Christian Party

DIEbold = LIEboldly

Ron Paul Got More Votes than All the Democrats In Nevada, and placed second

among Republicans: ‘Paper trail’ voting system used in Nevada - Electronic ballot

machines equipped with printers

WHAT A DIFFERENCE A PAPER TRAIL MAKES!

Only Mitt Romney beat Ron Paul in this heavily Mormon state

Hillary and Obama ran hard in the state.
DEMS                VOTES
Hillary Clinton    5,355
Barack Obama   4,773
John Edwards       396

REPUBS             VOTES
Mitt Romney     22,649
Ron Paul             6,087
John McCain        5,651
Mike Huckabee    3,6i6
Fred Thompson   3,521
Rudy Giuliani       1,910
Duncan Hunter       890
Tom Tancredo           0

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5937115/

‘Paper trail’ voting system used in Nevada

Electronic ballot machines equipped with printers

Isaac Brekkken / AP

Election worker Stella Cuevas monitors an EDGE electronic voting machine during primary election voting at R. Guild Gray Elementary School in Las Vegas on Tuesday. The machines let voters view, but not keep, paper printouts of their ballots.

INTERACTIVE

[Launch]

< /DIV>

Learn how voting systems work, from paper ballots to e-voting.

By Rachel Konrad

Technology Writer

updated 9:23 p.m. ET, Tues., Sept. 7, 2004

CARSON CITY, Nev. - In what could become a model for other states, Nevada voters on Tuesday became the first in the nation to cast ballots in a statewide election on computers that printed paper records of electronic ballots.

A delegation of federal election officials monitored the equipment’s debut in the state capital Tuesday, touring precincts and talking to poll workers as residents voted for congressional candidates, state legislators, school officials and judges.

Nevada’s $9.3 million voting system includes more than 2,600 computers and printers deployed in every county. California, Washington and Illinois recently passed laws requiring a paper trail for electronic ballots, and at least 20 others are considering similar legislation.

------------------------------------

http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/10/28/nevada.evote/index.html

One key to the selection: A voter-verified paper trail installed on the machines.

"Without a paper trail attach ed to a voting machine today, I think any election would be suspect," Heller says.

For this year's general election, Nevada is the only state where virtually every voting machine has a paper backup that could aid in a machine malfunction, an audit or a recount.

"If you want to talk about security, I would say right now the electronic voting devices in Nevada are the most secure devices in the country right now," Heller says.

============================

http://www.safevoting.org/

Nevada became the first state in the US to vote using electronic voting machines producing a voter-verifiable paper trail.

------------ ------

Vote fraud busting: a web page to tabulate the votes that the machines "missed"

We need a web page similar to this, for every state:

Statewide Results

http://www.state.sc.us/cgi-bin/scsec/scsec-repprisw-011908.pl

We need a link on that web page similar to this, for every state:

Statewide Results by County

(This will only open, when click from the page above)

http://www.state.sc.us/cgi-bin/scsec/r108p

THEN WE NEED FOR THAT PAGE TO HAVE LINKS

WHERE YOU GO WHEN YOU CLICK ON YOUR PRECINCT,

AND YOU FIND THIS:

I __________certify that I voted for Ron Paul in <precinct name filled in> on Jan. 19, 2008

NAME:__________________________________________

STREET ADDRESS:_______________________________

CITY:___________________________________________

ZIP CODE:_______________________________________

STATE OF SC

EMAIL ADDRESS, IF YOU HAVE ONE:__________________

This web page should then verify that the person by that name,

ACTUALLY DID vote in that precinct (from the public record).

This web page should then tabulate the number of certifications.

When the number of certifications is more than the "official" reports we get on the phone:

"We would like to have a notary public meet you, at you convenience, to collect your signature on an affidavit".

I have a web page hosted at this time. I just need help building it.

ANY VOLUNTEERS?

Doing this for each state individually might eliminate to problem of overloaded servers.

It has also been suggested that we provide a toll free number for people who are not on the internet.

IN ADDITION, we can issue PRESS RELEASES to find people who are not on the internet.

-----------------------------

South Carolina, Super Tuesday, and Ron Paul

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REfVcc-4Zrk

Three Ways YOUR Help Is NEEDED to Prevent Stolen Votes

http://www.ronpaulvotecount.com:80/

Protect Ron Paul from Vote Fraud

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQxB5VKWlfg&feature=related

Colorado set to abandon electronic voting

http://www.denverpost.com:80/breakingnews/ci_7981616

http:/ /www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8U9658O0&show_article=1

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/011808_diebold_disparities.htm

Chaos in Horry County Primary Elections 2008

http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=yJqSxZ7RFH0

SC Attorney General Henry McMasters would be the central figure

in any case for PROSECUTING vote fraud.

It was interesting to see him standing by McCain during his victory speech.

MORE Questions for CWhitmire@elections.sc.gov of South Carolina election commission

Ballot? WHAT BALLOT?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

For the French automobile manufacturer, see Ballot (automobile).

For the town in France, see Ballots, Mayenne.

A ballot is a device (originally a small ball - see blackball) used to record choices made by voters. Each voter uses one ballot, and ballots are not shared. In the simplest elections, a ballot may be a simple scrap of paper on which each voter writes in the name of a candidate, but governmental elections use pre-printed to protect the secrecy of the votes. The voter casts their ballot in a box at a polling station.

From Code of Laws of South Carolina:

http://www.scstatehouse.net/code/t07c013.htm

SECTION 7-13-320. Ballot standards and specifications. [SC ST SEC 7-13-320]

General election ballots shall conform to the following standards and specifications:

(A) The ballot shall be printed on paper of such thickness that the printing cannot be distinguished from the back and shall be of such size and color as directed by the State Election Commission. If more than one ballot is to be used in any election, each such ballot shall be printed upon different colored paper;

----- Original Message -----

From: Whitmire, Chris

Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:58 PM

Subject: RE: ESS VOTING MACHINE CERTIFICATIONS?

1. When where the voting machines LAST certified?

1. The voting system was originally certified in 2004. The latest software upgrade was certified in 2007.

2. Who did the certification?

2. The State Election Commission.

3. Who witnessed the certification, specifically?

3. State Election Commission staff.

4. Have the machines been under a secure storage facility since the certification?

4. Yes.

5. Are voting machines unconstitutional?

5. The ballots are not counted in secret. The process is public.

6. Will we receive a printed receipt showing how our vote was counted?

6. S.C. voters do not receive a printed receipt when they cast their ballot.

If you would like me to provide you with more information regarding our voting system, feel free to give me a call and we can discuss these issues.

Thank you,

Chris Whitmire

Public Information Officer

South Carolina State Election Commission

Post Office Box 5987

Columbia, S.C. 29250

Tel: 803.734.9070

Fax: 803.734.9366

This message originates from the South Carolina State Election Commission. If you have received this message in error, we would appreciate it if you would immediately notify the South Carolina State Election Commission by sending a reply e-mail to the sender of this message. Thank you.

They Lost My Vote

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dPagNaWccQ&eurl=http://www.ncel.w4sp.com/

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/archives/cat_vote_fraud.html

To: Whitmire, Chris
Subject: ESS VOTING MACHINE CERTIFICATIONS?

Questions for CWhitmire@elections.sc.gov of SOUTH CAROLINA election commission

If contact with Chris Whitmire results in no action, Gov. Mark Sandford may be contacted at 803 734-2100 mark@gov.sc.gov

Will South Carolina be the brunt of a national scandel?

Lou Dobbs says SOUTH CAROLINA PRIMARY IS ALREADY STOLEN

CORRECTED LINK:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUpN5GaOjkY

I would like to get the answers to these 6 questions please:

1. When where the voting machines LAST certified?

2. Who did the certification?

3. Who witnessed the certification, specifically?

4. Have the machines been under a secure storage facility since the certification?

5. Are voting machines unconstitutional?

Article 2, Section 1 of the S.C. Constitution:

http://www.scstatehouse.net/scconstitution/a02.htm

ARTICLE II.
RIGHT OF SUFFRAGE
SECTION 1. Elections to be by secret ballot; protection of right of suffrage.
All elections by the people shall be by secret ballot, but the ballots shall not be counted in secret. The right of suffrage, as regulated in this Constitution, shall be protected by laws regulating elections and prohibiting, under adequate penalties, all undue influence from power, bribery, tumult, or improper conduct

6. Will we receive a printed receipt showing how our vote was counted?

South Carolina General Assembly
117th Session, 2007-2008

Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format

~~Indicates Matter Stricken~~
Indicates New Matter

S. 256

STATUS INFORMATION

General Bill
Sponsors: Senator Leventis
Document Path: l:\council\bills\gjk\20049sd07.doc

Introduced in the Senate on January 9, 2007
Currently residing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary

Summary: Electronic voting machines

HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS

     Date      Body   Action Description with journal page number  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------      1/9/2007  Senate  Introduced and read first time SJ-143      1/9/2007  Senate  Referred to Committee on Judiciary SJ-143     1/17/2007  Senate  Referred to Subcommittee: Martin (ch), Malloy, Campsen,                           Williams

View the latest legislative information at the LPITS web site

VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

1/9/2007

(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)

A BILL

TO AMEND SECTION 7-13-1640, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO VOTING MACHINE REQUIREMENTS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT BEGINNING WITH THE 2008 GENERAL ELECTION, ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES MUST PRINT OUT A RECEIPT SHOWING HOW THE VOTER CAST HIS VOTE THAT MUST BE DEPOSITED IN A RECEPTACLE BY THE VOTER TO VERIFY THE VOTE TALLEY IF THERE IS A RECOUNT.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION 1. Section 7-13-1640 of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 103 of 1999, is further amended by adding at the end:

"(D) Beginning with the 2008 general election, an electronic voting machine must print out a receipt showing how the voter cast his vote that must be deposited in a receptacle by the voter, which only must be used to verify the vote at the polling place if there is a recount."

SECTION 2. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

----XX----

This web page was last updated on January 18, 2007 at 3:25 PM

"Those Who Cast the Votes Decide Nothing-

Those who Count the Votes decide everything"

attributed to Joseph Stalin

Electronic voting machines in Florida showed one candidate with negative votes.

Fraud in the central tabulator in New Hampshire?

This youtube shows the votes, when they were first released, as a town by town tabulation. This early release shows Ron Paul won.

DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO AND SAVE IT. THIS IS HARD EVIDENCE.

01-09-2008 4:00 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8xgWjFe1cE

If you visit this site now, you will find that the results have been flipped to match the central tabulator:

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/nh/nh_primary_gop_results_by_town/

Ron Paul - Now The Boston Globe Changed Their Story http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=Zu0Oaw9tIPM

Here is actual recorded testimony, given under oath,

by Clinton Curtis who admits that he wrote the program for vote fraud:

Rigged USA Elections Exposed

http://www.fliggo.com:80/video/sk0SiTCu

and

http://www.iwilltryit.com/fixed1.htm

Nothing is an honest count unless it is in full view of the people. NO electronic vote counting machine does that.

http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/jan/07/s_c_use_voting_machines_banned_other_sta26854/

Associated Press

Monday, January 7, 2008

GREENVILLE — South Carolina election officials say they still plan to use touch-screen voting machines despite the fact that other states have banned the use of similar systems made by the same company.

Last month, top election officials in Ohio and Colorado declared that Election Systems and Software's iVotroni c is unfit for elections.

The ban was prompted by a study done for the state of Ohio in which researchers found electronic voting systems could be corrupted with magnets or handheld electronic devices such as Palm Treos.

"We've reviewed the report and we remain confident in the security and accuracy of South Carolina's voting system," state Election Commission spokesman Chris Whitmire said.

But the South Carolina League of Women Voters has renewed its call for the state to record votes on paper as well as electronically to allow for accuracy checks, though there have been no documented cases of actual election tampering.

"It's very difficult to get evidence that somebody tampered with the vote if you have no way of knowing what the vote was before they tampered," said Eleanor Hare, a computer scientist who participated in a study of the machines by the South Carolina League of Women Voters.

The machines have been used statewide since 2006.

The Ohio study found the machines "lack the fundamental technical controls necessary to guarantee a trustworthy election under operational conditions."

"Exploitable vulnerabilities allow even persons with limited access — voters and precinct poll workers — to compromise voting machines and precinct results, and, in some cases, to inject and spread software viruses into the central election management system," the report says.

However, the company that makes the machines says on its Web site that it disagrees with the Ohio report's technical findings.

"All of our voting systems have been thoroughly tested and examined under realistic election conditions before those systems are ever made available to states for additional testing and consideration," the company's statement says. "The testing and certification processes already in place are extremely rigorous, ensuring that voting systems meet well-established standards for performance under realistic election conditions."

--------------------------------

Can You Count on Voting Machines?

http://www.nytimes.com:80/2008/01/06/magazine/06Vote-t.html?ref=magazine

-------------

Voter Fraud Against Paul Confirmed in Sutton, N.H.

http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=655

http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=681
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=1587

By admin | January 8, 2008

Kurt Nimmo
Truth News
January 8, 2008

According to a post this evening on the Ron Paul Forums, vote fraud occurred in Sutton, New Hampshire:

Sutton with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton posted:
My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn’t corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???

Originally Posted by sstjean View Post
This was posted to ronpaul-801 tonight: “This town numbers are wrong wrong wrong on this map. I am from Sutton originally and my parents and one aunt all voted for Ron Paul today and Sutton says 0. So this is wrong. This is a town that had 20 people counting the ballots and I have no reason to believe that they cheated. Small town and I was born and raised there. The real numbers will come in by morning. The electronic machines in the big towns are the ones we have to worry about.”

Earlier in the day, Brad Blog reported other suspicious behavior:

Our Spidey-sense started tingling before going to bed last night and hearing reports, on MSNBC, that there were 17 paper ballots cast in Dixville Notch, NH’s midnight, first-in-the-country voting. The report said that there were only 16 registered voters in the tiny voting precinct, yet 17 votes had been cast — suggesting that somehow, paper ballot “voter fraud” skullduggery was afoot.

Brad, however, believes the story is easily debunked:

Given that one of those reports seems to have begun on The DRUDGE REPORT earlier today, we’re not particularly surprised that the MSM kept repeating the easily-debunked stories running all day.

That, even while there are reasons to be concerned about how the paper ballots used in the New Hampshire Primary will actually be counted by the hackable Diebold optical-scan systems used in the state, as controlled and programmed by an outrageously bad private contractor there.

Of course, there is plenty of room for hank-panky, as Michael Collins notes:

81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as “Premier”). The elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots. People like to say “but we use paper ballots! They can always be counted by hand!”

But they’re not. They’re counted by Diebold. Only a candidate can request a hand recount, and most never do so. And a rigged election can easily become a rigged recount, as we learned in Ohio 2004, where two election officials were convicted of rigging their recount….

In short, the stage was set by Diebold and Republican operatives to rig yet another election, as the above first-hand account seems to indicate.

---------------------

If any of these Urls do not open, use copy and paste into the address bar.

-------------------

hacking democracy”

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=hacking+democracy&search=Search

Hacking Democracy 1 of 9

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzPXer7946E

Hacking Democracy 2 of 9

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eopnvw7mh_8&feature=related

Hacking Democracy 3 of 9

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxGSXYUkplA&feature=related

Hacking Democracy 4 of 9