From Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or <rcwcodebuster@...> or
<rcwcodebuster@...> or <rcwcodebuster@...> or
<rcwcodebuster@...> or <luis@...>


(Note: Please copy and paste all 5 of my e-mail addresses listed above
& below and ADD them to your CONTACTS FOLDER.)


I have 4 different e-mail addresses under <rcwcodebuster @ the
following 4 sections:


a.) comcast.net>
b.) yahoo.com>
c.) gmail.com>
d.) hotmail.com>



New Web Sites: <www.luisewing.com> or <www.ultimateusers.com>




SUBJECT: HOW TO INVOKE YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW TO STOP CPS
FROM FORCIBLY VACCINATING YOUR NEWBORN BABIES AND STOP COPS FROM
CONDUCTING BLOOD TEST'S ON PREGNANT MOTHERS AND THEIR NEWBORN BABIES
WHICH ARE FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GAINING THE EVIDENCE THAT THEY NEED
SO THAT THEY CAN . . . KIDNAP AND SELL YOUR BABIES TO CANADIAN
CITIZENS FOR $150,000.00 TO $200,000.00 OR MORE!!!!



"I AM" . . . the . . . "RCW CODE BUSTER" . . . first and foremost to
show ALL MY CHRISTIAN BROTHERS that . . . [mans law] (sic) . . . is .
. . NOT THE LAW!!!!

Here is the CrR 1.1 decisional law of the TERRITORY OF WASHINGTON . .
. that clearly . . . ALL NINE MEN . . . of . . . THE WASHINGTON STATE
SUPREME COURT . . . clearly held that . . . THE RCW STATUTES THAT THE
COPS CITE YOU WITH FOR SPEEDING, DUI, RUNNING A RED LIGHT, ETC., . . .
ARE NOT THE LAW!!!!

"But the legislature specifically disclaimed any intention to
change the meaning of any statute. The compilers of the code were not
empowered by congress to amend existing law, and doubtless had no
thought of doing so ..." ...the act before us does not purport to
amend a section of an act, but only a section of a compilation
entitled "REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON," WHICH IS NOT THE LAW. Such an
act purporting to amend only a section of the prima facie compilation
leaves the law unchanged. En Banc." PAROSA v. TACOMA, 57 Wn.(2d) 409
(Dec.22, 1960).


I CAN SHOW EVERYONE THAT THE STATUTES ARE NOT THE LAW IN EVERY
STATE!!!!

I CAN PROVE THAT THE STATES NO LONGER EXIST!!!!

I CAN PROVE THAT WE ARE ALL UNDER TERRITORIAL LAW!!!!

I CAN PROVE THAT THE UNITED STATES WAS DESTROYED AT THE END OF THE
CIVIL WAR IN 1860!!!!

I CAN PROVE THAT ALL 50 OF THE DEJURE STATES IN THE OLD UNION WERE
DESTROYED AT THE END OF THE CIVIL WAR IN 1860!!!!

GO READ . . . THE RECONSTRUCTION ACTS!!!!

See . . . RCW 38 MILITIA & MILITARY AFFAIRS . . . and then go search
your STATE STATUTE BOOKS and you find a similar chapter in your
STATE!!!!

CPS is an administrative extension of . . . THE POLICE POWERS . . . or
. . . EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY . . . by . . . STATUTES . . . WHICH ARE NOT
THE LAW!!!!

I CAN PROVE THAT EVERY DEJURE STATE IN THE OLD UNION WAS ORDERED TO
SUSPEND THEIR STATE CONSTITUTIONS AND PUT NEW CONSTITUTIONS INTO PLACE
FOR . . . THE NEW UNION!!!!

I CAN PROVE THAT ALL ORIGINAL STATE CONSTITUTIONS HAVE BEEN PLACED
INTO THE ARCHIVES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE!!!!

I CAN PROVE THAT THE ORIGINAL U.S. CONSTITUTION IS . . . CAPTURED . .
. and is . . . HELD UNDER A GLASS SEAL . . . in Washington D.C. by . .
. "THE NATIONAL MILITARY ARCHIVES."

YES, THAT'S RIGHT, OUR . . . U.S. CONSTITUTION . . . IS HELD IN . . .
CUSTODY . . . and . . . POSSESSION BY . . . "A MILITARY ARCHIVES" . .
. and has been since 1860 when we were under MARTIAL LAW which has
NEVER BEEN DECLARED TO BE OVER!!!!

I CAN PROVE THAT ALL THE CURRENT PHONY CORPORATE CHARTER
[constitutions] IN YOUR CURRENT STATUTE BOOKS ARE MERELY A STATUTE
WHICH IS NOT THE LAW!!!!

I CAN PROVE THAT ALL ATTORNEYS ARE BEHIND THE LARGEST CONSPIRACY TO
DEPRIVE ALL OF US OUT OF THE LAWFUL REPUBLIC FORM OF GOVERNMENT THAT
WE WERE SUPPOSED TO HAVE, ALLODIAL TITLE LAND AND THE ONLY LEGAL
TENDER WHICH IS GOLD AND SILVER BACKED MONEY, ETC.!!!!

I CAN HELP WITH CHILD STEALING AND CHILD SUPPORT & CONTEMPT ISSUES,
ETC.!!!

GODS LAW IS THE 1 AND ONLY LAW THAT EXISTS!!!!

Did you know that CPS has installed an office in every hospital all
across . . . AMERIKA????

WHY DOES THE CPS DIVISION OF DSHS ALREADY HAVE AN OFFICE IN EVERY
HOSPITAL IN AMERIKA????

Did you know that CPS has a . . . SECRET UNPUBLISHED POLICY . . . that
they will in collusion and conspiracy have their DSHS CPS Social
Worker meet and communicate with the Hospital Social Worker who has
been trained to "trick" all expecting mothers who have . . .NOT HAD
ANY PRENATAL CARE . . . into submitting to a . . . BLOOD TEST . . .
and that they will . . . LIE TO YOU . . . and tell you that they are .
. . CHECKING THE IRON LEVELS . . . . and . . . THEY WILL NOT DISCLOSE
TO YOU THAT THEY SUSPECT YOU OF ALLEGED CRIMINAL DRUG ABUSE????

However, the law clearly states in many published case law opinions
that if any official suspects you of any crime, that they are required
to inform you of . . . YOUR RIGHTS TO REFUSE TO SUBMIT TO ANY DRUG
TESTING WHATSOEVER!!!!

Did you know that there is . . . NO LAW THAT REQUIRES ANY PREGNANT
WOMAN TO GET PRENATAL CARE IN THE FIRST PLACE????

All hospitals are engaged in RACIAL & ECONOMIC PROFILING against those
who are too poor to afford the cost of GAS to drive back and forth to
see their . . . PRENATAL DOCTOR . . . and if you are healthy, who
wants to waste the time or money to go see a . . .PRENATAL DOCTOR . .
. in the 1st place????

Women have been having babies . . . WITHOUT PRENATAL CARE . . . for .
. . HUNDREDS OF YEARS!!!!

IT'S NOT ILLEGAL TO NOT GET PRENATAL CARE IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!

So why are the Nurses so anxious to get any expecting mother who has
applied to DSHS for the cost's of having their baby to submit to . . .
BLOOD TESTS . . . when they don't require . . . RICH PEOPLE . . . who
could afford to pay for the cost of their birthing at the hospital
with their own money????

The FACTS are that most of the women who are too poor to be able to
pay for the cost's of their birthing happen to be . . . BLACK,
MEXICAN, NATIVE AMERICAN INDIAN . . . or some other ethnic minority.

Well it looks like the . . . CPS DIVISION OF DSHS . . . has figured
out that anyone who doesn't have MONEY to pay for the cost of their
own birthing probably doesn't have a very high paying job, doesn't
have any post secondary college or university education and therefore
probably doesn't have any . . . MONEY TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY TO FIGHT
BACK WHEN THEY COME TO STEAL YOUR BABY!!!!

These are NOT situations where a CRACK ADDICT or DRUG ADDICT came into
the hospital by 911 EMERGENCY VEHICLE because she was OVERDOSING and
happened to be pregnant!!!!

But the HOSPITALS are treating every case where any . . . POOR BLACK
PERSON, POOR MEXICAN PERSON or POOR INDIAN happens to test positive
for even the smallest minute and trace amount of any kind of drug,
except . . . MARIJUANA . . . like a FULL BLOWN DRUG ADDICT WHO CAME IN
THROUGH A 911 EMERGENCY PHONE CALL AND HAD TO BE TRANSPORTED BY
AMBULANCE!!!!

The NURSES AT GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL say that they won't take your
baby if it only tests positive for . . . MARIJUANA!!!!

That's right GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL has a SECRET UNPUBLISHED POLICY
that says . . . SOME DRUGS LIKE MARIJUANA ARE OKAY . . . but other
drugs are NOT????

Sound discriminatory????

Every hospital all across the U.S. does the same thing!

So they claim authority to arrest your child for 72 hours without a
court order but refuse to tell you what statute at the time they do
it?

So they claim authority to arrest for a 2nd 72 hour period without a
court order but refuse to tell you what statute that is either?

They tell you that they are not required to have an AFFIDAVIT OF
PROBABLE CAUSE that was sworn to under oath and signed in the presence
of a judicial officer????

They claim that there was a report made by telephone by the doctor and
that is all that they have to have????

When you question the doctor he claims that the nurses made the
report?

When you question the nurses, they claim the hospital social worker
made the report?

When you question the hospital social worker, the hospital social
worker says she was required by a secret unpublished public hospital
policy to report to CPS who is interestingly enough already . . .
STATIONED AT THE HOSPITAL WAITING FOR YOU TO BRING THEM A NEW BABY
which happens to be . . . YOUR BABY!!!!

Neither the CPS or anybody at the hospital tells you the statutes say
that they were . . . REQUIRED TO GIVE YOU 14 DAYS NOTICE . . . that .
. . CPS . . . or . . . ANY OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY suspected you
of drug abuse and was requesting that your blood and/or your NEWBORN
BABIES BLOOD BE TESTED so that you would have NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY
TO DEFEND which would give you time to go apply to the Superior Court
for an INJUNCTION and/or a WRIT OF PROHIBITION that would stop them
from DRUG TESTING YOU AND YOUR BABY????

CPS tells you that since you are NOT legally married they do NOT have
to listen to anything the NATURAL FATHER SAYS and that they do NOT
need the consent of THE NATURAL FATHER . . . to conduct any DRUG
TESTING!!!!

CPS doesn't tell you that the statutes specifically states that they
need the PERMISSION OF BOTH PARENTS, MARRIED . . . or . . . UNMARRIED
to do any blood testing.

Then CPS takes your PERFECTLY HEALTHY NEWBORN BABY down to a . . .
PIIC FACILITY . . . where they . . . FORCIBLY PUMP MORPHINE . . . in
to . . . PERFECTLY HEALTHY BABIES . . . WHO ARE NOT DRUG ADDICTED
BABIES!!!!

I am also asking anybody out there who has knowledge of any good
medical journals or medical studies or medical law reviews that
establish and prove that MORPHINE PERMANENT DAMAGE to send me the
citations to the published case law opinions that say that????

If anybody out there knows of any good lawsuits where someone
prevailed regarding FORCED VACCINATIONS without legal authorization
and permission by the parents to send me the citations to those cases
as well????

The CPS does NOT tell you that the STATE STATUTES specifically state
that ALL PARENTS HAVE THE RIGHT TO TAKE THEIR BABY TO A SECOND DOCTOR
OF THEIR CHOICE to do your own test . . . TO COVER UP THE FACT THAT
THE 2ND DOCTOR MIGHT DISCOVER THAT YOUR BABY IS NOT YET . . . A DRUG
ADDICTED BABY!!!!

But don't worry about that, they plan to make sure that . . . IF THE
NEWBORN BABY WAS NOT A DRUG ADDICT WHEN THEY BROUGHT THE BABY TO . . .
THE PIIC FACILITIES . . . THE BABY WILL BE BY ADDICTED TO MORPHINE BY
THE TIME ANYONE COMES AROUND TO CHALLENGE OR CHECK THEM TO PROVE THAT
THE BABY WASN'T REALLY ADDICTED TO DRUGS!!!!

I KNOW HOW TO STOP THIS AND A LOT MORE!!!!

I HAVE BEEN DRIVING WITH NO DRIVERS LICENSE FOR TEN YEARS PLUS AND
BEAT ALL MY TICKETS!!!!

I HAVE PREVENTED MANY FROM GOING TO JAIL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR
FAILURE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT AND FOR FAILURE TO PRODUCE BOOKS AND
RECORDS FOR THE IRS!!!!

I HAVE GOTTEN OTHERS OUT OF JAIL FOR FAILURE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT AND
FOR FAILURE TO PRODUCE BOOKS AND RECORDS FOR THE IRS!!!!

YOU DO NOT NEED AN ATTORNEY!!!!

YOU CANNOT TRUST . . . ANY BAR CARD CARRYING ATTORNEY PERIOD!!!!

NO I AM NOT WORRIED ABOUT BEING CHARGED WITH THE BS CHARGE OF
UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW AS I HAVE ALREADY BEATEN THOSE CHARGES A
FEW TIMES ALREADY AND HAVE 1 CASE PENDING WHERE I HAVE ALREADY KICKED
THEIR BUTTS ON PAPER!!!!

I CAN PRACTICE LAW AND THERE IS NOTHING THAT ANY OF THE 50 CRIMINALLY
CORRUPT STATE BAR ASSOCIATIONS CAN DO ABOUT IT!!!!

ALL ATTORNEYS ARE OFFICERS OF THE COURT AND THEIR FIRST DUTY IS TO THE
COURT AND THE STATE AND NOT THE CLIENT!!!!

DO NOT BE FOOLED, THE ATTORNEYS ARE NOT ON YOUR SIDE!!!!

Here are 4 FACTS that are NOT . . . A CONSPIRACY:


1.) Every JUDGE is a member of . . . THE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION!!!!!

2.) Every PROSECUTOR is a member of . . . THE STATE BAR
ASSOCIATION!!!!

3.) Every ATTORNEY in the yellow pages is a member of . . . THE STATE
BAR ASSOCIATION!!!!

4.) Every PUBLIC DEFENDER is a member of . . . THE STATE BAR
ASSOCIATION!!!!


The worst part of getting a Public Defender is that they . . . GET
THEIR PAYCHECK FROM THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS OFFICE . . . in most
States.

DO YOU THINK ANY PUBLIC DEFENDER IS GOING TO BITE THE HANDS THAT FEEDS
THEM????

THE ATTORNEYS ARE NOT JUST A PART OF THE PROBLEM, . . . THEY ARE THE
PROBLEM!!!!

Do you really believe ANY ATTORNEY is NOT scared of being DISBARRED .
. . were they to have . . . THE BALLS . . .or the courage to stand up
to . . . THE SYSTEM????

ALL JUDGES, PROSECUTORS, ATTORNEYS, LAWYERS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS ARE
ALL PART OF THE VERY SAME BAR ASSOCIATION, . . . AND THAT FACT
STANDING ALONE SPEAKS VOLUMES!!!!

YOU CANNOT TRUST ANY . . . ATTORNEY PERIOD!!!!

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A GOOD ATTORNEY!!!!

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A . . . HONEST ATTORNEY!!!!

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A . . . CHRISTIAN ATTORNEY!!!!

Anybody who thinks they are going to get JUSTICE in this system for
FREE is going to find out the hard way that in our . . . LEGAL CASTE
SYSTEM . . . that . . . YOU WILL GET ALL THE JUSTUS YOU ARE WILLING TO
PAY FOR!!!!

IN THE END YOU WILL FIND OUT THE HARD WAY . . . BY LOSING YOUR
CHILDREN PERMANENTLY, . . . THAT YOU CANNOT TRUST ANY ATTORNEY
PERIOD!!!!

ALL JUDGES, PROSECUTORS, ATTORNEYS, LAWYERS AND PUBLIC DEFENDER ARE IN
FACT WORKING IN COLLUSION AND CONSPIRACY TO PUT ON A DOG AND PONY SHOW
OF SMOKE AND MIRRORS AND PRETEND TO BE FIGHTING FOR YOUR RIGHTS TO
GET YOUR CHILDREN BACK AND WILL . . . MILK THE COW . . . UNTIL YOU ARE
BROKE . . . AND IN THE END . . . YOU WON'T GET YOUR CHILDREN BACK AND
THEN YOU WILL HAVE TO QUIT TRYING BECAUSE YOU ARE BROKE AND DON'T KNOW
WHAT TO DO!!!!

I know how to . . . STOP CPS and much much more!!!!

For now, I have created a . . . NEW RELIGIOUS STOP VACCINATION FLYER .
. . that is . . .TWO PAGES . . . but if you take it to a KINKO COPY
CENTER, they can convert it to a ONE-PAGE DOUBLE-SIDED FLYER.


I will send this . . . NEW RELIGIOUS OBJECTION TO VACCINATIONS & BLOOD
TEST'S FOR DRUGS FLYER FOR ALL PREGNANT MOTHERS to anyone who sends me
an E–MAIL asking me to send it to them for FREE!!!!

* * *

Here is what it says basically:


FEDERAL LAW AT TITLE 42, CHAPTER 7, SUBCHAPTER XIX, SECTION 1396 (f)
AND STATE LAWS AT RCW 74.09.190, RCW 70.83.020 & RCW 28A.210.090
PROVIDE THAT MY BABY AND I ARE EXEMPT AND NOT REQUIRED TO SUBMIT TO
ANY "DRUG TESTING" OR "VACCINATIONS" BASED UPON OUR PHILOSOPHICAL &
RELIGIOUS OBJECTIONS

It is undisputed that the Social Security Act as codified in
Federal law at Title 42, Chapter 7, Subchapter XIX, Section 1396 (f)
reads:
"Title 42, Chapter 7, Subchapter XIX, § 1396 (f) Observance
of religious beliefs
Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to require any
State which has a plan approved under this subchapter to compel any
person to undergo any medical screening, examination, diagnosis, or
treatment or to accept any other health care or services provided
under such plan for any purpose (other than for the purpose of
discovering and preventing the spread of infection or contagious
disease or for the purpose of protecting environmental health), if
such person objects (or, in case such person is a child, his parent
or guardian objects) thereto on religious grounds. (Source: Aug. 14,
1935, ch. 531, title XIX, § 1907, as added, Pub. L. 90-248, title
II, § 232, Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 905."

Similarly, Washington law at RCW 74.09.190 reads:
"RCW 74.09.190 Religious beliefs – Construction of Chapter.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as empowering the secretary
to compel any recipient of public assistance and a medical indigent
person to undergo any physical examination, surgical operation, or
accept any form of medical treatment contrary to the wishes of said
person who relies on or is treated by prayer or spiritual means in
accordance with the creed and tenets of any well recognized church or
religious denomination."

It is therefore undisputed that both State and Federal law
provide that Good Samaritan Hospital does not have any legal authority
to compel any patient, pregnant mother or her newborn baby to undergo
any medical screening, examination, diagnosis, treatment or "DRUG
TESTING" pursuant to our "RELIGIOUS OBJECTIONS." Furthermore,
Washington law at RCW 70.83.020 in reference to Screening tests of
newborn infants specifically allows for RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION from
newborn screening and reads:
"RCW 70.83.020 Screening tests of newborn infants. It
shall be the duty of the department of health to require screening
tests of all newborn infants before they are discharged from the
hospital for the detection of phenylketonuria and other hertitable or
metabolic disorders leading to mental retardation or physical defects
as defined by the state board of health: PROVIDED, That no such test
shall be given to any newborn infant whose parents or guardian object
thereto on the grounds that such tests conflict with their religious
tenets and practices."

Similarly, Washington law at RCW 28A.210.090 reads:
"RCW 28A.210.090 Immunization program–Exemptions from
on presentation of alternative certifications. Any child shall be
exempt in whole or part from the immunization measures required by RCW
28A.210.060 through 28A.210.070 upon the presentation of any one or
more of the following, on a form prescribed by the department of
health: . . . (2) A written certification by any parent or legal
guardian of the child or any adult in loco parentis to the child that
the religious beliefs of the signator are contrary to the required
immunization measures; and (3) A written certification signed by any
parent or legal guardian of the child that the signator has either a
philosophical or personal objection to the immunization of the child."

It is undisputed that RCW 28A.210.090 specifically provides
that my child or newborn baby is EXEMPT and is NOT required to submit
to any "VACCINATIONS" or "VITAMIN K SHOTS" pursuant to my
philosophical and RELIGIOUS OBJECTIONS. The main purpose of the
"Doctrine of Informed Consent" is to protect patients from being given
UN-AUTHORIZED treatments or "DRUG TESTS." If a physician performs an
UN-AUTHORIZED DRUG TEST, he has committed a battery against that
patient for failure to obtain the patients knowledgeable permission.
Holt v. Nelson, 11 Wn.App. 230 (1974); Miller v. Kennedy, 85 Wn.2d
151 (1975); Miller v. Kennedy, 11 Wn.App. 272 (1974); Gates v. Jenson,
92 Wn.2d 246 (1979); ZeBarth v. Swedish Hosp. Med. Center, 81 Wn.2d
12 (1972); Bang v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, 88 N.W.2d 186;
Natanson v. Kline, 350 P.2d 1093, 354 P.2d 670; Salgo v. Leland
Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees, 317 P.2d 170; Mitchell v.
Robinson, 334 S.W.2d 11; Woods v. Brumlop, 71 N.M. 221, 337 P.2d 520,
Annot. 79 ALR 2d 1028; Bowars v. Talmadge, 159 So.2d 888; 49 ALR 3d
501-17 (1973).
IF YOUR BABY WAS STOLEN BECAUSE YOU TESTED POSITIVE FOR DRUGS AND YOU
WANT TO SUE THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL & THE CPS DIVISION OF DSHS,
Please call Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or E-Mail:
<rcwcodebuster@...>

* * *
With this FREE FLYER, every pregnant mother can stop the Hospitals
from further engaging in their conspiracy with the CPS Division of
DSHS from conducting a DRUG TEST of both you and your newborn babies
BLOOD samples for the purpose of wanting to steal & kidnap NEWBORN
BABIES from their Mothers so that they can PROFIT by SELLING YOUR
BABIES to CANADIAN citizens & parents who can't have children for
$100,000.00 to $150,000.00 from THE PIIC FACILITIES WHERE THEY PUMP
MORPHINE TO PERFECTLY HEALTHY BABIES who show NO symptoms of drug
addiction!!!!!

* * *
I will be teaching SEMINARS in 2009 or 2010 and will cover such topics
how to prevent the judge from throwing you in jail for contempt of
court for failure to pay child support or refusing to produce books
and records for the IRS, how to handle yourself in a traffic stop and
how to conduct your own case "without" an attorney and go PRO-SE ALL
THE WAY.

Sincerely
Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741

PS — Go see my 2 NEW WEB SITES at: <www.luisewing.com> or
<www.ultimateusers.com>

Question: How do I get Luis Ewing's FREE FLYERS????

Answer: Send me an E-MAIL to <rcwcodebuster @ the 4 below listed e-
mail providers requesting that I send you my FREE FLYERS and please
tell me what STATE you live in and I will add you to my list which I
do STATE by STATE so that I can let you know when I might be teaching
a LEGAL SEMINAR in your STATE!

1.) comcast.net>
2.) yahoo.com>
3.) gmail.com>
4.) hotmail.com>

NOTE: If you saw this POST on a YAHOO GROUP and did NOT get the
ATTACHED FREE FLYERS listed above and you want them, PLEASE SEND ME AN
E-MAIL REQUESTING THE 4 FREE FLYERS to <rcwcodebuster @ the 4 above
listed internet e-mail providers, and I will be happy to send them to
you.

PLEASE DON'T FORGET TO COPY & PASTE ALL 5 OF MY E-MAIL ADDRESSES INTO
YOUR CONTACTS FOLDER IF YOU DON'T WANT MY E-MAILS TO GET ROUTED
STRAIGHT TO YOUR SPAM FOLDER BY YOUR INTERNET PROVIDER:
rcwcodebuster@..., rcwcodebuster@...,
rcwcodebuster@..., rcwcodebuster@...,
luis@...



AUTHORITY TO PRACTICE LAW . . . "WITHOUT ADMISSION" . . . by the
WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT: RCW 2.48.190, RCW 26.25.010, RCW
26.26.011 (19), RCW 26.21.005 (19)(a) and RCW 26.21A.005 (21)(a),
RCW 26.27.021 (16) & RCW 26.27.041, 18 U.S.C. 1154, 18 U.S.C 1161, 25
U.S.C. 3631, RCW 2.48.170, RCW 2.48.180 (7), APR 1.1 (a), Sections
3275 & 3276 of the Territorial Code of 1881.


CAVEAT WITH REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS HERE: This E-Mail is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510 to 18 U.S.C.
2521; RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a)(b); RCW 9A.52.110; RCW 9A.52.120; RCW
9A.52.130 and RCW 9.73.020 and is legally privileged and you do NOT
have my "consent" for forward this e-mail to anyone. The information
contained in this E-Mail is intended only for use of the individual or
entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or attorney or agent responsible to deliver
it to the Sendee, please destroy the E-Mail after advising by reply
that you erroneously received this E-Mail. The receipt by anyone other
than the designated recipient does NOT waive the lawyer or "of-counsel
client privilege," nor will it constitute a waiver of the "work-
product doctrine." Any information obtained in violation of RCW
9.73.030; RCW 9A.52.110; RCW 9A.52.120; RCW 9A.52.130 and RCW
9.73.020 is inadmissible in court pursuant to RCW 9.73.050 and
further, anyone who forwards this e-mail to anyone else without my
express prior "written consent" is liable for civil monetary damages
under Washington law pursuant to RCW 9.73.060 and criminal penalties
under RCW 9.73.080. The information contained in this transmission is
privileged and confidential and may be hazardous to your
preconceptions. FREE DISTRIBUTION: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed free "only" to those
specific recipients listed above who have previously expressed an
interest in receiving the information for research and educational
purposes and have made a prior request for said information. If the
reader of this message is not the intended addressee, the reader is
hereby notified that any consideration, dissemination or duplication
of this communication is strictly prohibited. RCW 9.73.030
(1)(a)(b)(C); RCW 9.73.050; RCW 9.73.060 and RCW 9.73.080 This
message is being sent to you in compliance with the current Federal
legislation for commercial e-mail (H.R.417 SECTION101Paragraph
(e)(1)(A)) AND Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S.
Congress. REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS: This message cannot be considered SPAM
as long as it includes: 1) contact information, and 2) a way to be
removed from future e-mailings. If this e-mail communication has
reached you in error, or should you wish to be permanently removed
from the mailing list, please return to the below listed address
asking me to remove you to Luis Ewing, 1910 147th Street Ct. East,
Tacoma, Wash. 98445-3499 or call and leave a message with your E-Mail
address and request to be removed at (253) 226-3741. Thank you!