|
| |
Common Law Should Rule Marriage and Divorce
"The husband is the head of the
family. He may choose any reasonable place or mode of living, and the wife must conform
thereto", California State Law
"The husband is the head of the
family. He may choose any reasonable place or mode of living, and the wife must conform thereto", Ohio General Code of 1910
The Holy
Bible on the Role of Women
Dear Charles,
"In a Democracy, Sovereignty lies with the People" which means that Common
Law, being made by the People on Juries, overrules anything a Parliament
might want to impose, such as Statute Law. For a "Family Court" to be a
Court, there must be Juries empanelled for every action unless both parties
give their consent not to have one (a Jury, that is).
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Bruce, Stewart" <charles@christiancommonlaw-gov.org>
To: <svanos2@fuse.net>
Cc: "CCLGA>" <generalassembly@christiancommonlaw-gov.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 12:49 PM
Subject: Cclga> Re: Why doesn't Common Law prevail in Child Custody?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > *From:* Steve <mailto:svanos2@fuse.net>
> > *To:* lawwork@yahoogroups.com <mailto:lawwork@yahoogroups.com>
> > *Sent:* Monday, June 13, 2005 6:25 PM
> > *Subject:* [lawwork] Why doesn't Common Law prevail in Child Custody?
> >
> > There may be an obvious answer, and if so, I'd like to know it. Common
> > Law, from the very beginning, gave custody of a child to the father.
>
> Correct. It was/is similar to
> the concept of "Coverture";
> which a lawful wife is suppose to be under.
>
> > Does anyone know anything that has changed this age-old common law?
>
> The "Law" has Not Changed.
> DeFacto Rule-Making Has Effected a "Color of Change".
>
> > If it hasn't been changed, then why can't a father, standing on Common
Law,
> > still get custody of his children?
>
> Corruption in the Evil-Empire.
>
> > And if Common Law doesn't work in this situation,
>
> Common-Law Rarely Works against the Agents of Evil;
> at least so far.
>
> > then how is it that the IRS situation is different so
> > that Common Law will protect us?
>
> I was un-aware that the Agents of the IRS
> gave any respect at all to "Common-Law".
>
> charles bruce, stewart
> sandy oregon
>
> > Thanks, Steve
> >
> >
> >
> > -Any Advertising Please Pass Through Owner -
> >
> > SEE THE FILES SECTION of the website for software available LEGAL.TXT
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lawwork/files/
>
| |
|
