sponsored by

MADD & The Blind, Deaf, & Dumb Feminist US Education System

	FRAUD from the NHTSA:   Police report that 4% of all accidents are "alcohol related", but after pedestrians, passengers, bicyclists, and other nondrivers who are the reason for an accident being classified as "alcohol involved" are removed, only 1.25% of all accidents involved a driver with a bac greater than .10%.
	A German study confirms the "Grand Rapids Study":  if all drivers had a safety record equivalent to drivers with a bac = 0.04 ('The Gold Standard'), the US would have 17,670 fewer traffic fatalities each year.
	While MADD publicly proclaims that they "saved 67,000 lives since our program began", the loss to society due to their program exceeds the benefit by 135 times.
	Outlawing women drivers would save 11 times as many lives than if MADD's campaign could be 100% successful.
	Fatalities classified by NHTSA as "alcohol involved" decreased 7,452 over a decade, but non-alcohol-related fatalities increased 3,029.
	The number of lives that advocacy groups claim they saved exceeded the actual reduction of 4,423 fatalities by five fold.
	We have a motor vehicle fatality rate 45% higher than Germany where speeds on the autobahn of 140 mph are common and where more than 70% of drivers admit that they drink and drive.
	The 136 million Americans who drink consume enough alcohol to keep their bac above zero for up to 6 hours or 40% of their waking day, each and every day of the year.
	DUI laws put more Americans in prison than Japan has in prison for all crimes combined.
	Former deputy attorney general on the fraud of DUI laws.
	The most liberal interpretation of NHTSA data is that DUI laws save 400 lives per year, a cost per life saved of $30.5 million, compared to cancer research which is less than $200 per life lost to cancer.
	Decreased alcohol consumption increased cardio-related fatalities by 35,000 per year, which is more than 87 times greater than the number of lives saved by the most liberal MADD estimate.

START WITH A CYNICAL HYPOTHESIS

The MADD, dui, anti-drinking, anti-alcohol, anti-Christian campaign is based on the cynical hypothesis that American citizens are too stupid to make proper personal choices for themselves, but that a disinterested judge sitting on a wooden bench miles away could or would care to make those choices for them for them, and could do a better job of it.  The government's own studies and statistics prove otherwise.  This is why an exact copy of this cynical hypothesis, Prohibition, was thankfully ended with certainty early in the Twentieth Century.

PAD THE DATA

By padding the data more than three fold, police departments take accidents which involve [not are "caused by"] at most 1.25% of the drivers accross the country who have a bac > .10 and report that 4% of all accidents are "alcohol involved".  They do this by adding any and everybody who was at the scene of the accident who had "been drinking", which means that 69% of the accidents which were classified as "alcohol involved" didn't even involve a driver with a bac > .10.  NHTSA compounds the error another ten fold with a "statistical model" that is the dream of every bureaucrat--they don't need to tell you how they do this, they get to spend billions of dollars to "solve" the "problem" without ever telling you exactly what they solved, and their budget continues to grow geometrically while the rest of the economy takes a tail spin, partially because of precisely this type of micromanagement of American's personal lives. 

	102,382 people involved in fatal accidents.
	42,020 fatalities.
	9,925 or 9.7% of those in fatal accidents are classified as "alcohol involved".
	1,514 of those who are "alcohol involved" are passengers.
	1,474 are pedestrians.
	118 are bicyclists.
	63 are other non-drivers.
	3,673 or 3.6% of those in fatal accidents are drivers classified as "alcohol involved".
	456 of those drivers had a BAC = 0%.
	39 of those drivers refused the test.
	599 of those drivers were never tested.
	815 of those drivers were tested but the tests were nonconclusive.
	609 of those drivers were tested but the results of the test were unknown.
	1,155 of those drivers had a BAC greater than 0% but less than .10%
	3,083 or 3% were drivers whose BAC was known to be greater than 0.10%.
	NO percentage of those drivers are KNOWN to have had an accident BECAUSE of alcohol.

ADD A LITTLE MASS HYSTERIA

Newspaper headlines pad it a little bit more, change the wording around, and the final message is:

"ALMOST HALF OF ALL TRAFFIC DEATHS ARE *CAUSED* BY DRINKING DRIVERS"

You might view this as the classic case of mass hysteria--if it weren't for the fact that it's become obvious that this is a carefuly orchestrated plan to destroy the country.  This mass hysteria isn't spreading by itself--it's being promoted by our own government under the guidance of anti-Christian forces. 

SUPPRESS THE TRUTH

These forces even managed to suppress the truth about multiple studies which proved that, if all drivers in the country had the track record of the safest driver, the driver with a bac = .04, the driver whom this program hopes to drive into extinction, we would have 12,865 fewer traffic deaths annually. 

They managed to suppress the data that shows that women are much less coordinated than men, that women pilots have four times as many accidents per hour flown than men pilots, that women drivers have 70% more accidents per mile driven than men drivers, that the distinct differences in their cranial capacities is proof of a distinctly different design criteria.  You might even claim that men and women are different--wow!  They suppress the data that shows that if women didn't drive, there would be 10,311 fewer highway fatalities each year.

They managed to suppress studies by numerous doctors from around the world that our current level of alcohol consumption prevents 80,000 heart disease fatalities annually, that increasing alcohol consumption would save 150,000 lives/year from heart disease, and that the recent decrease in alcohol consumption costs us an additional 35,000 heart disease deaths/year. 

AND YOU HAVE A $1.8 TRILLION CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY

What is the total cost of this criminal conspiracy referred to as "MADD"?  Not counting our loss of Constitutional rights, which is priceless, the bottom line price in dollars is $121.9 billion per year, or $1.8 trillion in current dollars over the last  15 years.  And what was the benefit again?

Do you realize that the government can't even estimate a benefit?  As hard as they try, as effectively as they've suppressed the studies which show that the driver they eliminated from the roads is the very driver who is 31% less likely to have an accident, regardless of how well they've concealed how much more dangerous a woman driver is than a drinking driver, their data still shows one thing:  THERE WAS NO BENEFIT!

Copyright @ 2010 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party