 whomG3739 he
hath notG3756 seen?G3708
(KJVA)
If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom
he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
(LITV)
If anyone says, I love God, and hates his brother, he is a liar. For the one not loving his brother whom
he has seen, how is he able to love God whom he has not seen?
(RSV)
If any one says, "I love God," and hates his brother, he
is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen, cannot love God whom he
has not seen.
(YLT)
if any one may say--`I love God,' and his brother he may hate, a liar he is; for he who is
not loving his brother
whom he hath seen, God--whom he hath not seen--how is he able
to love?
God
KNOWS how you LIE by passing around this PAGAN FILTH, and surely has a nice
warm place in eternity just for you two NON-brothers:
<<<If we say we love God
but hate others we are liars
St John said, "If we say we love God, but hate others,
we are liars. For we cannot love God, whom we have not seen, if we do not love others,
whom we have seen."(1 John 4:20 TEV)>>>
John
Knight
-----
Original Message -----
From: Faith Full
To: JPB
Cc: Jacob Israel ; TWOMIFTG@yahoogroups.com
; houseisrael@yahoogroups.com
; Israelites@yahoogroups.com
; israeliteidentity@yahoogroups.com ; hilloftorah@yahoogroups.com
; christiandentity@yahoogroups.com ; identity@yahoogroups.com
; davidicke2@yahoogroups.com
; thespiritofjacob@yahoogroups.com ; jewsareedom@yahoogroups.com
; mamzers@yahoogroups.com
; EVEB
DEMIAN ; Virginia
F. Raines ; Jacob Israel
; Jacob Israel ; Jacob
Israel ; Jacob Israel
Sent: Saturday, September
27, 2008 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: God hates Esau
and niggers
I
certainly would, and if I was born into JK's family, knowing how he hates
woman, can you imagine how much abuse I would have to put up with as a female family
member? Particularly as he feels the Bible backs him up and justifies
his bad conduct.
On
Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:29 PM, JPB <debunks@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
|
If you had been
born in his family you'd probably be crying on Oprah's shoulders right
now. Val, your words ring straight and true. Jesus said: (Joh 15:16) You
did not choose Me, but I chose you, and appointed you, that you should go and
bear fruit, and that your fruit should remain, so that whatever you may ask
the Father in My name He may give to you. Consider yourself
blessed. Undoubtedly due to the prayers and faithfulness of your
ancestors, too. -------Original Message-------
From: Faith Full Date: 9/26/2008 12:52:37 PM To: Jacob
Israel Cc: TWOMIFTG@yahoogroups.com; Debunks; houseisrael@yahoogroups.com;
Israelites@yahoogroups.com;
israeliteidentity@yahoogroups.com;
hilloftorah@yahoogroups.com;
christiandentity@yahoogroups.com;
identity@yahoogroups.com;
davidicke2@yahoogroups.com;
thespiritofjacob@yahoogroups.com;
jewsareedom@yahoogroups.com;
mamzers@yahoogroups.com;
EVEB DEMIAN;
Virginia F.
Raines; Jacob
Israel; Jacob
Israel; Jacob
Israel; Jacob Israel Subject: Re: God hates Esau and niggers
I stand by what I said previously. And I will say this, if I thought for a moment that God felt the way you think He does, hating his creation, promoting racism, saving only white people (ludicrous) - I'd just give up and become an atheist. I couldn't bear to belong to such a hate-promoting cult. I thank God every day for looking after me, for ensuring that I got the wonderful Catholic upbringing that I experienced. It could have been so different. He might have sent me to YOUR family! Shudder of shudders! FF On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Jacob Israel <ji@blackexile.com> wrote: You know, faith FAKE, it's so nice to have you around, we need a whipping boy. We greatly appreciate you highlighting just how willing your kikeaholic "friend" was to ALTER the Word of God to make this verse say just the OPPOSITE of what God and Jesus and the entire 12 Disciples and all the Apostles originally INTENDED for it to say:
<<<"If we say we love God, but hate others, we are liars. For we cannot love God, whom we have not seen, if we do not love others, whom we have seen.">>>
The operative word is NOT "others", it's "brethren", which was originally in Greek "adelphos", which is ALWAYS a fellow Israelite, and NEVER a non-Israelite [and specifically in this case, a fellow Israelite ONLY of the House of ISRAEL]. "others" and "brethren" are almost antipodes to each other:
1 John 4:20 If1437 a man5100 say,2036 I love25 God,2316 and2532 hateth3404 his848 brethren,80 he is2076 a liar:5583 for1063 he that loveth25 not3361 his848 brethren80 whom3739 he hath seen,3708 how4459 can1410 he love25 God2316 whom3739 he hath not3756 seen?3708
Even if you don't understand Strong's numbers [like the little 80 above "brethren"], you MUST have some sense for what an EGREGIOUS switch your "friend" made. Note the following definition of "adelphos" :
G80 ἀδελφός adelphos ad-el-fos' From G1 (as a connective particle) and δελφύς delphus (the womb); a brother (literally or figuratively) near or remote (much like [H1]): - brother.
Let's have Paul himself explain explicitly to you what HE means when he uses the word "adelphos":
Who are his "adelphos"?
· "Kinsmen according to the FLESH", not just any nigger or Edomite! · "who are Israelites"! · "who are heirs to the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises"! · ONLY to "whom … Christ came"!
Do you REALLY not know why God calls you a LIAR?
John Knight
From: Faith Full [mailto:alecoque33@gmail.com]
Just to go slightly off topic - on the subject of hate, look at what a friend sent me today!
FF
If we say we love God but hate others we are liars St John said, "If we say we love God, but hate others, we are liars. For we cannot love God, whom we have not seen, if we do not love others, whom we have seen."(1 John 4:20 TEV) Jesus tells us that God Himself "is kind to the ungrateful and the wicked" (Luke 6:35 NJB) and "makes His sun to shine on bad and good people alike, and gives rain to those who do good and to those who do evil." (Matthew 5:45 TEV) Jesus shows us His love even when we are difficult and unreasonable, abusive and manipulative, hot-tempered and resentful towards others. Jesus is able to love us in spite of these lousy traits in us because Jesus does not see us with normal human eyes. He sees us as Beloved children of God. We are precious to Jesus and are loved with an everlasting love by Him. Yet, we ourselves find it most difficult to love an abusive, or exacting, or unreasonable, or irritable, or hot-tempered or manipulative relative or friend or colleague. How to love them? Who wants to be close to them? They tend to become the unloved ones, the unwanted ones, and the uncared ones. Such individuals are undesirable. Some people literally hate them! But, as Christians, we are commanded to love everyone---and God. Before we can come to love God, we want to know where God is to our human eyes. God makes it easy for us to know Him in Jesus. Jesus says: "The Father and I are one."(John 10:30 TEV) "Whoever sees Me sees also Him who sent Me."(John 12:45 TEV) St Paul says, "Christ is the visible likeness of the invisible God."(Colossians 1:15 TEV) When Jesus was questioned, "Where is your father?" Jesus answered, "You know neither Me nor my Father. If you knew Me, you would know my Father also."(John 8:19 TEV)
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Jacob Israel <ji@blackexile.com> wrote: Dear Terry,
You wrote:
<<<>> There is only one Adam. The Adam of Gen. 1:27 is the same as the Adam as Gen. 2:7. The Apostle Paul, I believe calls Jesus Christ the second Adam. Also in Christ's genealogy; Jesus Christ is related to Adam, the Gospel of Luke 3:23-38.>>>
Needless to say, this is a heavy topic. The following is an excerpt from an excellent paper by Arnold Kennedy which can be read in its entirety at http://fathersmanifesto.net/gardenofeden.htm
It's a lot of reading, but you might find it one of the most interesting analyses you've seen in a long time.
Before you decide not to, please note that many of us shared the same view you now have and this is what changed their minds: sixth ERROR. "Genesis One and Two are about the same event". This is about the highlighted sentence on page 38 of "The Answers Book" which reads, "Genesis chapter two is not a different account of creation – it is a more detailed account of the sixth day of creation". Let us see why this is wrong, starting by answering the following question. WHEN WAS THE GARDEN OF EDEN? Without a thought, most people would answer by saying, "Why? At the beginning of course". By "the beginning" they mean something like, "At the beginning of the Bible" as if it had something to do with the first man on earth. Well, that only seems right since we find what is commonly called the Garden of Eden, is found in the second chapter of Genesis, and is not in the first chapter. It comes after the creation of men and women in Genesis One. But few people know that "Eden" occurs elsewhere in the Bible, and that it occurs concurrently with the Assyrian empire in the Ezekiel 31-32 passage below. Although this passage is symbolic, it immediately calls for a re-think of what we have believed, that is, that the Garden of Eden may not have been "at the beginning". So we will take a look as to when it was. We can see in Genesis 1:27 that men and women (plural) were created and lived upon the earth. But when we come to Genesis Two, we find, "And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed" -(Gen. 2:8). "Formed" has a different meaning to "created", so "the man" here has little to do with those in males and females of Genesis One. In Genesis Two we have a "garden" = gan = an enclosure, which was "planted" for one man only in that one part of the earth specified. A "garden", as a planted enclosure, cannot be the whole earth. It was made exclusively for one man, to start with. When we take a good look into these things, we must conclude that the people created by the Elohim in Genesis 1 are different in many ways to that man, and thus his offspring, formed by Jehovah-Elohim as presented from Genesis 2:4 on. This is why the "Brotherhood of Man" doctrine of the humanists, together with those seduced by them, is not Biblical. Before we look at this further, let us consider the first part of these Ezekiel chapters to get a starting point. Ezek. 31:1 "And it came to pass in the eleventh year, in the third month, in the first day of the month, that the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, Son of man, speak unto Pharaoh king of Egypt, and to his multitude; Whom art thou like in thy greatness? Behold, the Assyrian was a cedar in Lebanon with fair branches, and with a shadowing shroud, and of an high stature; and his top was among the thick boughs. The waters made him great, the deep set him up on high with her rivers running round about his plants, and sent out her little rivers unto all the trees of the field. Therefore his height was exalted above all the trees of the field, and his boughs were multiplied, and his branches became long because of the multitude of waters, when he shot forth. All the fowls of heaven made their nests in his boughs, and under his branches did all the beasts of the field bring forth their young, and under his shadow dwelt all great nations. Thus was he fair in his greatness, in the length of his branches: for his root was by great waters. The cedars in the Garden of God could not hide him: the fir trees were not like his boughs, and the chesnut trees were not like his branches; nor any tree in the Garden of God was like unto him in his beauty. I have made him fair by the multitude of his branches: so that all the trees of Eden, that were in the Garden of God, envied him". There is much symbolism in these passages, such as Kings being like trees, and of "trees" being able to envy. However, from this account, long after the Garden of Eden, we can see that the "Garden of Eden" and "the Garden of God" are being presented as being contemporary with the civilizations mentioned in this passage. There is no reason to say that Ezekiel would be "out of line" with what existed at the time of Genesis Two. We are going to see a number of other confirmations why The Garden of Eden was not "at the beginning". SOME OF THESE OTHER CONFIRMATIONS. In Genesis 2:13-14, we find, "And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia. And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria". Here we find references to nations that existed at the time of the Garden of Eden, and thus before it. In Genesis 2:8, Where we read, "And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed", the word "eastward" = qedem = 'from that which was aforetime'. This tells us the Garden was different from that which had gone before in Genesis Chapter One. ("Eastward" here is not the same word as "East" in verse 14). Chapter 1:25 of the book of Jasher (referred to in Joshua 10:13 and 2 Samuel 1:18), records, "And Cain hastened and rose up and took the iron part of his ploughing instrument, with which he suddenly smote his brother". Iron is the product of a civilisation, and this indicates the existence of civilisations such as Assyria and Egypt at the time of the Garden of Eden. (4) The Book of Jasher speaks about the art of writing being known and practiced from the pre-flood period. (5) Genesis 3:16 says, "And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD". The Book of Jasher confirms this was going from one place to another, "At that time Cain went forth from the presence of the Lord, from the place where he was". This indicates that God's presence was not found outside of the Garden, and that Cain went from one place to another. (6) The mention of the harp, the organ, iron and brass as early as Genesis 4:21 indicates an earlier period of civilised development. (7) History, science and archaeology back up the Bible one hundred percent. Skeletons of Whites, Negroes and Asiatics are far different and easily identifiable. Radioactive tests determine the age of these archaeological findings, not to the day or even the year but very close. Skeletons of Negroes have been found in the caves of Kilimanjaro and elsewhere dating back some 74,000 years, and Asiatics have been uncovered dating back almost 1,750,000 years ago. This is very important: no trace of a White Man has ever been found over 7,400 years old, which coincides with the Bible period that gives the white man as being formed about 5,500 B.C. (8) The ancient Vedic scriptures of India also tell the story of the coming of what they, (and the Bible), call "the holy seed" who are described as being the "tall white ones", and as being "sons of God", a phrase not unknown in both Testaments. But the matter of this "holy seed" (see Ezra 9:2, Isaiah 6:13, Daniel 8:24, 12:7) as the line through Adam-Noah-Abraham-Isaac-Jacob/Israel as "the holy people", (Deut. 7:6, 14:2, 14:21, 28:9, Isaiah. 62:12, Dan. 12:7, etc) is denied today by almost every church, and also by "ANSWERS IN GENESIS".. In Exodus 19:8 and 1 Peter 2:9 these "holy people" are described as "an holy nation". Most of the Bible is about, and is addressed to, this one people. Much of the story of the Bible is about the attempts to destroy this holy seed, primarily by race mixing, and unbelief in whom they are, as God's people. These holy people were conceived that way, and did not become such in the way modern evangelism says. (9) Chinese records from the flood period, (the reign of King Yao), record floods in the Hwang Ho river, as the Tarim Basin drained. this is the same area mentioned in the Vedic Scriptures where the Sons of God came from. Chinese history was not interrupted by Noah's flood, and neither was that of Egypt, India, South America or Africa, and so the flood did not cover the areas of the globe these were living in.
Sincerely,
John Knight
From: israeliteidentity@yahoogroups.com [mailto:israeliteidentity@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Terry Gabrich
|
