|
| |
This is the html
version of the file http://tcbhatecrew.net/text/the_jew_as_criminal-%20J.%20Keller%20and%20Hanns%20Anderson.pdf.
G o o g l e
automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the
web.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url:
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:TYx53ZcD5A4J:tcbhatecrew.net/text/the_jew_as_criminal-%2520J.%2520Keller%2520and%2520Hanns%2520Anderson.pdf+%22jewish+mass+murderers&hl=en
Google is neither affiliated with the
authors of this page nor responsible for its
content. |
| These
search terms have been highlighted: |
jewish |
mass |
murderers | | |
T h e J e w a s C
r i m i n
a
l
by J. Keller and
Hanns Andersen
a translation by
R. Belser of
D e r J u d e
a l s V e r b
r e c h e r
von J. Keller und
Hanns Andersen
Nibelungen-Verlag,
Berlin und Leipzig, 1937
Table of
Contents
"Kochemer-Loschen,"
the language of crooks -- The Jew in Criminality -- The Jew in
Politics
Jurisprudence
and Administration of Justice in the Power of the Jews -- Caro vs.
Petschek -- The
"Trotskyist Trial" in Moscow
The Criminal
Quarter and Red District -- A Leipzig 'Furrier' -- Michael Sto�Ÿenspieler, a
Jew from Poland
-- The Night Specter in the Imperial Court -- Violinists and
Pickpockets --
Fencing in the Grand Style
Ignaz Stra�Ÿnoff
-- Trebitsch-Lincoln -- Finkelstein-Litvinov -- Dimitri Navaschin --
Sobelsohn-Klauer
Ghetto Jews and
Opportunistic Jews -- The Linder-Rosenfeld Affair -- "Borenstein
threatened with
sentence of Death" -- Healthy business failures -- "Immediate cash" --
Einspongeschäfte
[con games] -- The Story of Colonel Salaban -- Leo Veit, the
Ethiopian
campaigner
Three-card Monte
-- The club of the "harmless" in the Central Hotel -- Scandal in
Hannover -- Aron
Simanovitch and the "Holy Devil" Rasputin
The career of
the Jewish prostitute Anna Meyner -- The Riehl-Pollack House -- Scandal
in Hannover --
Pimps -- Silberreich and Wallerstein -- Wholesale and Retail -- The Trial
of the 112 --
Zvi Migdol, or the Great Power
The "Paradise"
of the Jews -- Some Pornography -- A "friend of children" -- Albert
Hirschland, the
race-defiler if Magdeburg
Jewish "Humor"
-- The Crime of Fritz Saffran -- Monk Eastman, King of the Gangsters --
The Murder of
McKinley -- The Attack on Otto von Bismarck -- The Murder of Count
Stürkgh -- The
Attempted Assassination of Stefan Tisza -- The Beylis Case -- Mordko
Bogrov, Murderer
of Minister President Peter Stolypin -- The Master Provocateur Asev
-
- Jakob Blumkin
shoots at Mirbach -- The End of a Kaiser -- Murder of Hostages -- The
Ship of Death --
The Worker-Murder of Astrakhan -- The Executioner of Tiflis --
Ssadowaya 5 --
Comrade Rosa -- Samuel Schwartzbart -- A Jew has shot. .
.
Still to
come. . .
List of
Photographs
I. The
"Patriarchs" of Bolshevism -- II. The "Patriarchs" of the Soviet Union of
today --
III. The
Propagandists of Bolshevism in Europe -- IV. Jews in Court -- V.
Defending
Counsel of Crime
-- VI. Imposters -- VII. Intellectual Jews -- VIII
Corruption-Jews --
IX.
Swindlers and Forgers -- X. The Patron of Protection -- XI. He
cheated -- XII.
Coffeehouse Jews
XIII. Sex-Jews -- XIV. Sexual Offenders -- XV. Murderers
A Note from
the Translator. . .
Since the
original text is extensively footnoted and some of the notes
refer to
other pages in the book, I have indicated the page numbers
from the
original text with small red page numbers,
so that you can
quickly
locate other sections of the text to which the author refers. All
footnote
numerals are hyper-linked to a footnote section and each note
has a link
back to the page where reference is made to it. Clarifications
or comments
of the translator will always be placed between square -- [
and ] --
brackets.
In the
original text, the author highlights the names of the important
characters
and emphasizes important features of the the case and/or
documents by
using a German form of emphasis : the insertion of
spaces
between the letters of a word. I've chosen to bolden these names
for ease in
reading, and so that a quick scan of the text while scrolling
through it
should be sufficient for you to find any references you may
be seeking.
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is prohibited. All rights
reserved.
T h e J e w a s
C r i m i n a l
An
Introductory Word from Julius
Streicher
---------------------------------------------------
---------------
(p.
9)
Whoever wants to
make a man healthy must remove the cause which
led to his
sickness. Entire peoples, too, can become ill and die if help
should fail to
come. That the peoples of the Ancient World perished
from the Jewish
poison is confirmed by the course of their history. And
thus, that the
peoples of the present will remain alive only if the Jewish
bacillus feeding
upon them is removed, can only be denied by those
people who do
not wish to see the truth.
Whoever carries
the truth of Jewish behavior in World history to the
people, helps to
solve the highest, greatest and most difficult problem
which has been
dealt to humanity by fate. The book of Mssrs. J. Keller
and Hanns
Andersen is such an aid. It is filled with valuable truths and
is replete with
great thoughts. This book deserves the consideration of
all
seekers.
Nuremberg,
The city of the
Reichsparteitage [Reich Party Days]
Pfingsten
[Whitsunday] 1937
Go
to:
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is not permitted. All rights
reserved.
T h e J e w a s
C r i m i n a l
The Findings
in Preview
---------------------------------------------------
---------------
(p.
10)
Without the
solution of the Jewish Question, there is no salvation for
the peoples of
the world.
This realization
has blazed a trail in Germany; in increasing measure, it
is becoming the
common property of all nations of culture.
Despite the
fierce and fiery reaction of its blind or bought allies, the
disastrous role
of the Jew, this parasite upon the body of every people
is being drawn
more and more into the light of day. Everywhere where
morality, law,
and order succumb to disintegration, where racketeering
and corruption
devour the economy, where materialistic dialectics
undermine the
foundations of faith, where Marxist propaganda
transforms
politics into a criminal reality, where the healthy race of the
people is made
sick and desecrated -- there one meets everywhere the
tracks of the
Jew.
That is the
historical experience of every century and of all peoples.
The new and
peculiar, which the Present adds to this ancient human
experience, is
the appearance of Bolshevism; in its shape World Jewry
rises to the
decisive attack upon the peoples of culture.
The frequent
criminality of the Jew is as well known a fact as its
peculiar
inclination and aptitude for fraud, dirty enterprises, cheating in
gambling, usury,
sexual offenses of all kinds, pickpocketing, high
treason, etc.
These things shall find their confirmation here. Beyond
this, however,
evidence is introduced that the role of Jewry in
criminality does
not limit itself to a more or less large participation, but
rather is much
more significant. In actually, the final threads of the
criminal world
come together in the hand of the Jew. The Jew is not
only beneficiary
of crime, he is also the leader and wire-puller of the
criminal
Underworld.
Yet at the same
time the Jew is irrefutable spokesman and director of
Bolshevism.
How could it be otherwise, where Bolshevism [11]
represents
nothing other than a politically camouflaged, organized
criminal sphere
on a world scale? Thus, just as the spirochetes which
are the bearers
of syphilis, so the Jews are the carriers of criminality in
its political
and non-political form.
The Jew is
fundamentally and basically criminal. Crime is, for him, the
form of
existence inherent in him. He is continuously and inescapably
on the attack
against the natural laws of order of the Volksgemeinschaft
[= ethnic
community] and the communal life of the various peoples. It
is by no means
money per se for which he strives. This view is a
dangerous
prejudice, which is apt to divert the gaze of the investigator
and the
politician from the essence. Money is for the Jew only a means
to an end, the
end goal is, for him, always the conquest of power, the
usurpation of
unlimited power over people. The entire content of the so-
called
'religion' of Judaism and its Chosen status is a mere monstrosity
of its morbid
greed for power. Thus its 'religion' is directed against
God, its Law
against Right, its morals against morality. Its nature is
contrary to
Nature, its ethnic consciousness is anti-ethnic, its
nationalism is
internationalist and its politics is crime. Therefore, the
Jew is the true
Anti-Man, the ruined member of a sub-racial mixture.
He is the born
leader of the Untermenschtum [sub-humanity].
The common
Jewish substance and the common direction of the
common
criminality on the one hand, and of the Bolshevism on the
other hand,
explain the correspondence and homogeneity of both
phenomena.
Criminal in its theory and criminal in its execution,
Bolshevism is
nothing other than a revolt of the Underworld under
Jewish
leadership, for the subjugation of the various peoples.
The criminal
argot, permeated with Hebrew, is the Esperanto of the
criminal world,
a product of the ghetto; exactly the same is true of the
'jargon' of the
Comintern.
Thus, every
variety of usual crime has its corresponding facet of
Bolshevism. The
counterfeiting of Maier and Kohn are merely "child's
play" in
comparison to the counterfeiting missions of the Soviet Jews;
the forgery of a
Salaban has its greatest prototype in the organized
forgery of the
Bolshevist rulers. The Jewish swindler Trebitsch-Lincoln
is left far
behind by the Bolshevist swindler Finkelstein-Litvinoff. And
are not the
directors of the 'nationalized' trade in Moscow considerably
more dangerous
than the small fences of the East End in London? Do
not the white
slavers Silberreich and Wallerstein [12]
show fealty to
the same
commercial and human 'morality' as the legislators and
executives of
the forced labor of women in the Soviet Union? The Red
card sharps in
politics are just such Jews as the professional card sharps
in New York and
Paris. The Jewish director of a capitalistic ready-
made clothing
firm looks with envy upon his colleague of the State
clothing trust
in the Soviet Union. Saffran killed a travelling
journeyman and
was active as an arsonist on a small scale; does he not
make an
insignificant impression next to the mass murderers and world-
class arsonists
of the stature of a Bela Kun, Bärmann and consorts? As
frightful as are
the murders done by Jews out of greed, lust and ritual
fanaticism, they
yet pale before the mass murders of the Jewish Cheka
in the world at
large.
Bolshevism is
the form of Jewish criminality 'adapted' to and
rationalized for
modern conditions. The Communist Internationale is
its propaganda
tool, and the Soviet Union its tool of power politics.
Impotent to
achieve and build, Judeo-Bolshevism works at
exterminating
and destroying when and where it appears. It is the Front
of the vulgar
and the less-worthy, the reservoir for the expectoration of
humanity.
With the toxin
of crime and the weapon of Bolshevism, the Jew
conducts his war
of extermination against all that is wholesome, true,
good and noble
in the world. He is the embodiment of evil, which
rebels against
God and Nature. Wherein his pestilential breath strikes,
the effect is
lethal. Who fights with the Jew, fights with the Devil, just
as the Führer
in his book Mein Kampf already said more than a decade
ago: "Inasmuch
as I struggle to protect against the Jew, I am fighting
for the work of
the Lord."
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is not permitted. All rights
reserved.
T h e J e w a s
C r i m i n a l
Chapter I :
What Linguistics and
Statistics
Show
---------------------------------------------------
---------------
(p.
13)
"The Kochem
scheften Gasche. Some holchen on Gschok and
dschornen
the Sore from the Sochtern or filch the Kis from the
Rande
of the
Gasche. Some holchen with Fehling on the Mertine and
kaspern
the
Gasche. They like to achlen and schwächen tob and
nicklen
grandig
in the Baiser."
What sort of
gibberish is this? What kind of evil-sounding tongue, in
which the
sibilants and gutturals predominate? It is the "Kochemer-
Loschen," the
language of criminals and swindlers.
This language
is not interpretable without knowledge of Hebrew and
Yiddish, as one
can easily convince oneself:
"Kochem"
comes from the Hebrew "chakam" (Yiddish, "chochem")
and means
"clever one." "Laschon" in Hebrew means "language." Thus
"Kochemer
Loschen" is the language of the clever, the cunning and
smart -- the
Gauner [German, "swindlers"]. "Ganove" too is a Hebrew
word
("Ganaw," i.e. "deceiver," "thief"). But Gauner? Isn't that a
purely German
word? No -- for formerly it was pronounced "Jauner"
and is a
transformation of the Hebrew "janah" (cheat, swindle) -- the
German language
has not created its own word for this concept
essentially
foreign to it.
The expressions
contained in the cited text (1) have the
following
meaning:
Gaunerwort
[Word in the
Criminal
Argot]
Meaning
Derivation
schaften
German sind
[are]
Hebrew
schebet (to be)
schofel
German
schlecht [bad]
Hebrew
schofel (base,
low)
Gasche
German
Menschen
[people,
humans]
Gypsy
language
holchen
German gehen
[go,
walk]
Hebrew
halach
dschornen
German
stehlen [steal]
Gypsy
language
Sochter
German
Krämer
[shopkeeper]
Hebrew
socher (dealer,
trader,
etc.)
Sore
German Ware
[product,
article]
Hebrew
sechora
(trading)
Kis
German Geld
[money]
Hebrew Kis
(purse)
[14] Rand
German
Tasche [bag,
pocket]
German word
[der Rand
= edge, rim,
border]
Fehling
German
Arznei
[medicine,
drug]
German
word
Mertine
German Land
[land,
country]
Hebrew
medina
(province)
kaspern
German
betrügen
[cheat,
deceive, trick]
Hebrew kazab
(lie to
someone)
achlen
German essen
[eat]
Hebrew akal
(eat)
schwächen
German
zechen
[carouse,
booze]
Hebrew
schakar
(carouse)
tob
German gut
[good]
Hebrew tob
(good)
nicklen
German
tanzen [dance]
Hebrew
niggen (make
music)
grandig
German viel
[much]
Italian
"grande"
Bais
German
Kneipe [tavern,
pub]
Hebrew Bet,
Bait
(house)
From these 25
expressions of the criminal argot, 2 are German, 2 of
Gypsy origin, 1
Italian and 18 -- Hebrew or Jewish!
Already, in the
Liber vagatorum (appeared in 1510) one finds an
enormous number
of Jewish words, even as in various still older
documents.
These incontestable facts demonstrate in the clearest
fashion that
the Gaunersprache [criminal argot] arose under the
decisive
influence of Jewry.
Dr. Martin
Luther already determined this, and in his opening remarks
to Bericht
von der falschen Betler-Büberei [Report on the false
Beggar-
Knavery],
printed in the year 1567, wrote the following(1): "Such a
thieves'
language indeed comes from the Jews, for there are many
Hebrew words in
it. . ."
Thus it
remained also in the next centuries. For example, in 1823 the
Criminal
Councilor F. A. Wennmohs writes the following in his book
�œber Gauner
und über das zweckmä�Ÿigste, vielleicht einzige Mittel zur
Vertilgung
dieses �œbels [Concerning Swindlers and the most expedient
single means
for exterminating this evil](1): "Robbery is called
perkoch
(more correct:
bekauch) handeln [i.e., to steal bekauch] by the
swindlers; it
is also called Chasnegehen [= going chasne]; theft by
night by
breaking-in, climbing into apartments and other buildings,
closets, etc.,
is called betuch handeln [to steal beruch] and zierlich
handeln
[to steal with finesse]. Handeln [The actual meaning of this
German word is:
to do, act, deal with, etc.] is by far the most usual
expression for
stealing. The word bekauch signifies the Latin vi [by
violence], the
word betuch -- the Latin clam [secretly, surreptitiously].
So the Gentile
thief uses the latter word, but the Jew actually does not
make use of it
because he, as a Hebrew, knows better, that betuch
actually does
not mean secretly, but rather surely and certainly, and
would still
better suit robbery, and he pronounces betuch and
bekauch
[as] betuach
and bekauach"
Highly
noteworthy is the claim of Wennmohs that in the Jewish
Gaunersprache,
in the Rotwelsch [German word meaning criminal
lingo],
"handeln" can be accepted as the customary expression for
stealing. The
inclination of the Jews for [15] dealing
[i.e., Handel --
trading,
dealing] thereby finds a novel interpretation. For them, there is
no essential
distinction between a "Geschäft" [=business] and a crime.
When they
"handeln" [= deal], then they are stealing, and when they
are stealing,
then they "handeln" [= deal]. Business is thievery and
thievery is
business.
Still more
striking is the fact, likewise communicated by Wennmohs,
that the large
crowbar, the most important tool for breaking and
entering, bears
the terrific name "Rebbmosche," i.e., Rabbi Moses.
With the
Rebbmosche in hand, breaking and entering is committed.
The leader of
the burglary likewise -- as is not otherwise to be expected
-- bears a
Hebrew name; he is the "Baal Massematte."
Yet the
corrupting influence of the language of the Jews is still more
far-reaching
than one might believe. Without its being noticed,
numerous Jewish
words and expressions have flowed into the German
language -- or,
better said, have been smuggled into it. Many a word
that is
thoroughly familiar to us originates in the "Kochemer Loschen."
Some examples
may suffice. "Baldowern" [crook, rogue] comes from
"Baal"
(lord, master) and "dabar" (thing), "Kassiber" [secret note] is
the rabbinic
"Kathiba" (piece of writing, document), "Pleite"
[bankruptcy] is
the Hebrew "peleta" (flight, escape), "verschütt gehen"
[to be run in,
taken in] conceals in itself the Hebrew "schuth" (fix, set),
while
"Knast" [jail] is nothing other than the Hebrew "knass"
(punishment).
Also Jewish are "Schlamassel" [dilemma, mess]
("massel" =
luck), Dalles [poverty], etc.
Many a word is
so well camouflaged that one can no longer see its
Jewish
origin.
"Dufte"
[crafty] has nothing to do with "Duft" [scent, aroma], but
comes from
"tob," "Kluft" [the primary and original German meaning
is "abyss,"
"chasm'" etc.; its secondary meaning is slang for "clothes,"
"duds"] is a
transmutation of the rabbinic "Killuph" (peel, skin, shell),
"Moos"
[primary Germany meaning is "moss," secondary and slang
meaning is
"lettuce," "cash"] in the sense of "money" is likewise a
rabbinic word
(maoth = coins). When we hear anyone claim that he
"schmuse"
[from schmusen: to flatter, to cuddle, fawn upon], is
speaking
"Kohl" [primary meaning is "cabbage," slang is twaddle,
nonsense], or
is a "Kaffer" [blockhead], so we are using purely Hebrew
words
"schemua" (speak), "kol" (speech) and "Kafar" (German
Dorf,
village) -- for
the Jews, the village dweller, the peasant, is always
despised as the
fool, the dumb guy, but is valued as a source of gain.
"Schmiere
stehen" [slang meaning "to stand watch"] has nothing in
common with
"schmierig" [oily, greasy], but is a derivation of the
Hebrew
"schemira" (watch, guard), and an "ausgekochter" fellow is
not someone who
has been cooked [German kochen = to cook;
auskochen
= boil], but rather a "Kochem," [sly fellow -- see p. 13], a
'Chochem,"
one who is totally cunning. "Abhauen" (actually,
"abbauen")
comes from the Hebrew "bo" (to come), and when we want
to
"verkohlen" [primary German word meaning is "to carbonize" which
originates in
the German word, die Kohle, coal -- but the slang
meaning --
originating from the Hebrew "kol," is: to hoax, bamboozle]
someone, so we
are using, without knowing it, the Jewish "kol" (foolish
speech). Even
such a traditional-sounding expression as "Wo Bartels
den Most
holt" [apparently literally: "Where Bartholemew gets [his]
cider" -- i.e.,
to know one's way around, know the ropes, etc.] contains
two Hebrew
words: "barzel" (crowbar) and "Moos" (money, coins) and
originally
meant [16] "Where one can get money for
himself by means
of breaking
in." And when someone "Schwein hat" [literally, "has a
hog/swine"],
that actually means that he holds the trumps in his hand,
for in the
Gaunersprache, a trump is designated by the Jewish word
"Chasir"
(swine, luck). Also of Jewish origin are: "kess" [pert, saucy]
(from kassas
= to rub, grind), "türmen" [the primary German meaning
is: to pile up,
to tower up -- from der Turm = tower; but the slang, non-
German-derived
meaning is: to run off, make tracks, etc.] (from tharam
= to leave),
"Pinke" [money, cash] (from Pinka, money bowl). And
should we be
surprised that "mogeln" [to cheat] is Jewish?
The number of
linguistic examples could be extended at will -- they
prove that
substantially, the leading class of the criminal element has
always
consisted of Jews.
In his lecture
concerning the criminality of Jewry, constructed from
rich source
material from the 18th and 19th centuries, Dr. v. Leers(1)
gives a wealth
of convincing examples regarding Jewish robbery bands
and gangs
receiving stolen goods, which made the German lands
unsafe to a
degree unimaginable today. It was often entire Jewish
criminal clans
and criminal towns which served as centers of complex
criminal
organizations. The switch of Jewry from violent gangs for
larceny,
robbery and murder to less violent methods ensued gradually
at first, in
natural adjustment to the given modern conditions. From the
Jewish hold-up
man, the Jewish swindler developed, from the Baal
Massematte,
the leader of a "financial consortium."
In 1831, a band
consisting of eleven Jews was arrested, which worked
under the
leadership of a certain Joseph Adolf Rosenthal. This Jew was
simultaneously
a trusted agent and vigilant of the police -- a worthy
precursor,
perhaps a model of the notorious Jewish Ochrana informer
Asev. Rosenthal
confessed to more than two hundred thefts and
burglaries,
among them thirty-six robberies of public treasuries, in
which over five
hundred persons participated and indeed, they were
predominantly
Jews. The threads led back to the small town of
Betsche, in the
district of Posen. Here and in the surrounding area
eighty-one Jews
were ultimately caught. Following this, the
Magdeburg area
was cleaned up, which resulted in a total of one
hundred
eighty-seven religious Jews and three baptized Jews falling
into the hands
of the police(2).
The Jews have
ever been the leaders of the Underworld. What do
modern
statistics say?
The answer is
as unambiguous as possible. The number of
investigations
concerning the Jewish element in the criminal world is
sufficiently
large, and they all lead to the same result.
[17] In such a manner did W. Giese(1) thoroughly study the German
criminal
statistics from the years 1882-89 and was able to reach
significant
conclusions.
He took the
number of Jews convicted per 100,000 and divided this
number by that
of the number of non-Jews convicted per 100,000. He
obtained the
following ratios:
procuring
(pimping) 1.22
treason,
national and state levels 1.25
pornographic
trade and dissemination of pornographic literature
1.31
breach of trust
1.39
slander/libel
1.48
forgery of
documents 1.79
embezzlement of
documents 2.06
false
accusations 2.10
violation of
measures for the prevention of infectious disease in cattle
2.17
fraud
2.29
violation of
military obligations 2.39
violation of
social legislation 2.39
extortion
2.50
gambling
2.75
bribery
2.83
violation of
the currency 2.99
violation of
foreign secrecy 3.59
production and
sale of unwholesome food 3.99
receiving
stolen goods ['fencing'] 5.07
violation of
working hours regulations and Sunday laws 8.86
violation of
intellectual property [i.e. copyright violations] 9.50
falsification
of bankruptcy 11.1
usury
18.9
simple
bankruptcy 20.9
An extremely
interesting table -- and numbers which speak for
themselves!
Crimes in which Jewry has a predominant share are:
pimping and
other crimes against morality, document forgery, slander
and the lodging
of false charges, extortion and fraud, bribery, breach of
trust,
national- and state- level treason, crimes against the currency and
against
military duty, etc. The table also shows, by the way, that the
Jews dealing
with cattle take scant trouble over sanitary and veterinary
prescriptions,
and that unwholesome food and luxury items are
trafficked in
four times more by Jews than non-Jews.
[18]To be addressed as specifically Jewish are:
exploitation of workers
and employees;
offenses against intellectual property (plagiarism and
duplication [of
works without permission and for profit]) are an almost
exclusively
Jewish domain; fraud of all kinds; usury and bankruptcy or
"Pleite"
[business "failures"].
This picture
which is reflected in the statistics is not very gratifying for
Jewry, and it
is understandable that Jewry has attempted in numerous
publications to
falsify the issue of Jewish criminality in its favor. It will
be sufficient
to limit ourselves to a single example.
In the year
1907, in the Statistischen und Nationalökonomischen
Abhandlungen
[ Statistics and National Economic Treatises] of the
University of
Munich, a work of the Jewish Authority for Criminal
Statistics, Dr.
R. Wassermann(1), appeared. With every
chicanery of
statistics,
with mathematical formulae, with diagrams, with countless
tables and a
strange multiplicity of footnotes, Dr. R. Wassermann
attempted to
prove that "the criminality of the Jews is not determined
by race and is
not rooted in their particularity, but is a product of social
conditions."
Despite the
most zealous processing of the statistics and disregarding
the "most
benevolent" consideration of the special social structure of
Judaism, of its
unique distribution into various occupations and its
specific
classification by age groups, Wassermann finally arrives at the
following table
(page 88) of the proportionate criminality of the Jews:
slander/libel.........................1.4
perjury...............................1.8
fraud.................................2.0
receiving
stolen goods................4.7
violation
against Sunday laws and delayed store closings........6.8
fraudulent
bankruptcy.................9.4
simple
bankruptcy.....................17.7
As one sees,
Wassermann's artifices have been of little help: even in his
statistics, the
Jews appear as deceivers, exploiters of workers, receivers
of stolen goods
and bankrupts.
The marked
inclination to crime of Jewry can therefore not be in doubt,
all the more so
because all existing statistics require a significant
correction
because the picture they provide is unilaterally favorable
to
Jewry.
[19]All statistics we have at our disposal are according to
religious
denomination,
not according to race. This means that the crimes of a
baptized Jew,
or of a dissident, or of a person of Jewish ancestry are
entered in the
statistics to the account of "non-Jews," although, in
reality, they
fall to the charge of Jewry. The criminality of the racial
Jew therefore
appears much too small: some researchers are of the
opinion that
nearly one third of the crimes for which Jewry is
responsible
have vanished from the statistics in this manner, while the
portion of the
non-Jews is given as correspondingly too large.
The not very
useful data from the old criminal statistics, which ignored
the factor of
race and thereby the core issue of Jewry in criminality,
have recently
received a commendable supplementation through the
Sonderbericht des
Preu�Ÿischen Landes-Kriminalamtes über die
Beteiligung
der Juden in der Krinimalität [Special Report of the
Prussian
State Criminal Office Concerning the Involvement of the Jews
in
Criminality]. We take from the relevant issues of the report pages of
the Prussian
State Criminal Office in Berlin a series of records,
unusually
descriptive and until now not available in this exactitude.
A preferred
main field of activity of the Jew is the narcotic drug trade.
From the files
and indices of the Central Authority for Drug Crimes,
the following
picture emerges:
Up to the year
1929, of 348 international drug dealers, 98 were Jews,
i.e., 28%. For
the first six months of 1935, the figure is 112 dealers, of
which 14 -- 13%
-- are Jews; a remarkable decrease after the National
Socialists came
to power. Of physicians addicted to drugs, up to 1929
we have 32 in
the records, 9 of them Jews, which is 28%. The figures
for the first
six months of 1935 are: 23 physicians, 7 of them -- 30% --
Jews. The
corresponding numbers for pharmacists are, up to 1929, a
total of 138,
26 of whom -- 19% -- were Jews, and the corresponding
figure for the
first half of 1935 is 9, of whom 3, or 33%, are Jews. All
of this is in a
population whose Jewish portion is 0.9%.
For the little
Jew, the characteristic crime is pickpocketing. Here the
Jewish element
is decisive; it is his 'profession' before he has 'arrived.'
[The English
idiom for this would be 'made it.'] The following numbers
bear this
out:
In Berlin in
1931, 136 international pickpockets were arrested. Of
these, not
fewer than 106 were Jews -- that is, 78%. In 1932, the
number of
arrested climbed to 163, of whom 134, or 82%, were Jews.
And even in the
first half of 1935, when the number of pickpockets
traveling into
Germany, of the Jewish race in particular, [20]
precipitously
fell, yet of a total of 20, 13, or 65%, were Jews.
From 01
February 1931 until 01 July 1935, a total of 2958 pickpockets
were arrested
in the rest of Germany and abroad. Of these, not fewer
than 1568 --
53% -- were Jews!
From the files
and documents of the Center for Combatting Gambling
and Gambling
Fraud, it can be determined with certainty that gambling
and cheating in
games of chance and cards, etc., are a further preferred
area of
activity of Jewish criminals. Thus, for example, of a total of 88
international
cardsharps arrested in Berlin in 1933, 55 -- or 62% --
were Jews. In
1935, this number, too, fell to a total of 23, but 14 of
them were still
Jews. Understandably, this proportion is even more
striking
outside of the German Reich. In 1935, of a total of 35 gamblers
and cardsharps
documented abroad, 28 were Jews -- which is 80% --
and in the
first half of 1935 the percent of Jews of the gamblers and
cardsharps
abroad was exactly two-thirds.
Nothing in
regard to these facts has changed to this very day. As ever,
the Jews have
the leading share in the areas named, and furthermore
also in the
'specialties' of abortion, tax evasion, marriage swindles,
exchange and
foreign currency swindles, receiving stolen goods,
insurance
fraud, credit and loan swindles, usury and the use of phoney
The
characteristic and essential peculiarity of the Jewish criminal is
that he commits
his crime in such a manner that most of his crimes
remain
undiscovered. If they are uncovered, he then attempts to evade
his conviction
and sentencing through countless machinations. It is in
this that he
sees his 'honor' and his 'art.'
Many Jewish
crimes are of the type that make the victim shy away
from drawing
public attention to himself and confessing his own
weakness or
stupidity (blackmail, fraud, gambling, and the like). On
the other hand,
the accomplices of the law-breaking Jew often stand in
an on-going
material dependency to him (e.g., the fence and the thieves
working for
him). Many such crimes, at any rate, remain unknown.
The Jewish
criminal lives and moves almost exclusively within the
circle of his
racial comrades, and he can unconditionally count upon
their sympathy
or at least their silence -- it does not often happen that
one Jew
denounces another.
[21]From the circumstance of Jewish solidarity with his
criminal racial
comrades, it
should not be inferred that the Jew possesses no 'moral
code.' On the
contrary -- the Jew has a very firm moral code in his
terms -- the
moral code of a nomadic tribe with no native soil
anywhere, for
whom anyone standing outside of his tribe is an enemy;
everyone
belonging to the tribe, however, must always and everywhere
be protected,
for without this unconditional solidarity the tribe would
split up and go
under (Talmud!).
For each of us,
the concept 'right' is a portentous and thoroughly vital
one. Our laws
are -- taken as a whole -- the expression of that which we
feel as 'the
right.' Even the law-breaker, insofar as he is not a
professional
criminal and thus an enemy of the people, feels it and
knows that he
has injured justice.
The Jew, on the
other had, has neither understanding nor feeling for
what we
call right. In our laws, he sees only an alien, formal,
incomprehensible
force, which breaks what the Jew feels as his 'right,'
which must be
combatted and outwitted. What we call 'crime' is for the
Jew only the
attempt to evade the grasp of an alien power. He is
delighted and
feels conceit when he succeeds in getting around,
bending, or
breaking the law. He is only not allowed to get caught --
that would be a
stupidity unworthy of a Jew.
In our world
Jewry feels itself to be a differently formed, alien
minority, avid
for power and money and seeks allies there. It finds
them in those
who likewise do not recognize our moral code, who do
not want to
submit themselves to the demands of the whole upon the
individual, who
are enemies of the Volksgemeinschaft [= ethnic
community,
national community identity, etc.]. He thus finds his allies
in
professional criminals, he finds them in the Underworld. This is a
transparent
fact which conceals in itself a host of novel realizations.
We arrive at
these discoveries effortlessly, if we examine more closely,
besides the
merely criminal, the political side of this connection as
well.
The alliance
between Jewry and the Underworld is certainly the most
important fact
of criminology. It is simultaneously the most important
fact of
politics. While the bond of the individual Jew with individual
members of the
Underworld leads to criminality, the organized alliance
of Jewry in
toto with the Underworld as a whole leads to the most
dangerous and
encompassing phenomenon of the political present,
Bolshevism.
Bolshevism is not a Weltanschauung [world view], not a
philosophy, not
an idea, not a social movement. Bolshevism is nothing
which is at all
[22] mystical, mysterious, or complex.
Bolshevism is the
revolt of the
Underworld under the leadership of Jewry, it is the
organized
struggle of Jewry for world mastery with the assistance of
the unleashed
Underworld. Jewry makes use of the Underworld to
establish the
naked dictatorship of exploitation over all peoples, with
the
annihilation of any race of higher standing, of all hierarchies and
values of the
various peoples, of the soul and the spirit. That is the core
of Marxism and
contemporary Bolshevism. Jews are the wire-pullers
of crime, Jews
are the wire-pullers of Bolshevism. Bolshevism is
political
criminality and criminality is non-political Bolshevism.
The intentional
and challenging idealization and promotion of the
Underworld, of
pimps, of prostitutes, of perversions of all kinds, of
theft, of
robbery, of murder, of the downright criminal by means of
Bolshevism, its
press and literature, is an indubitable fact, proven by
In the
'classic' manner the Communist arsonist and mass murderer Max
Hölz
expresses this in his "dedication' to his memoirs, where he
"The second
part of my memoirs of the 'life' behind prison walls I
dedicate not
only to all political prisoners, but also to the criminals, the
thieves, the
perjurers, the sexual offenders, the pimps, murderers and
swindlers, to
all who lived buried for years or for decades. The
selfishness and
dishonesty, the envy, the malice and brutality of those
exiled from
civil society, are true and genuine. They at least wear no
masks."
It can not be
surprising under these circumstances, that Jewry has an
entirely
overwhelming portion of the leading positions in Marxism and
Bolshevism(3). But in
this we do not want to forget that the
significance of
Jewry in criminality just as in Bolshevism is more an
issue of
'quality' than of quantity, still more a question of recognition of
the essence
than of the statistics. The influence and the portion of Jews
increases
corresponding to [23] the significance and
importance of the
posts which it
counts as conquered or held.
Jews have
invented Marxism-Bolshevism: Karl Mordechai (Karl
Marx),
Ferdinand Loslauer-Wolfssohn (Ferdinand Lasalle), the
Jewess Rosalie
Lübeck (Rosa Luxemburg), and the half-Jew Ulyanov
(Lenin; his
mother was the Jewess Blank).
A central chief
directorate of 10 persons commanded the Communist
Revolution in
Russia and put through Bolshevism. Among these 10
persons were 1
Georgian (Stalin-Dyugashvili), 1 Pole (Dzeryinski), a
single Russian
(Bubnov) and not fewer than 6 Jews and 1 half-Jew:
Bronstein -
Trotsky
Brilliant -
Sokolnikov
Apfelbaum -
Sinovyev
Rosenfeld -
Kamenev
Jacob Moses
Sverdlov
Moses
Uritzky
Ulyanov -
Lenin
From the
beginning down to the present, the Soviet Union, which
covers a sixth
of the earth's surface area, has been ruled by Jews.
According to
the situation of February 1937, for example, the
following were
sitting as ministers and deputies: Litvinov-Finkelstein
(Minister of
the Exterior) -- Yankel Gamarnik (War) -- Moses
Ruchimovich,
M. Mosessohn Kaganovitch (Armament Industry) --
M. Davidsohn
Bärman, Jacob Saulovitch Agranov, Leo Belsky
(Interior, GPU)
-- Rosenholz (Foreign Trade) -- Israel Weizer, Sacher
Salomonsohn
Bolotin, Michael Abrahamsohn Levinsohn (Domestic
Trade) --
Lazarus Mosessohn Kaganovitch (Transportation) -- A. J.
Gurevitch
(Heavy Industry) -- Isidor Lyubimov (Light Industry) --
Mark
Natansohn Belenky, Levitin (Foodstuffs Industry) -- Benjamin
Gantmann,
Lazarus Kogan (Wood Industry) -- Herschel Yagoda
(Postal) --
Rosental (Shipping) -- Aron Israelsohn Geister
(Economy) --
Moses Kalmanovitch, Grigory Lazarussohn
Ostrovsky
(State Goods) -- Levin, Kagan (Finance) -- Issai
Solz
(Justice) --
M. G. Gurevitch (Public Health).
In
addition:
In the
directorship of the State Bank: Salomon Lazarussohn
Kruglikov; in
the leadership positions of the Commission for Soviet
Control:
Sachar Mosessohn Belenky and Roisemann; in the
leadership
positions of the commission for Artistic Affairs: Jakob
Josefsohn
Boyarsky and Baruch Schumyatzky; the Chief Justice of
Labor:
Philipp [24] Issaisohn Golotshokin
and his Deputy Michael
Josefsohn
Lifschitz -- etc., etc.
The GPU is
completely Judafied. Event he political leadership of the
Red Army finds
itself in the hands of Jews, likewise the theoretical
education of
the Red Army. Even a portion of the officer corps, to say
nothing of the
medical staff and directorship, etc., is Judafied.
What is true of
Russia is also true of other nations. Hugo Hasse,
Liebknecht,
Luxemburg, Levi and Cohn were the November Jews in
Germany;
Kurt Eisner, Levin, Leviné-Nissen, Axelrod, Toller, Erich
Mühsam were the
Red Jews in Munich. Over the 'Socialization
Commission,'
presided the Jews Rudolf Hilferding, Emil Lederer, and
Theodor
Vogelstein. Not fewer than 5 Jews belonged to the first
'republican'
government of 13 February 1919, and so forth.
The Soviet
government in Hungary was a Jewish clique around Aaron
Kohn -- Bela
Kun. Jews were the allies of the Bolshevists at their
invasion of
Poland; up to the present day, the portion of Jews in the
Communist
functionaries in Poland amounts to about 95%. But the
same picture
also obtains in the United States in North America.
There, among
the functionaries of the Communist Party and their
related
organizations are teeming with Benjamin, Brodsky, Gold,
Goldmannn,
Löwenthal, Goldstein, Levinsohn, Lifschitz, Gerson,
Weinberg,
Zuckermann, etc.
Among the chief
parties responsible in the Communist revolt in Brasil
in November
1935 were, besides the two Soviet Jews Minkin and
Evert, the
following Jews: Baruch Zell, Ruben Goldberg, Abraham
Rosenberg,
Moises Lipes, Karl Karfunkel, Jaime Steinberg, Jakob Gris,
José Wei�Ÿ,
Joseph Fridemann, Moises Kava. Exactly the same in
Argentina:
Jacob Cossin is the General Secretary of the Communist
Youth
Association there; Leo Libenson is the Director of Propaganda
of the
Communist Party of Argentina, Jeremias Milchberg leads the
illegal
machinery, and in the Committee for Agitation and Propaganda
of the Central
Committee of the Communist Party of Argentina three of
the five
members are Jews; in the Women's Committee, of five
members, five
are Jewesses, and so it goes.
Independent of
time and place, the standard apparatus of Bolshevism is
composed always
and everywhere of Jews.
End of
Chapter 1
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is not permitted. All rights
reserved.
T h e J e w a s
C r i m i n a l
Chapter II :
The Jew in Court
---------------------------------------------------
---------------
(p.
25)
As wire-pullers
and mouthpieces of the criminal and political
Underworld,
Jewry leads a concentrated attack upon the law and order
of the people.
The Jewish fence helpfully stands by the Jewish thief,
the Jewish
psychologist and expert stands by the Jewish sexual
offender, and
the Jewish attorney stands by both; the judgement is not
in doubt if a
Jew is also sitting on the judge's bench, as was so
frequently the
case in the German System(1). As if this
were not
enough, Jewry
got ahold to the furthest extent even of the science,
interpretation
and execution of criminal law. It moulded and
undermined the
law in order to render it an impotent tool against
Jewish
criminality. To whatever extent these methods fell short, the
goal was
accomplished through the corruption of the procedures of
criminal law
and through Communist propaganda. The President of the
Senate,
Professor Dr. K. Klee, justly emphasized in his lecture
concerning
Judentum im Strafrecht [Jewry in the Criminal Law]: (2)
"Everywhere
they (the Jews) were fighting in the front most ranks
when it was a
matter of blunting the sword of punishment in the
struggle
against crime." Professor Klee mentions a small selection of
Jewish 'penal
law theorists,' such as Moritz Liebmann, James
Goldschmidt,
State Counselor of Law Löwenstein, the Prussian Justice
Minister Kurt
Rosenfeld, Kantorowicz, Gumbel, Freymuth, and others.
Among these
corruptors of criminal law, the known Communist
Werthauer
assumes a remarkable place. He denies that the State has
any right at
all to punish(3). Naturally [26] he demands the
decriminalization of
all offenses against morality, of abortion and
homosexuality
and finally escalates his shamelessness so far as to
demand the
decriminalization of fraud(1).
The working
hand-in-hand of the Jewish criminal world, the Jewish
'criminal
jurisprudence' and 'administration of justice,' and the Marxist
propaganda
jumps immediately to the eye. The Jewish theorists
demand freedom
from punishment primarily in the areas which are the
domain of
Jewry: sexual offenses, fraud, and treason, high and regional-
level.
If, as
defenders of common criminals, the 'celebrated' Jewish advocates
of republican
Berlin stepped to the bar, it was the same 'attorneys-at-
law' who, in
the 'sensational' trials of the Weimar system, defended the
Communist
functionaries and terrorists (2). Especially notorious
were
the 'attorneys'
Löwenstein, Löwenfeld, Rosenthal and Rosenfeld, the
Werthauer who
is already known to us, and Felix Halle, the specialist
for sexual
offenses, and also Litten and Appel. Concerning the role of
Litten in the
notorious Felseneck trial in the summer of 1932, which
had as its
center the murder of several National Socialists during a
Communist
attack in the north of Berlin, Professor Siegert reports in
his lecture
about Judentum im Strafverfahrensrecht [Jewry in Criminal
Law
Proceedings](3) in the
following manner:
"In the Felsen
trial. . .by means of influencing witnesses and co-
defendants, a
defense counsel, the Jewish attorney Litten, was guilty of
preferential
treatment of his followers. The Court expelled him for this
from the Office
of the Defense Counsel. Instead of now joining the
Court in the
interests of justice, the Jewish state's counsel Siegfried
Löwenstein
addressed the legal [profession] public in the Deutsche
Juristenzeitung
[German Legal News] published by the Jew Otto
Liebmann with
an essay, Verteidigernot [Defense Counsel's Dilemma],
and requested
opinions in favor of his racial comrade Litten, the man
who gave
preferential treatment to the Communist accused. One
hundred
seventy-eight (178) members of the Berlin bar proposed in his
favor an
extraordinary meeting in chambers. The chamber -- occupied
for the most
part by Jews -- under the leadership of the Jew Ernst
Wolff --
thereupon unanimously decided in favor of [27]
the allegedly
endangered
independence and liberty of the defense and thereby aided
and abetted the
Jewish Communist Litten. Now, the Jew Max
Hachenburg, as
author of the Juristische Wochenschau [Legal
Newsreel],
appears as the last in line in the German legal newspaper.
He praises the
"calm objectivity" of his racial comrade Ernst Wolff and
supports the
safeguarding of the independent attorney class. As if not
the Jewish
Communist Litten, but on the contrary, the impartial Court
had imperilled
the legal profession in the present case. Thus the racial
comrades from
the apparently most disparate political camps met in
common struggle
against good administration of justice."
When a Jew
appears before any court whatsoever, he is secure in the
sympathy of
Jewry and of the Jewish 'public opinion.'
Until the take
over of power by National Socialism, the German press
stood under
decisive Jewish influence(1).
Naturally
this press was gentle in its judgement of Jewish criminals.
Had any sort of
poor devil stolen a bicycle, perhaps out of need, his full
name was
printed in the paper: "a certain Fritz Schulze"; when,
however, some
Kohn committed a fraud and injured other people
without
scruple, it read shyly "a merchant, K." -- why should his name
be trumpeted
about?
That was the
sympathetic atmosphere in which the accused Jew
appeared before
the Court; judges, state's attorneys, jurors, witnesses --
all were more
or less -- often unconsciously -- influenced by the Jewish
'public
opinion.'
The fact is
significant that, of the Jewish judges -- their names read:
Ruben,
Glücksohn, Hirsch, Jacobi, Katzmann, Manasse, Schlome,
Schmoschewer,
Peltasohn, Kohn, Seligsohn, Mensch, Nothmann,
Rosauer, Loewy,
Moses, Noah, Bukofzer, [28] Citron,
Schuftan, etc. --
three
quarters of them had as their fathers Jewish businessmen and
dealers.
Already, in their parental house, they breathed in the
atmosphere of
doing business and of the Jewish 'notion of right';
understanding
and solidarity with the Jewish law-breaker was already
in their
blood.
And then the
witnesses: witnesses from whom the truth often was in no
way to be
gotten, witnesses who could speak for hours at a time
without saying
anything, witnesses who commit any perjury with iron
brow and sell
their testimony to the highest bidder -- Jewish witnesses.
Then the Jewish
'experts.' At all universities, at all academies, in every
focus of
economic and cultural life, Jews had encysted themselves,
always they
monopolized discourse and occupied the best places: 42%
of Berlin
physicians were Jews, they had gotten control of 68% of the
positions in
school and welfare institutions. Naturally the experts cited
by Jewish
defendants were themselves Jews, who boldly sprang to the
aid of the
threatened racial comrade.
Their own
publications throw a glaring light upon the mind-set and the
activity of
these Jewish 'experts,' as for example the 'monographs' from
the Institute
for Sexual Science in Berlin, Sexus, published by the
notorious
Magnus Hirschfeld, the evilest sexual Bolshevist of the
Weimar epoch.
Volume 4 of these 'monographs' is filled with "critical
contributions"
for the "reform" of the law concerning sexual offenses.
With the
exception of a Herr v. Treskow, who reports on the topic of
blackmail on
sexual grounds, the contributions originate from the pens
of the
following Jews: Werthauer, Kronfeld, Juliusburger, Alsberg,
Kurt Hiller and
Hirschfeld, the very notables of the Weimar epoch. It
fits the whole
picture that Herr Hirschfeld was lodging the Communist
Reichstag
Deputy and major businessman Willy Münzenberg in the
building of the
Sexual Institute at number 10 In den Zelten, Berlin. The
'State
Counselor' Dr. Werthauer, incidentally a friend of the Jewish
black marketeer
Kutisker and known as defender of Communists, was
later sentenced
to a year's imprisonment and a fine of 80,000 RM on
account of tax
evasion. This character had the brazenness to give his
opinion for the
benefit of the 'reform' of German marriage law, while
Herr
Hirschfeld, in his accustomed manner, offered his dirty hands for
the protection
of every perversity. The Jew Hirschfeld, who was
allowed to bear
the title of "Counselor for Public Health," and whose
'Institute' was
financed by the Prussian state, was for years the
recognized
"scientific expert" for the German courts. The
inconceivable
nerve of this Jew seduced him into appending, in his
contribution to
the already mentioned [29] monographs, the
following
sentence: "The
thing that matters (particularly in the disposition of
sexual crimes)
is the proof furnished, after the most careful study of the
offender, of
his previous life, his antecedents, his motives, his entire
metaphysical
personality, that the accused has no guilt." In this,
therefore, the
Jew Hirschfeld saw his "mission" before the Court: to
furnish the
proof that the criminal is no criminal.
His colleague
and co-director of the Sexual Institute, Doctor of
Medicine and of
Philosophy Kronfeld, expressed himself in great detail
in the same
monograph, concerning the "job of medical expert before
the Court." He
sees the single mission of the "medical expert" in Court
to be the
obtaining of freedom for every criminal by means of the
corresponding
application of "psychology," "medical science," and
"knowledge and
conscience" and thwarting any use of the penal law.
To what a
sublime art of pseudo-scientific abetting of crime the Jewish
"experts,"
"scientists," and "psychologists" have gradually brought the
criminal law,
the infamous "psychoanalytic method" of a Sigmund
Freud is
sufficient proof and example.
The results of
the court proceedings? 'Public opinion,' attorneys,
witnesses,
experts, and defendants supported one another in the effort
to confuse the
whole affair and to construct an inextricable tangle out
of distortion
and lies. That the non-Jewish state's attorneys and judges
seldom
succeeded in proving the guilt of the accused under such
circumstances,
is clear. This means that it was incomparably more
difficult to
convict a Jew than a non-Jew: the number of acquitted
Jews was
always disproportionately great. In other words: the Jew
could break the
law without being convicted.
Since the Jews,
by means of selection and type of crime, by their own
slyness and the
cunning of their attorneys, knew how to diminish the
points of
suspicion and the circumstantial evidence before the Court so
much that these
were often no longer sufficient for a conviction, the
actual
criminality of the Jews is considerably higher than emerges from
the
statistics.
In summation,
one can say that, although 1. the Jews not of the Mosaic
confession
[i.e., Jews not espousing Judaism as their religion] were not
covered in the
criminal statistics [as Jews], 2. a portion of the Jewish
criminals were
not included at all, 3. a significant portion of the
accused Jews
knew how to hinder a conviction -- the statistics of the
crimes [30] yield a clear picture: fraud, usury,
bankruptcy, receiving
stolen goods
are typically Jewish crimes. The percentage of Jews is
disproportionately
high in perjury, adulteration of foodstuffs,
offences
against decency, high and regular treason.
In conclusion,
as an example of the behavior of Jews in Court, the Caro-
Petschek trial
might be mentioned.
Nikodem Caro, a
Jew born in Lodz, was a chemist by profession. At 50
years of age,
he was Privy Councilor, President of the Bavarian
nitrogen works,
honorary citizen of seventeen Bavarian cities and
towns, several
times over honorary doctor and honorary senator, consul
of a Balkan
state, professor, 23 times member of boards of trustees -- in
short, a
typical example for the brilliant ascent of a poor but miserly,
clever, and
unscrupulous Jew. Caro was naturally a passionate
"German
patriot" and all his inventions he placed at the disposal of the
Reich.
Such nobility of sentiment did not go unrewarded, and in the
three years of
the war, the idealist Caro earned 1.5 million Marks. Half
was lying in
the bank (whether and how much he had designated as
war loans is
unknown), but 700,000 Marks he held in cash at home --
safe and
secure.
Caro's
opponent, Ignaz Petschek, was a Czech Jew who had known
how to bring
the Central German brown coal industry under his
"supervision."
His son, Dr. Ernst Petschek, loved his Austrian
fatherland no
less fervently than Caro did the Weimar Republic. He
was active
during the war -- that is, in Karlsbad. There, he got to know
and love a
young lady with the poetic name of Vera, Caro's daughter.
"I never gave
any thought to a dowry" -- he claimed in Court, to which
the opposing
counsel called upon all the rabbis of the world as
witnesses that
a Jewish marriage at which the dowry was not
addressed, was
an absurdity. . .
The two
married, begat children, argued, separated, the poor Frau Vera
had to content
herself from then on with a paltry 70,000 Marks a month
-- an everyday
sort of tale. This story took a peculiar turn on the day on
which the
question of the dowry of 400,000 Marks was brought into
play. Caro
swore by the God of his fathers that he had paid the dowry
in cash -- from
his house safe. The Petscheks, however, sneeringly
asked where the
receipt was, then, for this -- after all -- not
inconsiderable
sum.
But the receipt
wasn't there. At first Caro claimed that he had
accidentally
destroyed it in 1924, when he was clearing out his desk
and burned a
great deal of trash.
[31] The Petscheks flatly refused to believe this story.
Then the story
suddenly
changed to: the receipt probably existed, but it was in
Warsaw (!) with
a racial comrade, the lawyer Löwenstein. Thereupon --
so Caro claimed
-- the Petscheks promptly sent a man to Warsaw, who
struck up an
acquaintance with Löwenstein's secretary in a café, and
wanted to get
her to steal the receipt -- it was all as if from a crime
novel.
Meanwhile, the
receipt presumably was located not in Warsaw, but in
Caro's safe:
the Petscheks had obtained a temporary decree, by whose
provisions the
receipt was supposed to be delivered to the district court.
When the
bailiff appeared at Caro's, the Privy Councilor explained
triumphantly:
"I have just torn up the receipt and thrown the pieces into
the toilet. It
is now on its way to the sewage fields!"
At the later
question of the Court, why Caro had torn up a document
which
represented a value of 400,000 Marks to him, Caro replied in a
most convoluted
manner -- he had acted in excitement, and anyway the
whole matter
had been a trap for Petschek, to lure him into perjury (!).
The baffled
President of the Court could only answer in the following
way: "I am
making an effort to comprehend your motives, but I must
say that such a
thing is unimaginable to me."
To shelter
himself from new visits of the bailiff, Caro found simple
means. First of
all, he moved his consulate to his villa in Dahlem
(where the
Privy Councilor otherwise could have lived) and thereby
became
'extra-territorial.'
On the other
hand, he 'leased' his villa to the Bavarian nitrogen works.
But when a
summons from the Court arrived, Caro had himself
certified by
the district physician as terminally unfit -- and then drove
to Gastein or
to Rie�Ÿersee for a few months. . .
The Petscheks
continually harassed Caro, and in the year 1931 it
became clear
that they would not be shaken loose at any price. Caro
now resorted to
a new weapon and used his "connections." In the
Weimar
government at that time, the notorious Dr. Wei�Ÿmann, a Jew,
was still
sitting as Secretary of State, and he began to visit authoritative
gentlemen of
the Ministry of Justice(1). He spoke about the
weather
and the
theater, but also about the fact that the approaching trial against
Caro was
embarrassing, since Caro was designated by the government
for [32] an important mission abroad, and the
impression would be
extremely
regrettable, in case. . .
Twice the state
attorney's office quashed the proceedings against Caro.
The Petscheks,
however, were just as much Jews as Caro. They had no
less cunning
than the Privy Councilor, but moreover, more money and
still better
"connections."
Tricks no
longer availed: on 06 June 1932, Caro had to appear before
the Court to
answer for forgery of the receipt and perjury. Three
attorneys
accompanied him: Alsberg, Dix, Heine. His opponent was
represented by
the attorneys Davidsohn, Roth, and Drucker -- a rather
racially pure
Jewish company.
The course of
the court proceedings defies any description. Day by
day, a German
court had to occupy itself with the dirty laundry of two
Jewish
families. The most impossible matters were brought before the
Court, proof
for which would never succeed. Caro raged and insulted,
pounded the
table with his fist and cried. The Plaintiff, the defendant,
witnesses,
lawyers insulted one another in the most vulgar manner --
the Jews
behaved just as they are accustomed to do at such business
haggling. Emile
Zola described it in his novel L'argent: "There stood
an unclean
party of Jews together in a noisy group, with faces
glistening with
grease or the emaciated profiles of raptors -- an unusual
assembly of
conspicuous noses, as if pressed densely against one
another over
their prey, and becoming excited among loud shouts and
close to the
point of devouring one another." A few examples of the
graceless and
vulgar manner of speech of these Jews may be sufficient:
Caro screams:
"What you're saying, there, is a lot of blather." Drucker
replies: "Your
account [of things] is organized like the Polish
economy." When
the subject of Caro's "fist-sized" kidney stone arises,
he says to the
opposing counsel: "I don't care if you get my kidney
stones!" To
which the other answers "with never-failing quick-
wittedness":
"Even in this area I refuse to do business with you."
Once the word
daffke occurred. The state's attorney, who did not know
it, asked about
its meaning. Those present smiled pityingly -- "the
dumb goy
doesn't know what daffke means!"
That was the
external form of the proceedings. In the case itself, no
progress was
being made. Caro admitted that the contents of one of his
statements made
under oath did not correspond to the truth.
Nonetheless,
that was not his fault -- he had signed a "blank statement"
[33] and knew nothing about what the steno typist had
written above
his signature.
. .
Yet when the
Court wanted to deal more closely with the facts of the
case, Caro
served up some sort of hair-raising tale, which was
supposed to
distract the attention of the Court. Over and over again, he
resorted to
effects from a crime novel: he told that he was being
watched day and
night by hostile spies, the letter carrier had been
suborned
exactly as the bailiff of the Court, and handed over his
correspondence
to his opponents, burglars who were in the pay of
Petschek had
searched his apartment. His telephone conversations were
tapped, they
wanted to kidnap his grandson, "a good looking
sportsman" had
been set loose to "seduce" his daughter, his life was in
constant danger
from rogues who were in the employ of Petschek --
perhaps they
were even Nazis! A wave of excitement swept through
the courtroom.
The poor, innocent Privy Councilor! They had even set
the Nazis on
him -- the peak of depravity! The persecuted innocent,
however, sobbed
into his snow-white handkerchief and secretly winked
at his
lawyer.
This disgusting
show lasted weeks and months long. How was the
Court supposed
to discover the truth in this tangle of calculated
hysteria,
triteness and vulgarity, tales of oriental fantasy, perjuries,
talmudic
nitpicking by the attorneys, threats, slanders and dark hints,
half truth and
half lie, bought testimony of witnesses and unverifiable
claims?
It was a
genuine Jewish trial.
It ended on 23
December 1932 with the acquittal of the accused, Privy
Councilor Caro.
The costs of the proceedings and those of the
defendant were
imposed upon the co-plaintiff, Dr. Ernst Petschek.
The
Caro-Petschek trial has only one worthy counterpart, the so-called
"Trotskyite
trial" against Sinovyev-Apfelbaum and Kamenev-
Rosenfeld in
Moscow in August 1936. It likewise was a matter of a
well-known
Jewish 'family quarrel,' the struggle for power between
two Jewish
cliques in the Bolshevist apparatus, a power-struggle which
lasted nearly
two decades and only came to an end with the 'liquidation'
of the Sinovyev
group. In the dock sat the Westernized coffeehouse-
and
asphalt-Jews, who in Europe are to be found at the head of the
Marxist and
liberal parties, to which Trotsky-Bronstein also belonged
intellectually,
and from which strong threads of sympathy and perhaps
also political
[34] connections ran to the so-called
Trotskyite-
Sinovyevists in
the Soviet Union. The judgement was passed and
executed by the
more brutal, filthier, but also more powerful ghetto-
Jews, like the
then head of the GPU, Yagoda (whose correct name was
Yehuda),
Bärmann, and the great number of hangers-on, the GPU-Jews
and the Jewish
clique around Stalin, which grouped itself about the
person of Lazar
Mosessohn Kaganovitch. The trial likewise offered a
disgusting and
nausea-producing picture of Jewish intrigue and Jewish
cowardice and
dishonesty, as the execution of the punishment unveiled
all the
features of an unchecked Jewish cruelty. A few samples of this:
Sinovyev, an
ill-reputed, flabby Jew, cowardly and intellectual,
belonged, like
the Jew Rosenfeld -- alias Kamenev -- to the old Lenin
Group, which in
1917 came from out of Switzerland to Russia, together
with this
half-breed. Sinovyev was close to the Jews who were later the
murderers of
the Czar, Sverdlov and Golostchekin, Bronstein-Trotsky,
the later
Soviet envoy Kollontai, the founder of the Petersburg Checka,
Uritzky, the
later People's Commissar Brilliant-Sokolnikov and Joffe,
who became
ambassador in Berlin after the Bolshevist Revolution, and
who was already
in August 1917 member of the Central Committee of
the Party. At
the historic session of the Central Committee of the Party
of 23 October
1917, where the armed revolt of the Bolshevists was
decided upon,
Sinovyev and Kamenev voted out of fear against the
overthrow.
Sinovyev and Kamenev then became members of the first
Polit bureau of
the Party and belonged to the ten most responsible
members of the
Supreme Central of Revolutionaries.
Sinovyev later
became the first General Secretary of the Communist
Internationale.
Kamenev filled the highest Soviet positions. The
struggle of
Stalin and the ghetto-Jews against the Bronstein-Apfelbaum-
Rosenfeld Group
lasted from 1917 until 1936. Step by step, Stalin
deprived his
rivals of power, neutralized, and finally executed them.
Sinovyev as
well as Kamenev were already sentenced to long terms of
imprisonment on
16 January 1935, in the affair of the so-called
Moscow Central
of Sinovyev's adherents. The war staff of Supreme
Court of the
Soviet Union sentenced Sinovyev and Kamenev to death
by shooting in
the sensational trial from 19 to 24 August 1936.
The
wire-pullers and directors of the trial were likewise Jews.
With justice,
the entire German public stressed what a disgusting and
repulsive
impression the self-accusatory behavior and humiliation of
the accused
Jews made before the Court, and how they outdid
themselves in
self-abasement, contrition, and raging attacks upon
"fascism," in
order to save their pathetic lives. In [35]
his summation in
the session of
23 August 1936, Rosenfeld-alias-Kamennev said the
following,
among other things:
"Together with
Sinovyev and Trotsky, I was the organizer and leader
of the
terrorist conspiracy which planned and prepared a series of
attempted
terrorist assassinations against the leaders of the government
and the Party
of our nation, and which carried out the murder of Kirov.
Therefore we
were serving Fascism (so Rosenfeld-Kamenev
concludes) and
we organized the counter-revolution against Socialism,
and thus
prepared the way for foreign intervention. This was our path
and such seems
the pit of our treason and of every sort of base dirty
trick, to which
we sunk."
Even
Apfelbaum-Sinovyev, the Jew once celebrated as "leader of the
World
Proletariat," as "Liberator of the Working Class" of all nations
and General
Secretary of the Communist Internationale, could offer
nothing
better.
"My defective
Bolshevism was transformed into anti-Bolshevism and
beyond
Trotsyism into Fascism. Trotskyism is only another kind of
Fascism and
Sinovyevism only a kind of Trotskyism." Through the
maze of this
Jewish dialectic a non-Jew can certainly not find his way.
Sinovyev had
been caught in the coils of his own noose.
As nauseating
as the trial, just as disgusting and repulsive was the way
the shooting
was carried out. We take the description from the Berne
Tagwacht
of 22 October 1936, which is based upon the report of a
foreigner,
which was first published in the Paris Journal and in the
London Daily
Mail:
"Most terrible
of all was the end of Sinovyev. He sat in a single cell in
the first floor
of the OGPU prison. After he, as the first, signed the
application for
mercy, he tried to fall asleep on the plank bed. Although
it was rather
warm, he kept tossing violently and he was freezing.
About one in
the morning, he was awakened. The nighttime
appearance of a
detachment of OGPU officials shook him. He jumped
up, frightened,
and looked around with uncomprehending eyes. The
leader of the
detachment said to him:
"Prepare
yourself, Sinovyev. We have been ordered to bring you to
another
location.'
With bloodless
face, Sinovyev sank back on the plank bed.
'Get dressed,
Sinovyev!"
Sinovyev made
inarticulate sounds and began pull at the hair at his
temples. One
got the impression that he had lost his mind
[36] Then one of the OGPU soldiers walked out of the cell
and brought
water. A
handful of this water was sprinkled on Sinovyev's face. Now
he got ahold of
himself and stood up. 'Take your belongings along!' he
was ordered. He
did so. A half minute later he was led from the cell.
Along the
route, a detachment of eight men was waiting. By their look,
Sinovyev
understood at last what was supposed to happen. He sobbed,
he resisted, he
screamed.
At the end of
the walk he had a downright attack of hysteria. He held
onto the hands
of the accompanying soldiers and squealed like a
woman. The
leader of the execution squad, Lieutenant Yevangulov,
commanded:
'Open the closest cell!' This was done. Sinovyev was
pushed into the
closest empty cell. Here the Lieutenant took hold of his
hair with his
left hand, bent his head downward, and put a bullet in the
back of his
head with his right hand."
Thus ended this
Jewish trial before a Jewish court -- disgusting and
bloody,
completely different from the 'famous' Jewish trials before
Aryan courts,
where the accused Jewish 'martyrs' either were totally
acquitted or
punished only too leniently.
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is not permitted. All rights
reserved.
T h e J e w a s
C r i m i n a l
Chapter III
: Fences and Thieves
---------------------------------------------------
---------------
(p.
37)
At one time
people called Poland the "Paradise of the Jews" -- Polonia
paradisum
iudaeorum -- and not without reason. By nature, the Pole is
a farmer or
soldier, and it isn't in him to be a trader. And thereby the
Jews could
bring all of commerce into their own hands in that
nation(1). Not only
the city merchant was a Jew, also the middle-man
of every kind,
the town grocer and -- almost without exception -- the
saloon keeper
and innkeeper. In Polish, a bar is kartschma, and when
the immigration
of Eastern Jews started, they brought this word along
with them.
These Jews met their natural allies in the hiding places of
the Underworld
-- and thus the word Kaschemme ['German' word of
Polish
derivation meaning "gin mill," etc.] developed from kartschma,
the designation
for a crook's pub or bar.
Kaschemmen
are not only to be found in crime novels or in the fantasy
of journalists.
They are a thoroughly real phenomenon. A professional
expert on the
world of crooks, Criminal Commissar Engelbrecht(2)
describes the
Kaschemmen of Berlin in the following somewhat
abridged
account.
"Taverns, which
predominantly the criminal world makes it a habit to
frequent, are
called Kaschemmen. There are such Kaschemmen in all
areas of the
city of Berlin. In particular, West Berlin is definitely not
free of them,
and one can visit Kaschemmen in Kurfürstenstra�Ÿe,
Ansbacher
Stra�Ÿe, Pestalozzi-, Goethe-, Rückertstra�Ÿe [note:
die
Stra�Ÿe =
street], at the Stuttgarter Platz, and Savignyplatz, and in many
other streets
of Charlottenburg and all of the western suburbs. But it
must definitely
be admitted that the milieu of these Kaschemmen
varies, too, in
the different parts of the city. The types one sees in the
Scheunen
Quarter are rarely to be encountered in the Kaschemmen of
the West.
Nevertheless, in the former as well as the latter, the
patronage of
these pubs is composed of prostitutes with their male
companions,
professional criminals of all kinds and 'Halbseidene'
[literally,
half-silk, an idiomatic expression equivalent to the old British
"not quite a
gentleman/lady"], work-shy lads [38] and
girls, the
augmentation of
the criminal world. Among these, sometimes, is also a
'Stubben' or
'Grünling' [= greenhorn], who either out of curiosity or out
of ignorance
falls into this society, and often has to pay the price in
health and
wealth.
The
Kaschemme itself is sometimes a licensed pub, other times a cellar
prepared
expressly as a hiding place for the criminal world. Such
cellars are to
be found chiefly in the Scheunen Quarter, in the Münz-,
August-,
and Steinstra�Ÿe, etc. The proprietor of the Kaschemme, called
a
'Boost' (1), must be
worthy of the trust of the criminal world. The
dimensions of
the place must allow for the possibility of disappearing
at an
unexpected visit from the criminal police, either by means of a
trap-door and
cellar into an neighboring yard, or through cellar
passages across
to stairs into an apartment located in the house, or,
lastly, as has
been found many times, by stairs up to the attic and from
here out to the
roofs into another house. These Kaschemmen have,
almost without
exception, business at night, which is strongly secured
for the most
part by several 'Spanner' [bouncers]. The more violent the
young men who
frequent the pub are, the stronger also, the security
generally is.
If the criminal police do not succeed in entering by
surprise, the
place is opened only if the criminals being sought are well
hidden or out
of danger. At recent raids, such fellows were fetched out
of the most
impossible hiding places by the criminal officials. Even out
of tiled ovens,
in a dumb-waiter, and in the middle section of a
sideboard.
Preferred hiding places are also large baskets and crates into
which the
wanted man climbs and has himself covered with dirty
laundry.
The main
business in these kinds of taverns always begins late in the
evening. Night
owls of all sorts, all those who shun the light of day and
transact their
unwholesome business at night, have their meetings here.
Here, a new
'Ding' [literally, 'thing,' the equivalent of the English-
speaking
criminal's 'job'] is discussed, and here they meet in order to
mutually 'ein
Ding absto�Ÿen'[= "divide the take"]. Each man gets his
due. The
piano-player plays dance music, and the prostitute invites her
johns [to meet]
the black marketeer. Whoever wants to play can try his
luck at
'Meine, Deine' ['Mine, Yours'] or 'Schlesischer Lottery' [Silesian
Lottery], for,
judging by experience, most criminals indulge in a
passion for
gambling. The playing tables, therefore, are especially
crowded, since
every guest has an interest in the play, all the more so if
an 'Otto' is
present, a fool who, according to all rules of the craft is
quickly
"cleaned out."
[39] Most of these pubs have a special back room, whose
entrance is
completely
unnoticeable and is opened only to favored customers who
are trusted. In
this often windowless 'club room,' the more important
pieces of
business are concluded. Here the booty of theft, the "Sohre,"
is divided and
deposited with the "Schärfer" ["Sharpers"], i.e., the
fences. Here,
also, the "Ganoven" [crooks] stay who are going
'treife,'(1) i.e., who
is being sought by the police.
The premises of
a Kaschemme are for the most part primitively
furnished, even
though there are also Kaschemme in which every
possible sort
of junk is supposed to simulate a shabby elegance. A
bar counter,
'Theke,' some tables and benches as well as chairs and, if
in any way
possible, a piano or gramophone mostly comprise the
furnishings;
anything else is a luxury, and the guests make no special
demands. But
all the greater, often, are the demands relative to food
and drink. Im
this the 'Boost' must be efficient, and also must be
supplied with
wine and champagne. Bouillon, beer and Schnaps,
Soruff(2) are
consumed in large quantity, and that bodily well-being is
otherwise well
looked after is given away by the rows of sausages and
the bowls of
grilled herring, with cold pig's feet and the like, which are
always very
popular.
The visiting of
such Kaschemmen is not without danger for strangers, a
'dicke
Marie' ['fat Marie'], i.e., a full wallet, awakens envy which
frequently
leads to a robbery assault. Not long ago, a Berlin journalist
fared badly in
one of the Kaschemmen of ill repute. He was left
completely
robbed and beaten unconscious. When the police come, the
robbers are
long gone and the police almost never learn anything from
the
'Boost.' Matters frequently escalate into a 'Aussprache'
['discussion,'
'heart-to-heart
talk'] among the guests, as every brawl is termed."
In Berlin the
situation was particularly bad in the vicinity of the
Silesian
railroad station, in the Koppen- and Madaistra�Ÿe, where there
was
oneKaschemme after another along these streets, where whores,
pimps, and
every sort of riff-raff hung about, where one was not
entirely safe
even in the daytime. The Silesian railroad station, the
large and
eastern most station in Berlin, was the goal and end point of
the Eastern
Jews immigrating to Germany. From there, they had not far
to go to reach
"Alex," [i.e. the Alexanderplatz, city center for
governmental
offices, etc.] where their racial comrade, the Police
President Dr.
Wei�Ÿ, resided and took pains to see that the naturalization
process went
smoothly for them. Therefore the streets of this district
offered the
spectacle of a tender mixture of "hard youths," "easy girls,"
and [40] greasy Jews. The Scheunen Quarter
also offered a similar
picture, which
teemed with Jewish dealers, black marketeers and
criminals,
where stolen goods were sold openly on the streets, where,
in the movie
houses which were open all day, ear-splitting music
roared and
enticed a dubious public. The best known Kaschemmen of
this district
were "Münzglocke [literally "coin-bell" -- the ringing of
change],
"Martins Hackepeter" [Hackepeter is a dish of minced meat],
"Der gute
Happen" ["The good/choice morsel"], "Café Dalles" [der
Dalles =
poverty], in which forks and spoons are fastened by means of
long chains to
the walls in order to prevent their being pilfered. In
earlier
decades, the criminal quarter extended deep into
Dorotheenstra�Ÿe
and to Jerusaleme Stra�Ÿe(1). It seems
symbolic, since
as time passed,
Jewish department stores and the palaces of Jewish
newspapers grew
up there, where earlier the Kaschemmen stood.
These criminal
districts of the large cities were simultaneously the
incubation
nests of Communism. Among the pimps, whores, fences
and thieves,
the agents of Moscow felt at home. Here the "operations"
of the illegal
Communist organizations were hatched out, here
criminals were
recruited and paid for what they had carried out. The
Underworld
furnishes the recruits of Communism. The Kaschemme is
the nursery of
criminal Bolshevism, just as the café is of salon-
Bolshevism. In
the Kaschemme of the East End [of London] or of the
Scheunen
Quarter, the same Jews sit as in the elegant cafés of the West
End and of the
Kurfürstendamm [famously fashionable street in Berlin,
corresponding
to New York City's Fifth Avenue]. The kaftan and the
earlocks are
not an essential feature of the Jews, any more than the
kerchief and
the crowbar essentially belong to the character of the
criminal.
The unified
front of Communism with the criminal world is
systematically
cultivated and built upon. The "legal" and illegal
Communist press
of the whole world openly incites theft and robbery
attacks. For
example, the Rote Fahne [Red Flag], the official organ of
the Communist
Party of Germany, wrote in 1931(2):
"Yesterday
afternoon at about 2 o'clock, several unemployed
appeared
in the branch
of the grocery store 'Nordstern' [=North Star]. in
Glasgow
Stra�Ÿe.
They took about 35 pounds of sausage meats from the
window
displays [41]and left. The police were able to arrest
none of the
culprits."
or:
"In the butter
and grocery store of Göbel in Knobelsdorfer Str.
56,
ten young lads
appeared this afternoon about 12 o'clock and
pilfered
sausage and
bacon meats from the sale table. They succeeded in
escaping with
their booty without being recognized."
and
further:
"Yesterday
evening a troop of unemployed went into the grocery
of
Hoffmann in
Gräfestra�Ÿe and took for themselves sausages and
bacon
among other
things from the counter, with the words: 'Welfare
pays
for
for that.' The
troop was pursued by two police officers in plain
clothes
and is also
supposed to have been shot at. Excited groups of
passersby
formed on the
street, who were talking about the fact that in the
crowded
streets,
they were shooting at the unemployed."
There is a
widely distributed, illegal Communist underworld press,
adapted
expressly for the criminal element, and which is naturally
written and
managed by Jews. One example from the Berlin of pre-
National
Socialist times may suffice. The illegal newspaper of the
street cells of
the Virchow Quarter in North Berlin, Der Rote Weg [The
Red
Path], wrote, for example, the following during the winter months
"Join together
in hundreds, just as the unemployed did in Köln.
Four
hundred
unemployed took to the fields of the estate owner and
got
for
themselves
the potatoes which had been refused them. In the
Ruhrgebiet
[Ruhr area,
known for its coal deposits and heavy industry],
hundreds
got
coal for
themselves from the piles of the Coal Kings, which
were full to
the
breaking
point.
This is
a mass struggle. If the unemployed do not wish to be
abandoned
to hunger and
freezing, then they organize 'Red Self-Help' and
get
what
they need for
themselves."
This "Rote
Selbsthilfe" ["Red Self-Help"] of the "unemployed" was, of
course, nothing
other than organized Bolshevist criminality. It is at the
same level of
criminality as the infamous "expropriations" of the Judeo-
Bolshevists in
Russia before 1917 and the murder and robbery of the
gangsters in
America.
[42] The criminal unions or "rings," which seek to conceal
their true
criminal core
under the most ridiculous names, like "Eintracht" [=
harmony,
unity], "Libelle" [= dragonfly], "Immertreu" [= ever-faithful],
"Sparverein"
[= savings club] and so forth, represent the transition
from the
individual Jewish criminal world to the organized criminality
of
Judeo-Bolshevism.
The members of
the "Ringvereine" [ring clubs] were in Berlin and are
today in all
large cities identical to the members of the Communist
terror groups,
of the Rotfrontkämpferbund [Red Front Fighters'
Association],
of the Antifa [Anti-fascists -- a group which has been
resurrected in
the puppet-Germany of the NWO] etc. The cowardly and
underhanded
murder of Horst Wessel, carried out by the member of the
Underworld,
Communist and pimp "Ali" Höhler on 14 January 1930,
instigated and
planned by Sali Eppstein and Else Cohn, has furnished
for all time
the irrefutable proof of the identity of Bolshevism, Jewry
and crime. The
murder of the two police captains on 09 August 1931,
in origin and
guidance carried out by the Red underworld at the behest
of the Jewish
Communist leaders Heinz Neumann and Hans
Kippenberger,
yet again confirmed this connection.
And lastly, as
a final example, the murder of the member of the
NSDAP
Friedrich Schulz, who was shot on 03 August 1932, in front
of the house at
Triftstra�Ÿe 67 in Berlin by the members of a "ring club"
who
"coincidentally" also belonged to the RFB [the
Rotfrontkämpferbund
mentioned above]!(1) The Jew is
the born
denizen of the
Underworld, he forms its bourgeoisie and feels at home
in its hiding
places, Kaschemmen and cellars, in the ghetto.
Although the
Jew generally does not commit theft or burglary by his
own hand since
he usually shrinks from the physical danger and only
reluctantly
reaches for the Klamonis (2), he is quite active
in fencing
out of
preference. Theft and burglary are not lucrative enough for him,
but their
"appraisal" definitely is.
An Austrian
criminologist (Herz(3)) has taken the
trouble to research
for the Court
District of Brünn the average loss which occurred due to
various crimes.
These average numbers are:
theft 62
Kronen
embezzlement
376 Kronen
fraud 397
Kronen
At the same
time, the minimum compensation [per year] in the area
was equal to
642 Kronen. In order to scrape out the meagerest of
livings, a
criminal would therefore have to [43]
commit ten thefts in an
average year,
but only two swindle type crimes.
These numbers
prove that stealing is actually a "trade" of little profit,
especially
measured against its risk. It is easy to understand that the
criminal Jew
prefers either to resort to fraud or to get others to steal for
him.
The Jew carries
on crime as a business -- and business, at least in
principle, as
crime. Both are, for him, merely different forms of his
struggle for
power and existence against the "others," the goyim. All
wholesome
transactions of the merchant take on, in the hands of the
Jew, a
distorted and criminal shape: credit is transformed into usury,
fair purchasing
into receiving stolen goods, exploitation of favorable
opportunities
into fraud, etc.
So it is easy
to understand that the Jew also conducts theft and burglary
"on a business
basis." Exactly as the "respectable" Jewish merchant
employs and
exploits workers and employees, the Jewish gang leader
or fence
has crooks and burglars "working" for him. The lion's share
remains with
the fence, while the burglar, who bears the risk and puts
his freedom on
the line, is put off with pennies.
How far the
exploitation of the thief by the fence goes, one can see
from a typical
example related by Dr. H. Wei�Ÿ(1) in his
monograph
about
fencing.
In November
1926, the thirty-one-year-old Jewish "fur dealer" B. met,
while on the
street in Leipzig, a seventeen-year-old apprentice
unknown to him
until then, S., who was carrying a parcel under his
arm. A fence
must have at his disposal knowledge of people and a
sharp eye, and
it immediately struck B. that something was not right
with the young
man -- his behavior was pointedly casual, but fear
lurked in his
eyes. He inquired of him whether he had furs to sell. Both
then went into
a hallway and B. inspected the furs stolen by S. from the
loft of a fur
goods firm. Without inquiring about the origin of the furs,
he selected one
fox fur for himself, for which S. was asking 8 RM. B.
explained that
he himself didn't want to buy the fox but only wanted to
"mediate" the
sale -- a well-known trick for securing a double profit for
himself. S.
declared himself in agreement with this proposal and B.
went to a
furrier, Cohn, to offer him the fox. As a matter of form, Cohn
[44] inquired whether the fur wasn't stolen, to which B.
assured him
that it was a
completely straightforward matter, that the fox belonged
to a small
furrier who had an urgent need of money for a bill. Cohn
acquiesced in
this explanation, since, for him, it was only a matter of
having an
excuse ready in case he would be called to account, and he
paid B. 20 RM.
But B. told S. that he [B.] had only gotten 8 RM, and
he subtracted 2
RM from that for himself as his "commission." When
S. wanted to
make objections, B. threatened him with giving
information to
the police, and S. was forced to give in by force of
necessity. A
short time later, B. met an older couple from the country
on the street,
who were looking for a fox fur and he brought them to
Cohn, where the
fox was sold for 45 RM, from which B. received 5
RM as
commission. Thus, the thief got 6 RM, the fence 19 RM, and
the dealer (who
was not much more than a fence) 20 RM -- a typical
case.
"A fence is
worse than a thief" -- so goes a well-known saying, and in
the estimation
of Sauer(1), the fence is one of
the most reprehensible
of criminals.
The true keystone of the Underworld is, second to the
pimp, the
fence. What would a burglar do with his booty if there were
no fences? The
fence is as indispensible for the thief as the customer is
for the
merchant. Without fences, no thieves; without Jews, no fences --
a quick
calculation!
The Jewish
fence has introduced the forms of Capitalism into the
Underworld --
organization, money- and sales-market. The Jew is the
employer in the
Underworld. Without participating himself, he garners
the profits of
the middle-man and the expeditor. But the fence is not
tied to the
individual criminal -- if the latter becomes rebellious or
demands a
larger share of the booty, the fence slams the door in the
face of the
thief. In the Underworld there are more than enough
criminals, and
the fence can choose for himself the most pliant of them.
The
far-reaching similarity between the economic structure of the
Underworld and
the forms of liberal Capitalism is no coincidence, but
rather a work
of the Jews. Jews comprise the leading class of Finance
Capitalism,
and, we can also add, of Marxism and Bolshevism; Jews
also comprise
the class of the "Upper Ten Thousand" of the
Underworld.
In outward
appearances, the professional fence is a more or less
"honest
businessman" -- a so-called respectable Jew -- a second-hand
dealer, a
shop-keeper, a dealer, sometimes even owner of a small
department
store -- for then he can, without hindrance, [45]
buy and
sell anything
without suspicion. Fences have a more or less close
relationship to
criminals, they advise them, give them tasks, "tips," or
even lead bands
of thieves, while some, on the other had, are more
cautious and
only come into contact with the thief when buying the
"Sohre
[goods, the "take", etc.]." The most dangerous because the
hardest to
catch, are the fences who work only with other fences and
move the stolen
goods onward: for the most part, the booty changes its
owners several
times in rapid succession and then resurfaces
somewhere at
the other end of the country.
Let the career
of a Jewish fence be described by the following, taken
from the book
by Dr. M. Wei�Ÿ:
"A
powerfully-built, broad-shouldered man with a well cared-for
appearance and
good clothes, from whose Jewish face cunning and
business sense
emanates, that's the thirty-two-year-old dealer Michael
Strossenspieler.
Related by marriage to the co-defendant 'King of
Burglars'
Kubusch, he is the prince of Polish-Jewish burglars, who
have
methodically been committing residential burglaries using lead
strips for many
years on their theft-journeys into various German cities,
but especially
in Leipzig. In the main trial, Strossenspieler contested all
charges,
preserved a calm demeanor, and sought to create the
impression of
an honorable businessman.
Many years ago,
Stossenspieler, nick-named Machull (from the
Hebrew
mechullah), is supposed to have come from poverty in Poland
to Berlin and
earned much money on the streets of the Berlin Scheunen
Quarter from
trade in well-made raincoats and stolen goods (watches,
diamonds,
diamond rings, jewelry, silverware, furs, various garments,
pawn tickets,
and so forth), but to have securely hidden this away
before his
arrest. In the evening, he is supposed to have waited on the
street for the
burglars, to buy stolen goods. He would proceed in this
way with stolen
goods: from jewelry, the stones were plucked out, the
gold and silver
melted down. With valuable watches, he changed the
numbers and
changed the linings of garments. The burglars are
supposed to
have met in Stossenspieler's living quarters, weighed
precious metals
and tested gemstones.
A Polish Jew is
supposed to have acquired, as a purchase of
opportunity, a
stolen gold watch from Stossenspieler on
Grenadierstra�Ÿe
in Berlin. In the ledger of purchases of a dealer in
precious
metals, the police discovered Stossenspieler's name several
times as the
seller of precious metals, though [the signature] was
somewhat
garbled. Although he was again recognized, Stossenspieler
denied ever
having been in this shop. In another case, [46]
two store
proprietors
identified Stossenspieler as the seller of a diamond ring and
as the orderer
of watch repair work. Stossenspieler replied that the
diamond ring
and the watches had been his legitimately acquired
property.
In the entire
trial, seven burglars denied the charges, just as did the
fence
Stossenspieler, and no one incriminated any of the others. In
front of the
courtroom, Stossenspieler's wife, wedded only according to
the Jewish
rite, threatened to scratch the eyes out of a wife of a co-
defendant
burglar, who had been summoned as a witness, and to bite
her throat out,
if she should make incriminating statements. She is also
supposed to
have arranged for another female witness to leave for
Poland. In the
main trial, however, she cried continuously and claimed
'to know
nothing.' The accused [Stossenspieler] received two years and
six months in
the penitentiary. Will this sentence deter him or even
'make him
better'?
Strossenspieler's
"milieu" was the ill-reputed Scheunen Quarter in
Berlin, the
meeting place of the Underworld and cesspool of the
Eastern
European Jews entering the country.
Criminal
Commissioner Liebermann von Sonnenberg(1) passes the
following
judgement on this Quarter:
"In this
residential quarter of foreign Jews, the amount of pilfered
goods which
disappear can be fathomed only by him who has been
working in this
area for years, and even his imagination will hardly
fully grasp the
reality."
Wulffen(2)
tells of a Jewish locksmith, Polaczek, who produced the
burglary tools
for the notorious burglar Kirsch in his work place.
Kirsch was
extraordinarily difficult to catch, since no one knew his
residence and
he appeared in Kaschemmen only intermittently to give
his orders and
then immediately vanished again. When Kirsch was
finally
arrested, Polaczek took his place as leader of the band, which
consisted of
two locksmiths, a silver polisher, and a mechanic.
The same author
reports on another band which was comprised of Jews
and which after
the Revolution of 1905 had fled Russia. There were
also several
children with this band, whose members stayed in various
inns and often
changed living quarters. The band lived from
pickpocketing
and purse-snatching, at which the children usually took
on the chief
role and frequently demonstrated an outstanding
dexterity.
[47] Jews were often active as store, cellar, garret,
overcoat, bicycle,
car, parcel,
marketplace, tenant and railroad station thieves, and as
thieves who
robbed the dead, etc. "Inventor" of the black leotard suit
for hotel
thieves was the hotel thief Hirsch Isaaksohn(1). This
"Merchant of
the Second Guild" was born in Belaya Zerkov, Russia.
He was barely
20 years old when he was imprisoned for the first time
in Tula. Two
years later, he was arrested in Petersburg after a major
theft. Hardly
having been released from prison, he decided to leave the
"anti-Semitic"
Russia. He had excellent language skills, was educated,
presented
himself very articulately and with good manners -- and
during his
second term of imprisonment he had learned all the tricks of
a
crook.
He was so
clever that he succeeded in living for nearly five years from
his thieving
before being caught. After serving a sentence of 18
months, he
began to travel throughout Europe: Rome, Bologna,
Florence,
Milan, Genoa, Monte Carlo, Nice, Paris, Vienna, Cracow,
Trieste,
Leipzig, Mannheim, Cologne, Berlin -- these are the cities in
which it is
definitely known that he committed his thefts. His tactics
were always the
same: in socks and a tightly fitting pair of black
leotards, he
left his room in the late hours of the night to steal. Should
he meet up with
anyone, he always said as an excuse that he was
searching for
the bathroom. His dexterity was incomparable and it gave
him not the
least difficulty to open a locked door and to steal gold
purses which
were lying under the pillows of the sleeping resident. He
frequently came
under suspicion of being a thief, but nothing could
ever be proved
against him. He was overtaken by his fate in Berlin. He
first went into
the Grand Hotel on the Alexanderplatz and stole from
two travelers
in the same night. The porter of the hotel recognized the
thief from his
extraordinarily bent and crooked nose, because he had
earlier worked
in Milan at a hotel where inexplicable thefts had
occurred. The
thief noticed the suspicion and immediately vanished, to
resurface in
the Kaiserhof. Here, too, he stole from a traveler, but made
himself
suspicious thereby, and the director of the hotel had all the
corridors of
the hotel filled with his employees on the following night.
About four in
the morning, the thief appeared; his gaunt form was
scarcely
visible in the dark leotards. When he was stopped, he acted
very indignant
and again tried the story of looking for the bathroom,
but this time
without success. In his luggage was found [48]
150 RM in
gold, 200 Lire
in paper, 50 Franks in gold, 6 black leotard suits, a large
supply of wax
candles, skeleton keys, cards from all over Europe and a
horse racing
program of the Hoppegarten. On his visiting cards was
written:
"Georgi O. Chambellan de Se Majesté le roi de Baviere". . .
The German
court proved to be hard-hearted. Despite all the efforts of
the defense
counsel Friedmann, who defended his racial comrade, the
hotel thief
received a term of imprisonment of five years.
As we have
already determined, a typical Jewish specialty is
pickpocketing.
A physiological peculiarity often observed in Jews may
contribute to
this feature of theirs: clever hands with sensitive long
fingers, which
so frequently make many Jews competent pianists,
violinists,
watchmakers and goldsmiths. When the middle and index
fingers are
almost of the same length, the man possesses nimbleness, a
talent for
dissembling, knowledge of people and ability to quickly
orient himself,
and thus we have before us the born pickpocket, the
The number of
tricks employed by pickpockets to divert the attention
of the victim
or of those surrounding him is extraordinarily large, and
Jewish cunning
takes care to constantly improve them. A practiced
pickpocket has
very powerful fingers, and he is able to hold completely
securely even a
heavy purse or pocket watch, even when he has them
grasped only by
the fingernails.
The hands of
the pickpocket are his main concern. No violinist
maintains them
with more care; they are preserved from any coarse
labor, washed
with soda in order to refine the sensitivity of the
fingertips,
kept supple with Vasoline and glycerin and properly
massaged.
Constant practice is also necessary in order to keep the grip,
once learned,
at its peak. Pickpocketting has to be learned; it takes
months until
the aspiring pickpocket succeeds in "working" with a
certain
skill.
In every nation
there are schools for pickpockets and, as the English
police, for
example, have been able to discover, their leaders were
almost without
exception "foreigners." This reticent little word, of
course,
conceals Jews from Eastern Europe. In these schools, models,
which are hung
with little bells, so that any careless movement by the
apprentice
[49] is immediately audible, are used for
practice. In a more
advanced stage
of "instruction" the task is assigned of stealing from the
teacher so that
he feels nothing when his eyes are closed. As a final
test, the
"teacher" leads his pupils out on the street, where they carry
out thefts
under his supervision.
The business of
the small Jewish pickpocket is "wearisome" and
dangerous; the
Jewish fence has things easier and more profitable -- but
it is most
effortless and most profitable when it takes on "legal" form
after the
victory of Bolshevism and is now conducted "on behalf of the
State."
In point of
fact, is the "trading activity" of the Soviet government
anything other
than theft and fencing in the grandest style? Whether it
is a matter of
the cashing in of the old Czarist jewels, which may come
from the
robbery-murder of the Imperial family, or of the auctioning
off of objects
of art from the formerly private possessions of Aryan
families, or of
the sale of paintings from the Hermitage -- all this is
actually and
properly fencing on a grand scale. The same is true of the
splendid
"business" of the Torgsin (literally: trade with foreigners), that
Soviet-Jewish
institution, which shows sales of many hundreds of
millions of
gold Rubles and which consists in the selling of food in
State stores to
the starving population in exchange for items of value --
gold and family
jewelry, gold teeth, bridges and crowns. This vulgar
extortion and
exploitation of the distress of the people is again, of
course,
conducted exclusively by Jews, who make the most terrific
"Reibach"
with it, which a Jewish enterprise always effects. This
"business"
bloomed and thrived until the last thing of value was
extracted from
the unfortunate Russian people. What the Jewish
Commissar robs
and appropriates from the nobility and the citizenry,
what it extorts
and coerces from the worker, the employee, and the
peasant, the
Soviet Jew then sells at cut-rate prices to his racial
comrades in the
world market and the stock exchanges of Paris and
New York. That
is fencing in its most evil sense, worsened by robbery
and extortion
with the application of force and abuse of state power.
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is not permitted. All rights
reserved.
T h e J e w a s
C r i m i n a l
Chapter IV :
Imposters
---------------------------------------------------
---------------
(page
50)
The father of
Ibnz Stra�Ÿnoff was an employee in Matészalka, a small
Hungarian city.
The family was viewed as thoroughly respectable, one
of the sons had
become an actor in Budapest and Ignaz was supposed
to have enjoyed
as good an upbringing as possible. But after four
classes he was
already bored with the gymnasium. The easy life and
glittering
Budapest enticed him -- he became a salesman in the capital.
His salary was
more than modest, and from home he could expect no
help, for his
father was dead. But he felt cigarette-smoking to be chic
and a
necessity. As a beginner, he was caught stealing in a tobacco
shop. Two
weeks' loss of liberty -- that was the first entry in a criminal
record which
was to become infinitely long: Stra�Ÿnoff had begun his
extravagant
career of crime (1).
Now he commits
further thefts: gold watches, purses, rings, or, if
nothing else is
around, even billiard balls. His brother is an actor,
consequently he
has connections to the theatrical world. He uses them
in order to
procure free tickets and then sells them -- in such a theater-
happy city as
Budapest, a profitable enterprise. For this he gets two
months.
When Stra�Ÿnoff
receives his third sentence -- three-and-a-half years in
prison -- he is
just 20 years old. Just having been released, he gets
himself
employed as -- of all things -- a cashier at a newspaper. In ten
days, he
commits thirteen instances of cheating and forgery and hurts
the paper
severely. Those are ten mad days. Stra�Ÿnoff's pockets are full
of money, and
he can finally realize his dreams. His duties are hardly
done before he
puts on black tie and becomes a noble cavalier. He rents
a cab for
himself for a month -- the driver will later mourn the loss of
his earnings --
and among the [51] prostitutes he seeks
the most
beautiful, buys
them elegant toiletries and spends nights with them in
the best
hotels. Hungarian wine is drunk there, the Gypsy violinist
softly plays
his favorite songs in his ear. Stra�Ÿnoff closes his eyes, his
face becomes
melancholy, he seems lost in the music. Then he sticks a
hundred-Kronen
bill on the damp brow of the Gypsy and orders a mad
csárdás.
Stra�Ÿnoff's eyes flash challengingly, his shoulders twitch in
time with the
music. A just-released Jewish jailbird? No, a genuine
Hungarian
Count, who is enjoying life!
Only ten days
does he play this role. Then the police appear, Stra�Ÿnoff
is arrested, in
his pockets they find only a few Heller -- all of it is
blown. He must
go back to prison for three years. But these three years
become
four.
Many a thief
has the ambition of burglarizing the police -- Stra�Ÿnoff
occupies
himself in prison as an embezzler.
He's
intelligent, has fine penmanship and is put to work in the office.
There, he
falsifies the cash books. He swindles 20 Kronen and receives
an additional
sentence of a year.
With this
fourth sentence, a change comes to Stra�Ÿnoff's life -- he
finally
transforms himself into an imposter and thereby finds his actual
"profession."
Barely released
from the penitentiary, he procures for himself by fraud
the uniform of
a Hussar officer and orders -- with the help of forged
credentials --
1200 halters for horses -- and demands 70 Kronen from
the
manufacturer as "commission." The manufacturer is non-plussed --
he is yet to
have seen officers who get commissions. But business is
business, and
he doesn't want to let this nice contract slip away from
him. . .On the
same day, the "Hussar Oberleutnant László Inezédy"
borrows a
considerable sum from a waiter. A year and nine months in
prison are the
consequences. . .
Stra�Ÿnoff tries
on a clerical role: as an "Evangelical pastor," he
swindles a
series of antique dealers. Two years in prison.
Hungary is
becoming too confining for Stra�Ÿnoff, he makes trips
abroad,
swindles hotels, plays cards in the train station (and "wins"
every time),
then becomes active as a marriage swindler, leaving debts
behind
everywhere and decamps.
His face is
haggard and shows many deep wrinkles, his black hair is
smoothly
parted, his nose is sharp and prominent, his lips narrow and
bloodless;
under bushy eyebrows sit a pair of dark brown, cunning
eyes. His hands
are well-cared for and fine -- the hands of a cardsharp
and pickpocket
-- [52] his bearing is pleasantly relaxed,
he wears in his
button hole the
blue ribbon of the Prussian Kronenorden, and he
prefers to be
called "Imperial Councilor Ludwig Bényei de
Erdöbenye." He
achieves his craziest scam as "Russian Military
Attaché" at the
royal maneuvers in Köszeg, where he awards various
contracts for
the Russian army -- naturally for commissions -- to a host
of blindly
trusting suppliers. When the affair becomes known, all of
Europe laughs.
Are these people blind, then, that they don't see the gray
overalls of the
prison inmate under the black tie or the uniform of the
swindler?
Now -- it is
not the fault of those who surround him, it is Stra�Ÿnoff's
"dues": he is
an outstanding actor. In every role that he plays --
clergyman,
officer, bon vivant, official -- he lives that role. Every
word, each of
his gestures, his clothing, all of this is "genuine." And of
the
penitentiary, in which he has spent nearly one-and-a-half decades,
one senses
nothing at all. His conduct is irreproachable, his knowledge
of languages
and his general knowledge are astonishing. Even in prison
Stra�Ÿnoff was
always playing a role, that of the contrite sinner. Since
he is, in
addition, intelligent and clever, always ready to perform any
service with a
smile, he understood how to avoid hard work and has
read a lot and
continued his education. No -- one truly sees nothing of
the prison in
Straénoff.
He shows up in
Hamburg as a book dealer, later he passes himself off
as a friend of
the American Consul. With a forged letter from the
Consul, he
makes the rounds of all the Consulates in Hamburg, and
borrows 200
Marks a piece at each. . .
Stra�Ÿnoff
tarries for seven months in America as a "photographer" and
five months in
England. With his new knowledge and experience, he
returns to
Hungary, where he wishes to realize an entirely major coup.
This time, the
princes of the Hungarian Church will have contributions
levied upon
them. He takes the address book of Budapest and selects a
suitable,
fine-sounding name for himself.
There now
appears on the scene "Ministerial Councilor Géza
Bértessy," a
high official in his mid-thirties, clever, gracious, well-
bred,
well-versed in Church affairs, much traveled, an educated man
and man of the
world.
The Herr
Ministerial Councilor first visits the Bishop of Nyitra. There
it turns out
that the real Géza Bértessy is a nephew of the Bishop.
Stra�Ÿnoff loses
his composure for only an instant. For the Bishop is
deaf, he's 76
years old and his eyesight is not the best. He clasps the
"nephew" to his
heart and disgorges 2000 Kronen to him without
hesitation --
Stra�Ÿnoff may look back with pride upon the long road
from cigarettes
stolen in a dilettantish way, [53] to
loans from a bishop.
He next
relieves a friend of the Bishop of about 800 Kronen.
The next victim
is supposed to be the Bishop of Steinamanger. Here,
too, the
"Ministerial Councilor" is received most heartily and is
permitted to
move in the best society, to be the center of attention in
the salons of
the provincial nobility -- which is pleasant but not very
profitable.
Following methods tried and tested many times, Stra�Ÿnoff
goes to work on
the Bishop -- at first, however, without success. The
Bishop is a man
of captivating courtliness but will not part with any
cash. Yet even
with him Stra�Ÿnoff has success at last. He contrives a
convoluted
story, according to which a well-known aristocrat has
contracted
considerable debts but is now unable to pay them. A scandal
by which even
the highest official of the district, the Obergespan,
would be
affected, must, however, be prevented by any means, and the
Minister
himself had entrusted him, the Ministerial Councilor Bértessy,
with the task
of enlisting the participation of the Bishop in this discreet
campaign. A
faked telegram from the Minister to the "Ministerial
Councilor"
gives the impetus, and the Bishop is made lighter by about
6000
Kronen.
A short time
afterward, Stra�Ÿnoff was arrested in Vienna, but only 270
Kronen
were found on him -- his passions were as posh and expensive
as
ever.
He sat in
prison for years, awaiting freedom with patience -- in order to
dedicate
himself once again to the profession of imposture. He travels
through Italy,
visits Venice, Abbrazia, returning to Budapest in
between. The
small swindles which he commits there do not satisfy
him, he would
like to again risk a great coup: in Agram, the
"Ministerial
Councilor Berger von Waldeneck" appears at the
Archbishop's
and gets received as representative of the government.
By chance he is
unmasked and must spend three years in the prison of
Lepoglda --
"Schönblick" ["beautiful view"] -- an ironic-sounding
name. He
remains there eight years, for he then again perpetrates a
fraud -- some
sort of black-marketing with furniture, which brings him
an additional
five years. When he emerges, he is an aging man, the
World War is
over, people have become mistrustful and smarter.
Stra�Ÿnoff
establishes himself as a photographer -- since then, no one
has heard
anything more from him, nothing except for his "memoirs,"
in which he
describes his life in the way he would have liked it to have
been. .
.
Ignaz Stra�Ÿnoff
has been one of the most successful imposters of our
time, and at
the same time one of the most typical. In him are displayed
with the
greatest clarity the outstanding traits of the imposter [54] -- the
firm will not
to work, coupled with theatrical talent.
E. Wulffen(1) numbers
among the most noteworthy peculiarities of the
imposter:
vanity, pleasure-seeking, capacity for auto-suggestion, vivid
fantasy,
presence of mind which rescues him even in dangerous
situations, and
boundless dishonesty. He describes the imposter in the
following
words:
"For it is the
deceiving, obliging demeanor, the open, honest eyes, the
charming
kindliness, the fine-sounding manner of speech, the nimble
movements, the
entire appearance with its enchanting and fascinating
sense of
certainty, the tasteful attire, at times even a costume in the
shape of a
uniform, the formal dress of a diplomat or the garments of a
priest."
It is now easy
to understand why so many Jews are to be found among
imposters:
their intellectual versatility, adaptability, their inborn
aptitude for
the art of pretence, their talent for imitation and copying
(note the many
Jewish actors and performers), not least of all their
unscrupulousness,
dishonesty, and the lack of a sense of right -- all
these are
characteristics which they have in common with imposters.
When the Jew
appears today as a "Russian," tomorrow as a "Pole,"
then as a
"Swede," as a "Spaniard," and as a "German" -- this is
political
imposture which all of Jewry has developed over centuries
into a high art
of public deception. The Jew plays roles and deceives on
principle,
professionally, as a rule, not as an exception. That is the
most important
weapon of his existence and in his struggle for power.
The diverse
arts of imposture are extraordinarily manifold -- starting
with the little
Jewish traveling salesman who makes himself out to be a
bank director
in order to commit a paltry fraud on a hotel, or the
cunning
marriage swindler whose target is the savings book of his
bride, up to
the international swindler who elicits money from
credulous women
and even takes in smart people in the business world.
As businessman,
estate owner, clergyman, soldier, rich private
individual,
traveling explorer, scholar, sportsman, honorable craftsman,
honest farmer,
artist, insurance agent, industrialist or engineer, the
Jewish imposter
appears equally adept, and of course just as he appears
in the
political arena as now a Democrat, then as a Socialist, then again
as a
Conservative and as a Liberal.
The social
sphere in which the imposter "works" is determined by his
special
capacities and inclinations: [55]
Stra�Ÿnoff played the role of
aristocrat, but
Ignaz Trebitsch, whose dynamic life shall be related
here, was
missionary, politician, adventurer and spy.
Paks is a small
Hungarian backwater, where the Danube rolls muddily
and wearily
through the broad Hungarian plains. There lived Nathan
Trebitsch, a
pious Jew -- pious and rich. He bought up the grain
harvested
through the labor of Hungarian peasants, and shipped it on
his own
vessels. He had two daughters who should some day make
wealthy
marriages, and two sons -- the one was supposed to become a
banker but then
succumbed to insanity; for the other son awaited the
career of a
teacher, a social democrat and -- somewhere in America --
the fate of an
emigrant presumed dead.
In 1879 a third
son, Isaak (or "Ignaz"), was born to the old Trebitsch.
Like the
father, little Ignaz was also pious -- three times a day he was
in the
synagogue, twice a week he fasted and he pursued the study of
the Talmud
with utmost zeal. His capacities are astounding -- with the
help of a tutor
he learns in one year everything needed to be able to
enter the fifth
class of the gymnasium. At 16 years of age he declares
absolutely that
he wants to become an actor. An actor? Certainly. For
Isaak Trebitsch
is of the same blood and mentality as Stra�Ÿnoff, as
Salaban, as
Finkelstein, as many other Jews who began on the stage,
only to later
try out their talents on their fellow men.
The trade in
grain is a thoroughly profitable business, and the old
Trebitsch does
not lack for money to send his son to Vienna, Dresden,
Fiume, Paris,
London -- perhaps there he will forget about his plans for
the theater. He
does not forget them, and he gets his way. In Budapest
he becomes an
actor, though to be sure not for any length of time. His
father must pay
again, and Ignatz travels to North and South America.
He describes
what he has seen there in the newspapers, in the
genuinely
Budapest manner -- wittily, with a light touch, like a
journalist and
erotically tinged; he becomes a well-known journalist
and tries to
involve himself in politics. For the most part, a Jewish
youth in
Hungary has the prospect of two careers: actor or journalist.
Trebitsch has
now entered them both simultaneously and becomes a
"politician."
Yet he is not
satisfied. He has gotten to know the world, Hungary is too
small for him.
The Jewish blood in his veins impels him toward
cosmopolitanism, and
just for this reason he wishes to put aside the
formal chains
of his membership in the Mosaic religion. They could
trouble him in
a world which is still not entirely free of prejudice. It
does not bother
him that on this account he should break with his
father; a sense
of family is not numbered among his weaknesses.
[56] In Hamburg he meets with Protestant missionaries who
work
among the Jews.
There, he is baptized by his former racial comrade, a
Dr. Frank.
Religion Nr. 2. . .
More than this,
Trebitsch becomes a priest of the Irish Reformed
Church and goes
to Canada as a missionary, where he has to convert
Jews who are
immigrants there. His successes are sensational, for he
has the whole
Talmud in his head, he can turn every argument around
exactly as well
as his opponents, can prove anything and also refute
anything. He
sits with his Jews for hours at a time, speech and counter-
speech resound,
they all take delight in the most impossible subtleties
and
hair-splitting. As they are accustomed to do at the cheder(1), they
begin to rock
their upper bodies and their voices become sing-song.
The best at
dialectics, the cleverest Jew is Trebitsch, and the converted
Jews become
more and more numerous.
Then comes the
great schism: Trebitsch demands free room and board
and 85 Dollars
salary, but the church committee wants to approve only
65 Dollars for
him, and besides, his activity is supposed to be under
their control.
Trebitsch is outraged, he flings the door shut -- and goes
over to the
rival. In the shortest time, he converts to Anglican high-
church, which
has placed the desired dollars under his supervision.
Trebitsch is
now 35 years old and already has his third religion; he
believes
neither in life after death, nor is he far from denying that
there's a God
at all, this priest Trebitsch.
One year later,
he's already in England, knows how to court the favor
of the
Archbishop of Canterbury and becomes the pastor in Appledore,
in the county
of Kent. For Trebitsch and his wife there now follow
months of
peaceful and quiet living: church services, baptisms, burials,
pastoral
visits, and now and then an invitation from a neighboring
squire. That's
all. No change, no "intellectual interests." No possibility
of playing a
great role, of creating a sensation, of earning a lot of
money -- in
short, it's no life for Trebitsch. The "pastor" can hardly
endure this
peaceful existence, he thinks with longing of the "world,"
recalls his
glittering journalistic period, again studies politics and
economics. For
three years already he has occupied himself as a
clergyman -- it
is not to be borne, this role is too heavy a burden for
him.
Then a great
piece of luck comes along -- a legacy, a sufficiently large
inheritance.
Not one moment does Trebitsch hesitate. He hangs his
clerical skirts
on a nail, goes to London [57] and
establishes himself.
The 24-year-old
Hungarian Jew is ambitious -- he wants to become a
member of the
most venerable of all parliaments, the English one. And
why not? He is
clever, nimble, adaptable and has money. Only one
impediment
stands in his way, the Jewish name. He's done with that in
no time. Isaak
Trebitsch, whose grandfather was still called
Schlesinger,
transforms himself into a genuinely English "Timothy
Lincoln-Trebitsch."
He finds a suitable start with members of the
Temperance
movement, at whose disposal he puts his oratorical
abilities. Then
he gets on close terms with a philanthropist and figure
of heavy
industry. On his behalf, he makes extended trips and pursues
legislative
studies. A travel office is organized, prominent scholars
labor under
Trebitsch's charge -- a comprehensive work concerning
legislation is
prepared.
All of this
brings Trebitsch into contact with numerous politicians, and
in 1910 he
manages to offer himself as the Liberal candidate at the
elections. His
fiery temperament, his sparkling wit, his biting sarcasm
make an
impression on the voters -- he becomes a Member of
Parliament.
A fabulous
ascent! Trebitsch is 31 years old, tall, has clever black eyes,
full lips, the
regular face of the Sephardic Western Jew. He is an
irreproachable
gentleman, British to his fingertips, clever, well-read, of
the best
manners, an efficient organizer, a very good speaker and a
feared
opponent. He has reached the zenith of his life, which up until
now has been,
to be sure, unusual and erratic, but not criminal.
Could he but
tame his inner restlessness, had he more perseverance, he
would be
justified in hoping for a further, still more glorious rise. But
he does not
want to and he cannot: he has neither ideals nor higher
goals in life,
he knows no boundaries, only one thing urges him on -- to
constantly
appear in new, glittering roles and to procure for himself
money and
power.
One critical
turning point is noticeable in his life. Parliament no longer
interests him.
He is still the English gentleman, but he shifts his
activity to
Galicia. There, a homelike breeze blows, there a man can
speculate on
oil, earn a lot of money but make still more in profits.
When were the
times when Trebitsch would become upset over 25
Dollars? Now
it's a matter of hundreds of thousands, indeed, even
millions. He
dedicates all of his free time to the Galician oil fields, a
band of
middle-men, brokerage house salesmen and men on
commission, of
brokers, lawyers; racketeers, half [58]
criminals and
entirely
swindlers, accompany him -- people called Rosenthal and
Rosenblum,
Pinsker and Jontefsohn. Trebitsch thaws in their society.
Finally, he has
"people" around him with whom he can speak without
having to mince
words, among whom he can be himself -- a Jew who
wants to do
business. Almost forgotten is the mask of "Timothy" -- the
ugly face of
Isaak now grins brazenly.
Money quickly
accumulates in Trebitsch's hands, but the war tears
apart all
threads.
Trebitsch, of
course, is a "Briton," he wants to have nothing in
common either
with Germans or with Hungarians, he places himself at
the disposal of
his election district, to fight the "Huns." That shouldn't
mean that he
would be prepared to risk his life on the battlefield -- no,
being a soldier
is not a Jewish calling. But he pledges to censor letters
written in the
German or Hungarian languages.
Nevertheless,
Trebitsch comes under suspicion. People say that he's a
spy, sideways
glances follow him in his club, there are whispers behind
his back.
Trebitsch flees to America. And now something unexpected
occurs, he
emerges in one fell swoop as a passionate hater of the
English. Having
hardly landed in New York, he writes a series of
articles in
which he ascribes to England the sole guilt for the World
War, and
besmirches his "second home" with deadly hatred. He
himself says
the following of these articles: "I let loose, I invented the
craziest fairy
tales, so that cold chills of horror ran down the spines of
the readers. No
word of it was true."
This sudden
hatred for England, where he had made the climb to
become a
respected and rich man, would be hard to understand for any
non-Jew. For
the Jew Trebitsch, however, the hate was natural --
whether against
England or Germany is immaterial. As a Jew, he surely
hated both
equally.
He lived
fifteen years among gentlemen and was compelled for the
sake of his
career to share their way of life, to imitate their view of
things, which
stood in the strongest contradiction to the instincts of a
Jewish vagabond
and imposter. For fifteen years he had to suppress his
real self --
his blind "rage against England" (his own words) was the
reaction to the
suppression of his true nature, the repression of his
instincts. For
too long the imposter had to mimic the respectable, the
Jew the
Britons. . .
Trebitsch was
arrested at the instigation of England and charged with
espionage and
forgeries. In 1915 he arrives [59]
in jail for the first
time, an
American jail. Soon he is a good friend with the professional
criminals who
have been arrested and is able to learn much from them.
In his memoirs,
he recalls this time not without comfort -- these were
lads with whom
one could be of one heart and soul. He offers to
decipher
encrypted telegrams for the authorities. This brings him
various sorts
of easing [in his conditions] and he is permitted to visit
the city and he
uses the opportunity for champagne drinking bouts with
prostitutes in
bars and Kaschemmen. Eleven years ago he was a pastor,
five years ago
a Member of Parliament, hardly a year ago a rich oil
field owner.
All is forgotten; he sits between safe-crackers and pimps, a
heavily made up
woman of the streets upon his knee, with corks
popping. Long
live a life of fun!
In 1916 he is
handed over to England. For the forging of some bills he
receives a
sentence of three years imprisonment. Prison -- that sounds
terrible! In
reality, Trebitsch becomes "sick," enters the hospital where
he lives for
nearly the entire time in a spacious, bright room with steam
heat. Trebitsch
has never lacked for cleverness and the art of
dissimulation.
. .
In 1919 he
gains his freedom and is expelled from England. He reaches
Berlin. There,
he writes articles and takes an interest in politics. To
whom should he
attach himself now? To the Left? No, there are
already so may
Jews there, and besides, Trebitsch does not believe in
the stability
of a parliamentary regime in Germany. He decides to try
his luck with
the Right. He gets to know Colonel Bauer, makes trips to
Doorn and
Wieringen, but is received neither by the Kaiser nor the
Crown Prince,
he offers his services everywhere, makes plans and
hopes to
arrange an alliance of the German monarchists with Soviet
Russia on the
one hand, and the Russian monarchists on the other hand,
becomes
interested in financial issues, appears everywhere without
being invited,
and his self- assurance is so great that one doesn't know
what to do with
this Hungarian Jew who bears the English name
Lincoln.
The Kapp-Putsch
takes place. Trebitsch forces his way into the
Reichskanzlei
[Chancellery of the Reich], finds an empty room,
establishes
himself there with the greatest coolness and names himself
Press Chief of
the new government. Unfortunately, the next day it is
suggested to
him in unmistakable terms that he should disappear.
Trebitsch
follows the advice, disappears and surfaces again -- in
Munich. He
tells of his "decisive role" in the Kapp-Putsch, invents a
thousand tales,
forges new plans, makes himself the center of attention,
although nobody
wants to take him seriously. [60] His
newest plan is
"to kindle a
counter-revolutionary movement," whose center is
supposed to be
located in Budapest. Conspiracies of great moment
require much
money. From where to get it? Trebitsch is not at a loss
for a way out
-- he gets everything ready to print false Soviet bank
notes: paper,
colored inks, presses. In prison he has learned many a
useful thing
about counterfeiting.
However,
something goes wrong with the execution of Trebitsch's
plan. There are
petty jealousies and bickering, Trebitsch is not granted
the role which
he claims for himself. One day it comes to an open
break, and
Trebitsch makes straightaway for the director of the French
intelligence
service, Muzet. Trebitsch has already changed religions
and
nationalities so many times that a change in his political
"orientation"
does not strike him as the least bit difficult. Trebitsch
reports on his
conversation with Herr Muzet in the following classic
words:
"Muzet offered
me 25,000 Czech Kronen.
I turned him
down.
He raised the
offer to 50,000. This I took.
What else
should I have done?"
What other
recourse is a Jew supposed to have?
The
collaboration with the French, however, doesn't thrive; they even
threaten him
with prison. Thereupon Trebitsch goes to the Czechs and
offers them
documents for a half-million Kronen. Under a "safe
conduct" he
travels to Prague, composes a memorandum there of 58
pages and
receives 200,000 Kronen payment. The Czechs make
difficulties
over the promised balance of 300,000 Kronen, and
Trebitsch has
the gall to sue the Czech government! The Czechs
respond with a
charge of fraud -- Trebitsch's documents are supposed
to be forged.
He is arrested but his opponents do not succeed in
bringing
forward valid proof of forgery, and the proceedings are
stopped.
Trebitsch now
decides to abandon ungrateful Europe to realize a long-
cherished plan
and goes to China, to work there "as reorganizer, for I
had selected
this profession for myself." His goal is the province of
Szechuan, on
the border of Tibet. After a few days, he teams up with a
Chinese General
and begins with the conquest of a province. Then he
becomes an
advisor to General Wu Pei Fu and promises him to obtain a
loan in Europe.
Trebitsch travels to Italy with great pomp, now
promoted to
"ambassador." Trebitsch is in his element, he can conduct
business, [61] tell fabulous stories, boast of his
successes, spy and
collect
intelligence. He has a few Chinese along, he's dressed them in
uniforms
dripping with gold braidings, and he passes them off as high-
ranking Chinese
officials. Yet now Trebitsch makes a fool of himself
in the most
pathetic fashion. A small furniture manufacturer from
Vienna
introduces himself as representative of a "consortium of banks"
and negotiates
with Trebitsch over a loan of 25 million Dollars -- for
which Trebitsch
promises every possible and impossible concession.
Nothing comes
of the whole thing, for the Viennese gentleman
possesses not
one red cent. The master of all imposters has come across
a still greater
swindler. Trebitsch must return to China without having
achieved
anything, but beforehand he is arrested in Zürich on account
of a passport
offense.
Trebitsch is
tired; he is also discredited due to his failure -- he enters a
Buddhist
monastery. There a heavy blow of fate meets him. His son
John, who was
living in London, is hanged as a murderer (it is
supposed to
have been a case of the fatal blow being struck under
conditions of
drunkenness).
Trebitsch
restlessly wanders through China for several years, from time
to time he
visits Europe, he writes well-paid articles and memoirs
which are
sensational beyond all measure, is arrested now and then and
pushed over the
border. He finally finds peace again in a Buddhist
monastery. He
adopts a new, the fourth (or is it the fifth?) religion and
becomes abbot
of the Monastery of the Sublime Inspiration. Yet it is
claimed(1) that this
peace is only an apparent one.
That is the
astonishing life of Isaak Trebitsch. In which transformations
is it yet to
appear?
The personality
of Trebitsch is extraordinarily interesting. Certainly he
is lacking in
perseverance and inner equanimity, but just this imbalance
in his being
allows the typical characteristics of the Jew to stand out in
him with
especial boldness. He possesses brilliant capabilities.
Instantly he
can grasp a strange concept or work out a plan. His
adaptability to
his environment permits him, as needed, to appear now
as a Hungarian,
then as an Englishman, as a German, even as a zealot
of the Chinese
revolution, without seeming inauthentic in this. He
knows no
mother-tongue, no fatherland, no religion, he is a chameleon,
ever changing,
ever adapting himself; with equal success he can play
the role of the
industrialist, of the missionary, of the politician, of the
conspirator --
he has no nature of his own, no faith of his own, no
personality of
his own, for it might be that kind of personality [62]
which is
displayed among Galician speculators or in the Kaschemmen
of New York.
Trebitsch is no dangerous criminal, like Stra�Ÿnoff, with
whom he has in
common theatrical talent, but his unscrupulousness in
the selection
of means is unlimited, it gives him no trouble to appear as
a forger, spy
or counterfeiter and to cross over into the realm of the
criminal. His
temperament is restless and fierce, ha allows himself to
be carried away
into acts of impulse -- in his memoirs (1)
the
expression
"Ich war wütend" ["I was enraged"] occurs again and again.
He is incapable
of a creative thought, but inimitable on the other hand
in the
utilization of foreign concepts. At all times and everywhere, his
own ego is an
end in itself and the single absolute measure of all
things.
Uncreative but clever, rootless, deceitful and versatile -- that is
Trebitsch, the
Jew.
And so is
another Jew -- the third in the series of the great imposters of
the present --
Finkelstein, born in Bialystok. A master in the art of
dissimulation
and of the Lie, without scruples, greedy for power and
worldly-wise,
fundamentally at heart a coward and cruel -- this wanted-
poster type of
summation is true not only of Ignaz Stra�Ÿnoff and
Trebitsch-Lincoln,
but also of Finkelstein, presently Foreign Minister
of the Soviet
Union.
Environment and
circumstances allowed Stra�Ÿnoff become an
adventurer of
business, Trebitsch an adventurer of religion, and
Finkelstein an
adventurer of politics. There is no great distinction
whether
Stra�Ÿnoff appears as "Ministerial Councilor Géza Bérthesy" or
Finkelstein as
"His Excellency Litvinov." Only the results are different,
perhaps also
the extent of the harm caused, in which the political
imposter
Finkelstein surpasses all Jewish swindlers up to this point.
There is no
essential difference between these Jewish crooks, merely a
difference in
the manner and fashion and in the extent of the deception.
An exact
investigation of all sources accessible up to now yields the
following
picture of that "Red Diplomat"(2):
Meier Wallach's
origin, like the majority of the Bolshevists, is that of
an Eastern
Jew. His parents presumably lived in the ghetto of
Bialytok. Of
his siblings, five, who all bear different family names,
have become
known.
[63] His eldest brother Leo has been living
since 1905, the year of the
first
revolution, in San Francisco and practices the honest profession of
a presser of
gentlemen's clothing there in 4th Avenue, Number 628. He
explains that
'our actual family name was Polyansky, but my brother
Maxim, who was
regarded from his earliest youth as a personality cut
out for
politics, settled arbitrarily on the name of Meier Wallach for
this reason.
But when he fled to Germany after that, he had suddenly
become Gustav
Graff, while he was still then called Litvinov. In any
case, as far as
I know, he never has borne the name Finkelstein(1).'
However, his
sister calls herself Esther Finkelstein. Things are going
quite badly for
her, since a year ago her landlord in Warsaw put her out
on the street
because she was not able to pay a hundred Marks arrears.
She complained
then very much about the fact that her great brother
did not want to
give her any help at all(2).
Before the war,
still a second sister was living in Ireland. This was
Rebekka.
She always took Wallach in when things became too hot for
him in England.
What she is doing today is unfortunately not known.
On the other
hand, the name of a further brother has appeared in all the
newspapers.
This is Saveley (Salomon), of whom we will be speaking
more
closely.
The third
brother answers to the name of a Rabbi Yankel Wallach and
lives in
Bialystok, Lodz and Warsaw in succession. But brother
Yankel, an
older, dirty rabbi with earlocks, claims to know the exact
name of his
brother. In reality, he is called Meier Moises Wallach --
where Meier is
supposed to mean 'light.' Yankel, to whom the sad
earthly lot has
fallen, as a poor rabbi, of caring for the welfare of the
soul of his
worldly brother, one day runs to the train station in order to
cadge from his
brother, the Comrade People's Commissar, on his
passage through
[town]. 'Meier, Meier!' he calls across the blocked-off
station, and he
actually is allowed to walk with him for a few minutes
across the
platform. Too bad, too bad, he speaks so much about money,
which the
powerful Meier Wallach has got to have, that the latter
finally
presents him with a cigar and then gets on with his departure in
a blazing
hurry. Concealed by a cohort of select bodyguards, Meier
Wallach leaves
for Geneva as Litvinov(3).
But he will be
speaking there on disarmament issues, about the Soviet
'definition of
the aggressor,' while in the Soviet Union [64]
the Red
Army of the
Revolution grows and grows, in order to be able to stand
by to assist at
an overthrow in other countries at the suitable moment.
But of course
that will not be 'war,' there will be no aggressor whom
one could
define, rather the 'army of peasants and workers' would be
only
undertaking a military stroll. Then Yankel must once again
complain about
the greed of his brother Meier, for he once turned to
him for some
support when he was sick. After a long wait he finally
received the
answer from the Secretary of Litvinov, that Comrade
Minister
Litvinov was not in a position to take money across the
border. Also,
the son of Rabbi Yankel, Axriel Wallach, who even went
to Moscow
personally, was rebuffed in no uncertain terms by 'Tanya,'
the daughter of
Meier.
This is the
milieu from which Meier Walach came. It has come in very
handy to him,
for just the most dangerous of the Bolshevists,
Menscheviki and
the 'Social'-Revolutionaries, come from the ghettos of
the Lithuanian,
Polish, and South Russian cities. They understand one
another. In the
secret gatherings of conspirators, in which the most
cowardly
assassination attempts were prepared, a society met which
also completely
belonged together organically and as whose general
prototype
Wallach is to be regarded. He was one of the most active of
the
conspirators. He was already traveling around Europe then, with
the money which
the poor peasants of the Caucuses had collected. Karl
Woltz, one of
the detectives of the Ochrana, tells how in 1902/03 he
often stood in
front of a small hotel in the Neustädtische Kirchstra�Ÿe in
Berlin, in
order to day and night watch over a 'seriously rich Russian'
of the name of
Wallach. 'Yes, Wallach, who later adopted the name
Litvinov, was
then a leader of the Russian terrorists who supplied
funds to his
people in Berlin. It wasn't my mission to make as many
arrests as
possible, but rather to follow the secret threads which led
from one
European capital to another in the Russian nihilist
Brother Yankel
can tell how Wallach, after performance of his military
duty in a
regiment of the Caucasus (which now is called the Litvinov-
Regiment) began
working in a string factory. There he was already
'drawing the
threads' of the revolt from one center of the conspirators to
another, until
he was finally arrested. During his two-year stay in
prison,
he got to know two other Jews, Rosenfeld (Kamenev) and
Apfelbaum
(Sinovyev) and became familiar with the 'conceptual world'
of Bolshevism.
He [65] escaped in the course of a prison
revolt. He
traveled home,
just as today, under a false name. Meier was pardoned
under a general
amnesty and then worked in a sugar factory of the
wealthy Baron
Ginsburg (one of the 'friends' of Rasputin!), who soon
named his
racial comrade Director with a salary of 20,000 Marks.
There Socialism
stopped even for Meier. That he was continuing to
support his
former friends with money, however, was finally
discovered and
Meier went to prison for a second time. He remained
there thirteen
months and then began his great travels to Germany, into
Switzerland and
to Paris, where he finally became a member of the
conspiracy
against the world, with Bronstein (Trotsky), and Ulyanov
(Lenin).
Wallach-Litvinov was later active as treasurer of the terrorist
organization
and shifted his residency to England for a long time(1).
Wallach spent
the entire time after his arrest in the activities typical of
the Bolshevist:
organization of conspiracy, illegal purchase and
transport of
weapons, preparation of attempted assassinations for
whose
performance he himself had not the courage. The Bolshevist
Jewess S. M.
Posner has collected several things in her book, Die erste
Kampforganisation
der Bolschewiki [The First Fighting Organization
of the
Bolshevists] which can serve as documentary proof of the
Bolshevist
conspiracy. Litvinov-Wallach himself draws up a picture in
it of his
activity, which throws a defining light upon his character and
simultaneously
proves that his 'politics' of today are only the
continuation of
the old, with different means. Litvinov-Wallach is
speaking
here:
'. . .In the
summer of 1905, Burenin came to me at Riga and imparted
to me that
Gapon, along with the social-revolutionaries, was loading
weapons on a
steamer (John Grafton) in a Scottish harbor, without
having taken
the trouble to arrange for their reception.'
To this, Posner
remarks that, in the correspondence of Lenin and
Krupskaya with
the revolutionary organizations, the following letter
from Riga
appears from 'Felix' (Litvinov) in the year 1905, concerning
the question of
the delivery of the weapons (Archives of the Lenin
Institute,
Letter Nr. 691):
'26 September.
Dear Friends! The thought haunts me about the delivery
of the weapons.
I could keep the previous roads completely open for
the weapons,
but where is one supposed to get the money? I am ready
to sell my soul
to the devil for the cursed metal. . .However, rifles,
especially
collapsible Mauser rifles, are necessary. Pyroxilin and
explosives
[66] we're able to get through our
artillery soldiers. The
company of
[military] miners in the fortress is for us and thirsts for
battle. .
.'
Litvinov
continues:
'The
social-revolutionaries applied to the Central Committee of our
Party for help,
and Burenin has now brought me the order from the
Central
Committee to take the matter in hand.
After a study
of the map of the Baltic, I have decided to go around the
open harbor and
make for the island of Nargo in the vicinity of Reval. I
immediately
went to the island, walked around it, and determined the
numerical
strength of the border post there as well as the conditions of
the watch. .
.We assigned to ourselves a reliable group of students and
workers out of
Petersburg and Reval and proceeded to get to work. .
.At night,
armed with spades, we made for the shore, dug out a pit,
covered it with
brushwood and over that with earth. Everyone worked
as colleagues.
. .We did not have long to work. After one week the
information
reached us that the John Grafton had smashed up in the
Finnish
shoals.'
A certain J.
Luter, who in Posner's book supplies a contribution to the
same affair,
makes a still more interesting remark about how the
German Marxists
stand on the issue of the weapons smuggling and the
arrested
comrades. 'In August 1906, when a certain failure ensued in
Hamburg, three
men, with Sute at their head, were arrested. . .Since the
bills of lading
on which the weapons had been dispatched had not been
intercepted and
the police had merely documentary evidence
concerning the
sale of the weapons, those arrested were able to be set
free with the
help of Karl Liebknecht and were brought to
Denmark.'
They were all
hand-in-glove. But all the top people, for example
Ulyanov
(Vladimir Illyitch Lenin) had directly participated as well. In
a footnote of
the same book we read: 'According to the recollections of
N. Burenin,
this was the situation: When L. Krassin learned that the
Social-Revolutionaries
were proposing to take over the reception of the
weapons from
the steamer John Grafton, and that Gapon, who at the
time was living
abroad, was playing a large role in this affair, he sent
N. Burenin to
Vladimir Illyitch in Geneva. After he had received his
instructions
from Vladimir Illyitch, Burenin journeyed to London
where he met
with Gapon.'
It is also
proven that Litvinov-Wallach had met with the Jewish
conspirator,
criminal and [67] provocateur,
notorious throughout the
whole world,
Asev, who will also still claim our attention. Posner
determines that
'the persons involved were, on the Finnish side, Konni
Zilliaukus
(activist), and on the Russian side, the social-
Revolutionaries
Asev and Rutenberg.'In this entire affair, the
provocateur
Asev was the predominant participant on the side of the
Social-
Revolutionaries.(1)' Konni Zilliaukus
remarks in addition:
'Naturally
Asev took part in all these consultations, he was not only
privy to all
the details of the plans which had been worked out, but he
also knew the
assignment of every single participant.'
The name Asev
is typical for the whole milieu of conspirators,
criminals,
traitors, Jews and informers in which Wallach moved and
was active.
What purpose, then, did this trafficking in weapons serve?
This, too,
Posner's book tells us. The general plan was this: Weapons
and equipment
were supposed to be brought by a freighter to a
previously
agreed upon point of the Finnish Gulf, the freight unloaded
there onto two
other ships and sent to Petersburg. In all, 12,000 men
were supposed
to be provided with arms. In order to divert the police,
cottages were
supposed to be set afire and Czarist castles in the vicinity
of Petersburg
were supposed to be blown up as the signal for the
revolt.
In this undertaking, a total of 15,000 rifles, 3000 revolvers and
several tons of
dynamite were transported. When everything had gone
wrong, 'Felix'
(Litvinov(2))
writes:
'If we had had
the money (100,000 Rubles) which the Finns and Social-
Revolutionaries
have handed out for their unlucky ship, we would have
been able to
make our reception of the weapons more secure. . .I
traveled to one
little island and arranged there unloading places for at
least a
schooner, but the ship never came at the agreed upon time and
turned up one
month later somewhere in Finnish waters. The end [of all
this] is
naturally known to you from the newspapers. The devil knows
how much this
hurts!'
Litvinov-Wallach
tells in the aforesaid book of yet another weapons
transport in
the year 1906. It was completed in the same fashion as the
one described.
We therefore cite it using just a few words. After the
crushing of the
first Bolshevist revolt in Moscow, Wallach lived [68]
on the passport
of a Ludwig Wilhelmovitch Nitz and managed the
Bolshevist
'Novaya Shizny.' When this was forbidden, he fled abroad.
Krassin
('Nikititsch') proposed to him, as an assignment from the
Central
Committee, that he either organize lectures for Maxim Gorky
in the U.S.A.
or take in hand the further building up of the weapons
smuggling for
the Trans-Caucasus. It's characteristic that Wallach
chose the
latter. Based in Paris, he looked to buy some thousand rifles,
Mauser and
Mannlicher, some dozen machine guns and handguns as
well as
ammunition. In Hamburg, under the mask of an officer of the
Republic of
Ecuador, he made a connection with a Danish officer and
bought machine
guns. In this he was supported by B. S. Stomonyakov,
then studying
in Lüttich, by Camille Huysmans, who was at that time
Secretary of
the Second Internationale, and by De Bruker and Luter.
The last named,
who was then living in Germany under the name
Eugene Pierre,
reports in another place of the same book concerning
the purchase of
weapons. Litvinov asked him at that time to provide
accommodations
for himself, 'Budu,' 'Kamo,' and a 'bald-headed
Menshevist' in
Berlin. Luter lodged the last two in an inn of dubious
quality in
Elsässe Stra�Ÿe, the others in the Hotel 'Zum roten Adler' ['at
the red eagle']
in Friedrichstra�Ÿe. There were then in Hamburg 500
Mauser pistols,
9 machine guns, 1000 kg of dynamite and 3 million
carbine
cartridges bought. Luter further says:
'Even in this
purchase, Maxim Litvinov participated as an officer of the
Republic of
Ecuador and as a member of the commission. As a
souvenir he
shot up his handkerchief with a machine gun. Did Maxim
Maximovitch
keep this memento?'
We believe that
Litvinov-Wallach has in the meantime bought a new
handkerchief,
to wipe the sweat from his brow when he reads this
report.
Litvinov-Wallach
further reports that he got the permission of the
Bulgarian
government, via the Macedonian revolutionaries and one of
their leaders,
Naum Tufektschieff, to send the weapons across Varna to
Armenia,
ostensibly in support of the Armenians against the Turks. A
well-known
Berlin transport office was successful in shipping the
weapons out of
Belgium and Germany across Austria-Hungary.
Litvinov
visited nearly all the harbors of Holland, Belgium, France,
Italy and
Austria-Hungary and finally bought in Fiume a yacht for
30,000 Francs.
By an almost unbelievable 'mishap,' this ship also
smashed up
on the Romanian coast.
[69] Other undertakings were more successful for the
Bolshevists. It's
known that in
July 1907, Stalin himself executed a raid on a bank
transport in
Tiflis, at which 32 men were killed and 250,000 Rubels
were looted.
Litvinov-Wallach, who was careful to keep himself far
from such
dangerous enterprises, was arrested on 18 January 1908
together with
his companion, Fanny Yanpolska, at the North train
station in
Paris, while attempting to secure and exchange the bank
notes from the
robbery. He was then calling himself by the 'French'
We remember
well, how the Foreign Commissar Litvinov spoke before
the Committee
of the People's Alliance in December 1934 on the
subject of
'basic arguments concerning terrorism.' He 'rejected' this
'political
means' as 'senseless and harmful' and as a member of the
Soviet
government, he stood opposed to it 'with outrage and disgust.'
What
grotesqueness there is in the fact that serious politicians of the
world allow a
Jew to say this to them, who not only has practiced
terrorism to
the full himself, but also represents a 'state' to whose
imperialistic
doctrine for spreading itself, the use of the political means
of terrorism in
every country in the world still belongs today and today
especially.
During the war,
Wallach remained in England, married the well-to-do
Ivy Low
there and got himself naturalized under the name Litvinov,
after had been
calling himself Finkelstein in recent years. After the
collapse of the
Czarist regime, he became the main agent of the
unrelenting
efforts of the Soviets to insert themselves into official
politics and to
so influence the government, that it would tolerate the
Communist
effort at overthrowing [it] with as little resistance as
possible. At
first, the obstacles to the intervention of Wallach in major
political
affairs appeared to be insurmountable. When he finally
exchanged his
activities as book printer and travelling salesman in
London for
those of a Soviet diplomat, Litvinov went to Denmark in
1919. But the
small state then refused the Soviet envoy hotel lodgings.
England as well
had not recognized his appointment to the
ambassadorship
in 1918. Then Litvinov spoke more publicly. In a letter
of
recommendation for the known English agent Lockhart, he wrote to
[70] 'I finally have the possibility of making the
acquaintance of
representatives
of the workers' movement. I have been publishing in all
the Socialist
papers an appeal to the English workers.'
It is also
typical that Lockhart, in order to meet with Litvinov, went
above Rex
Leeper, to Rotstein (both Jews), who was then a translator
in the English
War Ministry and who later became Soviet envoy in
Tehran. Here
the lines of espionage and of Bolshevist agency -- with
and without
diplomatic status -- come into contact.
How the
'acquaintanceship' of Wallach with the English workers was
seen, emerges
from a little scene which was played off between the
Prince of Wales
and Litvinov. After the Prince had attended a football
match, a
delegation of war veterans pushed their way through to him,
led by a
somewhat un-English-looking man. The latter immediately
began a typical
agitator's speech against the Capitalists in such a rude
manner that
they wanted to throw him out. The Prince of Wales at last
inquired as to
what regiment he had served with. Without answering,
he continued
his speech. Again the Prince asked the question, so that
finally the
veterans themselves intervened and forced Litvinov -- for it
was he -- to
answer. This amounted to the naturalized Eastern Jew
vanishing with
all possible haste(1).
Nevertheless,
Litvinov kept pushing propaganda tirelessly. For
example, in
1919, he published a brochure via the publishing house of
the British
Socialist Party: The Bolshevist Revolution, its Development
and
Significance, in which he reduced the hundreds of thousands
murdered in the
Soviet Union to 500 and at the same time gave such a
detailed
presentation of the overthrow, that any English worker could
use it as
instructions for treason against his country.
In 1919
Litvinov was arrested. After he was released, he went as Soviet
envoy to
Estonia and afterwards became Deputy Foreign Commissar
of the Soviet
Union under Tchitscherin. He wanted to return to
England several
times but received no travel permit. Even when he was
supposed to be
officially named ambassador in London in 1924, he
again received
a refusal. Only much later did the English government
change its
attitude, when Wallach became Foreign Commissar in 1930.
The same
Litvinov, who earlier had to be arrested, was then permitted,
as is known, to
receive Eden [71] in Moscow and to propose
a cheer
for the English
King. The same Bolshevists who had bestially
murdered the
cousin of the King, the Russian Czar, and his family, and
who at the same
time are making every effort to bring revolution to the
British
colonial empire and separate it from its motherland, struck up
God Save the
King. Afterward, it was also not taken to be offensive
that Wallach
walked behind the casket of the King, while his comrade
of the
Humanité published base comments about the solemnities.(1)
The English
writer Karmell tells how, after a visit with His Excellency
Litvinov at his
splendid villa near Moscow, she had met him there, to
play cards with
his children Mischa and Tanya. The play consisted in
that person
being the winner who was best able to cheat without being
caught. Papa
had been the best at it up till now, and at the end of each
play one heard
the children yell enthusiastically 'Papa Swindler, Papa
Swindler!'
But Maxim
Litvinov is certainly more than "only" a swindler.
The mysterious
murder of Dimitri Navashin in Paris on 28 January
1937 has again
directed the attention of the entire world upon the
international
criminal organization of the Bolshevist Checka. Navashin
was in no sense
a "Russian" or even an anti-Bolshevist White emigrant,
as the press
claimed, but rather in all probability a full-blooded Jew
with the past
typical of such a person. Navashin began his filthy career,
as have so many
Jews, during the war with the central management of
the Red Cross
in Petersburg, by which he achieved, above all else,
freedom from
military service. Presumably in collaboration with the
infamous
Rasputin-pimp Simanovitch, he was active as a war profiteer
and contributed
much money toward keeping his racial comrades from
the dangers of
the trenches, in that he obtained for them exemption
certificates of
various kinds. Shortly before the Revolution, we meet
Navashin in
Stockholm, as a member of the commission which dealt
with the
exchange of prisoners of war -- in complete safety and in
possession of a
great deal of currency.
[72] After the triumph of the Bolshevists, this Jewish
citizen of the
demi-monde
is named director of the Soviet bank in Paris and manages
the "Banc du
Pays du Nord." At that time he in all probability was
already a
Freemason. In his three- fold capacity as Jew, Freemason,
and bank
"director" he becomes the typical "Métèque," who soon has a
"brotherly"
relationship with the French deputies and ministers and
becomes an
initiate of the ruling Paris clique.
With good
reason, with the reporting of the Navashin case, the
attention of
the public was drawn to the remarkable coincidence of the
murder of
Navashin with the kidnapping of the White General
Kutiepov seven
years ago. But what is more strange, one fundamental
fact did escape
it, which shows the whole affair in its proper light. The
kidnapping of
the General Kutiepov occurred on 28 January 1930 on
the day when
the sensational trial of Saveliy Litvinov-Wallach, the
brother of the
Foreign Commissar of the Soviet Union, ended with the
acquittal of
Litvinov. And yet a third event falls, even more strangely,
on the same
day: the judgement against Radek-Sobelsohn, Sokolnikov-
Brilliant,
Arnold and consorts in Moscow, in the familiar second
"Trotsyite
trial." All of these four events fall upon the same day. Even
with this, the
presumed connections between all of these things, as
disgusting as
they are frightening, are still not exhausted. Navashin was
a Freemason and
was murdered in a classically Masonic manner, with
a stiletto. And
Radek-Sobelsohn was a Freemason and maintained his
connection to
the "Grand Orient" [well-known Masonic lodge], to
which Navashin
also belonged. The accused, who gave the
incriminating
testimony in Moscow, the adventurer Arnold, was
according to
his own statement likewise a Freemason. The third
defendant in
the Moscow trial, Sokolnikov-Brilliant, was Soviet
ambassador in
Paris at just the time of the Litvinov Affair. Remarkable,
that exactly
these three, Radek, Arnold, and Sokolnikov, were not
sentenced to
death but went into exile. And now the most important
thing of all:
Navashin was the one who "uncovered" the alleged
counterfeiting
of Saveliy Litvinov and thus got the trial going seven
years ago. As
is known, it then dealt with the matter of the round sum
of 200,000
English Pounds (= 25,000,000 Franks), a considerable
amount, which
was supposed to be applied to Communist propaganda
abroad. As the
French court found, the notes were issued by Saveliy
Wallach-Litvinov on
orders of the Soviets themselves in Moscow,
when he was
still an employee of the Soviets.
[73] For example, the witness Aaronsohn said so: "Before my
departure from
Moscow in the year 1926, I went to Litvinov, who was
living on the
Kusnetsky bridge. Litvinov issued the bills directly. Two
notes were
lying on the table, very near me. The one was made out for
5000 Pounds,
the other in the amount of 10,000 Pounds. I asked: 'What
are these large
notes intended for?' Litvinov answered: 'This is for
overseas.' The
notes were on plain paper made out by hand."
The French
court saw through the crooked ploy the Bolshevist Jews
had intended.
They wanted to date the bills in Paris, issued with their
knowledge and
by their order in Moscow, and then expose them as
counterfeit and
refuse to redeem them, so that the French savers would
have financed
the Communist propaganda in France. They presumably
counted on a
very lenient sentence for Litvinov and his accomplices,
the Jews Joffe
and Liborius, so that all the perpetrators would emerge
from the affair
unscathed at best, and the money was lying on the table
of the house.
For this is nearly what happened, thanks to the zealous
defense,
conducted with a foaming-at-the-mouth "anti-Bolshevism"
which -- take
note -- was in the hands of the London Jewish attorney
Moro-Giafferi,
all too well-known from the Reichstag fire sham-trial.
It is actually
the same Moro-Giafferi, who in his speech for the defense
before the
Paris court on 28 January 1930, made the following
statement,
which he surely would not want to have regarded as true
today: "Lies,
murder, and robbery, those are the basic commandments
of
Bolshevism."
Even the other
defense counsel were not sparing with apt
characterizations of
the Soviet government. For example, the defense
attorney
Campinchi, who today likewise stands in a unified front with
Bolshevism,
said: "Before me are the representatives of the
dishonorable
Soviet government. The government of thieves and
bandits, which
they here represent, has no right to count upon our
assistance.
Gentlemen of the jury, the verdict that you will pronounce
this evening,
must resound like a ringing slap in the face which will be
your reply to
the Soviet government."(1)
Finally, the
Soviet Trade Representation had to answer for the notes,
but of course
just in installments on the date of maturity.
[74] Only Jews appeared as defendants, witnesses, and
defense counsel
in this trial,
and by their statements they involuntarily produced a
downright
shocking impression of an inextricable tangle of Jewish-
Bolshevist
crimes whose threads run on to the present day and
continually
require new human victims. When Navashin at last became
ensnarled
himself in these coils and paid for it with his life, so, also,
before the
beginning of the trial, a certain Turov, under whose orders
the notes had
been produced and who likewise after the completion of
this
assignment, as the French court discovered, was murdered in
Moscow. A short
time later, the "bandits" who had killed Turov were
themselves
shot. Thus the avalanche began to roll which today has
taken on such
monstrous dimensions and swept up perpetrators,
accomplices,
the guilty and the innocent into the abyss with it.
What role the
"great brother" of the Jewish swindler Saveliy Wallach,
the Soviet
Foreign Commissar Litvinov-Wallach-Finkelstein, played in
that dirty and
bloody affair is still unfortunately unclear, as is his role
in the
contemporaneous judicial murders in Moscow. According to his
entire past and
profession, Finkelstein-Wallach-Litvinov belongs to the
most intimate
membership of the Judeo-Bolshevist band of gangsters
whose most
prominent members, Apfelbaum-Sinovyev and Rosenfeld-
Kamenev, the
old "friends" of Wallach-Finkelstein, were shot in
Moscow shortly
before Navashin's murder. If "Litvinov" did not
participate in
any of these murders, did Finkelstein, or Wallach?
His own brother
described the process of the change of name of the
Jew Wallach to
the French court as follows:
"In my youth I
wasn't called Litvinov. My correct name is Wallach. As
is my brother,
the Moscow Commissar. But after the Tiflis 'Ex'
(expropriation
-- i.e., armed robbery), when the present dictator Stalin
robbed the post
of a half-million Rubels, my brother, Maxim
Maximovitch
Litvinov was arrested at the Gar du Nord (on 18 January
1908). In his
luggage was found a portion of the Tiflis money. Right
then my brother
decided to change his name Wallach for the name
Litvinov. He
also asked me to do the same, and I agreed."
One "minor
matter" yet came out at the proceedings before the Paris
court in
January 1930: One of the witnesses, the Warsaw Jew Dischur,
Secretary of
the "Society for the Support of Jewish Emigrants,"
testified that
Saveliy Litvinov stole 10,000 Dollars from the till of this
society in the
year 1923. [75] Litvinov's justification
to the court
sounded very
lame. "Some fellow Wallach stole in Warsaw, and not
Litvinov, and I
didn't return the 10,000 Dollars later on. . ." Half did it,
half didn't do
it -- maybe it was a third brother from the noble tribe of
Wallach-Litvinov?
As fence,
weapons broker and swindler, Finkelstein began his career,
which after the
victory of Bolshevism bore him up to the "dizzying"
[There is a
play on words here; "schwindeln means both "to make
dizzy" and "to
swindle."] heights of a political imposture of the greatest
style. Today he
plays the roles of a Foreign Minister and member of
the Geneva
Council with the same virtuosity as he earlier played the
roles of an
officer of Ecuador, of a "leader of the workers," and of a
"Socialist."
Genuine in him is only his Jewishness, which drives him
from deceit to
crime and from crime back again to deceit. The base and
cunning role
which he has really played will perhaps sometime later
come into the
full light of day -- or is "Maxim" supposed to not know
what "Maier"
does? The dead will one day rise up and testify against
Finkelstein.
This Jewish
imposter in the realm of politics by no means stands alone.
His companions
are of the same breed. They all began by making
themselves out
to be something other than they really were in order to
acquire
respect, power, and money. His rival in the realm of foreign
affairs, the
man who wanted to try another tack with Bolshevist
"business,"
namely over the notorious politics of Rapallo, is the Jew
Sobelsohn. He
was born in Vilna and was "active" in Germany during
the Revolution
period of 1918/19, sat here in jail, then went to Moscow
and was finally
"taken care of" by Kagan and Finkelstein in the well-
known trial in
February 1937.
His alias is
Karl Radek or, for short, K. Radek = Kradek, in German
"der
Klauer" [from the noun die Klaue, claw], which means "the thief."
Sobelsohn
obviously treated himself to this Yiddish "K-lauer" after he
had been pulled
in after stealing a coat in Leipzig. A typically Jewish
reaction to
typically Jewish behavior. The already mentioned Sinovyev-
Apfelbaum and
Kamenev-Rosenfeld offer another example.
The same is
true of the "great revolutionary" Bronstein-Trotsky, who
was even able
to play the role of a bold War Commissar of the Red
Army for a
time, and indeed so aptly that even today many
unsuspecting
Europeans are convinced that he understands something
of courage and
the art of war. Bronstein as field marshal -- truly a
zenith of
Jewish misrepresentation and imposture, which not even
Stra�Ÿnoff was
able to achieve.
[76] The examples of such Jewish name changes are
numberless:
Goldstein, with
the assumed name Volodsky; Goldendach alias
Ryasanov;
Nachamkes alias Sbeklov; Salkind with the alias
Semlyatshka;
Jehuda alias Yagoda, Brilliant alias Sokolnikov;
Gubelmann alias
Yaroslavsky; Mandelstamm alias Lyadov; Chaimov
alias
Lunatsharsky; Epstein alias Yakovlev; Löwenstein alias
Lapinsky, etc.,
etc. The same is of course true outside of Russia:
Mardochai =
Karl Marx; Wolfsohn = Lassalle; Helphand = Parvus;
Aaron Kohn =
Bela Kun; Salomon Cesmanievski = Kurt Eisner, etc.,
etc.
The Jew has no
being of his own, no name, no language. Therefore he
does not
"cheat" when he cheats, for deception is his natural and
normal
behavior. He is the embodiment of the Lie and the Unnatural.
The most
relevant characteristic of the Jew is inadvertently stated by
the Communist
central organ itself, the "Rundschau" [Review], when it
allows a
certain H. Walecki to make the following evaluation about
Radek-Sobelsohn:
Radek, the "type of the born traitor," is reminiscent
in his behavior
of "that beast in the work of Baudelaire that, like a
feverishly
glowing and lecherous woman sweating out a poison,
languorously
and cynically opens its womb filled with exudations. . ."
This
unappetizing description not only fits Sobelsohn-Radek, it fits
Jewry in
general.
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is not permitted. All rights
reserved.
T h e J e w a s
C r i m i n a l
Chapter V:
Swindlers and Racketeers
---------------------------------------------------
---------------
(page
77)
"Let yourself
step out of the lead, let yourself be thrown out of your
rooms, let
yourself be sued in court, let yourself sit in a doghouse, let
yourself be
whipped, let yourself be tortured half to death -- but you
must become
rich!(1) -- those
are the words of an Eastern Jew, whose
son is off for
the wide world. To suffer any torment, to take any pain
upon oneself,
to shy away from no effort, in order to get rich, for "my
honor is my
money.'"
As tightly
packed as ants in their hill are the Eastern European Jews in
their ghettos.
There are only a few craftsmen among them, nearly all
are dealers.
The most improbable professions are seen there -- such as
the Jew who
roves around the marketplace with a corkscrew, to uncork
the vodka
bottles for the peasants with it.
So numerous are
the Eastern Jews, that they get in one another's way.
To do business
among themselves means little profit, for each one
knows every
wrinkle in the tricks of the other and is just as crafty. But
if a non-Jew
appears from whom money can be made, those striving
after profit
fall upon him like a swarm of blowflies. With elbows
pushing into
one another and bickering fiercely over every penny, they
vegetate in the
ghetto but in their hearts burns a violent greed for
money, which
makes them capable of every act and any outrage.
Now, when one
of these Eastern Jews, adorned in the filthy kaftan and
with forelocks,
once leaves his ghetto, when he arrives in a country
where fidelity
and faith are not empty words, when one man does not
sniff at
another like a swindler, where the people are free and enjoy
equal rights --
then the Eastern Jew becomes a dangerous predator. For
him, who is
without the sense of right and wrong, who shrinks from no
trespassing of
the law, for whom the entire world appears to be only a
means for the
unfolding of his own ego, every path now stands open.
[78] But when he does find a locked door, he gets it open --
if possible,
with cunning,
but with force if need be. Our law is not his law, our
morality is not
his morality, deception and crime do not seem to him
dishonorable.
With time, the immigrant Jew also learns that one doesn't
have to
absolutely violate the law. It is enough to circumvent it or to
slip through
its meshes. The criminality of the foreigners -- for a
significant
segment of the "foreigners" continually residing in Germany
in reality
consists of immigrating Jews -- is very revealing. Let us
examine the
statistics of the crimes and offenses committed by
foreigners(1). From this
we discover that of 100 convicted foreigners,
70% --
therefore more than two-thirds -- are "Poles" and "Czechs," or,
in other words,
Polish or Czech and Galician Jews. If one takes the
number of
foreigners in general residing in Germany, one sees that, of
1000 residing
foreigners, the number of convicted are:
Lithuanians........................29.8
Rumanians..........................25.4
Poles..............................21.8
Czechs.............................17.7
Those are the
nations which send us their Jews. On the other hand,
however:
Sweden.............................7.3
Denmark............................5.0
Switzerland........................4.6
Netherlands........................3.3
Those are the
nations from which we do not get any Jews. . .These
numbers speak
for themselves.
As an example
of the "career" of an Eastern Jew, let us here relate the
history of the
racketeer U., whom the author personally knew. It isn't
the story of
one of the major Jewish racketeers, who claim the attention
of the
newspapers, the courts and the public, but rather the tale of a
completely
average and typical Eastern Jew, one of the parasites who
immigrated
after 1918 and were naturalized by the "German Republic"
during that
period.
In the Spring
of 1923, U., a middling tall, typically Jewish-looking man
with
reddish-blonde hair and colorless blue eyes, arrived in Germany.
How he slipped
over the border is his secret, but in any event he
arrived without
a visa. What he brought along with him [79]
was not
only his
spotted and dirty suit, his torn shoes with their uneven heels --
but also his
untamed desire for material success, his lack of scruples,
and his
"knowledge of languages." He could yammer away in a
Yiddish accent
in Polish and German -- almost like the red-bearded
Social Democrat
Charles Rappaport, who was famous not just for his
aversion to any
sort of bathing, but also for the fact that he could speak
ten languages
with a strikingly Jewish accent. What occupation a Jew
takes up is
purely incidental, for it is never matter of what he should
do, but rather
a matter of how much money he can make. One will
become a
politician, another a dentist or inn-keeper, but most remain
dealers. U.,
also, was faithful to the tradition of his forebears, and he
conducted his
numerous obscure and, at first, his still not very
profitable
businesses in the Scheunen Quarter of Berlin, that first
station for all
newly-arriving Eastern Jews. Yet he had higher
aspirations,
"society" attracted him, the society of the currency
exchange
vultures, who at that time were gathering in inflationary
Germany in
thick swarms.
The world city
lay open before U., here he wanted to create his good
fortune. His
good fortune -- what did that mean to him?
To visit fine
clubs, where waiters in black tie toadied to a clientele of
racketeers,
where the noise of a nigger band, cigar smoke, a din of
voices, perfume
and the smell of sweat provided the proper background
for the throng
of cramped dancing couples. To sit at the gaming table,
to attend the
races, to wear elegant clothes and to have an expensive
barber give his
Eastern Jewish head as European look as possible. No
longer to be
known as "the crook," but rather to be called "the rich
merchant
Alexander U." [To indulge his small] illnesses by frequently
treating
himself to the best physicians. To drive to winter sports or the
lake and to
marvel at the goyim who actually panted up the mountains
or entered the
cold water. To have much money, and still more money,
to do
profitable business and to watch how his rivals burst with envy.
In later years,
to go to Marienbad for the cure, to be chosen for the
board of
directors of the synagogue, to possess a villa in Dahlem. But
each and every
time -- women! Obliging, rayon-and-peroxided
beauties, who
tolerate everything with a smile and who are ready for
anything, with
whom one can show off, who do not show their disgust,
whom one can
use at will, and to whom one owes no responsibility --
women whom one
can own and pay for.
These were the
ideals which U. wanted to realize. More and more often
he let himself
be seen in the cafés and nightclubs of Western Berlin,
whose sham
glamour, whose atmosphere of greasy dealings [80]
and of
lechery
irresistibly attracted him. In such a club, one of the better
Kaschemmen,
his fate was decided -- he got to know Grete S. She was
a secretary and
bookkeeper at some firm or other. She performed her
work after a
fashion, she gave no particular cause for complaint -- a
thoroughly
average Jewish office girl. She lived with her mother in
Charlottenburg,
in a small three-room flat, in the morning she packed
up her
sandwich, like thousands of other women in Berlin, but on
Sunday evening
she went into the café.
There the two
found each other. From the acquaintanceship there soon
developed an
intimate friendship, for they complemented one another
in the best
way: Grete had money at her disposal, but U. knew how one
can most
profitably use money.
This was the
time when the Mark sank into the abyss, when more and
more zeros
appeared on the bank notes and all those who were cautious
racked their
brains over what would come after the millions and
billions. The
exchange rate of the Dollar, the single valid standard of
all material
and spiritual value, varied from hour to hour, the Mark
could lose from
five to ten, even twenty per cent of its value in the
period from one
afternoon to the next morning. Whoever knew how to
cleverly make
use of this, could double his money within a week, and
during a month
could multiply it twenty times over. One needed only
to know what,
when and where to buy or to sell. In this art of the
business of
illusion, of the swindle, of speculation and deceit, U. was a
master. He was
able to prove this when S. placed money at his
disposal: she
enjoyed the full trust of her boss, she always kept the key
to the cashbox
and she was the last to leave the office. U. was already
waiting for her
at the door, he took the cash -- all of it, to the last
million-Mark
bill. By eight in the morning the money had to be back in
the cashbox,
else S. would be unmasked as a thief. But there were
fifteen hours
until eight o'clock, U. knew how to exploit them for the
greatest profit
for himself and for his financial backer, accomplice and
lover.
This game
lasted for weeks and then months. During the day, S. was
the dutiful
employee, but evenings and nights the couple spent in the
clubs and dives
which grew like toadstools on the manure of inflation.
There was not
only drinking and dancing there, no, the essential thing
was the
"business" -- cars loaded down with all sorts of goods, import
and export
licenses, commission [money] for procuring an apartment,
hush-money for
accessories. An apartment building for a hundred
Dollars, girls,
stocks, enterprises, false passports [81]
and genuine
residency
permits, any articles of real value, cocaine -- and above all
currency -- was
bought, sold, and resold. This was the murky water in
which U.
sported and fished. And did so with great success. Larger and
larger became
the pile of Dollar notes put aside as future capital. The
couple did not
have the remotest intention of speculating further with
the money
"earned" in this fashion -- for already foreign money from
the foreign
cashbox had to be paid for.
The Dollar
notes put aside increased in a downright delightful fashion.
And yet S.
cried many a night: since her companion had gotten money
in his hands,
he had become the perfect gentleman, whom only his
Jewish accent
distinguished from his racial comrades who populated
the
Kurfürstendamm.
He had learned
the art of bathing himself, strictly followed every "law
of fashion" --
and too often for Grete's taste, let himself be persuaded to
gamble.
Meanwhile, his luck at cards stayed good -- or perhaps he
knew how to
help it along? But one thing more than anything else: U.
was seeing
women on the side. Grete's fat hips and her greasy hair
were not very
tempting, and there were so many appetizing women,
who could be
bought for good Dollar bills. . .
Thus U. was
making progress along the route he had set for himself.
The experts of
the law may look for legal definitions for what this fine
couple were
doing -- at its most basic level, it was embezzlement and
fraud.
It is
characteristic of Jewish methods -- and that is what this narrative is
about -- that
in the event S. would have been caught, she would have
had to expect
only a slight punishment, for her boss had suffered no
material harm.
As concerns U., under the circumstances he was able to
get off with no
punishment at all, for by his craftiness and cunning he
would have
found means to prove that he had suspected nothing at all
of the unlawful
dealings of his "bride." The Jew is a master at finding
sufficiently
wide loopholes in the law, and with his money he can
furnish himself
with the best lawyers. . .
The further
history of the pair is quickly told. When the inflation
suddenly came
to an end, that was also the end of the currency luck,
and most of the
newly rich and profiteers disappeared together with the
many zeros on
the bank notes. But not in the case of U. He had been
clever enough
to collect only Dollars, and he proved to be the
possessor of
"an amount of capital which, while not large, was
sufficient" for
becoming a solid "merchant," [82] to marry
his bride, to
procure an
apartment on the Kaiserdamm and to become a member of
"society."
Years went by,
during which there was nothing in particular heard of
U. When
National Socialism triumphed in Germany, U. left this now
inhospitable
country and moved to the strongly democratic country of
Switzerland. In
December 1935, he was arrested under charges of
offering for
sale counterfeit bills to the Paris Soviet Trade delegation.
Why shouldn't
that which was fair for the brother of His Excellency
Litvinov, also
be proper for U.?
That is the
tale of a small Jewish racketeer and swindler, not that of a
Barmat,
Kutisker, Michael or Goldschmidt, rather that of an average
Jew, who led
the life of a parasite and swindler using dubious means,
but always
unclean and dishonorable.
The device of
the Jew reads: Exploit the economic situation! Be it
business or
politics, or best of all both at once. The Jewish racketeer
Rosenfeld
furnishes a brief but excellent example of this, which we
take
verbatim from the large French newspaper Le Matin(1):
"The
Linder-Rosenfeld affair is gradually becoming clearer. Both of
he main figures
are emerging more and more plainly.
Michael
Rosenfeld, born on 9 May 1903 in Smolensk, Russia, was the
son of a
physician in Moscow, who was forced by the Revolution to
emigrate. The
young Rosenfeld was smart, venturesome, educated and
very ambitious
and seemed to have but one goal before him: to make a
profit! This
desire misled him into not always employing the necessary
care in the
choice of his means. Some difficulties and an incident
involving
post-dated checks on 21 January 1936 earned him expulsion
from the
country. He went to Zürich for a time without, however,
breaking off
his profitable enterprises. Everything was going quite well
enough for him,
and we find him at numerous transactions in which he
personally
regularly secured for himself a good share. Although his
family had to
suffer under the Bolshevists, he had no reservations at all
about stepping
in for the Soviets in more than one supply transaction.
Apparently the
weapons trade was a preferred area of work, without,
however, his
having to absolutely transgress the law in his
dealings.
[83] Without a doubt, Rosenfeld again returned to France
using illegal
means, and
found opportunity through the events in Spain for a very
profitable
involvement. As middleman between the Iberian customers
and those
supplying weapons, he devised numerous combinations to
get around the
difficulties in exporting [them]. One of the simplest is to
arrange for
fictitious orders into other states. In this manner, the crates
of weapons sail
toward Mexico, in order to go no farther than Spain.
Rosenfeld was
involved in international dealings and thought of further
extending them
and eliminating his competitors. Thus he was very
interested in
documents which passed through individual
administrative
offices of the Quai d'Orsay. His secretary, Mlle. Linder,
was the tool at
hand for obtaining information.
Incidentally,
the dossier which existed on him at the Quai d'Orsay was
somewhat
unpleasant for him, first of all because from [reading] it he
was afraid of
disruption of his business, and second of all because he
had the
intention, it was asserted, of requesting naturalization.
If the desire
of making money explains the entire life history of
Michael
Rosenfeld, so this appears to also be true of the leitmotif for
the dealings of
Suzanne Linder.
Accustomed to
luxury for years and unable to forswear it, as merely a
modest employee
she could not refuse her boss anything. She procured
information,
she falsified the dossier but seems not to have dealt in real
espionage. In
any case, one cannot designate the pilferage and the
damage, though
serious, done to the secret service in the interests of
financial
transactions of an individual, as espionage.
For more than a
year, those in the office of the Quai d'Orsay had taken
note of the
behavior of Linder, whose poorly concealed curiosity
justified every
suspicion.
A few weeks
before, the Security Police had been consulted. By means
of a piece of
carbon paper, they got on the trail of a forgery; it was a
matter of
laudatory information about Rosenfeld which was created out
of thin air and
signed with the forged signature of a high official who
had since
died.
At the same
time, probably a few documents disadvantageous to
Rosenfeld
vanished from the dossier.
The
interrogation which M. Fougerit, the director of Department II of
the Security
Police, conducted on Sunday evening with Fräulein
Linder,
stretched [84] throughout the entire day.
At first she denied
having
committed a forgery. Strangely, she was brought to confess
more easily
that she had betrayed to her friend Rosenfeld confidential
communications,
which she had picked up here and there in the
administrative
offices.
Finally, at
the pressing questioning by the police, she confessed
everything.
M. de Moissac,
the examining magistrate, brought two bills of
indictment: 1.
Examination of Mlle. Linder and comrades for forgery;
2. Charges due
to offenses against an order of expulsion and the use of
a false
passport by Rosenfeld (only that! -- The author.).
Both accused
were brought before the examining magistrate in charge,
and after
that, on the past Wednesday, arrested.
M. de Moissac
begins the first hearing this afternoon. In the presence
of the
accused, the sealed documents which had been confiscated at the
house searches
are opened.
Yesterday
afternoon, in the office of Herr Emile Joly, 4 Avenue
Carnot, we
were able to meet one of Rosenfeld's colleagues, Herr
Cabarocas, who
had participated in the Spanish enterprise:
'I am a
Spaniard,' declared the latter right at the start,'but I am neither
directly nor
indirectly an agent of the Frente Popular in France. At any
rate, since
five or six years ago already, I've had connections with
several
political journalists of my country. . . I was even on the
managing board
of a paper there -- then I still had money to lose!
But since my
resettlement in France, two-and-a-half years ago, I've
given up any
political activity. I am married to a Frenchwoman and
have been a
colleague of Rosenfeld's for seven or eight months: that
proves that
our relationship began before the Franco revolt.'"
Swindling is
the typical Jewish crime. As cautious a scholar and a man
as reserved in
his judgements as Sauer(1)
expresses himself in the
following way
on this question: "Many swindling specialties are
excellently
suited for the Jewish race. . .In addition, there are their own
abilities and
capacities, which likewise favor deceit: [85]
a sense of
acquisitiveness,
the drive toward being active, delight in participating
in lively
dealings, speaking talents, boastfulness, the power of
suggestion,
the ability to misrepresent oneself and to lead others astray,
slight
affection for the truth, the capacity for adaptation, for empathy,
and for
transforming themselves, quick-wittedness, adroitness in
exploiting the
moment, especially in terms of the weaknesses of others,
disinclination
toward open, dangerous acts of their own. Thus we find
all types of
fraud realized in the Jews."
The kinds and
the forms of fraud are thus numerous and manifold, the
Jew
understands so well how to use every appearance, every event,
every fact for
his own purposes, that an exhaustive description of
"fraud" is
hardly possible. Let only the most important types of crime
be indicated
here:
Fraud in
contracts dealing with trade, work, services, labor, renting,
leasing, and
loans. Swindling with precious gems, the sale of worthless
goods, the
Einspongeschäft [The closest English slang equivalent to
this is the
term 'con game.'].
Fraud at
businesses with securities, stocks, dividends, currency, checks,
savings
account books, mortgage bonds, pawn tickets; fraud with bail,
foundations,
balance sheets and insurance fraud. Bookmaking
swindles.
Fraud in employment, apartment rental, marriage, titles and
military
decorations agencies. Fraud in the use of public transport, as
well as at the
attending of theatrical events and at celebrations. Hotel
fraud,
skipping out on restaurant bills, swindles in lodgings. Con
games. Fraud
in rarities and antiques. Phony officials, commercial or
industrial
employees. Nonsense cures of all kinds, hypnosis, alleged
medicines.
Fortune-telling, magic, card-reading. Marriage swindles,
marriages
obtained by trickery, bigamy, adoption swindles and
marriage-for-name.
Those are some
-- by no means all -- of the types of fraud which enjoy
special favor
with the Jews.
Fraud is often
tied together with another crime -- document forgery,
counterfeiting,
card sharping, embezzlement, theft, extortion, abortion,
arson,
bankruptcy dellict, perjury, slander, etc.
If theft was
formerly the most widespread crime, in recent years it has
become
otherwise, and in first place now stands fraud(1). Fraud is the
most universal
Jewish crime, it is the form of Jewish existence in
general,
whether it is a "business" or is "politics," it is all the
same.
[86] Let's take a look at the practice of the Jews in the
Soviet Union. It
is an easy
matter to demonstrate that the entire "political economy" of
the Soviet
Union represents nothing other than the systematic looting
of a people
whose population is 200 million strong. There, the Jew is in
possession of
a total monopoly. He is the sole employer, for everything
is
"nationalized" and he owns the state. For the working man in the
Soviet Union,
there is no deliverance from the Jew. He is in possession
of the entire
capital, movable and immovable. The credit system and
the banking
apparatus is in his hands, including the issuing of currency.
The Jew
dictates the wages of the worker and also decides the price of
all of the
necessities of life, of food, clothing and shelter. All economic
and police
instruments are at his disposal, in order to complete the
enslavement of
the people. Wages at a level for bare survival on the
one hand, and
fantastically high prices for goods on the other hand,
methods of
incitement, standards of coercion, etc., give the Jew the
possibility of
turning usury and defrauding into the "legal" standards of
the state.
That toward which the Jewish criminal strives using fraud
and forgery,
"political" Jewry has perfectly achieved in the Soviet
Union. There
is no essential difference between the Jewish usurer in
New York and
the Jewish President of the State Bank in Leningrad,
between the
Jewish garment manufacturer in London and the Red
director in
Moscow. What the Jewish crooks do on a small scale, the
Jewish
"politicians" in Moscow do on a grand scale: credit swindles,
imposture,
counterfeiting, looting, theft and robbery. What is the Soviet
"loan-politics,"
other than a large but downright fraud? The workers
and peasants
are forced to subscribe to the loans, which are completely
devalued
within the next year. The Soviet-Jewish issuing bank kept
printing new
paper millions and forced the population to part with
things of
value and to perform services and paid them with it. The
money melts
away and loses value in the hands of the exploited. Small
wonder that
this clever Soviet- Jewish system finally leads to the death
by famine of
many millions of people.
If they can
afford it, countries outside Russia will also be drawn into
these kinds of
fraudulent manipulations. The history of the so-called
foreign
concessions in the USSR, which ended together with the
collapse and
"take-over" of the foreign capital by the Soviet Jews, is
one proof of
this, as is the continued counterfeiting by the Soviet trade
delegations
outside the USSR. That here the maneuvers of the fraud
adopt a
"state" form, merely corresponds to the large scale of these
Jewish
enterprises. A state which just represents a cloak for [87]
Jewish
criminality in the economic sphere and politics, should hardly
be permitted
to still have any entitlement to be recognized as a state(1).
It is
established that: fraud in this or that form is the specific manner of
conduct of the
Jew. This is demonstrable not only generally, but also in
an infinite
portion of individual cases. Some examples may suffice.
First of all,
an example from the Soviet Union itself, where the little
Jews as well
as the big Jews want to "live," taken verbatim from the
Yiddish paper
Hajnt, on 15 February 1937, Warsaw:
"An
antiquarian has swindled the Soviet antiquarian warehouse.
In Moscow a
trial is underway against the antiquarian Borenstein there,
who is charged
with swindling Soviet Socialist property.
Borenstein was
accustomed to buy various articles in the state
antiquarian
warehouse; sometimes he was seen crawling about in the
papers which
the administrators and warehouses threw out as waste
paper of no
use.
The increased
expenditures by Borenstein aroused suspicion. He was
arrested and
an audit was made at a search of his apartment. It has
turned out
that Borenstein picked out important historical documents
among the
papers thrown out; in his apartment, for example, were
found original
letters from Catherine II, Nicolas I, etc. Moreover, he
was accustomed
to buy things in the state antiquarian warehouse on
which the
sellers had put too low a price, far lower than their practical
value, due to
their inexperience and scant education. Borenstein has
managed to
assemble a valuable collection from all these things.
According to
the Izvestia, the collection numbers more than 1200
pieces. Just
the plates of old Sèvres porcelain.
Borenstein is
facing a death sentence."
Poor
Borenstein, he "faces a death sentence"; he didn't have as much
luck as
Finkelstein.
One of the
most favored fraudulent maneuvers of the Jewish merchants
is bankruptcy.
Only rarely is the fraudulent intent proven, but almost
always it is
there: the Jew is such a cunning businessman, the circle of
relatives and
acquaintances [88] from which he can count
on assistance
is nearly so
large that in most cases he can obstruct the opening of a
rival concern,
if it is really important to him.
For a non-Jew,
bankruptcy is a catastrophe, a difficult trial from which
many a man
cannot recover for the rest of his life. On the other hand,
the "business
failure" for a Jew is an everyday and insignificant event --
more than
that, bankruptcy is used by preference in order to "sich
gesund zu
machen" ["restore one's health"] as the vulgar expression has
it. Pyrrhus
was ruined by his victory, but for the Jew as many defeats
as possible,
in the form of bankruptcies, are the surest road to
affluence.
Levy says to
Cohen: "Cohen, you're messhuge [crazy]! You're selling
your goods for
less than the purchase price and you'll be ruined!" To
which Cohen
calmly replies: "No problem, the sales will fix it!"
That's not
just a joke, but it's also a hint at the "technique" of the
bankruptcy. To
give a rough outline, a "rehabilitating" bankruptcy is
begun as
follows:
Cohen
establishes a business selling men's coats, his "capital" is
scarcely able
to cover the first month's rent for the store. Since he
(naturally)
has at his disposal acquaintances, recommendations and
references,
he's able to buy, let's say, 1000 coats for 50 RM a piece on
credit. He
sells them for 40 RM each, therefore at a bargain-basement
price which
must result in his losing 10 RM on each piece. His
business
flourishes, for such cheap prices are unheard of, but he does
not pay his
creditors one penny, so that in a short time he goes
bankrupt. He's
sold 500 coats, therefore taken in 20,000 RM, but this
money vanishes
without a trace. His honorable wife helps him with
that, or
earlier liabilities punctually surface which are unconditional
and must be
paid immediately, or he claims that he's been swindled by
a villainous
person -- or something along those lines -- and there's
nothing left
of the 20,000 RM. The only things of tangible value are the
500 still
unsold coats. They're publicly auctioned off and Cohen
secretly buys
up the remnant through a middleman, a relative or good
friend from
the Underworld, for perhaps half the price, for 12,000 RM.
This money
goes to the creditors, who thereby are losing 75% of what
is owed them.
But Cohen is rubbing his hands together. For his actual
final balance
looks like this: he has put out in cash only 12,500 RM. In
Cohen's
pocket, therefore, 7500 RM in cash remains, and besides this
he's the owner
of 500 coats, which with no trouble [89]
he can sell for
at least
20,000 RM. That's what is called a healthy bankruptcy! Under
the
circumstances, it can "pay" to even accept a punishment, if the
fraud can be
proven, since the dishonestly acquired money is so well
shifted
[currently, we would say "laundered"], that it remains protected
from seizure
by the authorities or by those injured.
The most
difficult thing for the swindler is the procurement of the
necessary
credit which makes possible for him the purchase of larger
lots of goods.
When an entire gang is operating, dummy firms, so-
called
"Sto�Ÿfirmen," are established in different parts of the city or
outside it,
which naturally have the best references, which pacify the
most
suspicious suppliers and infuse them with trust. How this is done
is illustrated
by the example of the Jew Moses Kamermann, convicted
in Berlin on
15 February 1936. He had teamed up with a Romanian
Jew living in
Bucharest, M. Lupu, who had established a firm there,
"M. Lupu &
Co." This swindle-enterprize now ordered all sorts of
goods from
various industrial and export companies in Germany. For
every order,
Kamermann was always given as a reference. If any of the
firms inquired
of him, he always hurried to furnish the best testimonial
of all for his
Bucharest accomplice: "The firm Lupu & Co. has a line of
credit of
40,000 RM." Not a few German firms fell victim to the
swindlers.
If the
swindler is thrown back on his own resources, and if he has some
money at his
disposal, he at first puts in small orders with the supply
firms and pays
them immediately in cash. When he sees that they are
ready to trust
him, he then puts in a large order which shall serve as his
coup.
As "security," forged certificates of deposit for securities, bills,
mortgage
bonds, etc., can be used.
A counterpart
to this "credit swindle" are the frauds dealing with the
giving of
credit. In every newspaper, especially in the Sunday issues,
one finds
notices in which money is offered. A Berliner who has tried
to get money
in this manner reports the following concerning his
experiences
with this.
"I had been
sick for a long time and got into financial difficulty. I
urgently
needed 500 RM, but didn't want to ask my acquaintances for a
loan, but
rather decided to try my luck with one of the 'financiers' who
advertise in
the papers. A few weeks before, I had [90]
furnished a
three-room
apartment for myself and had paid over 3000 RM for the
furniture
then. Now I wanted to raise money on the furniture.
Of the three
addresses which I had picked out of the newspaper for
myself, the
first was the most promising: there was wording about
financing
within three days, accommodating, low fees and so on. When
I showed up, a
flaxen-haired young man received me. At first I was
delighted not
to have to deal with a Jew, but soon I had to notice that I
was dealing
with a straw man, who knew nothing and whose only job
was: to get a
fee of 15 RM 'for investigation' from those seeking credit.
It was an
obvious swindle, and I wished the young man good day and a
more
respectable line of work.
My second
choice likewise led me to a young man, this time a brunette,
badly shaved
and who spoke with a definite Jewish accent. He
apparently
lived there as a sub-tenant, since the bed of the alleged
financier was
also in the small, disorderly room. Here, too, 15 RM was
demanded of me
at the start, whereupon I took my leave.
In both of
these cases it was clear that the goal was simply the 'fee for
investigation.' The
third one I visited, however, was entirely more
cunning, and I
quickly fell for it. Although he had a hooked nose and a
Jewish name,
he seemed otherwise trustworthy enough: good manners,
of a mature
age, impeccable German, a well-arranged office, two
telephones on
the desk. He, too, asked for a registration fee, but only of
6 RM. As I had
resolved firmly in advance to refuse to pay, even if
only a penny,
he explained to me in a long speech for what pressing
reasons he had
to ask the 6 RM from me, and proved to me that it
would be an
unforgivable foolishness on my part not to give him the 6
RM. I let
myself be persuaded. . . After this what happened was. .
.nothing. When
I became impatient and called at the 'financier's' several
times, he
promised me to expedite the matter, at which point it turned
out that the
actual lender was another person.
After some
days, a neat but somewhat arrogant young man appeared at
my place --
this was the 'investigator.' He comfortably smoked my
cigars, stuck
the list of my furniture in his pocket without showing any
particular
interest, grumbled about the weather and the hard times, and
presented me
with a receipt for 3 RM 'for investigation.' Before I was
able to
properly understand the whole thing, [91]
my 3 RM had
actually made
their way into his pocket.
Again, weeks
passed; I wrote, telephoned, and then received a
questionnaire
with -- if I'm not mistaken -- 47 different questions, to
each of which
an exhaustive answer was expected. Then, again
nothing. Two
months had gone by and not the least thing had
happened. I
was happy when I was able to find another way out to
getting my
affairs in order."
The matter
came off still not too seriously for the man who tells this,
since
apparently not too much was able to be gotten from him. Under
certain
circumstances, however, rather large amounts are pried out
from others,
since repeatedly "new difficulties have arisen" from which
one can escape
only with the aid of advances. . .
One may ask
why the "financiers" are content with coaxing out
advances and
down payments, instead of really lending money out and
getting
interest. The answer is simple: only in the rarest cases do these
"lenders" have
actual money -- even if they wanted to, they would not
be able to
give a loan. Certainly there are such cases, in which one can
get a loan.
But they are unusual, three-fold and always tangible security
is demanded,
and usurious interest must be paid. But in general, the
entire
"credit"-giving is a swindle, which is based upon the exploitation
of small
amounts.
Popular and
profitable are the Einspongeschäfte[The slang noun, die
Einspongeschäft
probably comes from the verb einspinnen = to lock in,
to reel in],
businesses in which the victim, called, in the
Gaunersprache
[crooks' jargon], the "Freier" [literally, "free man" or
"citizen"; an
American equivalent might be "mark," which will be used
here, although
in the U.S., those operating outside the law often refer to
the naive
non-criminal with some contempt as a "citizen" and the
police often
refer to him, with equal contempt, as a "civilian"] or
"Molle (1), is first lulled into
a sense of security and infused with trust.
He is first
"reeled in" and then the coup follows. Criminal
Commissioner
Possehl(2) tells the
following typical story:
A certain B.
had acted as broker for a "mark" in various completely
legitimate
businesses, which were not unprofitable, so that the "mark"
firmly trusted
the "broker." One day the "broker" appeared again and
told him this:
"I have bought a lot of circular saws for export for 40,000
Marks. The
goods are at the shipping agent's, but I myself have only
6000 Marks
that I can tie up in this business. I've already found a buyer
in London
who'll pay me 44,000 Marks for it. If you want to participate
in this [by
coming up] with the missing 34,000 Marks, I'm ready to
share the
profits with you."
[92] The prospect of making 2000 Marks without any effort
does not
fail to make
an impression upon the "mark." But, as a cautious man, he
demands that
the buyer in London furnish him with a document in
which he
states that he has seen the goods and is satisfied with their
condition.
Moreover, a letter of credit is supposed to be deposited at a
major bank.
Everything is arranged to the satisfaction of the "mark,"
and the buyer
in London only makes one condition, that the goods be
shipped at the
latest at a date given by himself. The time period is
sufficiently
long and the "mark" hasn't the slightest reservations [about
the
deal].
At the
shipping agent's, he deposits the 34,000 Marks, the goods are
loaded and
transported to the harbor in time. After some time, the
unsuspecting
"mark" drives to the harbor city in order to receive the
purchase
price, but dreadful news awaits him there: the gentleman from
London writes
that he is reneging on the contract, since the goods have
not been
shipped by the agreed-upon date. The "mark" is dumbstruck --
how is this
possible? But the "broker" seems to be the most aggrieved,
he is bereft
of his profits. Meanwhile, it turns out that the Englishman
is actually in
the right, because the goods arrived in the harbor city late
for some
reason or other. . .
Meanwhile, a
new letter arrives from England, and the "buyer" informs
them that
perhaps, in time, he might be in a position to buy the goods.
The "broker"
then persuades the "mark" to send the goods to England
on the basis
of cash-on-delivery.
With that, the
fraud is complete. The 34,000 Marks are split between
the "broker"
and the "buyer," the goods are naturally not redeemed and
several weeks
later are put up for auction by customs. The proceeds
amount to a
few hundred Marks, for the goods have proven to be
totally
worthless.
The essence of
this kind of fraud consists in making the "mark" so
trusting by
means of earlier common and successful deals, that this
time he
neglects to verify whether the goods whose purchase he is
financing
really possess the value which the "broker" has said they do.
The "mark" has
lost his money. To recover it by legal action is
completely
hopeless. The "Englishman," in actuality one of the
swindlers, can
not legally be sued since the contract has not been
adhered to. As
a last possibility there remains suing the "broker." He,
however, is
long gone. Finding him proves impossible. The address of
his "firm"
turns out to be a boarding house, he has not left his new
address, and
his personal data appear to have been forged.
[93] And thus the "mark" is the richer by one life
experience, but both
swindlers by a
very nice sum. Do we still need to attest that there are
no greater
masters of the Einspongeschäft than the Jews?
The work of a
counterfeiter isn't easy, since a good copy of coins and
modern bank
notes is extraordinarily difficult, time-consuming and
expensive, the
risk with it is very great, the punishment is high and the
criminalists
know of hardly one case of counterfeiting which has not
been
discovered. And yet men are repeatedly found who take on the
work as well
as the risk, so much are they possessed by the passion for
money. For a
Jew, for whom money, money as a means to power and
as an end in
itself, appears to be the thing most worth acquiring on
earth, the
thought of creating money with his own hands has something
irresistibly
seductive about it. One meets many Jews among
counterfeiters. As
an example, let the story of Colonel Salaban be
related:
Salaban was an
extraordinarily multi-facetted, able and clever man,
born in
Czernowitz. His criminal instincts already showed themselves
in early youth
and he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment for
burglary. It
is an old tradition of the Eastern Jew to leave home and
head for
Vienna or Berlin when things get too hot for him at home.
Salaban, too,
followed this tradition after serving his sentence. He
surfaced in
Germany as -- an actor. His acting wasn't bad but it earned
him too
little, for he already had all kinds of expensive habits at that
time.
He left the
stage and became a businessman. At first, he struggled as a
bookkeeper,
but proved to be so capable that he was promoted to an
authorized
signatory. Then he ventured to make the great jump: he
became
independent. But still more than that -- on his own authority he
gave himself
an academic degree. As Doctor of Jurisprudence C.
Salaban, he
ran a sales business for chemical articles. Burglar, actor,
businessman --
Salban could do still more. He dedicated his free time
to amateur
craftsmanship, in which he showed outstanding dexterity,
and to legal
studies. He conducted them with the greatest zeal, he
listened to
scientific lectures and also acquired a fair amount of
knowledge, so
that he was even able to become a member of the
International
Law Association and the publisher of a handbook on
international
law.
[94] Salaban had every reason to be satisfied with life; he
was to some
extent
well-known and respected, he lived in a villa in Lichterfeld, and
he led the
peaceful life of the private scholar. In actuality, he was
running a
counterfeiting operation. What drove him to become a
counterfeiter?
In court, he claimed that his income had become so
small and he'd
been on the verge of ruin. Now, such an inventive and
able mind, a
man with so many different areas of knowledge and
relationships,
would have been able to find means other than criminal
ones to rescue
himself. No, it was the irresistible greed for money, the
triumphant
feeling: "I myself am the source of the money, I myself am
the creator of
the most powerful [men] in the world," which drove him
to
crime.
In 1919 the
fifty-year-old began to produce counterfeit two-Mark
pieces. The
execution was very good, the false pieces contained exactly
as much silver
as the genuine ones and were not differentiable by their
ringing sound.
In order to get possession of the corresponding alloy,
Salaban used
the relationships which he had made in his time as a
businessman:
at a chemical manufacturer's, he ordered thin silver
sheets which
contained fifty percent silver, exactly like the genuine
coins. In
accordance with this, Salaban had it established in court that
he had neither
injured nor deceived those persons who came into
possession of
his coins. He bought 29,000 Marks worth of these silver
plates in the
course of the year!
He produced
the coins in the cellar of his villa. The servants only
stayed in the
house during the daytime, so that Salaban could not be
disturbed by
them at night. In the cellar, there was a large shelf with
books, behind
which was, however -- as in a crime novel -- a secret
door, which
led to an extremely well-equipped workroom. As was
fitting for
the owner of a villa, Salaban owned his own automobile. In
the hours
before noon he drove, usually accompanied by his wife, into
the
neighborhood of one of the numerous weekly markets. Shabbily
dressed, the
two walked along the stalls with shopping bags and bought
various small
items, mostly soup greens for five Pfennige and paid
each time with
a two-Mark piece. In the course of three years, Salaban
had put over
40,000 counterfeit coins into circulation, more than
40,000 times
did injury to the sellers. As cautiously as Salaban went to
work, he
nonetheless made himself suspicious: he was arrested on 13
January 1932
on the Rudolf-Wilde-Platz in Schöneberg, in front of the
Rathaus
[city hall], when he was about to get into his car with a bag
full of
vegetables.
[95] It is claimed of professional criminals, that they
never change their
specialty and
always commit the same type of crime: the safecracker
will not
practice pickpocketing, the cat burglar will not become a
package thief,
and the bell- ringer [for 'charity'] will not try his hand at
cardsharping.
However, one cannot say this of the Jewish criminal. On
the contrary,
they amaze one by their versatility. The forty-six- year-
old Jew Leo
Veit, who was convicted in Berlin on 12 February 1936,
might serve as
an example of this.
Veit is a
trickster, a marriage swindler and imposter. At "work" he
always appears
adorned with a band of military decorations, on which
a good dozen
different medals hang -- his bravery and his merit have
supposedly
yielded these honors. In reality, during the war Veit had
made
successful efforts to stay as far as possible from the shooting, and
all of his
"medals" were commemorative or memorial coins which he
bought.
Nevertheless, these decorations do not fail to have an effect,
especially
upon women, who are impressed by his sure and self-
confident
bearing. The array of tricks used by Veit to deceive his
victims is
astonishing. At one time it was sure-fire racing tips, which
promised to
bring in a small fortune, another time he lured the watches
[from his
victims] "in order to give them settings of gemstones." He
also
successfully tried his hand at marriage swindles and knew how to
remove rings,
furs or less significant amounts of cash from his
unsuspecting
"brides." Sometimes he assumed the mask of an honest
businessman,
and took jewelry and objects of value in order to show
them to "high
paying interested persons," at the sale of which he
promised to
take for himself only a modest commission (naturally,
every time he
disappeared, never to be seen again). In all, Veit was
convicted
fifteen times. In March 1935 he had served his last sentence,
and hardly
having been released, he found a new, gullible victim, again
a woman.
Tricked out in his military decorations, he introduced
himself as a
"writer and representative of the press." In apparent
contradiction
to this profession were his hands, which in prison had
become rough
and coarse. Veit was not at a loss for an explanation: he
had just
returned from the theater of war in Ethiopia, where he had had
to do hard
labor. His bad luck that times had changed in a fundamental
way; he will
probably hardly find opportunity again to spin the story of
his "heroic
deeds" to gullible and unsuspecting women.
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is not permitted. All rights
reserved.
T h e J e w a
s C r i m i n a l
Chapter VI:
Gambling Cheats
---------------------------------------------------
---------------
(page
96)
A few years
ago, one could observe the following scene everywhere
where many
people were passing by. A man appears, sits down on a
bench or even
in the grass, takes cards out of his pocket and proposes a
game to the
passersby. Soon one of them stays there, that's the
assistant, the
Schlepper [= the tower, dragger; i.e., the one who pulls in
the "marks"]
-- and wins, wins so persistently that people gather
around. So
there is now a whole group, most of them are onlookers, but
there is
always one who is the stupidest, the "Freier" ["mark"]. He
wants to play
too, his money makes its way into the pocket of the
"Zocker"
(the word comes from the Hebrew "tsochek" = cards). The
game is
"Kümmelblättchen" -- this term has nothing to do with
Kümmel
[i.e., caraway
seeds], it again comes from the Hebrew, from "cimmel,"
which means
"three"; it therefore means "Dreiblättchen" [i.e., "three
little
leaves/pages/cards"]. The Zocker and his Schlepper sit down
somewhere in
the open, preferably on a beautiful Sunday, when
strollers are
plentiful. Or the "mark" is lured into a pub, where he
comes upon the
players, etc. The different ways of enticing the victim
are manifold,
but their goal is always to bring the unsuspecting one to
the
Zocker. The game itself is described by H. v. Manteuffel, a
prominent
expert who directed the Gambling Section of the Berlin
Police
Praesidium for twenty years, in the following words (1). [The
game, as
described below, appears to be identical to a popular card
scam called
"three-card Monte." It is also quite similar in principle to
the "shell
game," in which a pea is placed under one of three nut pecan
or walnut
shells and the shells are interchanged several times by
moving them
around on a table top.]
"Three cards,
the so-called 'Besen' ['brooms' or 'whisks' or 'beaters'], are
shown to the
mark. Only one of these three has a picture on its other
side. The
con-man picks up the three cards so that he holds one card
with the
thumb, middle, and index fingers of his left hand, and holds
the two other
cards on top of each other with the same fingers of his
right hand,
all of the cards with the back side face upward. The picture,
i.e., the
winning card, as he declares to the mark, he holds in his right
hand on the
bottom, and he shows the mark exactly where he has
placed the
cards. Now, using flamboyant motions, right before the
mark's eyes,
the con-man throws down on the table one after the other,
first the
picture, then the single card held by the left [97] hand, and
finally the
card still remaining in the right hand with its back side face
upward. At
this point, the con-man asks the mark to pay attention to
where the
winning card stays and changes the position of the cards on
the table by
picking up the cards one by one. The point of this behavior
is to instill
the error in the mark that winning only depends upon
watching the
first card thrown down and following its motions exactly.
. ."If the
mark is made to feel absolutely sure, and places higher bets at
the
encouragement of his comrades, then the con-man no longer makes
a show, as he
did in the beginning, of throwing down the picture card
first and then
the other cards, but instead first throws down the upper
card from the
right hand, then the card from the left hand, and at the
end throws
down the picture card from the right hand. The mark, who
neither
suspects nor can see anything of this trick, camouflaged by the
flamboyant
hand motions at the placing of the cards, in his error that
the picture
card would again be thrown down first, follows closely with
his eyes the
first card thrown down and now has to lose and guess the
wrong
card."
The
Kümmelblättchen is thus no game but a flat-out deception on
which much
money can be made. If the crook has found a suitable little
place and if
he has at his disposal clever Schlepper, the day's
"earnings" can
amount to 100 RM or even more.
From what
classes of the Underworld are gambling cheats recruited?
For the most
part, from the ranks of the pimps and other work-shy
rabble. A
pimp, even if he is "running several girls," has enough free
time -- for
his profession is not one which requires hard labor. What
does he do in
his idle hours? Now, he sits somewhere in a Kaschemme,
crime gossip
is exchanged, plans are contrived, information and
experiences
exchanged, and in between there is a bit of gambling.
Sometimes this
is played on the basis of "gut Massel" (from the
Hebrew
"massel" = luck), i.e, the game is honest, but often experienced
Zocker
demonstrate their tricks and boast of their successes. New
talents are
discovered there, and aspiring cheats earn their first spurs.
Many
cardsharps come from the ranks of the imposters, since the art of
guiding the
luck of the cards along suitable channels can be of the
greatest use
to the soldier of fortune who is traveling around. Under the
circumstances,
it is simpler, quicker and cheaper, to pluck a successful
commercial
traveller -- a "star salesman" -- on a train -- or to clean out
a rich
tradesman [98] in a crooked game at a
health resort, than to make
do with minor
swindles or to get tied up in protracted marriage
swindles.
Finally, a
certain connection exists between cardsharps and
pickpockets,
since both have to have at their command dexterous
hands,
cold-bloodedness, ability to dissimulate and a facile ability to
empathize with
the mind of a stranger.
Cheating at
cards is not a simple matter, for success depends not only
upon the
manual skills of a Zocker, but also upon proper organization.
If the players
to be gulled are sober and watchful, it is extraordinarily
difficult,
even when the cardsharp is adroit enough to completely
conceal his
illicit hand movements. It is necessary to have assistants
who distract
attention from the Zocker, create the necessary mood by
means of
joking and quarreling, encourage drinking, and who -- this is
of great
importance -- enjoy an exorbitant amount of luck -- arranged
beforehand --
in the game, and thereby awaken a desire in the marks of
likewise
winning. These helpers -- they bear the descriptive name of
"Judas" -- are
indispensible and get up to one-fourth of the "winnings."
Further
necessary collaborators are the "Spanner," whose task it is to
keep a look
out for police officers and give warning about them. The
role of the
"Schlepper" is also of importance, for it's incumbent upon
him to find
suitable persons who are easily talked into going to the card
table and to
bring them to the Zocker. If a Schlepper comes across a
suitable and
wealthy "mark," he doesn't let him out of his sight, he
studies his
habits, discovers his associations and determines how
contact can
best be made with him. If a mark is travelling on business,
the Zocker
goes hot on his trail, for experience shows that even
mistrustful
people are more accessible when on a trip.
This large
retinue of "assistants," the journeys, the appearance
"appropriate
to his class" of the Zocker -- all of this requires not just
good
organization, but also much money. Each of the more important
gangs has its
"Lageman [= lay-out man]," i.e., organizer and financier.
The Lageman
plays the exactly same role as the fence, since he holds
in his hands
the actual secret directorship, only he is even harder to
catch than the
fence. In general, the relationship of the Lageman with
his helpers is
a very good one, and only rarely is he "auf Tivoli
geschoben
[pushed onto Tivoli]," i.e., betrayed. The role of the
Lageman
is excellently suited for Jews, and their [99] collaboration in
this "trade"
is actually particularly great. Since they themselves do not
directly
participate, it is as good as impossible to catch and convict
them.
The passion
for gambling has spread to all levels of society and its
effect is
devastating everywhere. The worker who carries home his
modest
paycheck is lured into a bar and at one of the numerous games --
Meine
Tante, deine Tante [My Aunt, your Aunt], Häufeln [Pile-up],
Mauscheln
["mauscheln" = to talk like a Jew] (!), Kartenlottum, [card
lottery],
Gottes Segen bei Cohn [God's Blessing for Cohen] (!) and
whatever they
might be called -- his small amount of earnings are taken
from him. The
employee, the civil servant who has fallen into the
company of
cardsharps, gambles away his belongings; he is misled into
a swindle and
cheat. For still wealthier circles, the more or less
"exclusive"
gaming clubs exist, which supposedly are open only to
members, but
they are really only better gambling hells. For they are
all gambling
hells, whether club or dive, whether an "exclusive" public
(one thinks of
the notorious "Isidor" Wei�Ÿ, the former Vice President
of Police in
Berlin, who indulged his passion for gambling in various
clubs, and his
brother, who took care of licenses for the gamblers) or
poor
fellow-countrymen lose their money there. Even in the case where
the
professional gambler is not a cardsharp, he remains a public danger.
What, then, is
the role of the Jew in gambling fraud? It is decisive.
The Jewish
fence himself does not steal, the Jewish bordello madam
does not sell
herself, and the Jewish director of a gaming club does not
need to
personally appear as a cardsharp. But over and over again,
human vices
and weaknesses serve for the enrichment of these
conscienceless
parasites, who, in accord with their nature, strive to
enlarge the
circle of their victims whenever possible.
The trial of
the "Harmlosen," (1)
["harmless" or "innocent"] as a
gambling club
in the Central Hotel was called, once caused an
enormous
sensation. The wealthiest people in Berlin socialized there. It
was a paradise
for those possessed by gambling. On the outside,
gentlemen with
feudal names and with expensive habits but uncertain
incomes,
represented the club. One of them had a fixed income of only
110 Marks a
month -- which did not stop him from having a
demanding
songstress as mistress, and a luxurious two-horse team with
a valet.
Another of these seedy courtiers was always stuck in debt, even
to waiters,
although his mother had already once paid 70,000 Marks for
him. These
people possessed [100] from their earliest
days the best
connections in
society, which extended up to Court circles, and served
as
"Schlepper" and, simultaneously, as ornamental figures in the
landscape for
the true wire-pullers -- the Jewish cardsharps Ernst
Levin
and Hermann Wolff.
Of the two
Wolff was the more dangerous. Originally from Austria, he
was work-shy
from his youth and grew up among nine siblings in poor
circumstances.
When barely seventeen years of age, he had to serve
two years in
prison, where he got to know all the secrets of the
Underworld. He
soon became an outstanding cardsharp and travelled
throughout
Europe. His greatest coup was his game with the
industrialist
Prinz-Reichenheim, from whom he took not less than
800,000 Marks,
half of it in one night. A term of imprisonment was the
result.
For long years
he wandered through America, North Africa, and the
East Indies,
always living in luxury, throwing money around and
searching for
new victims. Of large physique, with black hair,
somewhat
corpulent, he dressed with utmost elegance and was seldom
seen without
patent leather shoes, top hat and expensive cuff links. His
manners were
impeccable, his extraordinary politeness overweening --
an astute
observer said of him: "He is too polite to be honest" -- and his
French was
genuinely Parisian. On the other hand, he mastered the
German
language only imperfectly. It is the old picture of the Jewish
imposter as
we've already come to recognize it.
After a
thoroughly rewarding stay in Aachen, Homburg and
Wiesbaden, he
arrived in Berlin in the summer of 1897. Gradually, a
circle of
dubious types now formed around him, and he leisurely
selected for
himself suitable persons to serve as props. The club was
able to be
opened with great pomp on 14 October 1898. . .There was
everything
that a "man of the world" of the time could wish for:
lobster,
caviar, and rivers of genuine champagne. After the Galadiner
[formal
reception or feast], Wolff took over an "honorary game table"
and donated
half of the profit of the club treasury to it -- a noble
gesture whose
value was impaired, however, by the fact that Wolff, as
always, had
profited through cheating. . .
For two months
the guests were plucked by every technique of the art,
and the
"earnings" of the cardsharps can't even be approximately
gauged. Not
only the masterful cardsharps of Wolf and Levin were
guilty of
this, but also all of the parasites who gathered about the club
and used it as
the base of their operations: artistes of the Varieté, music
hall
songstresses, women of thedemi-monde and also "ambitious"
prostitutes
who wanted to climb higher, the swarm of pimps associated
with them, but
also racing horse owners and [101]
trainers, suppliers of
wine, of
delicacies, jewelry and women's toiletries, blackmailers,
feudal valets
who looked like genuine dukes and had at their disposal
the best
connections of the Underworld -- each wanted his part of the
prosperity.
The lion's share, however, stayed with Wolff. Thus, for
example, he
won 120,000 marks from Herr v. Gally during a game
which went on
without interruption from Sunday evening until
Monday.
Whoever arrived in Berlin from the provinces -- industrialists,
squires,
general directors [of companies] -- and who brought a wallet
sufficiently
stuffed, wanted to try his luck in the gaming club and
pocket a fat
profit. For winning wasn't rare, it belonged to the tactics of
the sharpster.
If anyone won a larger sum, then the news spread like
wildfire, and
those greedy for loot streamed in from all directions.
The bomb
exploded when (more strikingly!) a sensational article by a
Dr.
Kornblum appeared in the Jewish Berliner Tageblatt [Berlin
Daily].
The topic was gambling fraud; names were not named, but
sufficiently
transparent hints were given and mention was made of
"Schlepper
from the nobility" (but not of the Jewish principals!).
The scandal
was stupendous, for the best society frequented the gaming
club. An
investigation was begun. Wolff was warned in time (or he
was in bed
with Kornblum?). He, Levin, and the card dealer who
managed the
"prepared" card games, vanished unscathed abroad and
were able to
take along all of their loot. Some persons were arrested.
But the trial
led to no clear result since the main defendants had fled,
and on the
other hand those arrested had influential patrons and
protectors.
The main goal
of this genuinely Jewish "coup" was completely
attained:
systematic plundering, corruption, and afterward "finger-
pointing" at
the non-Jewish "good Society" and a part of the Prussian
nobility by
Jewish provocateurs and journalists!
Still more
revealing is the trial in Hanover in the year 1893. What
follows is
taken from a book of the Jew H. Friedlander(1).
Friedlander
was a well-known Jewish court reporter who undertook the
publishing of
a collection of reports about contemporary sensational
trials. In the
ten-volume work [102] the number of Jewish
criminals
listed is
extraordinarily small -- he was just an "objective" reporter,
who painted
the sins of the anti-Semites in the most glaring colors.
There can be
no doubt that Friedlander has glossed over the crimes of
the Jewish
gangs in Hanover. But even what he does tell is vast
enough.
As witnesses
over one hundred officers of every rank were called, but
at the defense
table sat the following persons, mostly Jews: the "man of
independent
means" Jakob Fährle, a large, bald-headed man with a
gray beard who
looked like a commercial counsellor from the comics
pages.
Although born in Offenbach, he wasn't able to speak German
properly. In
his youth he'd been a newspaper seller, then a thief and
swindler. He
fled abroad and was active as an imposter and cardsharp.
He passed
himself off as a foreigner, was restless and nervous and so
undisciplined
that his attorney, a racial comrade, had to constantly
warn him to be
still.
The two
bankers, Julius and Max Rosenberg. They looked like honest
businessmen,
as did the banker Ludwig Sü�Ÿmann. In reality, they
were merciless
usurers.
A special
ornament of this company was the man of independent
means,
Samuel Seemann, called the "old honest Seemann," he was a
plain man as
it says in the book, with a full gray beard, quiet, reliable-
looking, a man
to whose honesty anyone would swear without a
thought. This
Seemann was well-known for his roulette, with which he
travelled
through all the cities of Europe. His popularity in gaming
circles was
very great, and, as one of the witnesses said: "why should
one go to
Monte Carlo, when one can go to Seemann's?" The roulette
was fitted
with a device which made it possible for Seemann to always
win.
The banker
Louis Abter, a quiet, rather young man, with black hair, a
beautiful full
beard and gold-framed glasses. In addition were charged:
the banker
Albert He�Ÿ, the travelling salesman Ludwig Stamer and
the captain of
cavalry, Baron a. d. von Meyerinck. The latter kept
himself off to
the side, exchanged not a word with his fellow-
defendants,
and maintained the greatest calm. The good-looking, well-
groomed man
with dark blonde, slightly grayed and styled hair and the
arrogant face
was the center of general interest.
The numerous
defense attorneys were likewise mostly Jews. The most
prominent
among them was Fritz Friedemann, himself a passionate
gambler. He
claimed that he played with his clients and had often
gambled away
to them his attorney fees in advance.
[103] Of what was this mixed company, which consisted of
bankers,
salesmen and
former officers, accused? Of usury and gambling fraud.
Max Rosenberg,
Abter, He�Ÿ and a certain Lichtner, a Jewish criminal
from Vienna
who had fled in time, conducted in Hanover a "banking
business,"
more accurately a usury business, which targeted officers. If
an officer was
in need of money, he could always get it from these
"bankers," but
on terms which one could never believe, had they not
been
established in court. The officer had to sign a note and pay six
percent
interest as well as two per cent commission, which were also
immediately
deducted from the amount paid to him. In themselves,
these
conditions weren't bad, if there hadn't been the detail that the
amount named
in the note was never paid to the officer in cash. Only
the smaller
portion did he actually receive that way, but the rest in
lottery
tickets and in fact not even in the original tickets, but in
"quit-
claim"
certificates. In other words, the debtor had claim only on
possible
winnings under 2000 Marks. Should larger winnings accrue to
a ticket, the
debtor had to sign it over to the "banker." At any extension
of the note,
new lottery tickets had to be bought, for which interest also
had to be
paid.
Thanks to this
system, the indebtedness soon grew immeasurably. So,
for example,
if an officer borrowed 2500 Marks from Abter. For this,
he had to buy
during the course of a few months lottery tickets of the
kind
described, for 8500 Marks, so that the usurer had in his hands
notes from the
officer for 11,000 Marks, therefore more than four times
the actual
amount loaned.
The
consequences of this system were devastating. The debtor was
either
impoverished or ruined, or driven to suicide. There were also
some cases in
which the officer resorted to embezzlement in order to
satisfy the
greedy gang. Still others became the will-less tools of the
criminals.
This system of usury and the shameless exploitation of the
situation of
the officers who had fallen into difficulties, were bad
enough
already. But the band went one step further -- it artificially
created a
situation such that officers had to get into trouble. The means
was
gambling. That was still not enough -- the essential goal and
actual result
of this criminal activity was the "scandal," the corruption
and defamation
of the Prussian officer, and of good society. It was such
"affairs" and
"scandals" which [104] made the old state
and the old
army into a
victim of Jewish "reporting," of Jewish humor and of the
Jewish
caricature. Behind the more or less "chic" affairs was
concealed, in
the last analysis, the planned, persistent and cunning
attack of
Jewry upon the existing order, the Jewish struggle for prestige
and
money.
The band in
Hanover consisted of two gangs. One -- the Zockers -- had
as its task
bringing officers to ruin through gambling fraud, thereby
driving the
victims into the arms of the usurers, who took from them
their last
resources. On the other hand, the gang of usurers played the
role of
"Lagemänner [lay-out men]," i..e., they fronted the money to
the cardsharps
which they needed for their machinations.
The affair had
grown to a large scale, and a great host of accomplices
and
cardsharps, who were brought to the spas or race tracks under the
camouflage of
being wealthy estate owners, merchants, etc., had to
come in on the
fraud. According to the proven recipe, at first the
cardsharp
"lost" but then won more and more, until the officer had lost
everything and
saw no other recourse but the usurious "banker."
The most
important role among these "Schlepper" was played by the
Baron von
Meyerinck, a man with an extraordinarily eventful past, a
passionate
gambler and wastrel. Once he had owned two estates for
which he had
made a down payment of 200,000 Taler, without ever
considering
payment of the rest of the amount. By 1880, he was
already forced
to sell both estates, for which he received 1,200,000
Marks, which
he nonetheless squandered within a short time. Earlier,
he had to take
an oath of manifestation in Stra�Ÿburg. A "small" income
of 22,000
Taler a year remained to him and for some years he
wandered
through Germany, settling in Hanover in 1885. He lived in
great style
(meat alone cost his household 6000 Marks yearly), gave
parties, his
house was always full of guests, and gambling flourished.
At last the
decadent aristocrat came into contact with the Hanover
gangs and
entered their service.
Von Meyerinck
particularly focused his efforts upon the officers of the
Hanover
garrison, or those who were seconded to the famous riding
academy. He
invited them to his magnificent villa or supped with them
in the best
hotels of the city. After the meal, it was a matter of: "Now
we'll go to
play Jeu [a game of chance popular at the time]." Then the
unsuspecting
victim was cleaned out and the winnings divided.
One of von
Meyerinck's closest friends was the Jew Lichtner, an
international
imposter and cardsharp. He had originally been a
salesman in a
Vienna fashion business, but then he was [105]
sentenced to a
long prison term for embezzlement, gambling and usury.
He succeeded
in escaping from the prison hospital. He then operated as
a gambler in
Hungary and in Germany.
One of the
witnesses, an officer, told the Court how the cardsharps
worked. In the
gaming room of the "Hotel de Russie" in Hanover, he
met Meyerinck
by chance. While he was chatting with him and with
another
gentleman, a good-looking man entered the gaming room (it
was Lichtner).
When Meyerinck spotted him, he said: "I know him
from
Helgoland. He's very rich and is called von Lindner -- we can
win some money
at Jeu from him, he always carries at least 50,000
Marks with
him." They were introduced and soon were sitting at the
card table.
They played Ecarté for perhaps a quarter-hour, at which the
supposed "von
Lindner" continually lost. But then they changed to
Makao, and
soon the officer had lost 3000 Marks. And he was not the
only one. Many
hundreds of people had fallen into the net of the blood-
suckers, and
most of them preferred to remain silent.
The sentence
was unspeakably lenient, the usurers, who were merely
punished for
the "lottery offense," naturally came out of it best. All of
those
sentenced accepted their punishment calmly, only Meyerinck
voluntarily
made an end to his misspent life.
Rarely has a
trial allowed such a deep insight into the devastating
activities of
Jewish gambling swindlers, whose goal was not only the
exploitation
of their victims, but also the ruin and the disintegration of
the social
order in general.
In spite of
their disastrous effects, both examples which have been
given pale
when we think of the role of another Jewish loan shark and
owner of
gambling hells, Aaron Simanovitch. The field of his activity
was
pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg, and later the base of the White
armies in
South Russia. Simanovitch falsely described himself as a
"secretary" of
the famous Rasputin, to whom he dedicated a book
which appeared
in 1928, published by Hensel & Co. Verlag in
To understand
the role of Simanovitch, one must understand to begin
with that
Jewry was subject to far-reaching limitations in Old Russia
and was
permitted to live only in the so-called Pale of Settlement in the
western part
of the realm. Jewry [106] formed the
leadership of all
revolutionary
movements and parties in Old Russia, as much the
bourgeois-liberal
as the "moderate"-Marxist, as well as the Bolshevist.
Hermann Fehst,
already cited by us once, reports concerning this(1):
"Jewish
revolutionaries were in all of the Russian democratic and
socialist
parties, from the Cadets to the Bolshevists. And, according to
number and
influence, they were always strongest in the leadership.
Their share in
the leadership was on average five to ten times greater
than it was in
the party masses.
There were
important Jewish leaders of the Cadets: Vinaver,
Grusenberg,
Yollos, Hessen, Herzenstein, etc.
In the
Menshevists: Martov (Zederbaum), Trotsky (Bronstein), Dan
(Gurvitch),
Martynov, Liber (Goldmann), Abramovitch (Rein), Gorev
(Goldmann),
etc.
In the
Internationalists: Steklov (Nachamkes), Suchanov (Himmer),
etc.
In the Social
Revolutionaries: Gotz, Bernstein, Bunakov
(Fundaminski),
Ruthenberg, etc.
In the Left
Social Revolutionaries: Kapelinski, Ehrlich, Linde,
Steinberg,
Proshyan, Schlichter, Schreider, etc.
In the
Bolshevists: Borodin (Grusenberg), Frumkin, Goloshchekin,
Hanecki
(Fürstenberg), Yaroslavsky (Gubelmann), Kamenev
(Rosenfeld),
Lashevitch, Litvinov (Wallach), Lyadov (Mandelstamm),
Radek
(Sobelsohn), Sinovyev (Radomyslsky), Sokolnikov (Brilliant),
Sverlov, etc.
In 1911, at the Bolshevist academy in Longuejumeaux
near Paris, of
twelve instructors, six were Jews: Steklov (Nachamkes),
Ryasanov
(Goldendach), Davidson, Rappoport, Sinovyev and
Kamenev."
The whole of
Jewry in Russia had but one single goal: the fall of Jewry-
hostile
Czarism, Emancipation and finally, the seizure of power. To
attain this
goal the Jews played at different roles in the various classes
of society, in
the different parties, in the Press, in public opinion, in the
economy, etc.,
in all of which these Jewish columns and divisions
naturally
mutually supported one another and so proceeded together
according to
one strategic plan. The Jews everywhere and at all times,
by the way,
are accustomed to act following this recipe. By its very
nature, the
task of penetrating the highest level of the Russian
aristocracy,
the Czarist Court itself, was especially difficult. One Jew
succeeded in
doing this -- Aaron Simanovitch, who by means of
bribery, by
establishing gaming clubs and as jeweler [107]
found entré
into the Court
circles and there unfolded his pernicious activities. This
one Jew
achieved more for the destruction of the Romanov monarchy
and for the
preparation of the Bolshevist Revolution than many of the
prominent
Party Jews.
The instrument
of his work of destruction was Rasputin. An enormous
literature,
which sometimes makes him out to be a kind of saint,
sometimes a
devil in the flesh, yet again a libertine, here as a miracle-
worker, there
as a plain man of the people, again as an opportunist, has
come about in
the entire world about this person. In any case, he is
imbued with
the aura of mystery, he's romanticized with a mystical
power and he
is considered to be one of the most interesting
personalities
of pre-Revolutionary Russia. This view of Rasputin must
today be
fundamentally revised and overturned.
Rasputin was
actually little more than a corrupt and depraved subject,
who allied
himself with Jewry -- to be more exact, who sold himself to
the Jews --
out of material motives, from the greed for power and
hatred against
the nobility. Simanovitch himself describes the
"significance"
of Rasputin in this way(1):
"Rasputin was
one of the many clairvoyants and soothsayers with
whom the
Czarist court teemed. These sort of people were sought for
all over
Russia, and the relatives of the Czar took an active part in the
hunt for
miracle-workers." (p.293-294)
Rasputin was
apparently brought to Court by Simanovitch, who had
gotten to know
him in Kiev (p. 33), and brought to the Princess
Orbeliani and
the Lady-in-waiting to the Czarina, Anna Vyrubova, who
smoothed the
way to the Czarina for Rasputin and who remained his
slave to the
end. Simanovitch writes about this:
"And indeed,
she was the first who intervened with her whole person
and with the
expenditure of her every power and all of her influence at
Court for
Rasputin. Every desire of Rasputin was law for Vyrubova.
She downright
idolized him, and to her, the loyal intercessor between
him and the
Imperial couple, Rasputin owed, to a great extent, his
unique
position. He said of her, that she would follow him to the end of
the world, and
she was actually his most devoted and compliant
Whether
Vyrubova believed that she was "merely acting in the interest
of the
Imperial couple and of the dynasty," as Simanovitch claims, or
whether she
did not, rather, also take a very material [108]
interest in
Rasputin and
in Simanovitch over and above this, is not entirely clearly
establishable.
In any case, Simanovitch reports (p. 211) that Vyrubova
frequently
accepted "donations," indeed, that she also personally
received
"valuable presents." Simanovitch writes verbatim: "Thus, Frau
Rubinstein
gave her, for example, 50,000 Rubles, Frau Beinensohn
25,000
Rubels, the Banker Manus 200,000 Rubels, Nachimov 30,000
Rubels,
Popov 10,000 Rubels. From me myself, Vyrubova received
various
valuable diamonds, emeralds and precious silver flower vases."
That sounds
rather incriminating. Protopopov, who, after making the
promise "to do
something for the Jews," (p. 209) obtained from
Simanovitch,
Rasputin and Vyrubova the post of Minister of the
Interior,
likewise "donated" 100,000 Rubels for the military hospital
founded by
Vyrubova -- one of the usual bribery maneuvers during the
war period in
Russia. Before his appointment, by the way, Simanovitch
redeemed the
note of Protopopov at a profit of 150,000 Rubels. But not
without
"Protopopov's promise to repay me this amount out of the
secret fund of
the Ministry of the Interior after his appointment." (p.
211.)
From these
examples, to which are added still numerous others from
the memoirs of
Simanovitch, it is obviously clear that Vyrubova at the
least liked to
"take along with her" such things. In her own memoirs(1)
Vyrubova
naturally treats Rasputin positively and declares that all
rumors about
him and his impure relations with the Czarist house are
slanders. She
pronounces him, as usual, to be a simple "itinerant
preacher," a
subordinate advisor of the Imperial couple, whose scant
influence was
based upon the well-known fact that he was able to
dispel the
hemophilia of the heir to the throne though his power of
suggestion (p.
140, etc.). That this was not the case emerges right from
the fact that
attacks in great number were committed against Rasputin,
and that he
finally was murdered by their own hands by a Grand Duke
(Dmitri
Pavlovitch), a Prince (Yussupov), and one of the most well-
known Duma
Deputies (Purishkevitch). These three persons would
obviously
never have needed to murder a man of no importance and
without
influence.
Most of the
legends about Rasputin stress the "strange magical
suggestive
power" of this man of wonders and describe the more or
less brutal
and boundless sexuality of Rasputin as the source of his
influence,
particularly upon his countless female supporters among the
highest levels
of [109] Petersburg society. It is
frequently even claimed
that his
influence on the Czarina was not without such a basis and that
even the
Czar's daughters were sexual slaves to him. As a typical
example of
this we might list a notorious article of the likewise
notorious
Jewish agent, journalist and companion of Simanovitch,
Manassevitch-Manuilov,
which he even presented before the
Extraordinary
Investigatory Commission of the Provisional
Government, on
8 April 1917(1):
"I published
an interview with him at that time, which raised a lot of
dust and which
was also translated into French and English; it appeared
in the
Novoye Vremye (The New Times). His famous story of the bath
room. . .What
it was about, was that he (Rasputin) described to me the
following:
'When I was living in Siberia, I had many female admirers
and among
these female admirers there were (I may say this, because
it's already
been printed) ladies who were very close to the Court. So
they came to
me there (that is, to Siberia) and then they desired to get
closer to God.
. .One can come closer to God only through self-
abasement. And
now I led all of these women of the great world, in
diamonds and
expensive clothes, into the bath room (there were seven
women). I
undressed them all and forced them to wash me.'"
This famous
account is typical of the legend of Rasputin. It's just as
typical that
it [the story] comes from a Jew. The Jews made use of
Rasputin for
two goals simultaneously: at once to carry corruption into
the Czar's
Court and to attain through him substantial influence on the
formation of
the government and the direction of politics, but at the
same time to
use the same Rasputin as the figure of propaganda
against
the Czar and the conditions at Court which had been created by
and desired by
themselves, at which [conditions] they of course
speculated in
true Jewish fashion on the avarice and meanness of
people, and in
this speculation they were correct. By means of the
agitation of
the Jewish press, Rasputin became the symbol of Czarist
degeneration.
He was so closely identified with Czardom, that the
revolver shots
of Yussupov at Rasputin became at the same time fatal
shots at the
Czarist rulership in general. Thus, the case of Rasputin in
actuality is a
political campaign of Jewry, planned out and executed
with downright
devilish genius, a campaign which had its conclusion
just in the
night of 18 July 1918 in Ekaterineburg, where the Czar
himself, the
Czarina [110] and all their children were
bestially
murdered by
Jews. Of this final act of the tragedy introduced by the
"Court
Jeweler" Simnaovitch we shall still have to speak.
The same
Manasse-Manuilov naturally(1) maintains
that Vyrubova
was the sexual
slave of Rasputin and that the same was also true of the
Czarina. In
noteworthy contrast to this is the statement before the
investigative
committee of Vyrubova herself, which very soberly
"But above
all, you yourselves know, that no woman would have been
prepared to
make love with him, why, he was an old man; well, how
old was he?
Fifty years, I believe."
From the
memoirs of Simanovitch as well as from the evidence of the
investigative
committee, and after the elimination of the romantic and
improbable,
the following simple fact emerges: Rasputin found himself
in the hands
of a clique of Jews and executed their orders in return for
generous
rewards.
Simanovitch
was in no way his "secretary," but rather his employer.
Besides
Simanovitch, who himself emphasizes this several times in his
memoirs, the
already mentioned Manassevitch- Manuilov belonged to
it [i.e., the
clique of Jews] as a "political agent." Manassavitch was an
agent of the
political police and was one of the best-known journalists
of Petersburg.
He became secretary to the liberal Minister President
Count Witte,
who was known to be married to a Jewess and later also
had
connections with Rasputin. During the war, Manassevitch became
"confidential
secretary," in reality probably a substantial advisor to the
Minister
President Stürmer. Extremely typical is the fact that Stürmer
himself,
Minister President of the Empire during the World War, was
of Jewish
descent and was appointed Minister President at the
instigation of
Rasputin, i.e., at the instigation of the clique of Jews,
Simanovitch
& Co.
If
Manassevitch represented the left hand of Stürmer, then his right
hand was
another Jew, Gurland, who after his "conversion" to
Christianity
supposedly became one of the most important leaders of
anti-Semitism.
In other words, Gurland played the role of a Jewish
provocateur
within the Jewry-hostile circles and in public opinion. To
the same
clique of Jews around Rasputin at that time belonged the
banker [111] Rubinstein, who later became Court Banker
to the
Czarina on the
recommendation of Rasputin, and further, the Jewish
attorney
Sliosberg, the banker Ginzburg, and several others. A typical
scene is
depicted in this passage(1):
"Many
outstanding representatives of Jewry were assembled, among
them the Baron
Ginzburg, well-known on account of his charitable
donations,
attorney-at-law Sliosberg, Leo Brodsky, Gerassim Schalit,
Samuel
Gurevitch, Bank Director Mandel, Varshavsky, Poliakov and
several
others. By intent, no lawyers besides Sliosberg were summoned
to the
conference since Rasputin declared that he wanted to deal with
neither
lawyers nor socialists. An exception was made for Sliosberg
because
Rasputin had nothing to say against him. He took him to be a
good Jew,
whose activities as an attorney didn't matter.
Those present
prepared an reception of honor for Rasputin at his arrival
in Ginzburg's
salon. Many among them wept. Rasputin was very
moved by these
signs of sorrow. He listened attentively to our
complaints
about the persecutions of the Jews and promised to set
about doing
everything to see that the Jewish Question would yet be
brought to a
resolution during his lifetime. He added: 'You must all
help
Simanovitch so that he has the possibility of bribing the people on
whom this
depends. Do as your fathers did, who even did financial
business with
the Czar himself. What has become of you! You no
longer act as
the Jews used to do in former times. The Jewish
Question
must be solved by bribery or cunning. As concerns myself,
you can be
entirely at ease. I will grant you every assistance.'"
Rasputin kept
his promise. From this point on, the ministers were
appointed and
discharged by the clique of Jews around Rasputin.
Simanovitch
and his friends found their greatest and most dangerous
opponent in
the Grand Duke Nikolai Nikolayevitch, the Supreme
Commander of
the Russian Army, an extraordinarily energetic man
who correctly
saw through the Jewish Question and who proceeded
against Jewry
ruthlessly at the front and in the rear lines. The clique of
Jews decided
upon his overthrow. And now there was played out an
unexampled
struggle for power between the oldest and most powerful
of the Grand
Dukes and Supreme Commander of the Russian Army on
the one side,
and Simanovitch, Rasputin and the clique of Jews on the
other side. It
ended with the triumph of the Jews(2).
[112] "After I had informed Moses Ginzburg about the result
of my
conversation
with Rasputin, he proposed arranging a Galadiner in the
apartment of
the attorney Sliosberg, whom Rasputin held to be a
trustworthy,
reliable Jewish leader. In fact, Sliosberg had done very
much for the
Jews, without the possibility of there having been any sort
of substantial
personal motives in it for him.
The Jewish
representatives assembled on the appointed day at
Sliosberg's,
among them Baron Ginzburg, Moses Ginzburg,
Blankenstein,
Mandel, Rabbi Maso and many others whose names
escape me
after so many years. After everyone had arrived, I was asked
by telephone
to show up with Rasputin. We drove there. When
Rasputin
entered the living room of Sliosberg, he was received with
ceremony and
with great respect. The Jewish delegates, older
gentlemen with
long, full beards, told Rasputin during the course of the
evening of the
persecutions of the Jews by Nikolai Nikolayevitch and
other
anti-Semitic men in power. Their descriptions made a deep
impression
upon Rasputin, he was actually shaken. In his attempt to
reassure the
delegates he was able to hold back his own tears only with
effort. When
the general excitement had somewhat abated, Rasputin
declared that
he was ready to gladly help the Jews, but that it appeared
to him
impossible to put through radical measures in a short time, since
the anti-
Semitism in Russian government circles was too deeply
rooted. 'The
government and the nobility,' he said, 'are vicious like
dogs. One must
steel oneself for a hard and long struggle. It's a pity,
but how can
one change it? I will try everything that I can. Only tell me
what I ought
to do for you. ' 'Help us, Father Grigory!' replied the
Jewish
delegates, who were very much heartened by Rasputin's words.
'You're
fools,' declared Rasputin, 'to be sure, you are rich and clever,
but you don't
know how to court the favor of the persons who could be
useful to you.
You must bribe all the people upon whom this depends,
you must do
everything, whatever you're able, to associate your
interests with
the interests of the influential men of power.'
The delegates
told Rasputin that the Jewish leaders Vinaver,
Grusenberg,
Kalmanovitch, Rabbi Eisenstadt and Friedmann, had
pronounced
themselves opposed to these kind of tactics, since
according to
their view, more than anything else the equal rights of the
entire Jewish
people must be strived for. For the implementation of that
sort of
reform, however, time would be necessary.
[113] 'I really don't understand you,' repeated Rasputin. 'In
earlier times
various Jews,
for example Polyakov, had great influence, and now
Simanovitch
has access to the Czar. Why will you not fight your way
through to
him?'
The delegates
continued their complaints over the Grand Duke Nikolai
Nikolayevitch
and asked Rasputin to protect the Jews from his
persecutions.
He had obviously not expected that he would have so
much to listen
to. We gave him one report after another about the
persecution of
the Jews and the hatred the Supreme Commander of the
Russian Army
had for the Jews, and we could not suppress our tears
when we told
of the countless executions of Jews by the military
authorities.
Rasputin stood
up and crossed himself. That signified that he had
vowed to
himself to help us. With profound emotion he declared he
would remove
Nikolai Nikolayevitch from his post as Supreme
Commander of
the Russian Army within ten days, as long as nothing
happened to
him himself.
'Then the Czar
himself will take over command and we can perhaps do
something for
the Jews,' he said.
Everyone
present was shocked by this promise of Rasputin. I proposed
to grant him a
donation of a hundred thousand Rubles for his family (!),
and my
proposal was unanimously accepted. Rasputin said that he
would tell the
Czar of this.
On the next
day, M. Ginzburg deposited fifty thousand Rubels at a
bank for each
of the two daughters of Rasputin.
We saw with
astonishment how Rasputin kept his word. Even before
the end of the
ten-day period, Nikolai Nikolayevitch was removed from
his post and
named Commander of the troops in the Caucasus."
The "Court
Jeweler" and proprietor of gaming clubs, Aaron
Simanovitch
had inflicted a grave defeat upon the Grand Duke Nikolai
Nikolayevitch.
This victory cost Jewry only 100,000 Rubels.
Simanovitch
reports that Rasputin's way of life consumed enormous
sums. He
received each month from the Ministry of the Interior, by
order of the
Czar, 5000 Rubels, which nonetheless did not go far. A
single
drinking bout in the notorious "Villa Rode," where Rasputin was
accustomed to
spend his nights, cost 15,000 Rubels in one instance(1).
[114] The largest sums for Rasputin came from the Jews, about
which
Simanovitch
writes the following(1):
"Therefore I
procured money for Rasputin from special sources which I
never shall
betray, in order not to harm co-religionists."
Rasputin never
refused Simanovitch his support.
"He became a
friend and patron of the Jews and supported me without
reservation in
my efforts to relieve their situation(2)."
That he did,
even when it meant desertion and treason in the war. An
"The Jews in
general showed little inclination for military service,
which was
understandable considering their outcast position and heavy
oppression. In
order to ease the way to their release from the duty of
military
service, I made further connections with the recruiting
commission in
the city of Luga not far from Petersburg. All members
of the
commission were appointed at the instigation of Rasputin, and
when I sent
anyone there whose papers displayed an agreed-upon
mark, he
inevitably came away free from military service."
Simanovitch
was a tireless founder of gaming clubs. At first, he
established a
gaming club under the screen of a chess club. The
Imperial
Maître d'Hôtel Poincet as well as both brothers, the Princes
Wittgenstein,
who served in the personal body guard of the Czar, had
an interest in
this establishment(4).
Another time,
he established a gaming club on the Fontanka wharf, in
house nr. 14.
A Count Tolstoy acted as founder, and Baron Roop was
elected
President of the club. The board of directors was comprised of
the Cossak
officer Bermond, Count Musvitz-Schadurki and the former
attorney
Rosen. It is extremely interesting that Rosen was legal advisor
in the very
influential reactionary and anti-Semitic Association of the
Archangel
Michael(5). The leader of this
Association was the famous
hater of Jews,
Purishkevitch, one of the later murderers of Rasputin.
What the
purpose of the "gaming club" of Herr Simanovitch, with Herr
Rosen as
"secretary" was, among other things, emerges from the
[115] "All complaints about the Jews which came into the
Association
were delivered
to him (Rosen) for examination. I managed it so that
Rosen first
sent these documents to me. Complaints which could have
had
undesirable consequences I burned up in short order, and only sent
on totally
unimportant letters to the leadership of the Association.
Purishkevitch
finally drew suspicious conclusions about Rosen. He was
followed and
surprised in the vicinity of my apartment with a large
briefcase
which was filled with complaints about the Jews. He was
thereupon
relieved of his post as secretary in the 'Association of the
Archangel
Michael.' Incidentally, that was no great loss for him. For he
was getting
two thousand Rubels from me each month and had other
income
besides."
The so-called
"Scientific-Commercial Alliance," whose "President"
was a
Professor Rayev, and which was also founded by Simanovitch,
was also
nothing more than a gaming club. When one day the Czar was
in need of a
man for the highest political-clerical position of Chief
Procurator of
the Holy Synod, Professor Rayev received this position
on the
recommendation of Rasputin. Another gaming club
establishment
of Simanovitch was the so-called "Fire Brigade Club." It
was located in
the house of the famous Countess Ignatiev and naturally
had nothing to
do with fire-fighting. The "President" of this fire-
fighting club
was the Lord Mayor of Pskov, Tomilin. He was hired
away by a
rival establishment, the so-called "Russian National Club"
and also took
along with him from the Fire Brigade Club two servants
into the new
club. These shifts in personnel occurred with the
knowledge and
with the intent of Simanovitch, who thus had eyes and
ears in the
rival establishment. It was in the "Russian National Club,"
incidentally,
that the secret conferences between Purishkevitch, the
Grand Duke
Dmitri Pavlovitch, the Prince Felix Yussupov and other
enemies of
Rasputin occurred, by whom Simanovitch was informed in
The plans of
his opponents seemed not to have been frustrated only
through the
"idiosyncracies" of Rasputin and the careless omissions of
the security
organs.
It strikes one
as very strange, since all means of power were indeed at
the disposal
of Rasputin and the clique of Jews. The assumption seems
more probable
that Simanovitch or one of his "co-religionists" was also
proprietor of
the "Russian National Club" and [116]
intentionally did
not prevent
the murder of Rasputin, perhaps even promoted it.
Rasputin had
served his purpose. The first act of the corruption and
undermining of
the Czarist rulership was finished. Now decisive
measures could
be taken. As the Jews well knew, Rasputin's death had
to plunge the
Imperial couple into despair, hopelessness and apathy.
Rasputin's
death had to become at the same time the signal for
revolution.
And so it
turned out to be. In the night of 17 December 1916, Rasputin
was shot in
the apartment of Felix Yussupov by the conspirators. One-
and-a-half
months later the Czar abdicated.
Simanovitch
nevertheless maintained his influence on the Czar even
after the
elimination of Rasputin. He writes(1):
"Directly
after Rasputin's death this (my) influence became downright
decisive. The
Czar believed I alone was informed about Rasputin's
plans."
Simanovitch
exploited this influence against the Czar to the last drop,
by placing a
totally unfit person at the head of the government at this
critical hour
of the Czarist dynasty(2):
"Our candidate
for the post of Minister President was Prince Golitsyn,
an old, frail
man, but a good friend of Protopopov (the Interior
Minister) and
a very sweet man. The mistresses of Protopopov and of
Prince
Golitsyn were on friendly terms with each other, and when
Protopopov
became Minister, both ladies decided to procure a high
post for the
Prince too, so that one friend would not be leaving the
other behind.
To our satisfaction, we discovered in the papers (of
Rasputin) a
photograph of Prince Golitsyn with the inscription by
Rasputin in
his own hand: 'The Old One' (i.e., the Minister President).
That sufficed
perfectly for our goals. . ."
"The result
was that Trepov had to leave the post of Minister President,
which he had
occupied approximately one week long, as soon as the
next day.
Prince Golitsyn, until then entirely unknown, was named as
his successor.
He himself was probably the one most surprised by this.
"Contrary to
custom up to this time, this cabinet did not present itself to
the Czar at
all. Prince Golitsyn, as well as I can recall, was not received
a single time
by the Czar. But [117] every newly named
Minister held
it to be his
bounden duty to make an initial visit to Vyrubova, for it was
very important
then to secure her support.
The Golitsyn
cabinet was the last under the government of the last
Czar
The work of
the Jew Simanovitch was complete. The gaming clubs had
payed for
themselves.
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is not permitted. All rights
reserved.
T h e J e w a
s C r i m i n a l
Chapter
VII: Pimps and White Slavers
---------------------------------------------------
---------------
(page
118)
Typical for
the Jew is the exploitation and organization of crime. This
is also true
of prostitution and procuring. Here, too, the Jew -- or the
Jewess -- is
usually the "entrepreneur," employer and pimp, sometimes,
though, even
the performer.
An objective
and expert criminologist, who deals only in facts and who
weighs every
word(1) has written
the following daring sentence, whose
reserved tone
underlines its content all the more:
"The
widely-held view that Jewesses are not to be found among
prostitutes
is absolutely refuted by the facts."
A Jewish
prostitute is in no sense an exceptional phenomenon. As an
example, let
the story of such a Jewish prostitute be related here(2):
Anna Mayner
was born in the year 1892 in Magdeburg. Her father is a
baker,
efficient in his business and well-to-do, the mother a former
milliner, a
nervous, always excitable woman. She is diabetic, the large
household
gives her much to do, she coddles her six children. Anna is a
healthy,
robust girl, she only sometimes has trouble -- as do many
Jewish
children -- with her tonsils. She attends a Jewish school, doesn't
learn
especially well, a couple of times she is not promoted. The reason
is more
laziness than lack of intelligence, for by no means is Anna
dumb, she has
self-confidence and her lack of book knowledge doesn't
bother her --
if things become difficult, she will find a way out. All in
all, Anna has
a happy childhood, she knows neither need nor bad
family
circumstances. Gradually, Anna is growing up, her circle of
acquaintances
and friends is large, she often goes off in the evening
and stays out
for a long time. Her mother quarrels with her, there are
unpleasant
scenes and then a tearful reconciliation: [119]
Anna
promises over
and over again to attend to her behavior, otherwise the
wealthy
marriage which has been placed in prospect for the baker's
daughter will
be more difficult to achieve. She doesn't keep her
promise for
very long. She's barely seventeen years old when she
makes the
acquaintance in the synagogue of a wealthy Jew. Directly
from the
synagogue the pair goes to a restaurant serving wine. The
gentleman is
generous and does not stint on the wine; the next morning
Anna awakens
in the apartment of her new friend. She's not
uncomfortable
with this situation, and a strong relationship ensues
which lasts a
year. Her friend wants to marry her, for she's a handsome,
typically
Jewish blonde, she comes "from a good house," her father is
not without
wealth. But Anna isn't thinking in the least of tying herself
down already.
With 500 Marks in her pocket, she leaves her parents'
house one day
and goes to Cologne, where she has an aunt. Then she
goes to
Brussels, to a new lover, a Jewish tenor. The singer is
masochistically
inclined, he enjoys it when he is abused, and Anna also
finds fun in
it, for she is not free of sadistic tendencies.
After four
months she has had enough of the tenor and returns to
Cologne. There
she gets to know a charwoman who does the laundry
for a large
bordello. Her descriptions of the supposedly carefree, labor-
free life of a
prostitute make an impression upon Anna, and she
becomes one of
the ornaments of this bordello.
That's the
right kind of life for the work-shy, fickle Anna, who is
enamored of
fineries! She doesn't need to work, she gets sweets, as
many as she
wants, and one evening after another she's allowed to
drink wine. To
be sure, it sometimes happens that she does too much of
a good thing.
Then she cuts loose, smashes things up and runs naked
out on the
streets. The proprietress of the bordello doesn't hold it
against her,
though -- she earns more than a little on Anna.
When Anna has
had enough of the "residential life," she leaves the
bordello and
goes on the street for a while. She's picked up by the vice
police, put
under supervision, and several times contracts venereal
disease. When
she wants to "rest," she returns to the bordello, only to
again become a
street prostitute for a change. She spends five years of
her life in
this way. . .
Nevertheless,
Anna does not in any way see herself as a "fallen"
woman. She is
still always the same lazy but by no means stupid
Jewish girl as
she was years before. In 1915, she makes acquaintance
with a Jewish
"wholesale merchant," who doesn't do badly supplying
the army. She
is 23 years old, her life experience is great, her mind
sharpened. She
believes that she has "amused" herself enough and that
it's time to
think of the future.
[120] Just as she once transformed herself from the spoiled
little
daughter of
the house into a street whore, she now completes the
transition to
the "respectable" life. She learns stenography and
bookkeeping,
she puts through her release from prostitution police
control, and
in 1916 she marries her racketeer and war profiteer. Now
she is
suddenly married, has a fine apartment for whose furnishings her
very numerous
acquaintances envy her. She dresses with elegance but
not flashily,
she is very proud of her beautifully cared for hands, her
husband earns
a lot of money. To complete the idyll, the two adopt the
illegitimate
child of one of Anna's sisters. Of the former prostitute no
trace
whatsoever seems to remain, Anna has, for now, transformed
herself into a
"lady."
Anna Meyner
could be regarded as a genuine full-blooded Jewess. In
her case we
see that typically Jewish slipping back-and-forth between
two spheres
which to us seem totally separate but which for the Jews
form a uniform
whole with no trouble at all -- the sphere of the middle-
class life and
the sphere of the criminal Underworld. Anna Meyner did
not go
down to ruin. She did nothing in the eyes of her racial comrades
which would
justify expulsion from their "society."
The Jewish
prostitute differs psychologically from the others -- she
regards her
activities as an occupation like any other, an occupation
which she can
always change. The Jewish prostitute is -- by Jewish
standards -- a
completely wholesome person, while non-Jewish whores
are
degenerate, genetically tainted, or are otherwise racially inferior.
The exception
here is the rule there; the inferior is "wholesome" there
and the
criminal, "legal." Two worlds. . .
The throng
attending the trial of Riehl-Pollack(1)
and accomplices was
huge.
Eleven persons
sit at the defense table: a plumber's helper who left his
daughter in
the public house of Riehl, received a monthly pension from
the
proprietress for it and had energetically worked on his daughter in
case she
became refractory. Further, there were eight wretched
prostitutes
who had been made to commit perjury by threats, requests
and promises
by Riehl. Those are the secondary figures in this trial.
The chief
defendants are two women: Riehl and Pollack. Regine Riehl,
a
powerfully-built, stocky person, with traces of former beauty in her
face, is
assured in her manners, impudent and at the same time fluid in
her gestures,
quick-witted in her responses -- the typical bordello
hostess.
[121] Next to her sits "Antoine Pollack, born 1
October 1838 in
Pravonin, of
the Mosaic religion, married, a waitress" -- a small,
deformed old
woman with a sunken back, black-colored hair, with
burning
unsteady eyes under the disorderly tangle of little curls, with
dark shadows
on her face, with nervous speech and a hard, guttural
voice: she
didn't know a thing [she said], she was a simple waitress, she
was being
slandered -- she cried all the time, protested her innocence,
called on God
to bear witness.
Of what are
Riehl and Pollack accused? False imprisonment, abuse of
the girls,
embezzlement, suborning perjury.
The husband of
Riehl was a chief clerk. Since he didn't earn enough,
Riehl came up
with the bright idea of establishing a bordello, in order
by this means
to "save and to prove that she was a good hostess." The
bordello is
located in the Grüne Torgasse and on the door it reads
"Riehl Fashion
Salon" -- it looks highly respectable. The establishment
had cost
40,000 Kronen, the yearly rent amounted to 10,000 Kronen --
a great deal
of money for the poor wife of a clerk. Who had advanced it
to her? Riehl
keeps up to 20 girls, and her confidante, assistant, agent
and helper is
Pollack. When it is a matter of keeping an eye on the
girls, taking
presents away from them which the guests had given them,
the so-called
"Strumpfgeld" ["stockings-money" -- i.e., money for
purchasing
silk stockings, given to a prostitute as a personal gift above
and beyond the
fee for sexual acts, which the "guests" knew went
mostly or
entirely into the pockets of the madam...], delivering a girl
who had become
ill to the hospital, picking up a convalescent girl,
recruiting new
girls, listening in to their conversations, pursuing girls
who had fled,
locking in the inmates of the bordello, talking the parents
of the girls
into tolerating their trade, leading the authorities astray --
all this
Pollack takes care of, to the complete satisfaction of Riehl.
Pollack can
handle everything, just not receive the police agent in
charge, who
bears the remarkable name Pi�Ÿ; Riehl takes care of that
herself.
Pollack does
not live in the bordello, since she has a "secondary
occupation":
somewhere in the Jewish Quarter she owns a residence
and rents the
rooms to "bed-goers" -- mostly whores who walk the
streets.
Pollack has supplied many of them to Riehl, and she otherwise
zealously
advertises the bordello of whose income -- and it is
extraordinarily
high, for Riehl earns up to 45,000 Kronen annually --
she is not
without a share. She keeps a file of agents who are constantly
searching for
such suitable girls: unemployed fellows, criminals,
pimps,
sometimes even unscrupulous parents. The usual fee is 4
Kronen
for each girl supplied but sometimes considerably more, if the
object is
especially beautiful and attractive. With agencies supplying
domestic help,
with the inmates of hospitals, in short, with [122] all
places where
reckless girls or girls who are in circumstances of need,
can be found,
the tireless Pollack maintains connections.
What is the
life of the girls like in the Riehl-Pollack House?
The rooms
below, where the guests are received, are fitted out with
great comfort,
but above is where the girls reside, and it has been
characterized
as "barracks." The last guest has scarcely gone off when
the girls are
herded upstairs where they must sleep two to a bed in
awful
proximity. The windows of the "barracks" are secured by means
of bars, and
the door is locked from the outside. The room is so small
that only nine
cubic meters of air is allotted for every girl (compared
with twenty
cubic meters in the district court prison). Sleep lasts until
the middle of
the day, then the girls must go to line up for lunch, only
to be locked
in the "barracks" again until evening. For clothing, one
blouse, a
slip, stockings, slippers and a large apron or nightgown are
given them --
in such clothing they can neither flee nor show
themselves on
the street. At Riehl-Pollack House, everything has been
calculated and
figured out ahead of time.
In the
evening, they go to the "salon"; there the girls get their
"professional
clothes," which they must surrender before going to
sleep.
Pollack, unceasingly darting back and forth with soundless steps,
collects the
money from the visitors, and nothing escapes her eyes and
ears.
The
correspondence of the girls is watched over in the strictest fashion,
they write
most of their letters from Riehl's dictation or Pollack's. None
of them are
allowed to go outside the house, only sometimes Riehl
permits some
favored girl to go into the garden for a short time, so that
most of them,
without air or sunlight for months, become pale and
sickly.
The inmates of
the bordello aren't able to save any money.
Theoretically
the girls are supposed to be paid one half of what is taken
in from the
guests. Theoretically -- for from the other half they have to
pay daily four
Kronen for "room and board," pay the doctor, pay for
their clothes.
In short, it always turns out that the girls never have a
penny to their
names and are not allowed to keep money with them at
all.
Life in the
bordello is so agonizing that each girl thinks of escaping.
They can
almost never realize it, for a Cerberus, to whom the strictest
orders are
given, sits at the door. The remaining single possibility is --
illness and
transfer to a hospital. And that is why Riehl-Pollack fear
nothing worse
than they fear [123] illnesses. When the
doctor comes
on his
prescribed visit, the sick girls are hidden in the henhouse, and if
transfer to a
hospital really cannot be avoided, Pollack must go into
action again
-- she delivers the girl there, she constantly informs herself
concerning the
course of the illness, she knows when the discharge is
supposed to
occur, she waits in front of the hospital prepared with a
hackney
carriage to bring the girl back into the bordello.
Riehl always
insists upon "the strictest observance of the laws," i.e.,
she observes
the police regulations in her way. So, for example, it is
prohibited to
keep girls in the house who have not yet lost their
virginity; if
such a girl falls into her hands, Pollack sees to it that what
is necessary
is done. If the victim yells too loudly, Pollack stuffs a
pillow in her
mouth.
Riehl-Pollack
believes in "strict discipline," in which face-slaps,
whippings,
pokers, canes, and broomsticks must be used. Requests for
release [from
the bordello], laments or complaints, have as their result
only insults,
threats of the police or the workhouse and mistreatment.
Pollack is
always there; the old hunchbacked sadist is delighted when
she hears a
girl scream and groan. Here she feels herself to be in her
element --
exploiting defenseless victims is the classic occupation of
not only the
male, but the female Jews as well.
Wheresoever
the whirls and eddies of life might drive the Jew, he does
not go under.
He slowly rises to the surface again, finds others of the
same attitude
and of the same blood, allies himself with them -- and
forms that
hardly visible over-layer of the nations, which cut off their
air, a class
which has just been torn away from Germany. . .
Jewry
constantly strives upward -- toward money and power. That is
true also of
the world of professional sexual offenses, of prostitution.
Among the
ordinary prostitutes, the Jewesses comprise perhaps 8-10%,
At the next
level -- pimps and procuresses -- we find the Jewish share
to be already
20%(1). And in the
highest levels of the criminal demi-
monde,
we meet almost exclusively Jews. As everywhere, we find
here, too, the
continual Jewish "migration" upward: the Jewish
prostitute is
in her later years a procuress, owner of a dubious inn
[analogous to
today's 'hot-sheet' motels] or bordello hostess, while the
young Jewish
male street person, who has focused on homosexuals,
becomes a pimp
and, if he's lucky, also a white slaver.
[124] Within the Underworld, the pimp plays a significant
role, for he
is the binding
glue between prostitution and criminality, he's the middle-
man of the
fence, the loan shark, and, naturally, the white slaver. More
than this, he
himself often steps into these roles and does not content
himself with
protecting prostitutes and living off their money, he also
goes into
business on his own initiative and plays banker to the
Underworld
livelihoods, he knows the best sources for cocaine, he
imparts
instruction on dexterous card-handling in his local Kaschemme,
he sells "sure
things" in the betting office, keeps an eye out for "fresh
goods" for
bordellos -- the pimp is the factotum of the criminal world.
With this
internal connection, it is small wonder that it was precisely
the pimps who
played an especially prominent role in the numerous
criminal
organizations, the "ring clubs," which, as we already
discovered,
were a particular ornament of the system of the time(1). In
Berlin, there
were, among others: the "Ring Gro�Ÿ-Berlin" [Great Berlin
Ring],
"Loge Gro�Ÿ-Berlin" [Great Berlin Lodge],
"Interessengemeinschaft"
[Community of Interests], etc. The nimble,
somewhat
elegant pimp was the natural representative of these rings to
the
authorities, from whom they had less to fear than notorious burglars
or fences did.
From the outside, the organizations were innocent social,
lottery or
sport clubs, but in reality they were loci of support for the
worst
criminals, who could find material help, defense counsel or
helpers there
on the occasion of an arrest or a similar misfortune.
"There must be
a clever lawyer appointed for the criminal, food
packages sent
to him while he was in custody awaiting trial, his family
supported and
consoled. Prosecution witnesses were intimidated,
defense
witnesses persuaded that they had really seen what they were
supposed to
have seen, and many a hard-to-produce alibi was cobbled
together by
hook or crook."
The fees were
very high, the gentlemen members wore gold badges,
their female
companions dripped with stolen jewels, and at festivals
they marched
with heavy, gold-embroidered banners. That's how they
lived then --
before the National Socialist power take-over -- in "beauty
and dignity."
Under the pressure of "public opinion" and influential
comrades, the
authorities had to keep one eye, or even both, shut tight.
They gathered
in expensive pubs with the Jewish lawyers, who were as
well-known for
being advocates for the Underworld [125]
as for the
communists,
and the pimp-song was sung with chests swollen with
pride:
"Who should
gobble up the whores' money
If it weren't
for us bastards!"
An
investigation by B. von der Laan(1), which is
devoted to the study
of the pimp,
shows with great clarity how deeply the pimp is rooted in
the
Underworld. The previous life of 134 pimps was studied. Only 12%
of them had
never been sentenced before, i.e., they were clever enough
not to have
let themselves get caught. For the rest, not less than 1096
previous
sentences, an average of almost 10 per subject, were
demonstrated,
and in particular:
Offenses
against morality . . . . . . 20
fraud . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . 56
receiving
stolen goods (fencing) . . . 59
embezzlement .
. . . . . . . . . . . 72
offenses
against public order . . . . 107
gambling . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . 198
offenses of
brutality . . . . . . . . 107
theft . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . 284
There is no
crime from which the genuine pimp would shrink!
From what
circles are pimps recruited? From all of them. The
streetwalker
has for her pimp the work-shy young man who went rotten
early in life,
or the bull-necked thug of the suburb, who follows her
when she goes
about her wretched trade in dark doorways, in empty
sheds or in
the shrubbery of public parks. The pimp of a "choicer"
prostitute is
often the waiter in a bar which provides entertainment, a
musician of
shabby elegance, a gigolo, who on the side steps out as a
male
prostitute. On the uppermost level is "elegant prostitution," which
is to be met
with in spas, race tracks, in gambling halls. In this case, the
pimp also
appears as a gentleman of total elegance. Often, he is an
imposter,
working with a prostitute who cleans out the victim, but not
infrequently
one also sees procurers who have a proper occupation too
-
- traveling
salesmen, agents on commission, real estate brokers. It is
typical that
one encounters mostly Jews among the procurers even in
this
"elevated" category, and no less typical and shocking is the fact
(reported by
B. von der Laan) that in the pimp jargon, a poorly earning
[126] prostitute is called a "Goje" [goye], i.e.,
designated with the same
contemptuous
word that the Jew uses for the non-Jew in general.
The female
counterpart to the pimp is the procuress, often a former
prostitute who
knew how to "work her way up." She, too, has the best
connections to
the Underworld, she too is frequently a fence or drug
dealer, and
she too has, for the most part, a previous record of being
sentenced for
offenses -- up to 20%!(1)
In her case as well, only in rare
instances can
she be held accountable for her filthy trade. Is it any
wonder that
the shape of the fat, old Jewess has become the prototype
of the
procuress?!
Silberreich
and Wallerstein are two excellent foreigners, they make
themselves out
to be Russians. Both have black hair; with Herr
Silberreich
one already sees individual strands of silver at the temples,
Herr
Wallerstein is bursting with good health and a good mood. With
the tips of
their moustaches curled -- this case is from the Berlin of
1910 -- armed
with Malacca canes and kid gloves, a monocle perched
at the eye,
they appear every evening in the finest pubs of the
Friedrichstra�Ÿe.
Both speak a fluent but harsh German; one who
knows can pick
out the Yiddish from their words, which rapidly bubble
out. They seem
to have money in abundance, they enjoy life to the
fullest.
But one thing
is unusual: both of these wealthy and posh gentlemen do
not live in an
expensive hotel, but in a sort of dive in the vicinity of the
Alexanderplatz,
there, where it's only two steps to the Jewish Quarter,
to
Grenadier- and Dragonerstra�Ÿe. They seem to feel an extraordinary
sense of
well-being there. They're on excellent terms with the dubious
characters who
reside at the "hotel," and they are often seen in earnest
discussions
with -- the cook. Not that this cook was particularly young
or attractive
-- an aging, vague, unclean Jewess -- also, her cooking is
miserable, but
this is a matter of business. Every transaction of such
business
brings in 1000 Marks apiece to the two men of honor, and in
the pre-war
era a lot could be accomplished with a thousand Marks.
What, then, is
their mysterious business? White slavery. The
gentlemen
Silberreich and Wallerstein supply the bordellos of Buenos
Aires with
fresh goods, the cook is the go-between; she searches for
girls who are
ready to emigrate to South America and receives 50 to
100 Marks
"commission" for each. The [127] two Jews
take over the
transport till
they reach South America and are paid twenty times this.
A good, solid
and safe business, which pays well enough to risk a
couple years
in prison.
Silberreich
and Wallerstein are cunning crooks, their accomplice cut
from the same
cloth, and for years all goes as desired and the bank
accounts of
the white slavers show ever- increasing numbers.
And then,
suddenly, something extraordinarily embarrassing happens.
The cook, the
stupid woman, makes a huge mistake: she tries to recruit
a Frau M. as a
sub-agent, and charges her with looking for suitable
girls. But
Frau M. has connections with the Berlin police . . .
She pretends
to accept this offer, but reports the story immediately in
the "Alex"
[i.e., police -- whose headquarters were probably located on
the
Alexanderplatz]. There, two policewomen are put at her disposal,
who are
supposed to play the roles of women eager to emigrate. The
two women are
introduced to the white slavers, but do not meet with
their
approval: the goods have to be young, really young, if possible
under 20 years
old.
Frau M.
succeeds in finding two other young women who are prepared
to play the
comedy. One is twenty years old, the other 16, and both are
of striking
beauty. Silberreich and Wallerstein are delighted. They roll
their eyes
and, gesturing expansively, they tell the two girls of the
paradise that
awaits them in South America. They are supposed to be
employed as
housekeepers in two fashionable homes. Little work,
much free
time, a fantastic salary and then -- marriage! For both will
most
definitely marry. In Argentina, they are told, there are three times
as many men as
women, the men there are rolling in wealth, and there
can be no
doubt that after a few months they'll find rich husbands. Only
one thing is
demanded of the girls -- complete discretion: the German
authorities,
they are told, are bureaucratic and narrow-minded;
whenever
there's an opportunity they'll make unnecessary difficulties . .
.
The women
pretend to be persuaded. The departure is supposed to
occur in a few
days, and meanwhile they are staying under the charge
of Frau M.,
who is supposed to prevent any attempt to get away. The
three are
living in the hotel of the white slavers; Frau M. is supposed to
receive her
payment -- 50 Marks for the older and 100 Marks for the
younger girl
-- right after their departure: Silberreich and Wallerstein
pay promptly,
but they do not give credit.
The day of
departure has now arrived. Wallerstein is supposed to drive
with the two
girls, Silberreich will follow them in one week. [128] He
is tired of
his lover, a beautiful girl, and wants to sell her as well at
Buenos Aires,
but she is not yet ready to travel. Frau M. meanwhile
keeps the
police posted on what is transpiring, and everything goes
perfectly --
the gang is arrested at the railroad station.
In Court, the
white slavers make a thousand excuses and difficulties.
First of all,
they supposedly can't understand German, only Russian.
An interpreter
is summoned, the accused pretend not to understand
him, and the
Court cannot proceed further until Frau M. appears and
testifies that
they both understand and speak German. Then, there are
problems with
determining personal facts: Silberreich and Wallerstein
do know, to be
sure, when they were born, but where has slipped their
minds. Also,
the Jewish defense counsel is no help to the Court, and
seeks to show,
using clever stratagems, that Paragraph 48 of the
Emigration Law
of 9 June 1897, speaks of "fraudulent concealment by
silence," but
that both girls in fact had been perfectly informed of the
true purpose
of the trip, so that there was not any intention to mislead
whatsoever.
However, all
of this is of no use, the situation is too clear. Not only the
witnesses are
able to confirm the guilt of the white slavers, but also the
correspondence
found with them. Though it is written in the Yiddish
tongue and
with Hebrew characters, it can be deciphered and much
discovered
about the past of the pair. Among other things, it is learned
that they
often gave the girls false passports and thus made any
investigations
impossible. Should any girl show that she was
mistrustful,
marriage was easily promised her or was even entered into -
- there were
enough rabbis who were ready to do anything for a
corresponding
compensation. The evidence was so overwhelming that
the Court
sentenced the pair to 2 and 2½ years in prison, respectively.
That's the
history of two white slavers who were caught, and whose
victims could
be freed at once. But how many are there of whom the
police knew
nothing, who were able to transport their "goods" right
under the
noses of the emigration authorities?
One indication
of this is given by statistics(1).
In the capital
of Argentina, Buenos Aires, during the years 1889-1901
prostitutes
were regulated by state authority. The following numbers
were
reported:
[129] originally from:
Argentina
................... 1561
Russia
...................... 1211
Italy
........................... 857
Austria
......................... 668
France
.......................... 606
Germany
.......................... 350
other nations
................ 1141
In other words
-- barely ¼ of the registered prostitutes were natives, the
rest were
nationals of other countries. In addition, in other South and
Central
American countries, the percentage of foreign prostitutes is
very high:
Brasil 80%, Mexico 60%, Uruguay 42%, etc. All in all, we
are speaking
of thousands of women who had arrived from overseas.
There can be
no doubt about the fact that here middle-men, recruiters,
employers,
organizers, had their hand in it, for this is not a case of
individual
phenomena but of an emigration of young women under
conscious
direction. Now, who are the directors and men behind the
scenes?
This is
actually a multi-branched organization in which the pimps, as
suppliers of
the "goods," bordello madams as customers and, finally,
agents who
find still innocent girls, are all connected. Above them the
white slavers
proper hold sway, who have the over-all control in their
hands but who
almost never come into direct contact with the human
"goods," and
who are therefore hardly ever caught.
How well this
organization works can be seen from the fact that in
Paris, every
two years a list of bordellos appears and that in Buenos
Aires, a
"trade paper," called Lupanar, was published. In the German
system as
well, there was a special newspaper for prostitutes, Der
Pranger
[The Pillory], which was tolerated by the police in exactly the
same way as
the papers of homosexual men and women, or like the
notorious
"Verein der Vorbestraften" [Ex-Convicts'
Association].
Only a little
is known to us about the true leaders of white slavery.
Only one thing
can we maintain with certainty -- that the great majority
of white
slavers are Jews. This fact cannot be contested.
So, for
example, stated Herr G. Tuch of Hamburg, representative of the
Jewish great
lodge for Germany of the Order of B'nai Brith: "A large
number of Jews
from the East devote themselves to this disgraceful
[130] Furthermore, the Rabbi Dr. L. Rosenack admitted in a
lecture(1)
at an assembly
of rabbis held in Frankfurt am Main in 1902: "But at
any rate, it
is a sad fact that the Jewish girl victims are a
proportionately
large part of the percentage which the Poles and
Russians,
Galicians and Romanians, generally put into white slavery,
and not less
gloomy is the fact that a good portion of the white slavers
are
Jews."
The Freemason
O. Henne am Rhyne(2)
also claims the same thing: "It
is mostly Jews
who are running this large organized branch of the
business."
And the list
of the white slavers who operate in Switzerland contains
almost
exclusively Jewish names: A. Klinger, Feibisch Singer, Sulisch
Singer, Laib
Reisner, Sperling, Josef Handl, Josef Falilmann, Leo
Tabak, Josef
Goldstaub, Hersch Hirsch, Jetta Trost, David Sucher,
Chaim Parlett,
Enoch Kohn, Josef Wolberg, Berta Fostel -- most of
them come from
Lemberg, Czernowitz, Kolomea.
The Jew Dr. B.
Schidlof(3) has
expressed himself in the same way. The
fact of the
Jewish dominant influence in the white slave trade is so
incontestably
true, that even the Jews themselves are not able to cast
doubts upon
it. The proclivity of the Jews for the white slave trade is
not
conditioned solely by the possibility of particularly high
earnings(4), but is
also explainable on psychological grounds: the
white slave
trade corresponds in especial degree to the psyche of the
Jew and his
unique "ethics." Let us listen to what Wulffen -- by no
means an enemy
of the Jews -- has to say concerning the psychology of
the white
slaver:(5) "The
cunning with which he frequently must
proceed at
recruitment, the feeling of superiority that he learns to feel
towards the
girls ensnared and the authorities and officials he has
deceived, can
at times develop a sadistic hardness in his character, a
hardness
which, if he has a sensual nature, is even not without regard
for the future
sexual life of his victims of the sexual Underground.
Then he allows
himself small confidences as signs of his supposed
caring. The
lustful white slaver is a psychologically interesting [131]
phenomenon.
Sometimes he awkwardly steps out of his role, but the
infatuated
girl senses no looming disaster. Sometimes he shows a
marked great
inner coldness of heart, indeed, even evil. If provoked, he
can easily
become brutal. He has no respect for the honor of the female
sex. For him,
the young woman is only a piece of goods, for whom he
shows merely
the same care as a tradesman." All these determinations
climax in this
sentence of Wulff: "All of these characteristics are to be
found together
in Jews."
The majority
of white slavers come from the ghettos of Eastern
Europe. The
European centers are located in Warsaw, Budapest,
Lemberg,
Jassy, Brussels, and the important "harbors of departure" are
Triest and
Marseilles, while Hamburg, in consequence of the
watchfulness
of the German police, is only used reluctantly.
In the
following, some typical cases of the white slave trade detailed by
Wagener are
given, which delineate the methods of this business.
In Warsaw
there lived a cigarette [factory] worker with his wife and his
beautiful
16-year-old daughter Pauline. He was forced by unfortunate
circumstances
to borrow a sum of 150 Rubels from Herr Israel Loput.
Through this,
he fell into the hands of this man and moved with him to
London, while
his wife and daughter remained behind in Warsaw.
After a short
time the father summoned his family to follow him to
London, and
Loput was to bring them the money to travel. Of course
Loput did not
travel to London with the women, but to Brasil by way
of Genoa. In
Rio de Janiero, he arranged for the wife to go on land,
while the ship
continued on to Buenos Aires. There Loput sold the
daughter for
4000 Marks to a whorehouse.
In the same
year the Jewish white slaver Hermann Bahr of Galicia was
arrested when
he was travelling with a transport of 25 girls to
Constantinople.
Bahr, who is a resident there, exported more than a
hundred girls
each year to Constantinople, where they were auctioned
off publicly
in Galata for 400 to 1500 Marks, according to beauty. At
first, the
girls were hired as cashiers or chambermaids at a large salary
and kept in
the dark as much as possible about their fate. When they
then
discovered the truth, return was impossible. Bahr had numerous
male and
female agents and a completely outfitted office. His firm
name read:
Bahr, Exports to the Orient.
Into the house
of a well-to-do merchant in Zatmar (Hungary), a
respectable-looking
gentleman who called himself Oskar Klein, and
passed himself
off as a patron of the arts, got himself installed. He
[132] very soon discovered that one of the daughters of the
merchant, a
talented opera
singer, was a rising star in the theatrical firmament. He
wanted to
smooth the way to glory for the future great singer and,
thanks to his
influential connections, arrange for an engagement for her
in Munich.
With that, her fortune would be as good as made. The
parents were
beside themselves with joy. The father delivered the
daughter to
his friend and handed over to him 2000 Gulden besides.
Herr Klein now
travelled to Constantinople with the girl and five other
novices of the
arts, supposedly to establish a German theater, but in
reality to
sell the girls. At the last moment the girls fortunately
succeeded in
escaping.
In the
Prater in Vienna, the cook Marie H. became acquainted with the
agent Chaim
Apter, who on the same evening introduced her to his
brothers
Scholem and David Apter. The brothers pretended to the girl
that they
wanted to get her a position as a cook in America. She would
get, in
addition to free room and board, 60 Dollars a month in salary,
free travel
and many presents. Marie H. declared that she was ready to
accept the
position, and met with Scholem Apter and another girl one
morning to
start the journey to America. Apter instructed the girls how
they had to
behave once underway. They were supposed to speak with
no one, not
leave the wagon at any station, and most important of all,
act as if they
had never before seen him, their leader. Only by a lucky
accident were
the girls freed.
One of the
best known and most dangerous white slavers, who was
already wanted
for about 15 years, but who constantly evaded arrest by
means of false
papers, was Israel Meyrowicz. He was caught in
Kattowitz and
sentenced to three years in prison and five years of loss
of civil
rights. He conducted a white slave trade by entering into fake
marriages with
the girls and then getting rid of them abroad. These
phony
marriages are, as already described, one of the most customary
means of
carrying off girls abroad. These marriages are all the easier to
bring about
because the parents themselves advise their daughters to
marry. The
agents go into the poorest areas of Galicia and promise the
girls the most
shining future, then also present them with contracts
mentioning the
same goals, which are naturally false. The parents can
neither read
nor write, and gladly give their approval, in the hope of
getting their
daughter married to a man without having to give a
trousseau
or dowry. The young couple, beaming with happiness,
travels to a
harbor, where the man, after he has gotten his wife on
board,
disappears on a flimsy pretext. He [133]
then sends a message in
the closest
harbor, that he will be coming behind in the ship following.
The young wife
is now travelling without anxiety to her true new
home, where
she is immediately brought into a bordello.
The white
slaver Breier (sometimes also called Dr. Oppermann) knew
how to
insinuate himself into a respectable Berlin family and become
engaged to the
daughter of the house. Despite the fact that the young
lady was
officially informed that Breier was a notorious white slaver
and had
already been married for a long time, the daughter went with
him to
Budapest. From there Breier wrote also to the younger sister and
invited her to
the wedding. Fortunately, the young girl did not accept
this
invitation. Probably she would have shared the same fate as her
sister. The
parents received only a postcard from the latter, with the sad
words: "Your
profoundly unhappy Jenni sends you her greeting." She
was later
discovered in Vienna, but refused to return to her parents.
In a manner
similar to these individuals, also a great proportion of
impresarios
conduct a white slave trade. The musical comedy theater
owner
Preu�Ÿer forced the members of his troupe to participate in
suppers in
cabinets séparés after the performances. Four of his female
singers, once
they had dissolved their employment relationship, filed
charges of
procuring against Preu�Ÿer, in which they heavily
incriminated
him. But Preu�Ÿer produced the girls of his present troupe
as defense
witnesses, who all swore in the most irresponsible way, that
nothing
improper had happened. Preu�Ÿer's conviction was thereby
circumvented.
This case shows clearly what a corrupting influence
these
"entrepreneurs" exercise over their employees, and how difficult
it is made for
the Court to convict the dealers, even when they have
gained proof
of their activities. All of these people see perjury as a
crime only
when they are caught at it.
The white
slaver Veith, who was also not unknown in Berlin, was
arrested in
Hamburg. He had assembled a troupe of artistes, "die sieben
Libellen"
["The Seven Dragonflies"] with whom he toured through
Russia,
Austria, Holland, Italy and Germany. He pressured his artistes
into sexual
offenses. A whole series of girls were sold by him to the
whore houses
in Buenos Aires. He was arrested by an accident. One of
the girls had
gotten a job in Hamburg as a waitress. She saw Veith with
a girl on the
street and brought about his arrest. The girl with whom he
was just
planning his departure, he had bought from her own parents
for 1000
Marks.
[134] As the internationally known police expert J. Palitzsch
(1) was
able to
determine, the modern modern white slave trade works in three
directions.
Once, inexperienced and innocent females were led into
sexual
indecency by deceit -- that is an instance of direct white slavery
which has now
become rare.
Another kind,
which is an extremely widespread and profitable
business, is a
matter of the professional supplying of women, who
either find
themselves in desperate need, or who are driven by
recklessness
and love of finery, to houses of ill repute, cafés with
female staff,
or to positions as "travelling companions," etc. Even in
this case, the
woman is kept in the dark about the actual purpose of the
trip
abroad.
The third kind
is the direct exchange of prostitutes from bordello to
bordello. This
is also a "rewarding business," for in France alone, for
example, there
are 1500 bordellos, 12,000 registered prostitutes and
perhaps 70,000
unregistered, of which 4000 are foreigners. In Spain
there are
21,000 prostitutes (1000 foreigners), in Italy 12,000 (900
foreign),
etc., so that the "turnover" and correspondingly, the "profit,"
would not be
insignificant.
The modern
white slave trade, then, is nothing other than an enormous
organized
pandering operation in international scope.
At the top of
the pyramid of the white slaver hierarchy are the
wholesalers,
who own their own villas, have impressive bank accounts
at their
disposal, and are members of "society." They earn the most,
they are never
caught, and their names seem spotless. Naturally, these
are
Jews.
The cases are
rare in which the police succeed in catching the agents,
and ever more
rarely do they penetrate to his man behind the scenes,
but always
Jews are encountered.
The
difficulties in battling this are shown by the "Trial of the 112" in
Buenos Aires,
of which Dr. J. Ninck, the President of the Swiss
National Union
against the White Slave Trade, tells.
Rahel
Liebermann is a pretty, fresh girl, far from stupid but somewhat
inclined to
adventure. She has the bad luck to meet a white slaver, who
promises her a
fabulous post in [135] Argentina. She
leaves Poland,
makes the long
journey across all of Europe and goes overseas, to land
in a bordello.
The girl did not reckon on that, she tries to gain her
freedom again.
However, the police officials are bribed, she isn't able
to speak
Spanish, and as an inmate of a whorehouse she is met with
mistrust
everywhere; the madam does not shrink from violent measures
to "calm" the
girl.
Rahel
Liebermann is clever enough to see that she will not get
anywhere this
way, that she is completely powerless without money.
Since she has
now become a prostitute, she decides to at least get the
greatest use
out of this profession. Four years she remains in the
bordello, she
is industrious in her "work" like no one else, the guests
like the
pretty, always cheerful girl, and she gets many a silver peso as
a present. She
is also good at numbers and does not let herself be
cheated by the
madam. So well can she quarrel, yell and argue, that she
knows how to
prevent an excessive record of "debts" and the madam
does not hold
it against her, for she recognizes in Liebermann a nature
which is akin
to her own.
After four
years things have progressed so far that Rahel Liebermann
has saved
enough money, she leaves the bordello and -- without any
transition --
becomes an honest businesswoman. She opens an art shop.
She runs her
business with the same zeal and the same devotion as she
earlier showed
in the prostitution business. She's successful and soon
has a capital
of 90,000 Pesos.
As one sees,
the story of Rahel Liebermann is very similar to that of
Anna Meyner.
No wonder -- they are the same type, a Jewish prostitute
who does not
feel shame or debasement in her her occupation, but
rather sees it
as a business, like any other. The similarity goes still
deeper --
Liebermann too is married -- she marries a rich Jew, Herr
Salomon Josef
Korn . . .
It soon turns
out that the otherwise so clever Rahel has made a big
mistake this
time: to wit, Herr Korn is a white slaver. He gets control
of his wife's
money but he demands of her that she again go into a
bordello.
For Rahel,
it's a matter of money -- and there she knows no
compromise.
Like a lioness, she fights for her capital, she goes to the
police, to the
state's attorney, to the Court. There she meets a judge,
Ocampo, who
has long waited for a chance [136] to
bring the white
slaver to
justice for his shameful trade. The judge takes on the case
with fiery
zeal, and he succeeds in discovering extremely interesting
facts.
In particular,
Herr Salomon Korn is a member of the "Warsaw Society
for Mutual
Assistance and Lawful Burial." From the outside, one of the
countless
Jewish charitable and burial societies, with numerous
members -- all
Jews from Poland -- which even had its own cemetary.
In reality,
however, this society served only one purpose, to
camouflage the
true activity of its members: they were white slavers.
The truth is
known to every insider, but the legal machinery to justify
intervention
by the state is lacking. But the scandal is so great that the
Polish envoy
gets involved and categorically demands that the word
"Warsaw"
should be removed. The society accommodates the envoy
and decides to
rename itself "Zwi Migdol" (i.e., The Great Power).
Meanwhile, the
business of white slaving continues . . .
Ocampo does
not give in. House searches are instituted,
correspondence,
always in the Yiddish language, is confiscated, the
evidence for a
white slave trade is produced. The circle of the guilty
and the
implicated grows ever larger, and 424 arrest warrants are
issued.
The entire
campaign runs up against almost insuperable difficulties --
what can even
a lone judge accomplish against an organized Jewish
gang!
Police
officials are bribed, witnesses intimidated, important documents
and protocols
vanish in incomprehensible ways. Many of the accused
have "moved to
an unknown address," especially clever ones have
managed to get
themselves death certificates; now they can walk the
streets in
peace and go about their business -- they're no longer living,
of course, and
the dead cannot be arrested.
Finally, only
¼ of the accused -- 112 persons -- appear in Court. The
best
advocates, Jews of course, defend them -- and look, they are
plainly
"innocent honorable men." All proof and circumstantial
evidence is
plucked apart and talked to pieces, it turns out that the
Argentinian
laws concerning pimps are full of loopholes, so that there
can be no
question of crimes, not even of petty offenses.
The end? 8
(eight) defendants receive light punishment for "offending
against the
statutes of the Zwi Migdol Society," the rest are
acquitted!
[137] And now the most interesting thing of all: it turns out
that the
largest
portion of the "Zwi Migdol" Jews(1)
were simultaneously
members of the
Procor, the Moscow organization for the resettlement
of Jews in the
Soviet Union! The Procor was nothing other than a
Communist
front organization, which was in close contact with the
Soviet Trade
Delegation in Buenos Aires and later in Montevideo (the
seat of the
infamous Minkin!). The Jewish "charitable" society,
therefore, was
in actuality running a white slave trade operation as well
as Communist
propaganda at the same time. The honorable gentlemen
of Zwi Migdol
drew their income, as was judicially established, as
pimps or white
slavers(2) and were
also in the service of the Soviet
"Trade
Delegation" as Bolshevist agents and spies. Even here,
Bolshevism and
criminality walked hand-in-hand again once again.
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is not permitted. All rights
reserved.
T h e J e w a
s C r i m i n a l
Chapter
VIII: Sexual Offenders
---------------------------------------------------
---------------
(page
138)
In the last
chapter we were able to be convinced that the Jews play a
decisive role
in the white slave trade, in pimping and procuring. That is
no accident,
rather it corresponds to the nature of Judaism.
Three traits
are characteristic of the Jews: unscrupulous greed for
power, greed
for money and a high degree of sexual greediness,
coupled with a
"morality" which is fundamentally alien and hostile to
us. The
unavoidable consequence is that every area which is in any
way connected
to sexuality, is controlled by or riddled with Jews.
To grasp these
facts in their full compass, we must take a closer look at
Jewish "sexual
morality." For that purpose, we take the work which for
sixty or
seventy generations of Jews has prescribed the type and style
of their life
and forms the meetest expression of the Law for Judaism --
When one
speaks of the Talmud, the Jews and those friendly to Jews
suggest that
the "modern" Jew no longer observes the Talmud, indeed,
does not know
its contents at all. Certainly, what European Jew will
belt himself(2)
with a handkerchief or fear to touch meat with a
"milky" knife,
or search his entire residence before the Passover feast
for the
presence of "Chomez"(3)? In this sense, in
the sense of the
literal
observance of all prescriptions, Western Jews do not adhere to
the
Talmud. What remains, however, is the spirit of the
Talmud.
If the
Talmud were not consubstantial with the spirit of the Jewish
people, it
would not have held this people under its spell for millenia,
to determine
its entire conduct and its hopes. Therefore, we are totally
justified
[139] in drawing inescapable conclusions
concerning the spirit
and the acts
of Jewry, even of emancipated Jewry, from the spirit if not
from the
literal text of the Talmud.
It is a
bizarre, abstract and -- one can say -- abominable world, which is
revealed in
the study of the Talmud. There is nothing of what we
understand by
the word "religion." No divine mercy, no sacraments, no
absurd hope --
which is not denied even to the sinner -- no faith, no
warmth of
heart, neither joy nor sorrow, no ecstasy, no love, no
contrition, no
profundity. Nothing of any of those things. Only barren,
cold and
hair-splitting dialectics, flat-out Materialism, scatologies, a
fantasy that
can revel only in numbers or in sexual debaucheries(1).
Judaism, as it
is reflected in the Talmud, is no community of Faith,
rather a
society of reciprocity and limited liability: the Jew fulfills all
commandments
of Yahweh, for which he is personally promised, and
all the people
of Israel are promised, wealth and power -- a proper
double-entry
bookkeeping, in which every God-pleasing act is
appraised and
entered to the Heller and Pfennig [i.e., to the exact dollar
and cent]. The
Talmud recognized 126 commandments of the first
importance,
and 243 prohibitions; whoever fulfills them exactly (be it
only formally,
as above in the example of the handkerchief), has the
right to claim
a corresponding reward from God's side of the ledger.
It is not our
task to characterize the Talmud from every angle; we wish
to take a
somewhat closer look only at what the Talmud has to say
concerning the
sexual life of Jewry. In essence, it is the following:
1. The Jew
is sexually undisciplined and uses every opportunity to
satisfy his
sexual greed.
The
Schulchan aruch prescribes: there shall be no steward in the house,
so that he
might not seduce the women. A scholar is not allowed to live
in a house
with a widow. A woman is not permitted to keep male
slaves, even
if they are children. An unmarried male shall not be a
teacher,
because mothers come to pick up their children. The same
holds for
unmarried female teachers, since men can also come to pick
up children.
It is not advisable for a man to remain alone [140] with
one other man
or with a beast (for he might be able to assault them). A
man and a
woman are not permitted to remain alone together for any
longer than is
needed to finish an egg meal, for otherwise well-founded
suspicion of
adultery would exist.
The effects
upon woman of the enjoyment of wine are described in the
following
words: "A cup does well by a woman, two are nasty, and
after three
she shifts to indecency in speech, with four she buys a
donkey at the
market (to satisfy herself with), and it means nothing to
her"
(Kethuboth, F. 65 a).
If this image
of the Jew, created by Jews -- lechery which is ready for
any
satisfaction and for any indecency -- is correct, one can understand
why the
Talmud regulates everything which concerns the sexual act so
thoroughly and
in such detail. The lustfulness of the Jew is a public
danger.
2. Moral
crimes and offenses are only punished by fines.
"The seducer
has to pay in three ways and the rapist in four ways(1)
.
The seducer
has to pay for shaming her, for the decrease in her value
and a fine for
atonement. The rapist must pay besides these, money for
her pain"
(Kethuboth 39a).
For an
unpremeditated rape, compensation, money for the pain, costs
of treatment
and payment for her absence must be rendered, but not
money for
shaming her, since the act was not planned (Baba kamma
26).
Now for an
interesting example, which, because of the time and the
source, can be
under no suspicion of being tendentious.
The Jewish
constable Friedenthal in the Friedenwalde had seduced a
serving girl
and a son was the result of the relationship, who died,
however, two
weeks after birth. The girl lodged a complaint against
Friedenthal
and in particular on the basis of the Jewish law which
regards
deflowering as a "crime expurgable by money." The assessors
of the
Jewish court in Berlin rendered the following opinion on 02
"The Jewish
laws, based upon purely Mosaic prescriptions, as well as
upon the
opinions of the Talmud, composed according to oral tradition
and the later
commentaries, whose line ends with Maimonides and the
Schulchan
aruch, entitle [141] the father of a
seduced girl, if she was
willing and
was herself complicit in the act, to demand a compensation
for the
corruption of an object completely belonging to him, which
consists of
this, that the seducer either marries the girl or pays him (the
father) a fine
of 50 Shekels. From the Talmud: Ketunbath and
Yadhachhazan
(of Maimonides) Hilchat Narok, the following
qualifications
apply: 1. that the seduced woman really has a father who
demands the
compensation; 2. that she never has been promised to a
man and 3.
that she has not yet reached the age of adulthood, i.e., six
months after
the signs of womanhood have arrived in her, which
usually
happens between the twelfth and fifteenth years of age and
make her a
woman. But in cases in which these qualifications do not all
occur
together, she is master over her own self and must bear the guilt,
if he did not
demonstrably promise her an amount as a gift, and if no
stuprum
violentum (desecration through the use of force, therefore
rape) had
occurred, without being able to demand more from the
seducer than
support for the child, which is his property and not hers.
Further, 50
Shekels, as the fixed sum of the bridegroom's gift, amounts
to 53 and 1/3
Lot of fine silver, but that would be about 53 Taler, since
the Taler
is worth 16 and 2/3 grams of fine silver, but not the 200
Taler
which was
demanded."
The
business-like nature of this opinion certainly cannot be outdone!
3.
Debaucheries are permissible if they do not show Jewry in a
bad
light.
"If someone
sees that his evil impulses are getting the better of him, let
him go to a
place where no one knows him, let him dress in black and
follow the
impulse of his heart, only let him not desecrate the divine
Name publicly"
(Chagiga 16a).
4. Sexual
intercourse with children is permitted.
The
Schulchan aruch determines: Coitus with a girl under three years
and one day
old is not punishable. A woman who has sexual relations
with a boy
under nine years of age is not punishable. Whoever has
misused a
Jewish virgin over three years and one day old, but under
twelve-and-a-half
years old, has only to pay a fine.
All the
disgusting "prescriptions" of the Talmud have a completely
current
significance for Jewry. The Talmudic anti-morality finds its
practical
precipitation in Jewish sexual offenses of all kinds; it finds its
"theoretical"
fallout in the "politics of law" of Jewry.
It is an
established fact that Jewry, by means of the Marxist and
Communist
Parties, but also by means of help [142]
from Liberalism,
seeks to
realize these principles of the Talmud in the practical
legislation of
its host nations and actually has realized them there,
where it has
been able to take over power -- in the Soviet Union.
What the
Jewish press, revue, film, theater(1)
agitate and propagandize
for, that is
what the Jewish "jurists," instructors in penal code,
attorneys,
judges and professors of civil and public law preach, that is
what the
Jewish leaders of the Marxist and Communist Parties propose
in the
parliaments, that is what the Jewish People's Commissars decree
in the
Bolshevist regime.
In the
foreground stands so-called "birth control," i.e., the unleashing
of abortion
and the systematic undermining of the potency of the
people. An
incalculable amount of literature, written by Jewish authors
of a
pseudo-scientific or purely propagandistic type, concerns itself
with this
problem. A single example may suffice.
In 1930 the
detailed research of the Jew Ernst Kahn, which appeared
in the Jewish
Sozietätsverlag [publishing society] of Frankfurt am
Main caused a
sensation: "The International Birth-Strike." The content
of this book
is exhausted in its title. The advertisement, found in the
same book, of
the book, "How one reads the business section of a daily
newspaper,"
authored by the same Ernst Kahn and his racial comrade
Fritz
Naphtali, and appearing from the same publisher, now worked
like a beam of
light into the connections of the Jewish activity of
corruption.
Naphtali was the economics expert of the Social
Democratic
trade unions of Germany. Ernst Kahn, at the same time,
was a
co-worker of the highly capitalistic Frankfurter Zeitung and of
the
Wirtschaftskurve [Economic Curves] from the same
publisher.
Another
example. One of the most dynamic Communist organizations
is, as is
well-known, the Internationale Rote Hilfe [International Red
Assistance],
MOPR in its Russian initials. In Berlin there is naturally a
Mopr
publishing house. In 1931, the latter issued a comprehensive
"scientific"
work under the title Geschlechtsleben und Strafrecht
[Sexual
Life and Criminal Law] of the notorious Communist Party
member,
cultural Bolshevist and red "theoretician of the Law," the Jew
Felix
Halle. The foreword to this lexicon of Judeo-Bolshevist
corruption of
morals [143] and distortion of law was of
course supplied
by the
inevitable Magnus Hirschfeld. This piece put forth the claim that
a "sexual
revolution" was necessary, and particularly in connection
with the armed
Communist rebellion. All "liberations" of the sexual
impulses, the
immunity from punishment for sexual offenses and
perversities
of every kind, would be brought about by the Bolshevist
Revolution,
just as actually had been realized in the Soviet
Union.
On the
question of abortion, for example, it says(1):
"The
legislation of the Soviet Republics was the first to draw
conclusions
from this situation. The Soviet legislation determines, in
regard to
abortion, that the pregnant woman is no longer subject to
criminal
responsibility for her person on account of abortion, or on
account of
corresponding acts of commission or omission."
Naturally, the
Communist faction of the Reichstag supported the repeal
of the
abortion paragraph 218. Exactly in the same way that the Social
Democrat
Reichstag Deputy Dr. (of Medicine) Julius Moses did in the
Abend
[Evening] of 12 March 1929(2):
"The infamous
§ 218, the so-called abortion paragraph, one of the most
disastrous
remnants of anti-social, reactionary legislation, will shortly
be placed in
debate in the law committee.
The
Social-Democratic Reichstag faction has already submitted
proposals in
earlier years, which demand the repeal of § 218 . . .
How many human
beings has § 218 already murdered? And the
operation --
let this again be stressed -- when performed by qualified
people -- is
not harmful. Unreasonable and criminal class interests have
joined forces
to cover up this truth."
And
furthermore, still more clearly(3):
"The Communist
Party had demanded in committee, in accordance
with the
principles here developed, to repeal the entire criminal status
of incest (see
Motion Nr. 314, Numeral 10, Reichstag printing of
Committee
21)."
The ideal, of
course, is the Soviet Union(4):
"Repeal of the
criminality of incest in the Soviet Union.
[144] The sexual penal law of the Soviet Union no longer
prosecutes
incest. The
proletariat has a vital interest in the health of the new
generation.
But since the research in the field of eugenics has so far
shown that,
assuming that the parents are themselves healthy, a healthy
posterity can
be descended even from those who are related by blood --
but on the
other hand, genetically tainted children can be the issue of
the congress
of sick parents who are not related, the Soviet legislator
does not see
any possibility of regulating this problem in the
proletarian
sense, by means of penal law."
Presumably,
the following is to be explained on the basis of Jewish
"Elimination
of the punishment of sodomy in the Soviet Union.
The Soviet
sexual criminal law on this issue is based upon the view of
the
legislator, that indecency with animals is not an act to which the
state has to
respond with the means of penal law. . ."
Consequently:
"Position of
the parties on the punishment of sodomy.
The Communist
faction of the Reichstag moved for the removal of this
regulation at
the first reading."
Naturally, the
open practice of homosexuality is also a "demand of the
class-conscious
proletariat."(2)
"Based upon
the recognition of these connections, the class-conscious
proletariat is
fighting against the situation in which, for homosexual
activity
during puberty, young male and female proletarians are
remanded as
"morally reprehensible" by the youth courts of the
bourgeois
state or by the administrative authorities, to reform school
and placed in
mental institutions, which, according to their method of
administration
and practice, are to be regarded as penitentiaries for
youth."
"The Soviet
law has eliminated the penal regulations in Czarist law
which referred
to homosexual acts."
This brief
listing can already suffice. On the other side, the conscious
corruption of
marriage and family corresponds to the positive
promotion of
sexual crime. The "Ideal" is the dissolution of marriage
and the
family, as became fact in the Soviet Union(4).
[145] "It is the common will which establishes marriage, the
cessation
of this common
will, even by the declaration of one spouse, leads to its
abolition. In
the time of transition, for reasons of order, the state merely
notes the fact
of a marital union or dissolution, in that it allows
corresponding
entries in a state marriage registry to be made.
But the free
union which is not registered, is not regarded by the
Socialist
legislator -- in contrast to the bourgeois legislator -- as legally
being of less
value."
Marriage as
natural order, as moral concept and as an institution of the
law, is
obliterated. In Soviet law, the place of marriage is taken by the
"actual sexual
relationship." According to Halle, the "sexual
revolution" of
Communism paves the way to unlimited sexual pleasure.
In the Soviet
state, the Golden Age is dawning of all desires which are
unnatural and
dissolute(1):
"Since in the
proletarian community the bounds of sexual freedom are
not determined
by the interests of a small minority through regard for
possession,
but are derived from the interests of the class as a whole, so
the result is
that all limitations which require an unnatural sexual life
(as, for
example, celibacy; life-long intractable monogamy -- or even a
marriage
lasting a long time when an aversion to the spouse has
developed;
demanding chastity of youth who are sexually mature, or of
those who are
unmarried), are rejected as coercive standards."
There can
hardly be a better proof of the inseparable connection
between Jewry,
crime and Bolshevism, than this piece of work by
Comrade
Halle.
The political
pornography of Judeo-Bolshevism takes its worthy place
alongside the
sexual pornography of its "liberal" racial comrades.
Behind both
leers the ugly face of the Jew.
Modern Jewry,
unleashed and come to power, destroys all foundations
of ethnic
life. It does this with state-organized propaganda, by law and
by terror, in
the country where rulership by Jews has become reality --
the Soviet
Union. The same fate would have fallen upon Germany, too,
had not Adolf
Hitler rescued it. As much as it was in its power to do so,
Jewry had
prepared a "sexual reform" according to the model of the
Soviet
Union.
Manifold are
the paths exploited by Jewry: writing, art, the press, film,
the stage and,
not least of all, science. For science, too, had to serve the
same goal.
Sigmund Freud surprised the world with "profoundly
probing" [146] discoveries. He taught that every boy
desires his own
mother and
wants to kill his father ("Oedipus Complex"), that fathers
have the
custom of threatening their sons with cutting off their
members
("Castration Complex"), that a dream in which a hatbox
appears
obviously refers to the female genitals, that every thought,
every feeling,
every stirring of the soul at all, is solely and exclusively
sexual. A
legion of "psychoanalysts" have put these theories into
practice.
Patients afflicted with mental pain are told that they are
suffering from
"repression," and "letting themselves go" is
recommended as
a remedy -- under the the pretext of medical
assistance,
depravity is released, and during the hour of discussion,
patient and
doctor strive to give to every wretched triviality as filthy an
interpretation
as possible.
One step lower
yet are the "sex scientists." What was once sold in
secret as
pornography, now lies in the open on the store counter.
"Sexual book
dealerships" came into existence, "enlightening" lectures
were held,
special "institutes" founded -- all this under the aegis of
"science." And
who were the "sex scientists"? Jews -- Hirschfeld,
Bloch,
Kronfeld, Abraham, Seelig, Schidlof,
Levy-Lenz,
Eulenburg,
Cohen, Rabinovitch, Hodann. --
One of the
most contemptible was the one last named above. His
subject was
masturbation, for whose inhibition he gave three reasons:
religion,
reactionism, and the power of the bourgeoisie, from which he
seriously
inferred that there could be no better remedy for the
"liberation"
of masturbators than the dictatorship of the proletariat!
Masturbators
of all nations, unite!
Those were the
authors. And their works? Here are some of the titles:
Die
Perversen [The Perverts], Die Prostitution
[Prostitution], Berlins
drittes
Geschlecht [Berlin's Third Sex], Künstliche
Verjungung
[Artificial
Rejuvenation], Sappho und Socrates [Sappho and Socrates],
Empfängnisverhütung
[Contraception], Geschlechtsübergänge
[Transexualities],
Liebesmittel [Love Aids]. One publisher issued an
entire series
of "moral histories" -- of the secret and forbidden, of the
intimate and
most intimate, of fondling and punishment, of vice and
indecency, of
scent, of taste, etc., etc. Another publisher put out a
series of
books: Das Weib als Sklavin [The Woman as Slave], Das
lüsterne
Weib [The Lustful Woman], Das feile Weib [The Woman for
Sale],
Das grausame Weibe [The Cruel Woman], Das üppige
Weib
[The
Luscious Woman] -- naturally always "profusely illustrated."
Worthy of this
"science" was also the "literature" manufactured by
Jewish
authors. They were the best-known literary men of the system
of the time,
who energetically took part in it: Lion Feuchtwanger,
Alfred
Döblin, Alfred Kerr, Ernst Toller, Emil Ludwig, Bert
Brecht,
F. Holländer and many others, each did his part [147] to
shake the
moral base and foundations of the character of the people.
For example, a
dozen years ago, a prominent Jewish writer, Arthur
Landsberger,
glorified the courtesan in these words:
"The courtesan
is to be spoken of as the most perfect type of woman in
creation. Of
course, whoever feels the mother with the mammal at her
breast to be
an idyll, and is immune to the odor of wet diapers, to him,
that mother
who bears the most children may appear most valuable."
Woman as
universally accessible object, as "courtesan," more
accurately
expressed, as whore! The same ideal, the same filthy
attitude --
any woman for any man -- we find in many so-called
"literary
productions" of the late Jewish greats, like Alfred Kerr, Kurt
Tucholsky,
Walter Hasenclever, etc.(1)
Jewry is
perhaps at its wildest in the revue, which is under 100%
Jewish
monopoly. James Klein could advertize his revue in Berlin
thusly:
"Undress! An evening without morality. With the assistance of
60
prize-winning models. The hunt for beautiful women. Adventures
with a
15-year-old. Bathing in natural water. The giant canopy bed.
The woman with
a whip. The image of the sun and naked magic."
The titles
other revues are typical: "Häuser der Liebe" ["Houses of
Love"],
"Tausend nackte Frauen" ["A Thousand Naked Women"],
"Streng
verboten" ["Strictly Forbidden"], "Sündig und sü�Ÿ" ["Sinful
and Sweet"].
Unmistakable, like the titles, was the text and stage
setting.
Adultery, homosexual love, prostitution -- that was
glamorized.
Only with the
deepest disgust can one recall this time, when unleashed
Jewry made
itself felt everywhere, perverted all that was natural, pulled
anything
sublime down into excrement and transformed it into smutty
triviality.
All of this --
Jewish literature, film, revue -- is hardly anything else
but a
reshaping of the old Jewish specialty, which is designated by
jurists as
"dissemination of indecent writings." The Jews have always --
the Talmud
already furnishes numerous examples -- felt an insuperable
inclination
toward intensive preoccupation with sexual matters, with
rooting about
in the sexual.
As we have
already seen, the Talmud sees no crime in the sexual abuse
of children,
but rather at most, [148] an offense which
can have no
consequences
other than a fine. Since the Talmud does not confer
recognition of
her own personality upon a woman and doesn't know the
notion of
"sexual honor," it is not to be wondered at if children are
viewed as
objects of lust. This spirit of sexual profanation of children
finds
expression in the extremely numerous cases in which Jews
violate
children. The public seldom learns of this, since the criminal
Jew is always
prepared "to pay a fine," i.e., to pay the victims and
parents money
to keep their mouths shut. Since the victims are chosen
with
premeditation, it usually turns out not to be difficult to purchase
silence by a
sufficiently high payment, all the more so, because the
parents fear
the public finding out about the violation of their children.
In what is to
follow, the famous Sternberg trial is described, in which
there was a
conviction only because a fearless and dutiful penal official
stood firm
against all the machinations of the Jews.
The accused
was a banker, son of a baptized Jew and of a German
woman.
Although the Jewish descent of Sternberg was not subject to
any doubt, he
was presented by the Jews as a "racially pure German."
Even the
Jewish reporter (S. Friedländer) from whose book,
Interessante
Prozesse [Interesting Trials], the following material is
taken, spoke
of Sternberg as if he were speaking of a non-Jew --
unpleasant
facts are always flatly denied by the Jewish side.
From his
father Sternberg had inherited business sense, from his
mother blonde
hair and blue eyes. He wears a fashionably trimmed full
beard; he is a
handsome man and a wealthy one. His wife is a German,
he seems to be
the best husband one could imagine, and his family life
is untroubled.
In other ways as well, Sternberg is a fortunate man, his
businesses do
brilliantly, he's on the best terms with the "leaders of
society." He
began as a modest bank employee, now he has become a
banker, he has
a share in various mining and iron works, and he's also
built the
Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe railroad. How great is Sternberg's
wealth? In
1893, the Jewish blood in his veins impels him into a
conflict with
the tax authorities, and his wealth is estimated by judicial
experts at at
least 18 million Marks. At the turn of the century, 18
million Marks
was a large, a very large, sum! -- Not in vain did his
friends and
admirers compare him with Harriman or Vanderbilt. The
life of August
Sternberg, 48 years old, born in Frankfurt am Main, now
a banker in
Berlin, seems [149] lucky, successful, and
harmonious.
And now, on 26
January 1900, this Sternberg is arrested! He is charged
with crimes of
immorality against an under-age girl. Sternberg has an
irrepressible
attraction to small children. Once, when he was still
single, he
took for himself a "housekeeper." She was just 17 years old,
a beauty by
the standards of the time: snow-white face, large, coal-
black eyes, a
well-developed figure. All went well for a time, but soon
Sternberg had
had enough of her -- she was too old for him -- already a
woman, not an
as yet undeveloped girl. One day Sternberg came out
with a plan --
the housekeeper was supposed to open a boarding school
for little
girls, he'd then visit her often. "I would like to have an eight-
year-old,
women 16 years old are disgusting to me." In these words he
confessed his
heart's desire. When the housekeeper refused, she was
thrown out on
the street.
Berlin is
large, there are enough obliging people there who are glad to
earn money.
One such person is Helene Fischer, the proprietress of a
"massage
salon." What kind of "salon" this is, is later discovered before
the Court --
Fischer will have to admit that she also massaged
"obscenely."
Small girls are a specialty of the "salon," in the house at
Alexandrinenstra�Ÿe
1 b, there are schoolgirls going in and out. One
tells another
that there's money that can be earned, and gradually a
proper stock
exchange of vice and child molestation comes into being.
Even in the
arcade, the meeting place of the Berlin prostitutes at that
time,
Fischer's name is known: frequently a deputy of the
masseusse
shows up and
in great haste picks up a girl of the streets who is as child-
like-appearing
as possible. Fischer also knows another way to help
herself -- in
many newspapers ads appear: "Models with juvenile looks
sought by
painter."
Sternberg is
one of Fischer's clients. One time, he's a painter, and has
models with
juvenile shapes, whom he requires for his "art studies,"
brought to
him. Another time he plays the role of "uncle doctor" and
"examines"
children. He has them take a bath in front of him,
sometimes he
"punishes" them and flogs them for supposed offenses,
for the
otherwise so lovable banker, a paragon of tenderness and
pampering when
at home by himself, is not completely free of sadistic
impulses, and
welts on the body of a little girl, from the blows of a
whip, spur on
his lust. Painter, doctor or educator -- the goal is always
the same --
sexual abuse of the girls. Later, the Court will certify of
him that the
number of his victims during a six month [150]
period had
amounted to at
least thirty. For how many girls had Sternberg pointed
the way to
depravity for the whole rest of their lives?
And now
everything has come out, and Sternberg sits in the dock. He
isn't taking
the case overly tragically -- once already, 15 years ago, he
was involved
in a similar affair, but his Jewish defense counsel was
able to
convince the court that Sternberg was acting in good faith when
he reckoned
the girl to be older than 16 years of age . . .
Why should
things turn out differently this time? However, his judges
are less
lenient and Sternberg is sentenced to two years in prison!
Sternberg was
not one of those who simply lays down his weapons in
defeat. First
of all, an appeal is filed, the Reichs-court nullifies the
conviction, he
is to be tried once again. With this, Sternberg gains
several
months' time, and he will make use of this time to effectively
prepare his
defense. The means for this -- genuinely Jewish -- are
"connections"
and money.
Sternberg is a
prominent member of Berlin "society," and he numbers
all sorts of
influential personalities among his friends. For example,
there's the
Director of the Berlin Police. He socializes on terms of
friendship
with Sternberg and is a frequent and welcome guest at his
villa. More
than this, Sternberg holds a 15,000 Mark mortgage on his
estate on the
island of Rügen, and he owes the banker 2000 Marks in
cash besides.
Can the police director show ingratitude, when Sternberg
asks a small
service of him -- for instance, to dampen the zeal of his
officers who
took part in the preliminary investigation, or transfer them
if need be?
Sternberg puts
even more hope in his money. He possesses millions --
whom would he
not be able to buy?
Somewhere in
Berlin is the detective bureau "Jus"; its Director, Herr
Detective-Director
Schulze, is prepared to assist Sternberg gladly -- by
seeing to it
that inconvenient witnesses are silent, or change their
testimony. He
also collects unfavorable information about prosecution
witnesses in
order to portray their testimony as not credible.
Foolish gossip
is collected, and money, promises and sinister threats
are used. In
the event of an acquittal, the Herr Detective-Director is
supposed to
receive not less than fifty thousand Marks (in actuality,
Sternberg will
pay only 12,000).
[151] And now the Herr Detective-Director sets his agents
loose upon
the witnesses.
The most dangerous is the constable Stierstädter; as a
police
officer, he is now just as zealous, energetic and conscientious as
he'd been as a
soldier. It is Stierstädter who uncovered the goings-on in
the
Alexandrinenstra�Ÿe house, and it was also thanks to him that
several of the
molested girls were found. From a level above the
Director, the
transfer of Stierstädter to Criminal Commissioner Thiel is
put through.
But Thiel has been bribed by the agents of the Banker: for
8000 Marks, he
has undertaken to "bring Stierstädter around, to be
reasonable"
(he will later be sentenced to three years in prison for this).
Thiel tries to
do so four times; one time, he invites Stierstädter to a
birthday
celebration; another time, they meet in an expensive
restaurant.
Once -- when they are eating partridges and drinking
champagne --
Thiel believes that he has worn Stierstädter down.
Without
beating about the bush, he offers him 70,000 Marks straight
out and holds
out to him the prospect of a villa on Lake Geneva. "One
must have some
human feeling, Sternberg has been sitting there such a
long time
already," he says, appealing to his emotions.
He doesn't
succeed; Stierstädter has gotten his teeth into the case, and
he is not to
be swayed into changing his testimony. Another way is
then tried.
The Command of the Police Director takes Stierstädter in
hand. It is
suggested to him that he give up any further steps in the
affair, and he
is then threatened that, in case he should resign, his
[discharge]
certificate will be unfavorable.
Nevertheless,
Stierstädter is, and remains, obstinate. He murmurs
something
about military service, his oath, and doesn't allow himself to
be forced to
change his testimony in any way. And it will be the lowly
police officer
Stierstädter who will bring down the powerful banker
Sternberg, for
all other witnesses allow themselves to be intimidated or
bribed.
Detective-Director
Schulze has mobilized an entire work force -- they
have names
like: Frau Stabs, Fritz Wolff, Popp, Suchart, Ebstein,
Frälein Saul,
the Friedmann brothers, Kemptner, almost all are Jews.
From feelings
of solidarity and for the sake of money they stand by
Sternberg to
the utmost of their powers. Witnesses receive payments of
10, 20, even
100 Marks, if they testify favorably or go on trips to
places
unknown. Others are intimidated, especially the girls whom
Sternberg once
molested. A gentleman in top hat and with curled dark
moustaches
whispers to one of the witnesses as he walks by her:
"Watch out,
it's your life that's at stake!" Another is invited to have a
glass [152] of beer by an unknown ordinary looking
fellow who
rehearses her
testimony with her. If she should testify differently --
here the
fellow suddenly drops his comfortable manner and looks like a
dangerous
predator -- she can expect a "charge of perjury." What that's
supposed to
mean the girl doesn't know, but it sounds perilously like
prison --
what's left for her to do, but give in without resistance? Herr
Wolff promises
the important witness Blümke 15,000 Marks to
establish a
business, and she is presented with a gold watch and a ring
as an advance.
Jewish journalists receive gifts and write favorably
about
Sternberg. The dangerous Fischer is deported to America as
quickly as
possible, and she is promised 100 Marks quarterly. It cannot
be ascertained
from the Court reports whether Fischer was a Jewess,
but to judge
by her business acumen, she certainly was: she put down
two written
statements one of them in favorable to Sternberg, the other -
- unfavorable.
She deposited each with a different attorney and
prepared to
earn as much money as possible for herself from the case.
Finally, the
trial is at hand. Sternberg is calm -- the witnesses are
prepared, and
he has not fewer than six attorneys, the flower of Jewish
advocacy:
Counselor Wronker, Counselor Stello, Dr. Werthauer
(already at
that time!), Dr. H. Heinemann, Dr. Fuchs I [sic], Dr.
Mendel. They
are to prove Sternberg's innocence.
The thesis of
the defense is this: Sternberg has enemies, these enemies
have bribed an
unscrupulous officer, namely Stierstädter, who for his
part bribed or
intimidated witnesses. With a mysterious smile, the
insinuation is
made that this is a case of sham charges based upon anti-
Semitism, and
therefore an affair which no enlightened and upstanding
person would
allow to be supported in any way. That is a tried and
tested Jewish
trick: the basis for discussion is shifted to another, more
suitable plane
and the facts of the case turned upside down.
The witness
Frieda Woyda, one of the most important and also a
victim,
appears. Orphaned early in life, she went to her aunt's and then -
- by way of a
classified ad -- to Fischer, to help in the business.
The small
Frieda is still very much a child. That she is soon to be
twelve years
old, one cannot tell at all; she is pretty, her eyes look full
of innocence
-- the right kind of prey for Sternberg, who molested her
several
times.
When she
appears in Court the first time, she answers all questions
candidly, if
shyly, she looks the judge in the eye, her voice is clear. In
the months
which have elapsed between the two trials, Frieda has been
"worked on."
[153] Her eyes are sunken, and one can
hardly hear what
she is saying.
The child is obviously acting under the influence of a
terrible fear.
She recants everything, Sternberg, she says, didn't do
anything to
her, the first time she was lying about everything.
All day long
the Court exerts itself over her; neither admonitions of the
judge, nor the
thundering voice of the state's attorney yield results.
Frieda is
silent or cries -- God knows what Sternberg's friends and
hirelings have
used to inspire such fear in her. When she is asked why
she testified
differently the first time, she shoves everything off on
Stierstädter
-- she said that he had intimidated her, he had threatened,
he had
rehearsed her testimony.
Other girls as
well testify in the same tone: Stierstädter had "so
frighteningly
rolled his eyes," he had bribed them, he had threatened
them with the
Vice Police . . .
Everywhere the
evil Stierstädter, the pig-headed anti-Semite, who
organized the
whole battue against a respectable Jewish banker. And
one day the
defense experiences a great triumph. It is discovered that
Stierstädter
is a morally depraved subject: once, he broke his marriage
vows! The
friends of the child-molester point at the adulterer with
horror, they
shout: "Pfui!" This is supposed to be a servant of the state,
one is
supposed to believe the word of this man! The policeman stands
there confused
and with his neck reddening, he doesn't know what has
hit him. He
believed he was doing his duty, but now he himself has
become the
accused. Meanwhile, the well-nourished and well-groomed
banker lolls
about at the defense table and arrogantly looks at
Stierstädter,
who dared to go up against six lawyers, against the Jewish
press, against
Sternberg's millions. In the Jewish papers, a storm
breaks,
Stierstädter is spoken of only with disgust and contempt,
disciplinary
proceedings are opened against the "disloyal" officer on
account of
adultery. That should serve as a lesson for others!
Sternberg's
defense methods are still not exhausted after that. Politics
as well should
be made serviceable to him, and in particular -- how
should it be
otherwise with a Jew -- the working class and the Social
Democrats. One
of the defense counsel asked the state's attorney: "Is it
true that you
had said that Social Democratic oaths are perjuries?"
The question
is not allowed by the Court, but the tone of voice and
gestures of
the defense counsel leave no room for doubt: this state's
attorney is a
cultureless and narrow-minded reactionary -- from whom
one cannot
believe one word.
[154] The defense also knows how to make much of the "social
service" of
the child-molester. Did he not always see to the welfare of
his workers?
Has he not worked on generous plans for unemployment
insurance? Has
he not been a reliable friend of the working man? But
extremely
unmistakable pressure is applied to the workers who labor in
Sternberg's
firms: either you sign a petition in his favor, or you're out . .
.
The trial
lasts 38 days, for 38 days German justice must concern itself
with a totally
clear case, for which a few days at most would have been
necessary.
Dozens of rehearsed witnesses march up to testify, the most
famous experts
have expressed opinions (the Court costs amount to
15,000 Marks),
the press is split into two camps, the unfortunate Police
Director
commits suicide, a series of witnesses are arrested right from
the witness
bench, several police officials go to disciplinary
proceedings,
existences are destroyed -- all due to a Jewish sex
criminal.
However, all
of this does not help, for Sternberg cannot buy everyone
with his
millions. Not the policeman loyal to his duty, and not the
Court, either:
Sternberg is convicted.
Jewry has
become richer by one "martyr," for what has Sternberg done,
other than
fulfill "the Law of the fathers"?!
On 29 April
1935, at about 10 in the evening, a teacher at the
Bruckschen
Higher Commercial School, Bachelor of Commercial
Education
Albert Hirschland, is arrested in Magdeburg. The founder of
the school as
well, Alfred Bruck, was a Jew, and related to Hirschland
by marriage.
On 19 June, 1935, Hirschland was convicted by the Jury-
Court in
Magdeburg to ten years in prison, ten years' loss of civil
liberties, and
supervision for life.
We give here
the argument of the foreman of the Jury-Court in this
case of a
Jewish sex criminal(1):
"When I got
the documents for the first time to study them, the
impression on
me then was so shocking and so depressing, as with no
other work
during my long time in office. The main trial has not
mitigated this
impression. It has sickened us even more and depressed
us even more.
The picture that we have gotten of the accused is that of
an
unrestrained and low libertine of rare type.
[155] The accused is a full-blooded Jew. To be sure, he had
himself
baptized on
the 17th of March of this year, but he didn't do this out of
conviction. He
himself maintains that he had gotten himself baptized in
order to
better be able to marry Gisela Stein, who is descended from
Jewish parents
but who wants to be an Evangelical. However that may
be, this
completed act of baptism is evidence of the inner duplicity of
the accused.
He betrays the faith of his fathers for reasons of
expediency and
today he states that he is an Evangelical Christian, but
he is
actually, as ever, a Jew.
Albert
Hirschland extensively conducted sexual affairs with non-Jews,
who for the
most part were his students. He has described this
intercourse
and these debaucheries in detail in diaries. These diaries are
the most base
[writings] imaginable. When they were read out this
morning, it
was certainly as if at first no one present would have
thought the
writing down of such things humanly possible. That is how
piggish, how
vulgar and how depressing they were.
The accused
has intentionally and by design exploited his position as
teacher and
leader of a commercial school. He has seduced his students
and made them
accommodate his perverse inclinations. He has seduced
them into
unnatural intercourse. He has ruined them in a shameless
manner and
frequently had two or three girls at the same time in his
room and had
intercourse with them. He managed to keep up these
relations with
the girls when he had to get specialized medical
treatment,
since he had contracted venereal disease. It is also typical of
the defendant
Hirschland, that when he was afflicted with a disgusting
contagious
pest (crab lice), he still engaged in intercourse with a non-
Jewish girl in
his bedroom.
The Court
confined itself to some excerpts from the doings of the
defendant. It
has purposely not extended the trial to all facts of the
case. The
present instances are sufficient to arrive at a conviction.
The defendant
has in no sense confessed to his crimes. At his first
interrogation,
he admitted much. In the main trial, however, he has
cravenly lied.
He has denied everything, and indeed, so long as up to
the time that
the opposite was proved against him. The way in which
he lied about
these things was shameless and stupid.
In his
seductions, the accused proceeded according to a particular
system. He
aroused the girls, showed them indecent pictures and
writings and
took nude [156] photographs. Beforehand,
he brought
them into wine
shops and into liquor shops to make them drunk. The
defendant
obviously produced such nude photographs in great
profusion. A
large share of these, and still other incriminating evidence
besides, was
cleared out by his fiancee Gisela Stein and by his sister
Elfriede
Bruck.
For the
assessment of the crimes, the whole picture yielded by the main
trial was
taken into consideration. His attitude toward his acts is base
and criminal
and exactly corresponds to the kind of person he is. The
defendant knew
the laws. The knowledge of the German penal code in
general, is
presumed of Jews. The calculations of the accused were
constantly
directed toward merely getting around the law. He had no
moral
considerations. Likewise, there is no moral law for the
defendant.
The true
confession of faith of the defendant, however, was set down in
a letter which
he wrote his bride from prison. In this we read: 'I now
have a sad
celebrity which is deserving of sympathy. But I feel pure
before my God,
before my conscience, and before men.'
The defendant
had no inner bonds with his victims, as can be seen in
every
instance. In his activity of molesting, he molested German girls
and he managed
to also continue this behavior even after his downfall.
He used the
German girls merely for the satisfaction of his wild sexual
lust. In 1922,
he wrote to one of his victims: 'I cannot marry you, as a
Jew I can only
marry a Jewess.' And now he has become engaged to a
full-blooded
Jewess. Therefore he has remained a Jew.
Thus we have
the portrait of a man who is a typical wastrel and
molester of
girls and who cannot and does not want to control this
impulse. The
Court has thus arrived at this finding in the assessment of
his behavior
as a whole and of his crimes: Hirschland is a dangerous
habitual
criminal. As a full-blooded Jew, he has shamefully abused the
rights of a
guest which the German people have granted him. He has
unscrupulously
and without restraint and in enormous profusion,
violated the
honor of German girls. But the honor of the sex of German
girls is one
of the most important possessions of law that we have. The
single excuse
which the defendant had for his crimes, however, is the
creed of faith
which I just read.
From all of
this, the Court has arrived at this express punishment. That,
due to his
dishonorable conduct, [157] civil rights
be denied to the
defendant,
with no further argument required. Public safety requires
that he be
taken into supervision. The defendant, even if he has served
ten years in
the penitentiary, will not change. On the contrary, it is to
be assumed
that he will then seek to satisfy his lust in still worse ways.
Finally, it
must be said, in consequence of the cowardly and duplicitous
conduct of the
defendant, that taking account of his [time spent in]
custody during
the investigation is out of the question."
The Court was
adjourned. The Magdeburg Jew-trial was at an end. The
defendant,
Albert Hirschland, who had to be called upon to stand up
while the
judgement was read, had not changed his attitude. In his face
was not a
trace of remorse. Not a trace of regret.
His defense
counsel, the Jew Dr. Hirschberg, looked grim and stared
ahead. The
judgement had confirmed for him that even the legal
system in
Germany was in the throes of awakening. It had confirmed
for him: the
Jew no longer played first fiddle in the German justice
system.
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is not permitted. All rights
reserved.
T h e J e w a
s C r i m i n a l
Chapter IX:
Murderers
---------------------------------------------------
---------------
(page
158)
One of the
most important weapons of Jewry in the struggle to obscure
and camouflage
its true nature, is the Jewish joke. Jewry officially
denies the
existence of psychic racial distinctions and wants to see the
study of race
limited to purely exterior, physical traits [these days, of
course, Jewry
has reached such dizzy heights in its ascendancy that it
now denies the
existence of race per se!]. Unofficially, whispering-
behind-its-hand, so
to speak, it is conceded that Jews have their
peculiarities,
and it is precisely the Jewish joke which serves as their
revelation.
Many of these
jokes are awkward, others tasteless, much has been
borrowed from
other peoples and correspondingly re-worked. But they
all have one
thing in common: to make the Jew out to be an essentially
harmless, if
sometimes ridiculous, person. Individual features of the
Jewish
character are derided -- clumsy familiarity, impudence, an
impertinent
nature, eccentric dialectics, greed, cowardliness, bodily
uncleanliness,
haggling, Talmudic narrow- mindedness -- but the
Jewish joke
never penetrates to the kernel of the Jewish essence. For it
is just in
this that the significance lies, that the emphasis upon minor
things diverts
[the attention] from the essential. This tactic is not
accidental,
rather it is employed by Jewry over and over again: the
basis for
discussion is fobbed off onto more favorable ground. A
characteristic
example is furnished by Soviet "self-criticism": in
newspapers,
etc., small grievances are sharply and continually
criticized in
order to avoid discussion of the true cause -- Jewish
Bolshevism.
The image of
the Jew propagated in the Jewish joke -- a crooked-
legged,
haggling cadger, peddler or businessman -- has become one of
the greatest
successes of Jewry: it is hard not to laugh at many Jewish
jokes; but
whatever one laughs about, one can neither hate nor fear,
and contempt
cripples the will to fight. The goal is therefore attained --
the Jew
appears as a ridiculous creature and behind his disdained petty
crookedness
disappears that in Jewry which is truly dangerous: the
greed for
economic, political and cultural power in the host nation, for
the
subordination of the host population [159]
under the will and the
interests of
Jewry. The Jew is not a ridiculous, but a dangerous
creature.
The image of
the hook-nosed, gesticulating, waddling, cheating and
defrauding Jew
has done its job also with many of those who are
opponents of
Jewry. They do not doubt that the Jew is capable of any
swindle, any
fraud, any crookedness, but they deny him the capacity
for physical
violence. To the question: "Are there Jewish thugs or even
murderers?"
one almost always hears the answer: "No!"
The reality is
something entirely different -- the Jew is capable of any
act, if his
own interests or those of his race are served thereby.
In Vienna,
there is a magazine published by the police: �–ffentliche
Sicherheit
[Public Safety], which among other things puts out
"circulars and
wanted posters" about internationally sought criminals.
We page
through the last few volumes. If we limit ourselves to the
murderers who
are without any doubt Jews, we find:
Markus
Goldmanovitch, born 1906 in South Russia, auto dealer.
Murdered Marie
Bernadotte Prunier in Sens (France). Fugitive.
(�–ffentliche
Sicherheit, 1934, Nr. 10.)
Alexander
Kaminski, born in Connecticut (USA), parents are Polish
Jews.
Twenty-five years old, dangerous criminal and murderer who
ruthlessly
resorts to weapons. Fugitive. (�–ffentliche Sicherheit, 1935,
Nr.
3.)
Harry
Brown, 53 years old, Polish Jew. Murderer and arsonist.
Fugitive.
(�–ffentliche Sicherheit, 1935, Nr. 18.)
Alexander
Kölner, Hungarian Jew from Budapest. Killed one of the
prisoners
while in jail. Fugitive.(�–ffentliche Sicherheit, 1936, Nr.
3.)
It is not the
Jewish way, to kill someone out of jealousy, or out of rage;
the Jews have
a different way of killing someone who displeases them.
The Jewish
murderer kills out of calculation and with cold reflection.
As an example,
let the story be related here of the murder committed
by Fritz
Saffran (1) in
connection with arson and insurance fraud,
which created
a great sensation a few years ago in East Prussia.
In the East
Prussian city of Rastenburg, there is a furniture business
which belongs
to a certain Platz. The owner of the business feels that
he's becoming
old, he wants to share the burden of running the business
with a younger
man, and with this in mind, he marries his daughter to a
Fritz
Saffran, the son of a Jewish cattle dealer, of whom [160] it is
claimed that
he is a skilful businessman. Saffran is tall and heavy-set,
with a high
forehead; behind horn-rimmed glasses are cold gray eyes,
his lips are
thin and he is around thirty years old.
At first it
seems as though the old furniture dealer had made the right
choice --
Saffran is a clever, intelligent, energetic merchant, and the
business does
well. Saffran knows people throughout the city, he's a
reputable
citizen though completely modern in his appearance and in
his conduct of
business.
A bit too
"modern," for Saffran is a liar, a swindler, a deceiver -- soon
things begin
to go worse and worse for him. Within a very short time
he has run the
business into the ground, debts on top of debts have
piled up,
credit debt accumulated, liabilities taken on whose
redemption is
impossible for the business to meet. Already, in 1928,
the firm is on
the brink of ruin, and only with effort, with the help of
loans gotten
here and there, does it succeed in keeping its head above
water. The
chief clerk of the firm, a man named Kipnik, knows all
that's going
on, but the old man Platz has no inkling of what his son-in-
law has done
with his company. Equally blind is Saffron's wife; he has
been
unfaithful to her for a long time and is maintaining a love affair
with the
office clerk Augustin, a lanky, dynamic person who is
employed by
the firm. The three -- Saffran, Kipnik, Augustin -- are
good actors,
and no one in the city, in the business or in the family
notices the
least thing wrong.
Saffran
carries things further and further. He keeps presenting the
same,
identical delivery contract to his creditors as security. He raises
money on
securities several times, he forges purchase contracts and
their
signatures, and he also falsifies the balance sheet. The firm's
liabilities,
according to the balance sheet, reach 285,000 Marks -- the
business is
finally ruined. Experts are later able to determine that not
less than
three hundred seventy-five contracts and eighteen notes have
been forged by
Saffran.
The situation
can no longer continue, but Saffran is not at a loss for a
way out. He
insures his life with five different companies for 200,000
Marks. The
plan of the criminal trio is now set: fire will be set to the
furniture
business, and amongst the wreckage a body shall be found
which will be
recognized as that of Saffran. Then the insurance
companies will
have to pay, and then the three will again have money
in
profusion.
Only one thing
is missing -- a male body. But Saffran finds no great
hurdle in this
-- at night [161] one meets so many
solitary men
wandering the
streets, that it should not be hard to kill someone.
In the summer
of 1930, the situation becomes ever more threatening;
the flood of
notes rises higher and higher. Now the three go on a
manhunt
together in an automobile or also separately. However, the
matter proves
to be rather difficult. Sometimes they drive the whole
night through
without meeting anyone. Another time, they succeed in
enticing a man
into the car, but the victim defends himself and escapes.
On 12
September, Saffran and Kipnik again go hunting for a man,
while
Augustin, who otherwise likes to participate, this time remains at
home. Along
their way, they meet a bicyclist, the twenty-six-year-old
milker, Dahl.
They stop him, shoot the unsuspecting man with their
pistols, and
roll the body into a carpet. The bicycle and the bag of the
murdered man
are hidden in the woods. They put the body, still in the
same night, in
the storeroom of the furniture business. Saffran's gold
watch and keys
are stuck in the pockets of the victim, Saffran's rings
are placed on
his fingers, Saffran's gold collar studs are fastened to his
shirt. Now all
is ready; on the night of Sunday, the 15th of September,
the fire is
supposed to be set, all the business books and the body of the
murdered man
are supposed to burn up.
At about one
o'clock in the morning Saffran and Kipnik pour benzene
all over the
place and set it afire. Saffran immediately hides at
Augustin's,
but Kipnik stays in the vicinity.
It doesn't
take long before the building is in bright flames. The fire
department
rushes there, the police appear, a dense crowd of people
surrounds the
fire. In their midst stands Kipnik, wringing his hands.
With a voice
interrupted by sobbing, he tells them all that he had seen
Saffran in the
building in the glow from the fire, and Saffran had
plunged into
the fire in order to save the business's books -- but he had
not come back
out.
The building
burns to the walls. Under the wreckage a body is found.
Watch, collar
studs, keys, everything proves that it is Saffran, who
risked his
life for the sake of the firm and met his death because of it --
a victim of
his sense of duty.
Saffran stays
hidden with Augustin for two days, then he travels
homeward to
Berlin. But he is observed at this and recognized. The
news that
Saffran is alive spreads like wildfire. The monstrous fraud
and nefarious
crime are discovered.
[162] Saffran hides at a relative's of Augustin and for an
entire month
long he
doesn't leave the house. He learns Spanish and English, for he
wants to go
overseas. He grows a full beard and believes that no one
will recognize
him. But fate wills it otherwise. He boards the train at
Spandau, in
order to flee abroad, when a conductor who once was in
Rastenburg
recognizes him despite his beard. He alerts the police, and
in Wittenberg,
as Saffran is about to drink a cup of coffee, the heavy
hand of a
police officer falls on his shoulder. . .
The jury-court
at Bartenstein condemns Saffran and Kipnik to death on
26 March 1931,
while Augustin is sentenced to five years in prison.
In giant
cities like New York and Chicago, Jewry finds a rich field of
activity for
its criminal talents. Today it may be taken to be an
established
fact that the notorious "American gangsters" are
predominantly
Jews [Although in the U.S. organized crime has been
and is
associated in the public mind with Italian immigrants -- mostly
Sicilians and
Neapolitans -- and their descendants, as is characteristic
with so many
other Jewish criminal operations, the financial "brains,"
and thus the
true power and control, of many crime organization
structures in
the U.S. turn out to be Jewish. Since the date of
publication of
this book -- 1937 -- the names of many other Jewish
gangsters have
become part of the history of organized crime in
America:
"Bugsy" Siegel, "Legs" Diamond; Meyer Lansky, etc. etc.
There have
also been shadowy figures such as the Bronfmans, Edgar
Sr. and Jr.,
whose fortunes have supposedly been based on the
"legitimate"
liquor business, but who multiplied their wealth by means
of Prohibition
and established a power base in both the corporate and
criminal
worlds.], who lead an organized fight against the order of law
in the United
States. That they make use of various cover-names is, for
us, already a
well-known and customary Jewish trick.
For example,
Asbury(1) tells many
a typical and interesting fact in his
history of the
New York Underworld.
One of the
most famous American Underworld figures, a gang leader
and murderer,
was the son of a Jewish restaurateur, Eduard
Ostermann,
who later called himself Monk Eastman. He had a head
which looked
like a cannon ball, strongly veined, heavy jowls, a bull-
like neck with
countless scars. His nasal bone had been broken, his hair
was always
shaggy and unkempt; on the top of his head perched a little
hat, his
clothes were messy, cheap and dirty.
When he was
twenty years old, his father bought him a pet shop but the
tendency
toward laziness and for crime was too strong -- Eastman
became a
bouncer in a disreputable bar. Armed with a club and a
cudgel, he
kept "order" in the pub. He was an outstanding boxer, and
when one of
the guests became contentious, Eastman "pacified" him
with a couple
of skilful punches, with his club, or -- when nothing else
would work, a
beer bottle. He boasted that during the first six months
on the job, he
had knocked in the skulls of over fifty men -- and the
nearby
outpatient clinic, where his victims were taken, received the
nick-name
"Eastman Pavilion."
[163] After a short time he gave up his job as a bouncer, for
higher
goals were
beckoning him. As a pure Jew, he was enormously
dynamic, never
lacked for money, and he had his fingers in a thousand
enterprises.
He had a share in bordellos and gambling parlors, worked
as a wholesale
procurer, had drawn up an entire organization for the
protection of
"his" streetwalkers, led theft and burglary gangs, took on
assignments to
beat up or even murder unpopular personalities, and
also occupied
himself in between times as a fence -- in short, he was a
universal
genius of the Underworld. His special interest was "politics."
He enjoyed the
best relations with Tammany Hall, the "democratic"
organization
which for decades played a decisive role in New York and
its
administration, for both parties got their money's worth with this
arrangement:
Eastman put his fists and the revolvers of his gang at the
disposal of
Tammany Hall, in return for which, however, he could
count on being
rescued in case he were arrested.
It was the
time when the first automobiles were appearing. Eastman's
criminal
astuteness could appreciate the significance of this new
invention and
the new technique of the gang assault: several bandits
show up in
stolen cars, there is a hail of bullets, the robbery or murder
is carried out
with lightning speed and then the criminals vanish. Later
this procedure
was perfected when machine guns came into use.
His criminal
activity lasted for years, until his high patron let the too
badly
compromised criminal go, and this happened in the following
way. Eastman
and one of his accomplices had taken on a murder
assignment.
But the man, having been attacked, defended himself, a
policeman
rushed to his aid, shooting broke out and Eastman, struck
down with a
rubber truncheon, was arrested. He tried to bring his
"connections"
into play, he did indeed receive help, and in 1904 he got
(only!) a
prison sentence of several years.
After five
years Eastman was released -- so exemplary is his conduct
supposed to
have been. He wanted to organize his gang again, but he
did not
succeed in meeting the challenge of the younger men who had
snatched the
leadership away during his "absence." Eastman now sank
to the level
of pickpocket, burglar and drug dealer. Several times he
had to serve
small sentences and landed in jail. In September 1917 he
was arrested
for brawling, and in custody Eastman discovered his
patriotic
American heart -- he resolved to fight the "Huns," and
participate in
the World War.
[164] His conduct as a soldier was good, and in the year 1919
his civil
rights, of
which he had been deprived by the Court, were restored. He
swore never
again to commit a crime and the police even procured for
him a small
position which made it possible for him to lead a peaceful
life. A
touching happy ending for the Jewish criminal.
The harmony of
this conclusion to his life, however, was impaired by
the fact that
Eastman was murdered on 26 December 1920. For despite
his oath,
furthermore, he was selling drugs again and he fell into an
argument with
one of his clients, in which he was murdered.
The successor
of Eastman in the leadership of his gang was the Jew
William
Alberts, called Jack Zelig.
He was a
slight young boy with enormous brown, somewhat startlingly
piercing eyes.
At fourteen years of age, he was a pickpocket, got
caught several
times but was never convicted: his appearance was so
child-like
that he succeeded in convincing the judge of his innocence.
Later he
employed the following trick with great results: during the
Court
proceedings, some woman would turn up, just as delicate, pretty
and full of
innocence as he himself, and she would implore the Court to
spare "the
father of my children" and not to send him to prison. . .
This was the
man who took over Eastman's gang. His most intimate
assistants at
this were three Jews, Harry Horrowitz ("Gyp the
Dashing"), a
famous bouncer, sharp-shooter and bomb-thrower; he
boasted that
he was able to put any man across his knee and break his
spine that
way; Jakob Seidenschnur ("Whitely Louis") was also a
thug who used
beatings and the revolver, while Louis Rosenberg
("Lefty
Louis") was mainly a thief.
The special
interest to which this gang devoted itself was the gambling
'hells,' and
their specific method was to foster and protect the richer
ones in return
for a certain indemnity, but they held up and robbed the
poorer ones.
That was a profitable and dangerous business. The owners
of the little
"joints" did not have enough money to secure for
themselves the
protection of a gang or to bribe police officials; there,
they actually
stood defenseless.
For years
Zelig earned huge money in this manner, until death caught
up with him,
too. He had a violent feud with Rosenthal, the Jewish
owner of a
gambling hell. The enmity went so far that Zelig decided
upon the death
of Rosenthal. One day, Rosenthal was in the Hotel
"Metropol" on
Broadway and was eating his evening meal. A well-
dressed man
stepped up to him and said that someone wanted [165] to
speak to him
on the street. Rosenthal's clients were of the sort that
avoids bright
lights. Without suspicion, he walked outside. Zelig and
his bandits
were waiting for him out on the street. They killed him with
several shots
and fled in an automobile. Yet Zelig did not survive this
triumph for
very long: a short time afterwards a competitor, the Jew
Phil
Davidson, shot him down as he was about to leave a street car.
In the
chronicle of criminality of New York, one can find countless
Jewish names.
Let us name just the gang leaders: Johnny Spanish,
Johnny
Lewinsky, Tanner Snith (Goldschmidt), Jakob
Dropper
(Nathan
Kaplan), Louis Kuschner (Cohen), Jack Organ (Klein),
Salomon
Shapira, Sam Epstein, Izy Presser, Harry Stein (the
murderer of
the woman of the demi-monde, Vivian Gordon). It serves
no purpose to
examine their misdeeds any more closely. It is always
the same: paid
assaults, alcohol and drug smuggling, procuring,
corruption of
officials, fencing, robbery and murder.
Here, in the
Underworld of New York, free to develop itself, the
"comic" nature
of the Jew reveals itself in its true, horrendous
shape.
Not only greed
for money, but greed for power is the mainspring of the
Jewish
criminal. For him, therefore, the money is but a means to an
end, a means
for the obtaining of power over men. The Jew is neither
"comical" nor
merely "materialistic." He is, first and foremost,
"political,"
but in the sense of a boundless drive for power that shrinks
from nothing
in order to attain the desired goal.
So it is no
wonder that Jews again and again appear as murderers in
political
mask. The infamous assassinations of modern times have been
perpetrated by
Jews -- a fact that up to the present day has been
overlooked
only too willingly.
For example,
it is almost completely unknown that the murderer of the
American
President MacKinley was the Jew Leo Czolgosz, in
collaboration
with the Jewess Emma Goldmann. Let her be recalled to
On 6 September
1901, President MacKinley arranged a reception on
the occasion
of the Pan-American Exhibition in Buffalo. According to
American
custom, the citizens have the right to shake the hand of the
President at
such public receptions, at which they walk up to him,
[166] one behind the other. In the line of those waiting, a
"young, well-
dressed man in
a frock coat and top hat" (as the papers then were able
to report)
also approached the President. He held a handkerchief in his
left hand,
while with his right hand he gripped MacKinley's hand.
Suddenly, with
a revolver hidden under the handkerchief he fired off
two shots at
the President at point-blank range, which had frightful
effects. The
perpetrator was the Polish Jew Leon Czolgosz, who had
travelled to
Buffalo alone in order to convert into action the plan which
had been
previously precisely decided upon with his Jewish
accomplice,
Emma Goldmann.
On 14
September, MacKinley succumbed to his critical wounds, and
on 24
September the jury found the assassin guilty; two days later the
decision of
the Court was announced that condemned Czolgosz to
death in the
electric chair.
The Jewish
murderer of MacKinley was well-known to the American
police. In the
album of criminals of the United States, there was
already a
comprehensive description of his personal data; the
newspaper
Post of 21 September 1901 discovered very interesting
details from
this:
"Leon
Czolgosz, alias Frank Niemann. Father of the criminal is of
Polish (!)
nationality. Residence in Cleveland. The assassin grew up in
an area there
which is especially strongly infected by Anarchism, found
his life as a
simple wire-worker too arduous and therefore found a way
to live
differently. He took over a bar in which an Anarchist club was
established.
He then knocked about in many cities, but most of all in
Chicago. Here,
his involvement with other Anarchists, especially with
Emma Goldmann,
was noted. This woman, despite her extremely
unsympathetic
character, seems to have made a great impression upon
Czolgosz. He
explicitly stated that he was spurred on to his crime by
the speeches
and letters of this woman. Since it is known that the
murder of the
King of Italy (Humbert) was hatched in Paterson [sic --
perhaps this
should be Patterson (NJ)], the murder of the President thus
appears to be
only a further link in the chain of such crimes."
These facts
indicate that President MacKinley fell victim to the
Anarchist-Jewish
clique, led by the Jewess Goldmann and her
accomplice
Czolgosz, who liquidated their "sentenced-to-death" target
with as much
coldness as calculation.
But who still
remembers that the founder of the German Reich, Otto
von
Bismarck, but for a narrow margin, would have likewise fallen
victim to a
Jewish murderer?
[167] The assassin
who attempted Bismarck's life (1) was the Jewish
student
Ferdinand Cohen, a step-son of the democratic writer Karl
Blind, who was
then living as an emigrant in London, and who had a
leading role
participating in the Baden revolt of 1849. The murderous
attack took
place shortly before the outbreak of the Prussian-Austrian
war, in which
Bismarck was seen as the most hated man in Prussia,
above all as a
consequence of the conflict with the Landtag [state
legislature].
When, on the afternoon of 07 May 1866, after a talk with
King Wilhelm I
on the central promenade of the "Linden," he returned
to his
apartment on the Wilhelmstra�Ÿe, Cohen, who was at the corner
of
Shadowstra�Ÿe, shot twice at the unsuspecting man from behind and
at point blank
range; only one bullet grazed him on the side -- and, as
Bismarck
quickly turned around, he shot a third time. That shot
wounded him
lightly in the right shoulder. After Bismarck succeeded
in seizing
Cohen by the right wrist, the latter switched the revolver to
his left hand
with lightning speed and fired twice more; the first of the
two shots
missed Bismarck, but the second bruised his ribs. As if by a
miracle,
Bismarck remained almost unscathed. He was now able to
hand over the
assassin to several officers and soldiers who happened to
be marching
past, and they delivered him to jail. During the same
night, Cohen
took his own life. In one letter, written to his step-father
before the
crime, he had declared he wanted to kill Bismarck because
he saw in him
the "worst foe of German freedom." Whether he was
acting from
his own impulses, or who his controller behind the scenes
might have
been, could no longer be discovered due to his suicide.
What would
have become of Germany, had the bullets of this Jew
reached their
target?! Probably the same thing which became of
Austria-Hungary
after the murder of Count Stürkgh, and of Russia after
the murder of
the Minister-President Stolypin by the Jews Adler and
Bogrov.
In the middle
of the war, on 21 October 1916, the Minister-President of
the
Austro-Hungarian monarchy, Count Stürkgh, was shot by the
Jewish Marxist
Friedrich Adler, the son of the founder of the Austrian
Social
Democracy, Viktor Adler. Scarcely two years later, the Austro-
Hungarian
state collapsed.
The murder of
Minister-President Count Stürkgh by the Jew Adler was
of decisive
significance for the tragic history of Austria-Hungary. The
Jewish-Marxist
Revolution followed the Jewish [168] acts
of
assassination
and the establishment of the Jewish rulership of the so-
called
"Austro-Marxism" in Vienna.
The Jew Adler
was, beyond all sense, commuted to 18 years of
imprisonment,
a sign of the full extirpation of the concept of law and of
political
consciousness in Austria. His racial comrades liberated him,
of course, in
1918, and he was unanimously chosen, in triumph, to be
Chairman of
the Austrian Social-Democratic party! This unhanged
Jewish
murderer thereupon immediately developed an extraordinary
industriousness at
the pursuit of the Jewish plans for world power. He
organized the
so-called "Two-and-a-half Internationale," which stood
between the
2nd and the 3rd Internationale. He performed handyman
services for
his Bolshevist racial comrades Aron Cohn (Bela Kun) and
Szamuely
during their bloody rule in Budapest and played a leading
role in the
infamous Conference of the Three Internationales in Berlin
in 1922. The
union of the 2nd with the Two-and-a-half Internationale
in the
so-called "Socialist Workers' Internationale," at whose first
congress in
Hamburg this Jewish felon was elected General Secretary,
is ascribed to
his personal influence. Friedrich Adler occupied this
position
unhampered for years -- a Jew on whose hands clung not only
the blood of
the murdered Minister-President Count Stürkgh, but also
the blood of
numberless victims of the Judeo-Bolshevist Terror in the
world.
It is
superfluous to mention that Friedrich Adler was already playing a
prominent role
in the Social Democracy of Austria before his crime of
murder, namely
as Secretary of the Party. In this capacity he was
openly
committing treason, whose crowning moment was the murder
of
Stürkgh.
It is almost
incomprehensible that the murder of Count Stürkgh by a
Jew has been
given so little attention right up to the present, all the
more
incomprehensible when one considers that a short time thereafter,
the Hungarian
Minister-President during the World War, Stefan Tisza,
was also
murdered by a Jew.
Various
attempts at assassination were made by Jews against the Count
Stefan
Tisza (1) (born 22
April 1861), who was Hungarian Minister-
President from
October 1903 to June 1905 and then again from June
1913 to May
1917, and who very forcefully opposed democratic
suffrage; for
Jewry, which for centuries had understood how to win for
itself [169] all leading positions of intellectual life
in Hungary, saw its
chief foe in
Tisza. The first assassination attempt occurred on 07 June
1912 in
the Budapest parliamentary hall, by a Hungarian Reichstag
deputy, the
Jew Julius Kovacz, when Tisza in his capacity as
Reichstag
President had exerted himself with energetic resolve to break
the continuing
obstruction of the opposition party. The shots missed,
and the
would-be assassin was deliberately acquitted by a Budapest
jury-court. In
June of 1918, Tisza's murder was decided upon by the
most extreme
left wing of the Hungarian Social Democratic Party --
which
included, among others, the Jews Paul Kéri, Otto Korwin-
Klein, Dr.
Eugene Lásslo (actually: Levy) and Dr. Landler. The
first attempt
to execute the decision was the -- likewise unsuccessful --
attempt of the
Jew Johann Lekai-Leitner, one of the disciples, filled
with anarchist
ideas, of the subversive Karolyi Party. As Tisza was
leaving the
Budapest House of Deputies on 16 October 1918, Lekai
was waiting on
the street to shoot down the Count with a revolver,
which was,
however, able to be knocked out of his hand in time.
Although Tisza
still remained unharmed this time as well, two weeks
later his
fate, which he had already expected for so long, overtook him
at last:
already, at the news of Stürkgh's murder, he had declared: "I
believed that
I would be the first." The instigator of the murder was the
already
mentioned 39-year-old journalist Paul Kéri, who was a friend
of the
bitterest political enemy of Tisza, the Minister-President of the
government
after the overthrow, Michael Karolyi. He first arranged the
plan with the
later President of the Military Council, Emerich
Csernyák, and
acquired several sailors for carrying out the crime. On
the morning of
31 October 1918, the day of the overthrow of the
government in
Hungary, the Jew Marcell Gaertner, a 37-year-old
chemist,
proceeded to Tisza's Budapest Villa, Roheim, and personally
sought out the
Count in order to use the opportunity to scout out the
scene of the
crime. In the afternoon, all the conspirators assembled in
the Budapest
Hotel "Astoria," where Kéri informed them about the
vicinity of
the crime. Then they went by two cars to the scene of the
crime. While
the two Jews kept themselves well away at a safe
distance
-- Kéri remained on the street, Gaertner in the lobby -- four
soldiers, the
Navy Sergeant Stefan Dobó, the midshipman Tibor
Sztanyikovsky
and the sailors Theodor Horvát-Szanovics and Josef
Pogány,
entered the room, engaged the Count, who fearlessly
confronted
them, in a short conversation and then shot him down at the
side of his
wife with their weapons. The overthrow, the government of
Karolyi, and
then the [170] Bolshevist Soviet regime in
1919 made any
clearing up of
the murder and a prosecution of the perpetrators
impossible at
first. It was just in the Fall of 1919 that some of them
were arrested.
At the trial before the military divisional court in
Budapest (02
August - 15 September 1920), the soldiers involved,
Dobó and
Sztanyikovsky, were condemned to death by the rope
(Czernyák,
Horvát-Szanovics and Pogány had escaped abroad), at a
following
trial before the Budapest Criminal Court, proceedings were
started
against the civilian perpetrators (12 April - 05 October 1921).
Kéri as
the instigator of the crime was likewise sentenced to death by
hanging,
Gaertner as accomplice was sentenced to 14 years
imprisonment.
Kéri was then later exchanged along with other
Hungarian
Communists for the Hungarian officers, prisoners of war,
who had been
held as hostages by the Soviet Union.
Unfortunately,
a typical case; the Jewish murderer is treated as a
"political"
criminal and escapes his punishment. In this case it is all the
more
incomprehensible, when the connection between the murder of
the
Minister-President Tisza by the Jew Kéri has a direct connection
with the
establishment of the Judeo-Bolshevist regime of blood of Bela
Kun (Aron
Cohns) which followed it in Budapest. The Jewish crime of
murder as
prelude to the Judeo- Bolshevist overthrow of the
government --
that is a legal sequence of events.
So it was,
also, in Russia.
On 20 March
1911, the body of a boy was discovered by children
playing on a
plot of undeveloped land on the edge of the city of
Kiev(1). It was found in the
sitting position, the hands were bound
behind the
back with string. The body was dressed only in a shirt,
underpants and
a single sock. The body showed wounds without any
kind of blood
traces being found in the hole [The body was found in a
excavated pit
on grounds which had been used as a source of clay and
which
therefore had many clay pits; for a more detailed account of this
and of other
cases of alleged Jewish ritual-murder, see Hellmut
Schramm:
Der jüdische Ritualmord: Eine historische Untersuchung,
1943; English
translation by R. Belser available on CD.]. It soon turned
out that the
body was that of the student of the first class of the Kiev
church school,
Andrei Yuschinski. The forensic examination
discovered the
following wounds on the body of the child: 7 puncture
wounds on the
upper scalp and on the back of the head; 1 on the left
temple, 13 on
the right temple; on the right side of the neck, 7, on the
larynx, 2;
beneath the lower jaw, 1; on the right side beneath the
armpit, 4; on
the back, at the right side between ribs and pelvis, 4; on
the left side
of the chest, beneath the nipple, 7; on the sternum, 1: a
total [171] of 47 stab wounds. The loss of blood from
the inflicted
wounds was so
great that the body was nearly empty of blood.
The attempts
of the Jews to mislead and cripple the investigation began
immediately.
The investigation was first in the hands of a certain
Krassowski,
who a year later was supposed to be arrested and brought
before the
Court on charges of offenses against his official duties. His
predecessor,
Mischtschuk, Director of the Kiev Criminal Police,
likewise fell
into the clutches of Jewry and later was convicted by the
Senate on
charges of forgeries and abuse of office.
Menachil-Mendel
Beylis was arrested only on 22 July. Precious time
had been lost
during which the state organs had been systematically led
astray by the
Jews. Thus, for example, the murdered boy's own parents
were arrested
on 24 March on the basis of information from the Jew
Barschewski.
After 14 days, they had to be released again since their
complete
innocence could be proved. Directly after this, the boy's
uncle, Theodor
Neyinski was accused by another Jew. Here, too, the
denunciation
turned out to be totally without merit. During the trial
proceedings,
even the defense of Beylis, which was in the hands of the
most
celebrated attorneys of that time, had to frankly admit that the
relatives of
the murdered boy were completely innocent of any part in
the
crime.
Nevertheless,
the Jews did not yet admit defeat. They regarded the
accusation
against Beylis, as always in such cases, as an accusation
against Jewry
as a whole, and pulled out all the stops to get Beylis off.
An endless
series of briberies, threats, denunciations, challenges,
propaganda and
interventions was put into play by them in order to set
the
investigating authorities, the jurors, the judges, the experts, but
above all
public opinion in Russia and in the entire world, in favor of
Beylis and
against his "anti-Semitic enemies."
The Jews
invented ever newer versions. The unfortunate youngster was
supposed to
have been murdered by three characters of the Underworld
in the
residence of a woman, Vera Cheberak. This, too, was later
shown to be a
lie, although the Jews offered Vera Cheberak 4000
Rubels
for a "voluntary confession."
It came out,
namely through unimpeachable testimony, that on 12
March 1911,
toward 8:15 A.M., i.e., perhaps an hour before the
beginning of
his martyrdom, the boy had been standing with some
playmates at
the entrance to the Sayzev factory, and then from there
began to play
with other playmates on the lot lying in front of it. The
children were
startled by Beylis and [172] two other
Jews. They ran off
in different
directions; the boy Yuschinski, however, was seized by
Beylis and
dragged off in the direction of the factory. It seems
extremely
remarkable and suspicious that the two most important
eyewitnesses
for Yuschinski having been dragged away by Beylis,
Schenya and
Valya, died shortly after the arrest of Beylis. Beylis was
arrested on 22
July: on 08 August Schenya died, and ten days later,
Valya
--
Menachil-Mendel
Beylis, 39 years old, was an employee of the brick
factory in
whose oven works the crime almost certainly was
committed. The
brickyard had formerly belonged to a rich Jew, Ion
Mordkovitch
Sayzev, who had made his wealth, including the
brickyard,
over to the Jewish surgical clinic. Until the death of Sayzev
in 1907,
Beylis enjoyed his especial trust, since he, just like the old
Jew, belonged
to the sect of the Hasidim. On behalf of old Sayzev,
each year
Mendel Beylis baked about 3000 pounds of matzot on
Sayzev's
estate in the presence of a rabbi. Beylis belonged to the
leading Jewish
clique of rabbis and schächter [= Jewish ritual-
slaughterers]
in Kiev. His friend, Feifel Schneerson, who, as later
developed, had
been stalking Yuschinski, also belonged to it. [The
Schneerson
dynasty of Hasidic rabbis produced no less than
three
individuals
who came under strong suspicion and/or charges of ritual-
murder over
the course of two centuries. The late Rabbi Menachem
Schneerson,
revered as a messianic figure by the world-wide enclaves
of his
followers, died only recently -- around the turn of the 21st
century -- and
was a serious power broker to whom heads of state
deferred and
gave a constant stream of brotherhood and humanitarian
awards,
concessions, etc., etc., despite the rabbi's unequivocal position
in support of
Jewish supremacy.] After the murder, Schneerson
disappeared
without trace. Incidentally, he was a descendant of the
famous Rabbi
Salomon Schneerson, one of the founders of the Hasidic
sect. His
father was a schächter and a relative of rabbis.
The forensic
experts, the most outstanding experts in this field in pre-
war Russia,
made the following report concerning the murder(1):
The boy is
pushed into the pit in which clay is found. He receives some
punctures
through his cap; however, as yet he does not lose
consciousness.
He is seized and his hands held firmly. One of the
murderers
holds his head and plugs his nose and mouth, while the other
murderer
inflicts wounds in such places as are rich in blood supply. In
particular, he
receives a puncture in the left temple which strikes the
artery and
produces a fountain of blood. Directly after this his coat is
pulled off and
his shirt collar removed and he receives 7 puncture
wounds in the
neck, which strike veins as well as arteries. This again
results in a
forceful outward gush of blood. The body of the victim is at
this point
somewhat inclined to the left. There is now a pause of 5 to 8
minutes during
which the boy is bleeding [173] to death.
He loses 5½
glasses of
blood, i.e., about 1½ kg. The victim then receives some
further lethal
punctures into the liver and kidneys and finally a stab into
the
heart.
Only the
Petersburg surgeon Pavlov, who had obviously been bribed
by the Jewish
defense, gave a dissenting report. It suffices to indicate
that Pavlov
used the following expression in his expert opinion: "Herr
Yuschinski,
this young man -- had a somewhat comical wound
inflicted in
the region of his waist. . ." Of the theological experts, only
the Catholic
Prelate Pranaitis dared to speak of the fact that in the
Jewish books
on law ritual-murder is dealt with.
At the 34th
session, on 28 October 1913, two questions were put to the
jurors. The
first question asked whether it was proven that on 12 March
1911 in Kiev,
in a room of the brick factory which belonged to the
Jewish
surgical clinic and which was under the management of the
merchant
Markus Sayzev, the thirteen-year-old boy Andrei Yuschinski
first received
a series of wounds, by which he lost five glasses of
blood, and
later new wounds, for a total of 47, which produced a nearly
complete
exsanguination and finally caused his death. The second
question
asked, if the above was proven, whether then the accused
Menachil-Mendel
Baylis, from motives of religious fanaticism, with
forethought
and deliberation, and with the participation of other
persons who
could not be discovered, had committed this crime.
The jurors
said yes to the first question and no to the second. Thus
ended the
trial with the finding of the crime, but without determining
the
criminal.
The question
concerning the perpetrator has remained unanswered to
the present
day. As with all ritual-murder trials of more recent times,
the Jews have
been not been able in this case, either, to produce proof
of their
innocence. That, in actuality, is a proof of their guilt, since at
least in the
case of Beylis they had unlimited means at their disposal,
and beyond
that the sympathy of the entire misled public and also the
full support
of the police and the judicial investigative authorities, who
regrettably
were only too little "anti-Semitic" in attitude.
Some years
later, Jewry nevertheless subsequently furnished proof of
its guilt and
its evil conscience. All persons who had participated in the
trial as
judges, as officials of the state attorney's office, as members of
the
administration of justice or who otherwise acted in the trial against
Beylis, were
shot immediately after the seizure of power by the
Bolshevists
without any judicial procedure. While Menachil Beylis
enjoyed his
pension as "martyr of Jewry" in peace and quiet [174] in
Palestine, the
prosecuting attorneys Wipper and Schalpliski, the Kiev
President of
the Court, Boldyrev, the judges Yevashoff and Vigura and
the Justice
Minister Zheglovitov, fell to the bullets of the Jewish
Cheka. The
defense counsel of Beylis, the Jews Grusenberg and
Sarudny, on
the other hand, were appointed to the Senate by the
government of
the half-Jew Kerensky. Andrei Yuschinski, the martyr
of the Russian
people in its struggle against Jewry, had been long
forgotten. And
who today thinks of this thirteen-year-old Russian
youngster who
bled out his life under unspeakable torture at the hands
of the Jewish
ritual-slaughterers?!
The
Minister-President of the Russian Empire, Stolypin, fell as the
first victim
of the Jewish "revenge for Beylis."
Stolypin came
to Kiev when the struggle over Beylis had reached its
peak. In the
eyes of the Jewish murderers, he was the most important
obstacle which
stood in the way of their criminal desires. He was
"guilty" of
the fact that the Russian government had dared to charge a
Jew with
murder. Stolypin had to die so that Beylis and the Jews could
"live."
Up to the
present day, the murder of Stolypin is been presented in a
totally
distorted manner. No one till now believes it necessary to call
attention to
the crucial fact that his murderer Dmitri Bogroff was in
reality the
Jew Mordko. Let us try to determine the true facts of the
On the evening
of 01 September 1911, the victor of the Revolution of
1905, the
creator of the revolutionary Russian peasant reforms, the
Minister-President
Peter Stolypin was murdered by two shots from a
revolver while
at the Czar's side, during a gala performance in the Kiev
city theater.
The assassin was arrested at the scene; it was the Jew
Dmitri
Bogroff.
The enormous
Russian Empire was shaken to its foundations by this
act. Stolypin
was the great hope of the nation. He had found the way to
lead the
Empire between reaction and revolution, along the the road to
reform,
recovery and the national new order. He was a political
personality
[175] of the caliber of Bismarck, this
powerful man with
the broad
shoulders, who seemed to be but lightly bowed from the
burden of the
huge historic responsibility. Three attempts to murder
him had
already been committed, the last on 12 August 1906, at which
several dozen
innocent bystanders had been killed. Revolutionaries
incited by the
Jews had thrown a bomb at his country house. The
balcony on
which the Minister-President was drinking tea with his
family plunged
far below. He himself remained unwounded, but two of
his children
were crippled from thence forward. But the constant threat
to his life
could not divert him from his path. He knew that he was a
man
consecrated to death and nonetheless did his duty.
How did this
murder come about, why did it happen in Kiev in
particular?
The best explanation is furnished by some sobering figures.
The number of
inhabitants of Kiev in the year 1874 amounted to
127,000, among
which there were 14,000 Jews. In 1910, a year before
the murder,
the population figures for Kiev had grown to 470,000, of
which 51,000
-- 11% -- were Jews. Then came the murder, the
Revolution,
and the breakthrough of the Jews into power. Until 1926,
the total
population figure for Kiev remained essentially stable (1926 =
493,873), but
the number of Jews had climbed to approximately three
times what it
had been, to 140,256 -- i.e., 28.4%. Today [ca. 1937],
according to
official Soviet figures, the percentage of the populace
which belongs
to Jewry has climbed to 35%, but actually probably
amounts to at
least 50%(1).
These few
numbers say it all. Jewry has besieged and finally conquered
Kiev. It has
won the breakthrough battle in Southern Russia and
occupied the
old capital of the Holy Russian Empire. Where are the
approximately
100,000 non-Jews, whose places in Kiev have been
taken by Jews?
They have been supplanted, driven out, exiled, shot and
starved to
death. Then, in 1911, the national struggle against Jewry, the
defense of the
people against the incursions of the Jews, had reached its
zenith. The
Jews had already occupied the most important positions of
power in
public life and the economy in Kiev. The masses of the
people put up
ever more fierce resistance. The Jews responded with
revolutionary
agitation, with "expropriations," with terror, [176] with
crime and
murder. Beylis was the first Chekist, who fed on the torment
of his
helpless victim, the young Yuschinski. Later, the Checkist
leaders Lazi�Ÿ,
Schwarzmann and Luponitz followed; they no longer
needed a
"symbolic" victim of a ritual-murder; into the place of the
"substitute"
stepped the entire Russian and Ukranian people.
In the act of
ritual-murder, the Jew kills his victim (as in hostage-
murder)
in "representation" of all non-Jews, over whom he does not
yet have
power; in the Cheka- murder [i.e., murder by the Soviet secret
police], he
makes real his "ritual." The murder of a hostage is a
secularized
ritual-murder; Cheka-murder is mass ritual-murder
actualized,
and the ritual-murder is an anticipated and vicariously
enjoyed
Checka-murder.
Thus it was in
Kiev. The gate to the fortress had to be blown open --
that was taken
care of by Mordko-Bogroff with the shots from his
revolver.
Already, after
his sentencing, on 10 September Bogroff delivered to the
Colonel of the
Ochrana Ivanoff a "final confession" written by his own
hand, in which
he explained in detail that he had been active in service
to the Ochrana
for long years, and had played the role of a provocateur
for a regular
monthly payment of 100 Rubels; but this informant role of
his had been
discovered by the revolutionary Anarcho-Communists
and he was
given a deadline of 05 September, after which the sentence
of death was
to be carried out on him by his comrades. In his
desperation,
he had wavered between suicide and a crime by which to
rehabilitate
himself, and at last decided to perform a sensational
assassination;
thanks to the favorable circumstance that he had received
a card of
admittance into the theater, he had carried out the murder of
Stolypin. In
other words, he had been for years a collaborator of the
Ochrana and
had committed the murder in this capacity.
This
post-judicial "confession" of Bogroff had the effect that a storm of
outrage over
the criminal methods of the Ochrana swept through all of
Russia and
through the entire world, outrage over the "bloody
Ochrana,"
which itself bred the criminals whom it pretended to fight. --
Opinion was
and is "unanimous" in believing that Minister-President
Stolypin was
killed by the Ochrana itself, for whatever dark and
impenetrable
reasons. The whole depravity and corruption of the
Czarist system
was thereby demonstrated for all time.
Considering
all this, what does the truth about Bogroff appear to be?
Dmitri Bogroff
was born on 29 January 1887, the son of a Jewish
landlord and
attorney, who had at his disposal assets of about 1 Million
Marks and who
played a considerable role in [177] Kiev
society. The
father
belonged to the left wing of the Constitutional-Democratic Party.
His son Dmitri
received a very good education; In 1905 and 1906, he
studied at the
University of Munich. In 1908, Dmitri was in Meran,
Leipzig and
Paris, in February 1910 he took the final bar examination,
travelled to
the Riviera and then, in February 1911, began his practice
in the office
of the attorney Goldenweiser in Kiev.
It is clearly
evident from this short biography that the Jew Bogroff
hadn't the
remotest thing to do either with the "working class" or with
Socialism,
that he led the life of a well-to-do Jewish intellectual. In the
last period of
his life, his father also transferred to him the management
of the
property in Kiev, so that Dmitri in no sense experienced any sort
of material
need. Nonetheless, as was proven and admitted, he entered
the service of
the Ochrana, which he justified in his later "confession"
by the fact
that he still wanted to have a "certain sum of money
beyond" what
he already had. From the Ochrana, he received 100 - 150
Rubels
monthly. He worked for them for about 2½ years, and under the
names Alemsky
and Mordko.
That is the
first apparently unexplained contradiction in the behavior of
the Jew
Bogroff. He certainly was not in need of the money from the
Ochrana. Why,
then, did he enter its service?
Dmitri Bogroff
described himself as a follower of the Anarcho-
Communists,
who took the position that the entire state and economic
order must be
wholly destroyed. He subscribed to the so-called
"Platform of
the London Congress of Anarchists" of 1881, which had
announced the
slogan of the "Propaganda of the Act."
"The
Anarchists take the position that every means is permitted for
attaining
their goals, and the rejection of the law is their highest
principle."(1) The
Anarchist organ Die Freihiet [Freedom] in New
York, 25
January 1885 (Nr. 4), declared the following guidelines for
conduct, which
were also applicable for Bogroff(2): "One must
attack
when and
wherever possible! The more quietly the lackeys of the order
can be
liquidated, the less danger is connected to the [liquidation of
the] more
prominent members. The revolver is good, when extreme
danger
threatens; dynamite should be used only for the most serious
political
campaigns. Otherwise, the dagger and poison are very
practical
means of propaganda."
That was the
Weltanschauung [world view] of the young
Bogroff.
[178] He belonged to a group of Anarcho-Communists in Kiev,
but
soon decided
to act completely alone and independently. Very
remarkable is
his statement of 02 September 1911, to the effect that
those alleged
Anarcho-Communists "in the main pursue purely
predatory
goals." In the same statement, Bogroff explains: "I decided to
furnish
made-up reports to the Petersburg Division of the Ochrana or to
the police
department, in order, out of revolutionary objectives, to have
close contact
with these authorities and to become familiar with their
activities."
The investigation made after the murder showed that
Bogroff had in
reality not performed any service of value whatsoever
for the
Ochrana, but rather only pretended to belong to it. He was an
agent of the
Ochrana in 1907 in Kiev, in Petersburg in 1910, and then
again in Kiev
in 1911.
The result of
the aforesaid investigation, which was conducted by
Senator
Trussevitch, was:
"One can
maintain with complete correctness, that Dmitri Bogroff, who
was well-known
to the Kiev division of the Ochrana as a revolutionary
Anarchist, led
Kulyapko (Director of the Kiev Ochrana) around by the
nose and
exploited the Ochrana for his own revolutionary aims."
Senator
Trussevitch came to the conclusion that the persons who had
been entrusted
with the guarding of the Czar in Kiev, namely Kurloff,
Colonel
Spiridovitch, Councilor Verigin and Colonel-Lieutenant
Kulyapko, were
guilty of a criminal negligence in office and must be
made to answer
for it.
Without a
doubt, Trussevitch was correct. Bogroff, as one of his own
comrades,
Sandomirski expressed it, was a "Provocateur without
provocation,"
or, better said: the Jew Bogroff not only incited the
Anarcho-Communists,
he incited and also betrayed the Ochrana. He
was a
provocateur raised to the second power. Accordingly, Dmitri
Bogroff was a
second and still worse Asev, because he instigated,
prepared and
personally carried out the murder of Minister-President
Stolypin. By
so doing, he consciously renounced having his own
"revolutionary
role" come to light. Rather, he described himself as an
agent of the
Ochrana, in order to add a yet enormous propagandizing
effect to the
effect of the murder -- the total defamation of the Ochrana.
Indeed, the
result of this was that not only the Ochrana, but he himself
had bad repute
in the (non-Jewish!) world. But to his Tribe, he had the
status of a
"super-hero." For example, this is how his brother, W.
Bogroff writes
of him:
[179] "Dmitri Bogroff brought still more than his life as a
sacrifice to
his
revolutionary ideas, as he understood them: he sacrificed his
revolutionary
name and his revolutionary honor."
So much for
the brother. In reality, of course, it has turned out
differently.
Dmitri Bogroff did not act as a "Revolutionary" and did not
sacrifice his
life and his "honor" in any sense to a "revolutionary idea";
rather, he
acted as a Jew and executive of the Jewish struggle for
power.
There is abundant evidence for this in the utterances of the
murderer
himself.
For example,
from Munich Dmitri Bogroff writes a letter to his parents,
in which he
comes to speak of the defense of the people against Jewry
in Russia, the
so-called pogroms, and then adds that he "cannot remain
calmly abroad
while in Russia people are beaten" (in place of "people"
the word
"Jews" should be used). In a completely confidential talk with
the
revolutionary Jew Lasareff in Petersburg in 1910, Bogroff
communicates
his goal of killing Stolypin. He tries to make clear to his
racial comrade
that, logically, he must perform this action entirely by
himself, so
that no persecution of the Jews will be caused by it, but that
he is counting
upon the "understanding" of his racial comrades. He
says, to
wit(1): "I am a
Jew, and permit me to remind you that today
we are still
living under the rule of the Black Hundreds (anti-Semites).
The Jews will
never forget the Kruschevanovs, Dubrovins,
Purischkevitches
and like malefactors. And Herzenstein? And where is
Yollos? Where
are the hundreds, the thousands, of Jews who have been
torn to pieces
-- men, women, and children with bellies slit open, with
noses and ears
cut off(?!) . . .To point out the truly guilty to the masses
is the duty of
the Socialist parties and the intelligentsia anyway. You
know that the
leader of violent reaction is Stolypin. I come to you and
say to you,
that I have resolved to eliminate him."
These words of
Bogroff are not to be outdone in their frankness. There
is only one
statement yet which is worthy of a place beside it: the
statement of
the Jew David Frankfurter, the murderer of Wilhelm
Gustloff in
Davos. David Frankfurter, like Dmitri Bogroff, confesses
openly that
they have acted as Jews. Neither for Frankfurter nor for
Bogroff is it
a matter of being "Socialists," "Anarchists" or
"Revolutionaries"
-- it is a matter of being instruments of the Jewish
war against
humanity, of being Jewish murderers.
[180] In another, strictly secret talk shortly before the
murder with the
Anarchist
Lyapkovski, likewise released from jail, Bogroff explains(1):
"I am a
Jew. With a murder of Nicolaus [the then Romanov Czar,
Nicolas II], I
would cause an enormous persecution of the Jews. Better
yet to murder
Stolypin. Thanks to his policies, the Revolution is
suffocated and
reaction has set in."
Therefore,
here, as well: the dam against the Revolution of Jewry must
be broken
through. Stolypin, who stands in the way of the struggle for
control by the
Jews, must fall.
On 11
September 1911, Bogroff was hanged.
The escape
plan, which he had layed out with the help of his racial
comrades, had
failed.
So much for
the case of Bogroff, who dealt a lethal blow to the anti-
Jewish Russian
Empire. An instructive example of the complete
ruthlessness,
cruelty and deliberation of Judeo- Bolshevist criminality,
an instructive
example, also, of the myopia and superficiality of the
state defense
for warding off revolutionary-criminal efforts; a defense
which marched
on past the essential core of these efforts, the Jewish
core, and
believed that it could place Jews in the service of this
defense, even
as provocateurs. The Jew as a provocateur -- as shown
by the cases
of Asev and Bogroff --- is always a "Provocateur without
provocation,"
a super-provocateur, whose provocation is directed not
against the
overthrow [of the state], but against order, law, and the
freedom of the
people.
The Jew as
informer is as customary a phenomenon as the Jew as
swindler, as
fence or as spy.
Still one more
historical example of this.
On 05 March
1917, among the first orders of business of the "Report of
the
Provisional Government," there was published in Russia a
prescription
for the establishment of an "Extra-ordinary Investigatory
Committee for
the Discovery of Unlawful Official Dealings of the
former
Minister and higher officials." The commission met in the just-
captured
Winter Palace. It questioned a total of 59 persons, among
them nearly
all of the former ministers, state secretaries, governors,
generals, the
directors of police departments, well-known politicians
and other
personalities of the old regime(2).
[181] Two topics in particular occupied the investigatory
commission,
which,
incidentally, "met" so long that they themselves were hunted
down and
themselves interrogated by the victorious Bolshevists: the
case of
Rasputin and the question of provocation as means of struggle
against the
revolutionary parties by the old Ochrana (political police).
The origin,
composition and activity of this commission puts it beyond
any suspicion
of enmity toward Jews. On the contrary, it was a
"prosecuting
authority" staged by the Jews against the anti-Semitic old
regime. All
the more potently incriminating and irrefutable was the
evidence of
criminal double-agentry and political murders of the Jews,
which was
unwillingly brought to light by the commission -- the
devastating
facts about such "outstanding" representatives of Jewry as
the
provocateur Asev, the informer and swindler Manassevitch
Manuilov, the
jeweler and gambling club owner Simanovitch, the
Court banker
and traitor Rubenstein, etc.
The commission
deliberated long and broadly over the famous
"instruction
for the organization and performance of internal
surveillance,"
the basis for the highly developed system of provocation
at the
Ochrana. This instruction begins with the sentence: "The single
reliable means
for securely informing the organs of investigation about
revolutionary
work, is the establishment of an interior agency. The
entire efforts
of political observation must be directed toward the
object of
discovering the center of revolutionary organizations and to
liquidate it
in the moment of the highest development of its activity."
Certainly the
system of "trusted people" and agents is as old as the
history of the
state itself, since there is hardly any other means for
[acquiring]
information about opposing organizations and for fighting
enemies of the
state. The very well thought-out instruction of the old
Ochraca had
foreseen all eventualities, incorporated all security
measures, to
create a well-functioning system of surveillance. And yet,
this
instruction, with its system of highly-disciplined provocation,
without a
doubt played an essential part in the collapse of the czarist
state. The
reason is to be found in the fact that the instruction and the
Ochrana had no
sensitivity for or view of the one decisive fact: the
basic
criminality, the fundamental revolutionism of Jewry. There were
no
proscriptions against the use of Jews as agents and informers. Thus
Jewry
succeeded in penetrating the Ochrana, in corrupting it and
misusing it
for the Jewish efforts at overthrowing the state. The
Ochrana
thought that it [182] was using the Jews,
but in actuality was
itself being
used by the Jews. [This is the entire story, played out over
milennia, of
the interaction between the state and the Jews!]
The
"classical" figure of the revolutionary Ochrana-Jew will always
remain
Yevno Asev, a figure about which just as many legends have
been spun as
about the figure of Rasputin. All these legends are
deliberately
silent about the Jewish core and represent him
intentionally
as a "betrayer of the Revolution." In reality, Asev was
definitely, to
be sure, a traitor to the honorable revolutionaries, and
equally as
much a traitor to his task-masters at the Ochrana. He was
"loyal" only
to his Jewish mission and fully consistent in executing it.
The mission of
the Jew Asev consisted, just as did that of the other
Jewish
provocateurs, revolutionaries, journalists and bankers, of
nothing other
than the simultaneous misdirection and corruption of the
revolutionary
powers on the one hand, and the corruption and
misleading of
the state apparatus on the other. These Jews prevented
the finding of
any positive outcome of the conflict between people and
state in
Russia, and thus prepared the way for and brought about the
Jewish-Bolshevist
seizure of power.
Asev was born
the son of a Jewish tailor in Russia and studied in
Karlsruhe,
where he took the examination to qualify as an engineer. As
a student, he
already pretended to enter the service of the Ochrana and
simultaneously
the foreign branch of the Social-Revolutionary Party,
an
agrarian-revolutionary organization, which until its liquidation in
1918,
represented the the strongest revolutionary movement of the Old
Russia. The
Social- Revolutionary party or, as abbreviated, SR, was
committed to
terrorism. The direction of all terrorist operations was in
the hands of
the combat center, to which, besides the Jew Chernov, the
famous
terrorist Boris Savinkov belonged. In 1903, Asev joined. Asev
was getting a
princely salary from the secret Division A of the the
Ochrana, and
presumably also money for the financing of the SR
operations as
well. Now he unfolded his criminal activity by betraying
the
revolutionaries and terrorists to the Ochrana, while at the same time
organizing and
carrying out murders of prominent personalities. From
the large list
of the murders in which Asev had taken part as instigator
and organizer,
let us consider above all the murder of the Minister of
the Interior,
Pleve, on 15 July 1904, as well as that of the Governor
General of
Moscow, Grand Duke Sergius, on 04 February 1905. Grand
Duke Sergius
was ripped into pieces by the bombs of the Asev
organization.
Asev crowned this crime by delivering up to the police
the deluded
perpetrators, who had no inkling of the fact [183] that they
were brought
to disaster by a Jew. They were hanged.
Whenever the
Ochrana began to become suspicious of Asev due to a
series of
successful operations of the SR, this Jewish criminal always
delivered up a
number of hapless revolutionaries to the hangman. Thus,
for example,
in 1908 he betrayed the entire combat organization of the
SR, which
resulted in the hanging of seven men. However, if any kind
of suspicion
toward him in his own ranks of the combat organization
began to be
bruited about, he saw to it that there was a successful
assassination
and again started out with a "clean" slate with his
comrades. It
was only in the year 1908 that this Jewish beast was
unmasked by a
rival; and a rival of his employer, General Gerassimov,
the Police
Director Lopuchin, made haste to confirm this revelation.
Thereupon --
nothing happened. Asev was "brought to justice" neither
by the
Ochrana, nor by the Social-Revolutionaries. Instead, he got a
considerable
pension and settled in Berlin, where he began dealing in
women's
corsets and at the same time speculated in the stock market,
under the name
Neumeyer. Then, in April 1918, he passed away
unscathed and
peacefully.
That is the
truth about Asev; it is less romantic, if no less terrible, than
the legends
say. It is an awful truth, the truth about a Jew who
ruthlessly,
cunningly and cruelly took care of the concerns of
Jewry.
And what was
the "judgement" about this of his former employer,
General
Alexander Gerassimov, who was Chief of the Ochrana in
Petersburg in
1905-1909, ? Gerassimov writes in 1934 of his
recollections:
"Asev
assembled a terrorist group of ten men out of the most active
revolutionaries.
His closest adjutant was the former student Peter
Karpovitch,
who in the year 1901 had murdered (!) the Minister of
Popular
Enlightenment, Bogolepov. He was sentenced to twenty years
of hard labor,
but later escaped from Siberia and had now offered his
services to
Asnev. Through Asev, I was systematically kept informed
about all
plans and acts of the terrorist group. The members lived in
Finland and
travelled to Petersburg from time to time, in order to carry
out some sort
of missions there connected with the attempted
assassination
of the Czar(!).
The services
of Asev (!) in the struggle with the revolutionaries are
enormous, and
we ought not to count it against him that he did not
deliver all
the terrorists, but rather we must be [184]
grateful (!) that at
least (!) he
frustrated a large number (!) of terrorist attacks. That is still
my firm
conviction today (1)."
Truly, these
people have learned nothing!
After its
victory in the Bolshevist Revolution, Jewry organized and
systematized
as "state" functions its "specialty," provocation. From the
Preu�Ÿischen
Zeitung [Prussian Times] of 22 October 1935, we take the
expert report
of an historic example:
"On 06 July
1918, the crime occurred. Toward 3:00 P.M., two men
drove up in
front of the building of the German embassy in a motor
vehicle. They
identified themselves by an authorization signed by
Dzerschinsky
(the Director of the Cheka) himself and by his secretary
Zenofontoff,
whose contents said that 'the representative of the
Revolutionary
Tribunal Nikolaus Andreyev and the member of the
Cheka Jakob
Blumkin were empowered to enter into negotiations
with the
German chargé d'affaires due to a matter which directly and
personally
concerned him.' This piece of writing later proved to have
been
forged.
The embassy
councilor Dr. Ritzler at first wanted to deal with the pair
of strange
visitors, who hardly evoked feelings of trust, by himself. But
these two
refused to supply any information about the alleged purpose
of their visit
and insisted upon a personal meeting with the (German
chargé
d'affaires) Count Mirbach. Finally, they were admitted and
Count Mirbach
received them in the presence of Dr. Ritzler and of
Lieutenant
Müller; the German chargé d'affaires and his colleagues sat
at one side of
the table, their two visitors across from them at the other
side.
The Jew
Blumkin began to relate a not entirely coherent tale about the
arrest of an
Austrian officer by the name of Robert Mirbach, whom he
described as a
relative of the Count, in whose fate the Count would
probably be
interested. Count Mirbach declared that there must be a
misunderstanding,
for the man arrested was not related to him.
Thereupon Dr.
Ritzler asked the Count whether he did not want to
regard the
conversation as concluded. Before Count Mirbach was able
to reply,
Andreyev interrupted with the question 'whether the Herr
Ambassador of
Germany did not want to find out how the
Revolutionary
Tribunal was thinking of proceeding against Robert
Mirbach?'
[185] That was the signal! Blumkin reached into his
briefcase, as
though he
wanted to pull out documents; but instead of this, he drew
out a revolver
and shot three times in quick succession: at first at Count
Mirbach,
then at Lieutenant Müller and finally at Dr. Ritzler; all of
the shots
missed their targets. Count Mirbach got up and wanted to flee
into the next
room; the wide table which was between the assassins and
their victims
prevented the immediate disarming of the attackers.
Hardly had
Count Mirbach stood up, when Andeyev shot at him, and
when the Count
nonetheless continued on his way, Blumkin shot at
him, and one
of the two assassins threw a bomb at the Count. The
explosion
caused considerable destruction in the room and smashed the
window panes.
Count Mirbach fell to the floor dead; the two
assassins
escaped through the window and into an automobile waiting
outside . .
."
Whence were
they fleeing? They directly made for the so-called
"Sailors'
Division" of the Cheka. Blumkin belonged to this Sailors'
Division. To
all appearances, it had raised the flag of revolt against
Lenin and
Dzerschinsky in common with the Social-Revolutionary
Party, which
was at that time still ruling Russia together with the
Bolshevists.
At the head of the "rebels" allegedly stood no less a figure
than the
acting Chief of the Cheka, Alexandrovsky, as well as the Chief
of the
Sailors' Division, Popoff.
The news of
the murder of Mirbach was received by Dzerschinsky,
strangely
enough, from Lenin personally and not from his own Cheka
apparatus. He
went to the scene of the crime and from there to the
"conspirators"
in the Sailors' Division, where at first he was "arrested."
But he came to
no harm. Meanwhile, his assistant Peters had the entire
faction of the
Social-Revolutionary Party arrested in the middle of the
Soviet
Congress which was "coincidentally" in session. Within a few
hours, the
"revolt" of the Sailors' Division was also ended and the
Bolshevists
had a bloody show down with the Social-Revolutionaries,
who were
completely eradicated.
Those were the
external events. Certainly there was a great provocation
of the Cheka
itself which was set up in this affair. It appears to be
completely
unbelievable that, in particular, the German embassy had
knowledge of
the assassination attempt and several times brought this
to the
attention of the foreign Commissariat and Dzerschinsky, but that
Dzerschinsky
himself wanted to know nothing about it. It is without a
doubt the case
that the Jew Blumkin penetrated [186] the
embassy not
with "forged,"
but with genuine identification papers of the Cheka and
that the
murder he committed was only supposed to provide the means
for the
extirpation of the Social Revolutionary Party, which at the time
was the rival
of the Bolshevists for power. Also, the dramatic arrest of
Dzerschinsky
in the Sailors' Division was nothing other than well-
placed
theater. If the Ochrana had already modelled the methods of
provocation to
perfection, so the Jewish Bolshevists, who for the most
part were
themselves former Ochrana informants and had an exact
knowledge of
these methods, raised provocation to the decisive
weapon of
their so-called art of statecraft.
That nothing
in this respect has changed up to the present day has been
demonstrated
by the recent trials in Moscow of the so-called
"Trotskyites."
The line between conspirators and Chekists, between
revolutionaries and
criminals, has been completely erased by the
Jewish Cheka.
Provocation and counter-provocation have become so
intertwined
that no one can find his way any longer in this chaos of lies
and
assassinations. Provocation is the type of crime in which Jewry has
no peer. This
dirtiest of all crimes is [a tool which they] manipulate
with total
mastery.
Only a few
days after this cunning murder of the Jewish terror-
organization
in Moscow, the cruellest and most disgusting crime of
modern history
was committed at the edge of the Urals -- the
slaughtering
of the Imperial family by the Jews Chaim Nacktbacke,
Wei�Ÿbart,
Jakob Moses Sverdloff and Jakob Yurovsky. Mirbach
was eliminated
-- the last protection of the unfortunate Czar had gone
with him. The
inhuman Jewish animals now indulged themselves
unrestrainedly
in the intoxication of their blood-lust of extermination.
The seed of
Mordechai [i.e., the "hero" of the Book of Esther, who
presided over
the slaughter not only of Haman and his ten sons, but of
thousands of
the Jews' enemies.] -- Bronstein, Asev and Bogroff --
were in full
bloom. The "deepening" of the Jewish revolution plunged
Russia into
the abyss. Thousands and hundreds of thousands of people
bled to death
and starved to death on the streets of the cities and on the
plains in the
chaos of the struggle of all-against-all, which was
unleashed by
Jewry, and which bears the name of "Bolshevist
Revolution."
When, on 01 September 1911, Bogroff spared the Czar
from fear of
the fury of the people against the Jewish murderers, in the
year 1918
Bogroff's racial comrades no longer needed to take the
Jewish tribal
interests into consideration. Thanks to the intrigues of the
Petersburg
clique of Jews -- Simanovitch, Rubinstein, Manassevitch-
Manuiloff and
Ginsburg -- the "bloodless" portion of the Jewish
Revolution had
ended with success. The half-Jew Kerensky (on his
mother's side
descended from the Viennese Adler clan!) had "taken
power" and
worked zealously as trail-blazer [187] of
Bolshevism. After
October 1917,
Jewry was able to proceed with execution of the
sentence of
death upon the Czar and the dynasty; it saw that it had
attained the
goal of its most passionate desire -- the murdering of the
Imperator
[Latin, "emperor"].
The final act
of the tragedy was played out in July 1918 in
Ekaterinburg.
The shadow of Rasputin had followed the Czar's family
there(1). It was Boris
Solovyeff who had come into the legacy of
Rasputin by
having married Rasputin's daughter Mara. She was by no
means an
innocent little lamb when she entered into marriage with
Solovyeff. On
the threshold of her maturity stood the Jewish journalist
Davidsohn.
[This is probably an idiom signifying that Mara's virginity
had been taken
by Davidsohn.] Mara Rasputin, together with her
husband,
followed the exiled Czar to Siberia. There, Solovyeff worked
at the
household of the unfortunate Imperial family as an informer for
Jewry and at
the same time cheated them of their money and jewelry.
All attempts
for their liberation which were undertaken by the anti-
Bolshevist
side were betrayed to the Jews by this couple, until the
transfer of
the Czar to Ekaterinburg, where the role of Solvyeff became
superfluous,
so that he travelled across Siberia to Europe accompanied
by the
Imperial diamonds(2).
The role of
Vyrubova, who was on friendly terms with Solovyeff in
1917 and 1918,
again became fateful.
On 14 August
1917, the Imperial family was brought to Tobolsk. This
was the home
town of Rasputin! On 05 October 1917, Solovyeff
married Mara
Rasputin. On 26 April 1918 the Czar was taken from
Tobolsk to
Ekaterinburg. On 12 April 1918, Solovyeff already had
knowledge of
this transfer of the victim to the scene of the murder(3).
Here in
Ekaterinburg, in the Ipatyeff house, the Imperial family was
finally
completely encircled, with no protection and helpless, delivered
up to the
Jewish murder organization. The Jew Jakob Yurovsky took
command of
guard duty in the Ipatyeff house. He was the Cheka
director and
the actual ruler of Ekaterinburg, the city, which in its time
had been
founded by the great German princess on the Russian
Imperial
throne, Katharina [i.e., Catherine the Great]. The [188] second
director
responsible for the murder and also the boss of Yurovsky was
the Jew
Chaim Golostschekin (in German: "Nacktbacke" [i.e., "bare
cheeks"!]), a
Jew from the Vitebsk District. During his exile in Siberia
in 1912, he
had gotten to know the third of the confederates in the
murder of the
Czar, the Jew Jakob Moses Sverdloff, who during the
period of the
crime occupied the highest and most representative
position in
the Bolshevist state: Sverdloff was the Chairman of the
Central
Executive Committee of the Soviet [i.e. Supreme Soviet] and,
after Lenin
and Stalin, was the third member of the triumvirate which
ruled the
entire land without any constraints(1). At the same time,
Sverdloff
occupied the office of Political Secretary of the Communist
Party. This
double position permitted him the crucial influence upon
the whole
state and party apparatus of power of Bolshevism. Sverdloff
belonged to
the ten decisive leaders of the Bolshevist Revolution. He is
the actual
head of the Jewish gang of murderers which murdered the
Imperial
family. Golotschekin was his confidante and his tool on the
scene;
Yurovsky directed the execution. After the death of Sverdloff --
he was killed
in a Moscow factory by Russian workers -- the city of the
Empress
Katharina, Ekaterinburg, was adorned with the Jewish name
"Sverdlovsk"
after the the murder of her great-grandson Nicolaus II. To
this day,
Ekaterinburg still bears the name of the Jewish murderer
Sverdloff.
Golotschekin
was Military Commissar of the District of the Urals.
Jewish clan
ties and "friendship" bound him to Yurovsky. Originally a
dentist, then
a photographer and watchmaker in Ekaterinburg,
immediately
after the Bolshevist overthrow of the state he became a
member of the
city soviet and Commissar of Justice. Golotschekin,
Yurovsky and a
third Jew, Beloborodoff (in German Wei�Ÿbart [i.e.,
"white
beard"]) were put in charge of the Ekaterinburg Cheka.
The murder
took place in the night of 16 - 17 July 1918.
The Czar
himself, Imperator of the Russian Empire and Supreme Head
of the Russian
Christian Orthodox Church, was shot by the Jew
Yurovsky
himself. The heir to the throne, Alexis, was still not dead
after several
salvos; thereupon he too was killed by the Jew Yurovsky
with three
revolver shots. The closest confidante of Golotschekin and
participant in
the act of murder, Paul Medvedeff, the investigatory
judge of
Admiral Koltschak, reports as follows concerning the
completion of
the murders(2):
[189] "On 16 July, toward 7 o'clock in the evening, Yurovsky
ordered
me to take the
revolvers from all the guards. In all, there was a total of
12 Nagan
pistols, which I brought to Yurovsky and layed on the table.
In the
morning, the latter had removed the little servant and had him
lodged in the
Popoff house with the guard detachment. Yurovsky gave
me no
explanation for any of this. Only when he took the pistols from
me did he say:
'Today we will shoot the whole family dead.' At 10
o'clock he
ordered me to instruct the guards that if they should hear
shots, they
should not sound the alarm. Therefore I let the guards know
this and
returned to the house. At midnight Yurovsky awakened the
Imperial
family. They rose, dressed and came out of their rooms in
about an hour.
They were calm; the thought of danger was remote to
them. Nicolaus
himself carried Alexis, they all went into the room
situated at
the extreme end of the house. Some had a pillow, the
chambermaid
was carrying two. Yurovsky said that chairs ought to be
brought and
three were brought. At this moment two members of the
Checka
arrived, one of whom, as I later heard, was Yermankoff from
Verch-Isset.
The other was unknown to me. Yurovsky, his assistant and
the two men
went to the ground floor below where the Imperial family
already was.
The seven other Latvians were also there. The revolvers
were
distributed by Yurovsky to the seven Latvians, to the two
Chekists and
to his assistant. He kept one himself. Yurovsky had a
Mauser rifle
besides. The Czarina, the Czar and Alexis took their
places on the
chairs. The others remained standing against the wall. All
were calm.
Some minutes thereafter, Yurovsky came into the next
room, where I
was, and said: 'Go out on the street and see whether
anyone is
there and watch to see whether the shots are heard or not!' I
went out and
immediately heard shots. When I entered the room again
to report to
Yurovsky, all the prisoners were lying on the floor in
different
positions, in large puddles of blood. All were dead, only
Alexis was
still groaning. Yurovsky then shot him two or three times.
The sight of
the blood-bath made such an impression upon me that I
became
nauseated and had to go outside. Then Yurovsky ordered me to
run to the
guards and to say to them that they mustn't get upset due to
the shots. As
I went out I heard two more shots. I met Starkoff and
Dobrynin on
the street, who ran up to me. They asked me: 'Nicolaus
surely has
been shot. You've taken care of the matter.' I answered them
that I had
seen with my own eyes how Nicolaus and his family were
shot; they
should keep their people calm. I therefore [190]
saw how the
ex-Emperor was
shot to death, his wife Alexandra, his son Alexis, his
four
daughters, Doctor Botkin, the cook, the servant and a
chambermaid.
Each of them had several wounds, their faces and
articles of
clothing were overflowing with blood. None of them had
had a
foreboding of the danger threatening them. I myself did not take
part in the
murder. When I returned to Yurovsky in the room, the latter
ordered me to
send him some men to get the bodies into the vehicle. I
had ten men
come, whose names I've forgotten. From two sleds that
were in the
coach-house they prepared a stretcher, tied a sheet together
with a string
and brought the bodies to the vehicle that way. They took
away what the
victims had on their hands, their rings, their bracelets,
and two gold
watches. Everything was handed over to Yurovsky. The
vehicle into
which the bodies were put was a truck which had been
brought into
the yard toward evening. The bodies were laid on grey
military cloth
and also covered with it. The cloth was taken from the
junk room. I
do not know where the dead were taken, I didn't inquire
about it.
Later, in Apeyevsk, I met one of the two Checkists,
Yermankoff,
and asked him where they'd been dragged off to. 'They
tossed them
into the shaft of an old mine beyond Verch-Isset,' he
replied to me.
After the bodies had been taken away, Yurovsky ordered
the detachment
to clean the floor and yard of the blood, which also
happened. Then
he returned to his room. I went to the Popov house
which I had
left just that morning. The Ipatyeff house was guarded
until 20 July,
although there were no longer prisoners in it. But they did
not want to
arouse the people and left them believing that the Imperial
family was
still living. When I went into the first floor of the Ipatyeff
house on 17
July, I found everything to be in great disorder. Yurovsky
was not there.
When I looked to see what was lying on the table, I
found sixty
Rubels in ten-Rubel notes in a little catechism. Without
saying
anything to anyone, I took them. On 21 July I returned; the
house was no
longer guarded. I remained in Ekaterinburg until 24 July.
On the 24th, I
went by train to Nishny-Tagil."
The bodies of
the murdered were robbed of all valuables and pieces of
jewelry,
dismembered and then, in the shaft of the "Four Brothers"
mine, had
gasoline poured over them and were burned up.
On 17 July, at
9 o'clock in the evening, the murderers sent a telegram
from
Ekaterinburg to the "People's Commissariat," the [191] Jewish
Murder-Central
in Moscow. This telegram reads(1): "Let
Sverdloff
know that the
entire family has suffered the same fate as its head.
Officially,
they were killed during the evacuation."
The murder of
the Imperial family in Ekaterinburg by the Jews
Yurovsky,
Wei�Ÿbart, Nacktbacke and Sverdloff is certainly one of the
most horrible
Jewish crimes in the entire history of mankind. Utter,
unsurpassed
vileness of mind drove these Jews to the crime. Let us
read the words
of their racial comrade, Simanovitch(2):
"At the murder
of the Imperial family the Bolshevist Commissar
Yurovsky
played a decisive role. He, too, was guided by the motive of
greed.
Yurovsky was a
jeweler by profession. After the transfer of the
Imperial
family to Ekaterinburg, he managed to become Bolshevist
Commissar
there and was entrusted with the supervision of the
Imperial
family. Yurovsky gave the prisoners permission to sell a
portion of
their jewelry to his friend Krumnos (Krumm-Nase! [The
author is
observing the comical probable etymology of the individual's
surname, which
means "Bent-Nose."]. By doing this he managed to
find out that
the Imperial family still had at its disposal jewels of
inestimable
value. The rumors according to which the Soviet
government was
supposed to be planning to bring to Czar to Moscow
in order to
place him in front of a Revolutionary Court, worried him;
on the other
hand, he was hearing about the efforts of the Monarchists
to free the
Imperial family. Neither outcome suited him, and he
decided,
together with the Commissars Beloborodov and Golotschekin,
to execute the
Imperial family by shooting, in order to get his hands on
their
jewelry(!).
Yurovsky
appropriated to himself the jewels of the Imperial family and
shared the
booty with Beloborodov and Golotschekin. The settings
were destroyed
and disposed of.
I learned all
these details from the jeweler Simon Golub, who, with the
Krumnos
mentioned above, was well-known. Golub was in
Ekaterinburg
at the time of the murder of the Imperial family. He was
staying in the
vicinity of the house in which the crime happened even
on the night
of the murder, and he himself heard the shots and screams.
Yurovsky told
him that not all the daughters of the Czar were dead
after the
salvos, and that the soldiers had slain them with their
bayonettes.
The unfortunate girls had even tried to defend
themselves."
[192] Three Jewish "jewelers" -- Yurovsky,
Golub, and Krumnos
--
gathered like
birds of carrion at the murder scene, in order to get their
hands on the
jewelry of the slaughtered Imperial family. These are not
any kind of
"revolutionaries," nor are they even "assassins" -- they are
Jewish
robbery-murderers and ghouls, who have reached the most
extreme level
of baseness and abomination. Are they even still human
beings?! They
are devils incarnate.
The
"political" murder, the murder from greed for power, is typical of
Jewry. In
this, the Jew directs his perverse cruelty always against a
defenseless
victim who is not able to ward off the attack. In all places
and at all
times where Jews usurp power in the form of Bolshevism or
struggle to
get power, they make use of the cowardly and base means
of
hostage-murder. Uninvolved, innocent people are seized and
slaughtered.
The
hostage-murder accompanied the Bolshevist civil war in Russia
from its
beginnings up to the present day. In every district which the
Bolshevists
took, it was the first act of the Checka to seize hostages
and to butcher
them at the first opportunity. The number of murdered
hostages in
Bolshevist Russia runs to several hundred thousands. After
the shooting
of the Petersburg founder of the Cheka, Moses Uritzki,
alone, several
ten thousands of hostages were shot in every city and
village. This
was the famous "blood tax" which the Jewish Cheka
imposed upon
the land as "atonement." The same thing happened after
the attempted
assassination of Lenin, and again after the shooting of
Kirov,
etc.
The hostage
system belongs to the established methods of the Judeo-
Bolshevist war
of annihilation. Hundreds of hostages were slaughtered
during the
Bolshevist control of the Baltic countries: in Mitau, in Riga,
in Dirpat, in
Wesenburg, etc. The Jews Kun and Szamuely bestially
murdered many
hostages during their short rulership in Hungary.
On 30 April
1919, the following hostages were shot in Munich under
the rule of
the Bolshevist Jews Lewien, Leviné-Nissen and Axelrod(1):
Berger,
Professor, 68 years old. Murdered by several shots at close
range in the
head and back.
Daumenlang,
railroad secretary, 54 years old. Murdered by five shots
in the
back.
[193] Hindorf,
Walter, soldier of the Hussar Regiment Nr. 8, 1st
Squadron, 19
years old. Was barbarously abused before his murder and
killed by four
shots in the head, back, and abdomen.
Linnenbrügger,
Fritz, soldier of the Hussar Regiment Nr. 8, 1st
Squadron, 41
years old. Murdered by a shot in the back.
Neuhaus,
Walter, artist (painter), 28 years old. Shot through the head
with six shots
to the body.
von
Seydlitz, F. W., artist (painter), 28 years old. Shot to death from
the front.
Head shot with critical skull and brain damage, shots to the
heart and
chest and a grazing wound to the left hand. [The latter wound
would probably
be termed a "defensive wound" by a forensic
pathologist.]
Deike,
commercial art student, 25 years old. Murdered by shots from
behind, with
five shots in head, neck, back, and thigh.
von
Teuchert, Baron, officer. Murdered by two shots in the back
(penetrating
the heart and destroying the jaw).
von Thurn
und Taxis, Prince, 30 years old. Killed by shots from
behind in the
head and back; shot in the abdomen as well.
von
Westarp, Hella, Countess, 33 years old. Murdered by shots
through the
neck, chest, shoulder blade and a shot through the left arm.
The mass
murders of the hostages in Spain are recalled by everyone. In
the small
district of Llora del Rio alone, one hundred eighty-seven
hostages were
murdered; in Constantina, two hundred fifty; in Bilbao
the
Bolshevists repeatedly went on rampage against the imprisoned
hostages, and
at one of their "assaults" two hundred eight jailed
hostages were
slaughtered.
Responsible
for these crimes were the Jews Moses Rosenberg, then
Soviet
"ambassador" in Madrid, Heinz Neumann, a Communist Jew
from Berlin;
also the Marxist Jew Deutsch from Austria and Kolzov-
Ginsburg, a
Jew from Moscow.
The
hostage-murder, the zenith of a refined and cowardly cruelty, is
and remains a
Jewish specialty.
The
exploration of Bolshevism and its terror-system(1)
has today
irrefutably
proven that Bolshevism as [194] a whole
represents a
Jewish
criminal organization, which works with every means -- of
torture, of
hostage -murder, of mass shootings, of individual
extermination
and physical liquidation of all opponents of the Judeo-
Bolshevist
dictatorship. Names such as that of the mass-butcher of
Shanghai and
Madrid, Heinz Neumann, of the mass-murderer in
Hungary, in
the Crimea as well as in Spain, Bela Kun = Aaron Kohn
with his
helpmate Semlyatchka = Salkind, of the founder of the Cheka,
Moses Uritzki,
of the Chief of the G.P.U. for many years, Yagoda =
Yehuda, of the
current acting Chief of the G.P.U., Bärman and
countless
other Checkist Jews, furnish incontrovertible proof of the fact
that this
horrifying murder organization, which is master over one-sixth
of the surface
of the Earth and has spread over the entire world,
represents a
murder-organization of Jewry. The Cheka -- G.P.U. --
proves the
identity of Bolshevism and crime. Its personal existence,
especially in
the leading positions, proves, in turn, that Bolshevism and
crime are
united in "personal union" and namely in the person of the
Jew.
Since it is
impossible to give an account even approaching the total
crimes of the
Jewish Cheka, we must be content with some few
examples.
The
Social-Democratic Party of Germany issued a book about the
Cheka in 1922,
in the book shop "Vorwärts," in which original excerpts
from the notes
of Marxists who themselves became the victims of the
Cheka, were
published. From this source, which is certainly beyond
suspicion of
having "anti-Bolshevist tendencies" or of being "anti-
Semitic," we
take the following account:
The main
offices of the Moscow Cheka are now housed at Great
Lubyanka Nr.
14, in the home of the former Moscow insurance
company. Here,
day and night, works the soulless death machine, here
the circle of
transformations, one after another, of a human being from
an accused
into a condemned man, closes with a mutilated corpse . .
.
[195] In the main building are located the cabinets of the
investigating
judges,
according to whose reports the board makes its stereotypical
horrible
judgements. Behind this house, in a cellar structure of the one-
storey garden
house, those consecrated to death await their last hour.
And directly
here in the yard, lying close by the Little Lubyanka, is
found also the
cellar established for the jail of the Cheka executioner.
There, in the
center of the city itself, behind the walls of the once-
benign
insurance company, one of the blindest tools of the terror has
found its
lodging, which quietly goes about exterminating hundreds
and thousands
of human lives. The room most feared of the cabinets of
the
investigatory judges is Room Nr. 55 -- the study of the first
investigating
judge, by the name Wuhl (a Jew), of the division for
common
criminals. In his hands are concentrated all criminal cases
and in
particular cases of banditry, for which there is usually no mercy
and for which
the death penalty seems to be the firm norm, almost
without
exception. Wuhl is the constant and single correspondent of the
'Troika'; he
directs the work of the subordinate investigatory judges,
and upon him
depends the outcome of the cases investigated. Still
young (perhaps
thirty years old), with light, wavy, hair and a firm
gaze from
glittering eyes, agile, energetic, calm and polite in
conversation,
Wuhl fills anyone who enters his study with a shudder.
For rarely
does a case end here without a death sentence, and rarely
does an
interrogation proceed without a wild beating of the accused. If
a subaltern
investigating judge does not succeed in wresting a
confession
from the accused, he threatens to bring him before Wuhl,
and often the
pronouncing of this name by itself is enough to coerce a
"voluntary"
confession. Wuhl directs the most important matters
himself, and
his methods of interrogation are a not unimportant feature
in the whole
picture of Chekist justice. Here one of the countless
samples of
these interrogations according to the story related
personally by
Jan Otremski.
Otremski was
charged with the shooting of the window of the Sovdeps
(the Soviet
authority) by Basmannaya. At a body-search of him, a
Mauser with
some empty casings were found, which, as it turned out,
he had won in
a card game with one of the adjutants of Dzerschinsky,
the supreme
Chief of the Cheka. Otremski denied any participation in
the crime
imputed to him and maintained that he had been slandered by
some
speculators with whom he had fallen out over the division of the
winnings. The
somewhat puzzling provenance of the Mauser
meanwhile
awakened a special interest in Wuhl in the [196]
case, and
he decided to
get at the truth at all cost.
'Wuhl received
me very kindly' -- related Otremski, as he wiped his
bloody, beaten
face with a handkerchief. -- 'He asked me to take a seat,
opened his
gold cigarette case and asked me if I drank "morning
coffee."
Without waiting for my reply, he rang, said a few words to the
servant who
entered, and after a few minutes there stood before us a
tray with two
glasses of coffee, sugar, white bread and butter. "I'm
asking," said
Wuhl, "that with our coffee we discuss the case at the
same time, as
well." At this moment the telephone rang, and I was a
witness to the
following conversation that Wuhl conducted: "Jan
Otremski is
sitting right here by me. . .I'm sure we will not need to
shoot him. .
.He wants to confess everything voluntarily and wants to
be a capable
colleague. . ." In this moment I did not grasp that the
entire
conversation was arranged especially for me, and suddenly I
didn't feel
well. "They want to know if you are still living. . .," said
Wuhl to me
with a smile, and pushed the plate with the bread closer to
me.
But I could
neither eat nor drink, for I sensed some sort of trap and was
very upset.
"Confess everything, Otremski," continued Wuhl, "and we
will forget
your past. . .You will have a job with us."
Thereupon he
started a speech of persuasion and during fifteen to
twenty minutes
he relentlessly used alternating threats and tempting
promises
toward me. But I stubbornly denied my participation in the
shooting and
also refused to accept a position in the Cheka. My
stubbornness
finally made him lose his composure; he jumped up from
his seat, he
grabbed a rifle which was standing in a corner and began to
hit me with
the butt. After some blows on the head and the chest, I
staggered and
fell, covered with blood, to the floor. But after a minute I
came to again,
stood up, and accompanied by Wuhl's fists and wild
insults, I
dragged myself out of his study. . ." Jan Otremski was a
Polish
subject. He related this case of a bestial beating to the Polish
Red Cross and
enclosed as proof the blood-spotted handkerchief. But
his Polish
nationality did not save Otremski, and shortly after this
interrogation
-- on 14 May 1921 -- according to a report, he was shot to
death by Wuhl
. . .
I am stopping
with these characteristic details of the interrogation of
Otremski, in
order not to overload the rest of the account with dozens
of similar
facts. This system of [197] interrogation
was practiced by
Wuhl day in,
day out, with unvarying calm and good nature, with only
details
changing now and then. Thus, in suspicious cases he personally
investigated
the accused in order to convince himself that the latter was
without
weapons and sufficiently defenseless. Sometimes he prefers to
strike not the
head, but the the muscles and the elbows of the
outstretched
arms . . . in general, however, the stereotype prevailed
with him:
cigarettes, coffee, white bread, offer of a job in the Cheka
and . . . a
blow with the butt of a rifle. And so on, day in and day out,
with almost
total passivity of the tortured. In the expression used by the
beaten
bandits, 'Wuhl is playing the guitar.' For his talented and
zealous
guitar-playing, the member Wuhl of the Russian Communist
Party wore an
Order of the Red Flag on his chest."
That the Cheka
is in no sense any sort of "proletarian" fighting
organization,
but rather only and exclusively a Jewish murder-
organization
against the people, is shown very compellingly by,
among
countless other proofs and examples, the famous mass shooting
of the
workers in Astrakhan in March 1919. On 10 March 1919, the
workers of the
factories "Vulcan," "Etna," "Caucasus" and "Mercury"
interrupted
their work and assembled for a meeting.
"The
meeting(1) at which
ten thousand workers had assembled and
discussed
their hard material condition was surrounded by soldiers with
machine guns,
sailors, and grenade-throwers. After the workers refused
to break up
the meeting, a rifle salvo was shot off. Then the machine
guns rattled,
directed against the compact mass of the meeting
participants,
and hand grenades exploded with deafening noise. The
gathering
trembled, lay down on the ground, and were dumb with
fright. Above
the rattling of the machine guns one heard neither the
groaning of
the wounded nor the screams of the dying.
Suddenly, this
entire mass of men rose up, stormed forward and broke
through the
cordon of death of the government troops, with a power
made tenfold
by their terror. And it ran unthinkingly in every direction -
- seeking
salvation from the bullets of the machine guns which had
begun firing
again. Those fleeing were shot. Those who were still alive
were driven
into an enclosed space and shot down at close range. The
space in which
a peaceful gathering was meeting was now covered by a
pile of
corpses. Between the workers writhing in [198]
their death
throes, one
also saw some 'tamers of the Revolution' trampled to death
by the crowd
at the breakthrough. The news of the shooting quickly
spread into
the city. People were fleeing there from everywhere. Only
the cries
'they are shooting! They're shooting!' could be heard.
A canon shot
in the distance. A strange, droning detonation in the air.
After this
whizzing, suddenly, a bang. Again, whizzing. The church
cupola
crackled and plunged down. A bang, and then another bang. A
projectile
explodes. A second one explodes. And another. The crowd of
people loses
their heads and scatters apart, like a herd of restive beasts.
But the
outpost troops shoot and keep shooting. From somewhere
comes a new
order to fire, and those fleeing are struck by grenades.
The city is
deserted. Silent. One part of the inhabitants fled, another
part hid
themselves. Not fewer than two thousand victims were swept
from the ranks
of the workers. Thus ended the first act of the frightful
tragedy of
Astrakhan.
The second --
still more horrifying -- act began on 12 March. A portion
of the workers
were arrested by the 'victors' and imprisoned in the
commander's
headquarters, in barques and in steamers. Among the
latter, the
steamer 'Gogol' particularly distinguished itself by its cruelty.
But dispatches
were flying to Moscow which were reporting a 'revolt.'
The Chairman
of the Revolutionary War Council of the Republic, L.
Trotsky
(Bronstein, a Jew), responded with a laconic dispatch: 'Settle
accounts
and show no mercy.' With that, the fate of the unfortunate
workers in
custody was sealed. A bloody insanity raged on land and
water. In the
cellars and yards of the commander's headquarters, the
people were
shot to death. From the barques and steamers, people were
thrown into
the Volga. Many were thrown in with stones tied around
their necks.
One worker, who sat in the keel space on the machine,
remained
unnoticed and saved himself, told that in one night, 180 men
were thrown
overboard from the steamer 'Gogol.' But in the city there
were so many
shot dead, that some nights [199] hardly
sufficed to
transport them
all to the cemetary, where they were unloaded in piles
as 'typhus
cases'. . .
. . . After
some days, the rulers began to to publish the names of the
shot
'Burschuis' by the hundreds. At the beginning of April, the number
of victims
named was already 4000. But meanwhile, the repressions
did not stop.
The authorities had plainly resolved to take revenge upon
the worker's
unions of Astrakhan for the entire wave of strikes which
rolled through
Tula, Boyansk, Petrograd and other cities in March of
1919. It was
only toward the end of April that the shootings tapered off
and
stopped."
Some
characteristic details are supplied by the certainly not
anti-
Semitic Roman
Gul in his book Dzerschinsky, which appeared in Paris
in 1936, in
the Russian language. Gul describes, among other things,
the Commandant
of the Georgian Checka, Schulmann, who was
possessed by a
bestial cruelty, and who was infamous in Tiflis under
the name "The
Commandant of Death."
Schulmann
usually took drugs in order to get in the necessary "mood."
One example of
his rage and murdering(1):
"One dark
night, the Commandant of the Cheka, Schulmann, appeared
in the stone
corridors of the subterranean prison, rattling his saber with
a detachment
of Red Army troops. They began to lead out the
condemned men
from their cells. The pity-inspiring, half-dressed
unfortunate
men automatically obeyed the orders of the executioners. It
seemed as if
Schulmann wanted to excite himself, in that he treated the
condemned men
with especial brutality. They were all brought to the
inner
courtyard of the Cheka, where some trucks were awaiting them.
With a few
practiced and rapid movements of their hands, the
executioners
took from the victims the rest of their clothing, chained
their hands
and threw them in the trucks. The trucks began to move . . .
At the place
of execution partitioned by the Chekists, ditches had been
prepared in
advance. The condemned were arranged in rank and file.
Schulmann and
his assistant stepped down the line with a revolver in
hand and shot
the forehead of the condemned; now and then they
stopped to
reload the revolvers. Not everyone yielded their heads to be
shot
peacefully. Many struck out around themselves, tried to retreat,
cried, asked
for mercy. Sometimes Schulmann's bullet only wounded
them and the
Chekists immediately finished them off with shots and
bayonettes.
[200] Meanwhile, the dead were tossed into
the pits. This
scene of human
butchery lasted no less than three hours."
One other Jew
who is still active today as one of the highest GPU
Chiefs, is
Jakob Agranov, an epileptic Jew with the face of a woman.
His specialty
is the destruction of the Russian Aryan intelligentsia. The
Jew Agranov
has exterminated the flower of Russian science and of
The blood-bath
of the already-mentioned Aaron Kohn -- Bela Kun --
in the Crimea
is well known. At his side stood his racial comrades
Feldmann
(male) and Salkind (female). To the same series of Jewish
mass-murderers
belong: Comrade Rosa in Kiev, Yurovsky,
Nacktbacke
and Wei�Ÿbart in Ekaterinburg; Steinberg and Deutsch in
Saratov,
Eugenie Bosch in Pensa, Rebekka Meisel-Plastenina in
Archangelsk,
the sadistic Jewess Braude in Moscow, who with her
own hands
first undressed and then shot the "White Guard swine."
Here also
belong, above all, the directors of the Cheka in the Ukraine:
Feldmann
and Portugeis in Kharkov and Lifschitz and
Schwartzmann
in Kiev. At the head of the all-Ukraine Cheka stood
the Jews
Laziss and Schwarz(2).
The report of
the eyewitness Nilostonski, which already appeared in
1921 in the
Neudeutschen Verlags- and Treuhandgesellschaft editions
in Berlin,
gives a true-to-life picture of the rampages of this Jewish
murder-organization
in the Ukraine.
The 11th
Chapter of this unfortunately now out-of-print document is
rendered here
unmodified(3).
"The slaughter
of the victims was as a rule carried out as a conclusion
of high
entertainment after the wild drinking bouts which went on in
the
executioners' houses, when everyone was in a state of intoxication.
The criminals,
in their cheerful party, then went down the steps into the
yard, into the
slaughter house, where each according to his bent or
together, as
agreed, enjoyed themselves by killing. The victims were
often
tormented for hours in the cruelest manner on these occasions.
Here, the
greatest variety of wounds were inflicted upon them, over
there, the
victims' skulls were slowly crushed, in another direction they
were stabbed
with every sort of instrument of torture, and in yet
another spot,
tongues and limbs were torn out, etc., etc. They were
actually
killed only when [201] the murderers, due
to alcohol
intoxication,
could no longer keep to their feet and had to end their
party. As in
the courtyard of Ssadovaya 5, we also found in all the rest
of the houses
of slaughter and Zcheresvytchaykas, mountains of
thousands upon
thousands of empty bottles of the most expensive kinds
of
wine.
In Kiev, I saw
an unfortunate mother whose only son, an officer, had
been murdered
in the slaughter house at Ssadovaya 5. Some days after
the murder,
two sailors came in a motor vehicle in front of the
residence
where the family of the murdered young man lived, drove up
and picked up
the only daughter, a nineteen-year-old young girl, the
sister of the
murdered son, to bring her to one of the mentioned
drinking bouts
in the house of the executioners. Here, the executioners,
who a few days
earlier had just slaughtered her brother, ordered her to
dance in front
of them. When she was unable to do so and began to
stagger, the
executioners ordered her to drink a glass of champagne. In
the moment
when she seemed to draw the glass to her lips, she
suddenly
poured the contents out, struck the upper part of the goblet off
on the edge of
the table and tried to use the rest of the glass to cut
through the
veins of her neck. In the same moment, the Jewish wife fell
upon her and
badly abused the unfortunate girl for this sabotage, cut
her face up
with the same piece of glass, stepped on her with her feet,
pulled her
hair, until she was finally brought senseless into the
slaughter
house and had to lie there as long as until the murder gang
had gotten
drunk enough to pass over into slaughtering and then to
'transport'
the unhappy girl 'to her counter-revolutionary brother.' The
sad incident
was confirmed to us by, besides the mother of the dead
girl, two
young ladies of society, who on that evening had to dance in
the
Zcheresvytchayka, who were present during the whole event and
escaped on
that evening with some blows from a Nagaika [Cossak
whip] which
they received for covering their faces with their hands and
sinking to the
floor helplessly during the tragic moments. At any rate,
the
'invitation' to young girls of society to these kinds of drinking bouts
was usual in
all the Zchresvytchaykas of Kiev, so that the refined
Satanic
revenge of the Soviet sadists extended even to these creatures
who were
guilty of nothing. That a Commissar would suddenly
announce to
the parents that he would live with their daughter and then
take her away,
was in all cities something completely common.
Usually, he
began his announcement with a threat, since he would
know that the
daughter had served the Volunteers [of the White Army]
as a Sister of
Mercy [i.e., in a hospital], so that she and the whole
family
deserved death.
[202] The Bolshevists were inflamed against our Sisters of
Mercy with
a particularly
savage rage. In case of capture, each of the Sisters of
Mercy serving
with us carried poison with her. But woe to the girl,
who, gravely
wounded, didn't have the chance to make use of this and
first returned
to consciousness in custody. For her it was written --
death by rape.
Consequently, it was also the custom in the Volunteer
Army in the
case where escape wasn't possible (for example, in an
encirclement)
to shoot first of all the Sisters, especially the wounded,
and then the
wounded officers and the rest of the Volunteers. It
happened more
than once that an officer or soldier shot his own sister
who was
serving with her brother in the same regiment.
Here I will
deviate somewhat from my actual theme and say some
words about
the conduct of the Soviet government toward our
prisoners and
wounded. The torturing of the captured and wounded
Volunteers by
the Bolshevists is of course generally known.
Consequently,
not even one person in the Volunteer Army surrenders.
Thus, the
remnant of the Volunteers, who had been driven into the
harbors of
Odessa and Novorossyisk, and for whom at the fall of these
places rescue
was cut off in February and March of 1920, all shot
themselves and
their families. Two of our hospitalers in Odessa who
weren't able
to evacuate in time, were burned to death along with all of
the sick and
wounded found there. At the fall of Rostov,
Novotscherkask
and Taganrog in January 1920, 18,000 sick and
wounded, who
had stayed behind in the military hospital, were all
killed by the
Bolshevists in the most horrifying way. We had the
opportunity to
be convinced of this ourselves when we retook Rostov
and
Novotscherkask for several days in February.
The members of
the terror-houses, when it suited them and after they
had gotten
their hands on a sufficient supply of cocaine, sent for some
arrestees from
Zchresvytschayka for individual torturing, upon whom
they now
carried out tortures in a single room of the jailhouse. These
creatures, who
without exception were all cocaine addicts, committed
their crimes,
as is already well known, for the most part out of sadistic
impulses. One
of these sadists, a certain Zchernyavski (the pseudonym
by which he
was known among the Chekists), who had to kill a number
of people each
day since otherwise he felt bad, finally went so far as to
no longer
trouble himself about the category of his victims, and
allowed
himself to use prisoners for his tortures who actually belonged
to the
Bolshevists and had been [203] temporarily
stuck in jail for
minor
offenses, merely in order to have material for the satisfaction of
his sadistic
drives. He was finally killed one night by some other
sadists in one
of the slaughter houses. The famous executioner of Kiev
was the Jewess
'Rosa' Schwarz. All of Kiev knew her under the name
of 'Rosa.' Her
victims must have been numbered in the hundreds. This
'Rosa,' who
was caught, told the Courts-Martial which condemned her,
that she
constantly injected caffeine and then, in a state of intoxication,
would proceed
to torture her victims. A member of the aforesaid
Alliance of
Zchresvytschayka Victims reported on how he was bound
to a table in
front of a Jewish girl who was known by the nickname
'Sonya,' how
during the course of almost an hour she stuck a revolver
at his temple,
his forehead, into his mouth and over his heart, while she
observed his
face, then finally reluctantly put the revolver in her pocket
with the
remark that she found that she was not in the mood. To the
bound man she
said that she would shoot him some other time, and
ordered him
taken away. At any rate, it must be said, that, as in Kiev,
so also in
Odessa, Kharkov, Poltava, etc., Jewish women and girls
especially
enjoyed engaging in torture and slaughter, and the number
doing so was
definitely significant. Every city had its 'Rosa,' 'Sonya'
etc., who
became celebrities in the cities concerned. When the Chinese
professional
torturers stepped back from an aged person whom they
were supposed
to torture, or when even their tortures seemed to be too
mild, it was
Jewish girls who snatched at the opportunity and fell upon
the victims
with delighted zest and, in their devilish lust, inflicted the
most
unthinkable torments upon gray and white heads, unheeding
whether it was
an old man or old woman, and finally killed them as the
concluding
act."
These
horrifying facts, which describe the reality of the Jewish war
against
humanity, show the true face of the Jew in the clearest way:
toadying,
perfidious and duplicitous, he approaches his victim, only to
annihilate him
in the next moment with an unexampled and bestial
cruelty. [Or,
as one old saying expresses it: "The Jew -- either at your
groin or at
your throat!] The Bolshevist Revolution in Russia was a
successful
crime of Jewry, carried out against the peoples of Eastern
Europe. The
Bolshevist subversive activities in the entire World are
crimes of
Jewry. The entire "politics" of Jewry is fundamentally and
right from the
start, criminal, and is directed to the end of the
enslavement
and the extirpation of all non-Jewish peoples.
The Jew
misuses the notion of the political as a pretext for his crimes,
just as he
misuses the concepts of "science," [204]
"Freedom of
thought,"
"Brotherhood" etc., for his agitation and propaganda. The
sorry
productions of a Magnus Hirschfeld are no more "scientific" than
the murder by
a David Frankfurter is "political." Both are criminal
actions,
completed crimes of Jewry.
Since the
start of the Jewish struggle for "Emancipation" and control in
the individual
nations, the chain of Jewish crimes and murder has
remained
unbroken.
On 25 May
1926, the Ukrainian nationalist leader Petlyura, the former
Chief of State
of the independent Ukrainian Republic, was murdered in
Paris by the
Jew Samuel Schwarzbart. The crime was carried out with
cold-blooded
cruelty. The murderer still fired several shots into his
defenseless
victim as he way lying on the ground. When he was
questioned,
Schwarzbart (naturally!) declared that he had acted out of
"political"
motives.
As a Jew, he
was filled with deep hatred for people of Ukrainian
nationality.
He murdered Petlyura as a leader of this nationality, a man
who embodied
the striving for freedom of the Ukrainian people.
A crime
committed in the name of Jewry and in its interests! This is
evident not
only from Schwarzbart's statements, but also from the
attitude of
Jewish-Free masonic justice and the Jewish press. World
Jewry
organized a "rescue-action" in the grandest style for the
murderer. The
advocate Torres, known as the attorney for many
Marxist
terrorists, took on Schwarzbart's defense. The murderer was
acquitted!
Still more
indicative of the true reasons behind the scene of this crime,
is the
circumstance that Samuel Schwarzbart went to Moscow after his
acquittal --
he had already formerly been a Commissar of the Red
Army -- and
today receives a state pension there! These facts stamp the
murder of the
Ukrainian nationalist Petlyura unambiguously as a crime
of the
Judeo-Bolshevist Internationale; moreover, it shows how the
threads of the
Jewish and Red Internationale are inextricably
interwoven
with each other.
This murder of
a political personality on foreign soul, in crass violation
of
International Law, of the principle of non-interference and of the
freedom of
guests of a foreign state, committed by a Bolshevist Jew, is
not a
singularity.
On 04 December
1936, the Court of the Canton of Graubünden in
Switzerland
passed the following judgement(1):
[205] "In the criminal case of Frankfurter, David, son
of Moritz and
Rebekka, neé
Pagel, student of Medicine, born on 9 July 1909 in
Daruvar,
Yugoslavia, Yugoslavian national, resident in Bern,
unmarried,
with no police record,
by decision of
the prosecutor's office of 5 June 1936, named as
defendant
charged with murder,
after the main
trial and careful deliberation, in application of the §§ 88
(in connection
with Fed. Constitution, Art. 65), 9, 48 and following,
particularly §
50 Sections 7 and 9, § 51, Sections 3 and 4 as well as §
18 of Penal
Law and §§ 58 and 59 StrVerf., it is established that:
1. David
Frankfurter is guilty of the murder of Wilhelm Gustloff.
2. For this
crime he will be punished by 18 years in prison, less 8
months for
pre-trial custody, then with the loss of civil honors and
rights during
the same period of time and sentenced to life-long exile
from this
country. The weapon of the murderer is confiscated.
3. The
convicted man is obligated as a matter of principle to
compensate for
all damages caused by the above-named crime.
4. The
convicted man is to bear in addition all costs related to the
investigation,
the court costs and the cost of imposing punishment."
For the first
time, this exemplary punishment was imposed by a Swiss
Court upon a
Jewish murderer, even if its proportions do not
correspond to
the German sense of right. The Graubünder sentence
signifies a
blow in the ugly face of the Jews, a severe defeat for World
Jewry, which
after a senseless murder has become the poorer by one
"martyr." The
German special correspondent at the trial of the
murderer David
Frankfurter, Wolfgang Diewerge, describes the murder
incident as
follows:
"Frau Kaufmann
and her daughter are walking along the spa
promenade of
Davos. They are well-off Jews from Bern. Someone
speaks to
them; Herr cand. med. [medical student] Frankfurter, a good
acquaintance,
is also in Bern. Yes, he's there for the sport, the snow-
covered
mountains entice him, the glorious world of the mountain
range. He
speaks quietly and in a friendly manner, like a guest at the
spa who has a
beautiful day behind him and is now taking a little
evening
stroll. They make a date to meet for tea. Frankfurter amiably
takes his
leave and keeps walking, down the promenade to the
signpost. This
signpost reads: Wilhelm Gustloff -- N.S.D.A.P.
Frankfurter
knows the way perfectly. And he doesn't need to ask
whether
Gustloff has returned. He knows all about it. Once more he
pulls the
crushed cigarette pack from his pocket, then he turns calmly
and with a
sure step from the [206] main street,
along the spa park,
until he
stands in front of a bright blue house 'Am Kurpak Nr. 3' ['Nr. 3
Spa Park']. In
his pocket he carries the murder-order. It is 04 February
1936,
about 8 o'clock in the evening, a Tuesday, which the Jews call
'Kee
Tov' = 'then it's good' -- it is considered to be a lucky day for
Jews.
Frau Gustloff
has been happy for quite a while about having a free
evening. It
shall belong to her and her husband alone. She will let him
tell her about
his trip, of the celebration in honor of the
Machtergreifung
[The accession to power of the N.S.D.A.P.], for once
she wants to
be together not with Landesgruppenleiter [national group
leader]
Gustloff, but with her man. But when the bell rings, she opens
the door
anyway, even though it's late and dark out. It might be a
comrade in
need. When it's a matter of someone needing help, Wilhelm
Gustloff is
always there to speak to.
A well-dressed
man stands at the door, his hat pulled down over his
eyes. His
exterior makes a respectable impression, he's quiet and
friendly. Sure
of himself, as if he knows the house, he goes past the
wife to the
inner door. Frau Gustoloff lets him into the corridor, where
Wilhelm
Gustloff is standing, speaking on the telephone. Base Thun is
on the
line.
Frankfurter
doesn't want to shoot here in the hallway, where there'll be
witnesses to
his crime. He calmly takes a seat in Gustloff's study, looks
at the
pictures of Hitler and examines the Ehrendolch ["honor dagger";
A number of
well-crafted edged weapons were given to party members
who had
distinguished themselves. They often were embossed with the
motto:
"Meine Ehre ist Treue" = "Loyalty is my Honor"] which is
hanging on the
wall here. Intermittently, he fingers his own weapon.
Five long
minutes go by. The telephone conversation which is being
conducted with
Dr. Habermann in Thun is constantly experiencing
disturbances
on the line. It must cost quite a bit to keep Wilhelm
Gustloff under
surveillance. His conversations are tapped, and not very
adroitly,
either. Wilhelm Gustloff makes a few choice comments into
the phone
about the 'expertise' of this disturbance of his peace, then
asks his wife
about the visitor and goes into his study.
For the first
time, the Jew sees his victim right in front of him. Tall,
with erect
posture, friendly and ready to be helpful. He pulls the
revolver from
his pocket and fires. True to his murder-orders, he aims
for the head
and chest. Wilhelm Gustloff collapses without uttering a
cry and falls
over. His wife rushes in, she has no fear of the smoking
weapon of the
murderer which is raised threateningly. She throws
herself on her
husband, wants to stop the bleeding but sees in the same
instant that
there is nothing that can any longer be done. In a few
minutes,
Wilhelm Gustloff bleeds to death in her arms, beneath the
portrait of
the Führer.
The shots and
screams alarm the house. The neighbors rush to the door.
The revolver
held in front by Frankfurter holds them back. David
Frankfurter
knows his way out of the house. He is already out in the
open. [207] Now -- into the spa park. Now his getaway
shall begin.
With hurried
steps he rushes into the darkness, but remains stuck in the
snow. In vain
he tries to keep going forward. He fails.
The cursed
snow! It holds him fast. He clutches at it. He's not getting
anywhere.
Sweat breaks out on him. How was it worded in his orders? -
'Try to get
away, otherwise commit suicide.' No, never! He didn't come
to Davos for
that. He wants to live, to be celebrated, but not die.
Otherwise, he
could have done the shooting in Germany, of course.
He hears the
alarms behind him, the calls for a doctor and the police,
the outraged
voices of the Swiss neighbors. He senses what will be in
store for him
if they catch hold of him here while he's in flight. And
then he sees
how good it was that he did not go to Germany, the way
his original
orders read, but to a canton which doesn't have the death
penalty. He
goes into the closest house. He calls the police and when it
takes too long
for him, full of fear, he goes by himself to watch, to get
into safe
custody and protection as soon as possible.
The first
questioning by the police begins. The murderer declares:
'I have
shot him because I am a Jew. I am fully aware of my act
and do not
feel any remorse for it.'
He is also
confronted by Frau Gustloff. She recognizes in him the
petitioner
whom she conducted to her husband. She asks him: 'Why
have you done
this?'
He answers:
'Because I am a Jew.'"
Frankfurter
shot, because he was a Jew. The Jewish "World League for
Resisting
Anti- Semitism" named the murderer its symbolic Honorary
President a
short time after the crime. And why shouldn't the murderer
Frankfurter be
the Honorary President of the World League, when the
murderer
Friedrich Adler was General Secretary of the Internationale?
What's right
for one murderer is fair for the other murderer. The organ
of the World
League, Le droit de vivre of 26 September 1936 published
the following
declaration of solidarity with David Frankfurter(1):
"We Jews feel
absolute solidarity with you, dear Frankfurter, and we
honor you
unendingly. If we abandoned you, we would be letting
ourselves miss
one of the most valuable opportunities on this poor
earth. To deny
you, [208] would mean giving up purity,
freedom and
dignity. In
our memory you will live on as a dove of peace on the
manure pile of
our egoism and above the swamp of our indifference."
The strange
"dove of peace on the manure pile" of Jewish egoism has
been locked in
a cage for a long time by the judgement of the Swiss
court.
The question
remains open as to whose mission Frankfurter was
carrying out.
This was no personal act of revenge, no senseless crime
of a mentally
ill person, but the crime of a Jew acting for World Jewry.
Whether this
is provable in particular, and concretely, is not the
crucial point.
What is crucial, is the confession of the murderer
himself: "I
have shot him because I am a Jew. I am fully aware of my
act and do not
feel any remorse for it."
The order for
the murder furnishes an important clue, written in the
Serbian
language on a piece of a cigarette pack, and found with the
murderer and
among the original Court documents:
"Monday, 03
February 36, 9:30, the sentence [of death] must be carried
out. Call
ahead and ask if he's there. If he doesn't come out and can't be
seen, try to
get away, else put into effect suicide. 1-2 shots in the chest.
Revolver in
the right-hand coat pocket. Not in the overcoat. As soon as
I'm in the
room, pull it out suddenly and shoot. In the head or the chest,
3
shots."
The murderer
claimed in Court "not to be able to recall" any longer
what the
circumstances were of how he came by this note. This piece
of evidence is
a clear indication of the murder having been long
prepared and
executed according to a written plan. One probably does
not go wrong
in assuming that the Murder-Central would not be far to
seek from the
Jewish World League in Paris.
Leo Czolgosz,
Emma Goldmann, Friedrich Adler, Paul Kéri, Gaertner,
Mordko
Bogroff, Yevno Asev, Jakob Yurovsky, Chaim Golotschekin,
Wei�Ÿbart,
Blumkin, Aaron Kohn, Szamuely, Heinz Neumann, Yehuda,
Bärman,
Schulmann, Lifschitz, Schwarzmann, Braude, Bosch, Meisel,
Salkind,
Portugeis, Schwarz, Lazi�Ÿ, Schwarzbart, Frankfurter -- 28
Jews, 28
murderers -- only a selection of the "most famous" from the
most recent
times. Who still dares to doubt that "there are Jewish
murderers"?!
[209] They are plain "political" murders, plain murders from
greed for
power. They
are plain "Anarcho-Communist" crimes, crimes of
Bolshevism.
The facts of the case are clear -- Jewry and Bolshevism
are identical;
Bolshevism and crime are the same thing. Jewry as leader
of the
Underworld, in a criminal attack upon the World, its culture, its
order and the
[non-Jewish] peoples of the World -- that is the reality of
the criminal
world conspiracy of the present, the reality of Judeo-
Bolshevism.
* * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is not permitted. All rights
reserved.
T h e J e w a
s C r i m i n a l
Afterword
---------------------------------------------------
---------------
O b i t u a
r y
(page
211)
Shortly before
the completion of this book my comrade and
collaborator
J. Keller unexpectedly died from complications of an
operation.
Even on his sick bed, he occupied himself over and beyond
his powers
with the labor whose far-ranging significance and whose
novel results
had drawn him completely under its spell. He died with
pen in hand
and left behind to me the legacy of completing the work he
had
begun.
Keller was
born on an estate in western Russia. After graduating from a
secondary
school in Petersburg, he studied Natural Science and History
at the
university there and was admitted to a university professorship
after the
successful conclusion of his studies. He received a research
grant which
led him abroad. He was active with great scientific success
in the field
of Physics and achieved for himself a continually increasing
appreciation
for his work from the scientific community. As an expert
and
correspondent in his native and in foreign institutes and as a
collaborator
in international compilations, he acquired a respected
position.
With his clear
anti-Communist attitude, opposed to Jewry, he was first
able to emerge
to a greater degree as a writer for the public since 1933,
and then with
ever greater success. He wrote in the Völkischer
Beobachter
[Julius Streicher's paper, the Nationalist Observer](1), in
the
Schwarzes Korps (2) [Black
Corps], and in Angriff [Attack], to
name only the
most important.
Imbued with
the National Socialist idea, he did not end his efforts with
his literary
activity, but despite his hard-pressed material situation and
his severe
physical suffering, worked even this last winter with total
self-sacrifice
for the Winter Aid.
[212] When I saw Keller for the last time, it was a few days
before his
death; he was
able to move around only with effort, bent over from
pain and
supported by a cane. As I later learned, he had had to take a
large dose of
narcotics in order to be able to leave his bed at all. But
nothing could
hold him back from his work and from his duty.
Keller was a
man of rare purity of mind and of character. To that was
added a wholly
unusual talent for writing and an extraordinary gift for
quick
comprehension. His death signifies a hard and irreplaceable loss
in the front
of the struggle against Judeo-Bolshevism.
May this book,
the fruit of bitter life experience, deep political insight
and painful
weeks of labor of a mind not broken by illness, find the
attention that
it deserves.
Keller wanted
to create readable knowledge, he wanted to write a book
which should
be as geared to the people as it would be reliable and
practical. He
surely attained this goal and thus the task which remains
to me is only
to deliver this work, in his name, too, to the public.
Berlin, March
1937.
Dr. Hanns
Andersen
Copyright
2002 by R. Belser. Reproduction in whole or in part without
express
written permission of the translator is not permitted. All rights
reserved.
</html
| |
|
