The Khazar Theory ... Only a Theory? By Gabrielle LaFoote
http://www.regmeister.net/khazars.htm

R. Belser claims that the idea of most of today's jewry being Khazars is merely a "Khazar theory" and "ridiculous" in her article, "Why the Khazar Theory is Absurd". In the second paragraph of her write-up, where she states her proof, she makes the false assumption that today's jews are the jews of the Bible ( i.e. the twelve tribes of Israel); she is, of course, wrong. R.Belser's entire argument basically comes from the jewish liberal author Jon Entine. Below are quotes from many different sources to prove that she is wrong about who the Israelites are as well as the "Khazar Theory."

'Abraham's seed were to be as "The sands of the sea" as promised in GENESIS 22:17, In GENESIS 24:60 Rebekah, Isaac's wife, was promised to be "mother of thousands of millions." At the time of the Exodus, Moses prophesied to Israel that Yahweh was t o make of them "a thousand times so many as ye are." (DEUT 1:11) There were over 3,000,000 Israelites then, and over 15,000,000 at the time of David, yet you insist that 15,000,000 jews today, 3000 years after David, are "all of Israel!"' writes a Christian website, accurately.

'In the book of Esther, when the king sent out the decree to protect the "jews" (who were the Judahites of the Babylonian captivity), "many of the people of the land BECAME jews: for the fear of the jews fell upon them." (ESTHER 8:17) This king ruled "from India unto Ethiopia" compassing the territory occupied by the Hittites, Hivites, Jebusites and Canaanites, so it is probable that tens of thousands of these people collectively known as "EDOM" professed the name "jew" to escape the king's wrath. They were NOT descendants of Jacob-Israel, though they had now become "jews." This was 500 years BEFORE Christ.

Coming down through history to near the time of Christ we find that Flavius Josephus states that the "Idumeans" (Edomites) became part of "jewry," as we have seen from the book of ESTHER. This would explain why some "jews" believed in Yahshua, and other "jews" hated Him. Those who believed were simply the ones of Israelite ancestry; while those who hated Him were of Esau-Edom! "

'The BIBLICA ENCYCLOPEDIA, Vol. 2, Col. 1187, says that the Edomites are part of Jewry. The scientist and historian Dr. David Davidson wrote: "Indeed the Edomites later became completely absorbed in jewry and under their aggressive intrusion the jews became racially the medium of expression for the Edomite ideal for which Herod the Great had first given political formation. The Edomite intrusion into judaism AT EVERY HISTORICAL POINT OF CONTACT is fully discussed in the volumes of the Camb ridge Ancient History. The History of the latest phase of the intrusion (absorption or inter-marriage) is in the summary of the Encyclopedia Biblica, Volume 2, Col 1187 (he then quotes that). Even the fact that the Edomites have at length BECOME jEWS was soon completely forgotten by the exponents of jewish tradition." (It is this "tradition" which Christian ministers have been tricked into preaching instead of the truth.)'

'The jewish ENCYCLOPEDIA, edition of 1925, Vol. 5, page 41, states "Edom is in modern Jewry."'

'H. G. Wells, in his great OUTLINE OF HISTORY verifies what we have just read, that millenniums ago the Edomites became "jews." But then he goes on and gives us another trial to follow in correctly identifying the people today "who call themselves jews." He says that these "Idumeans" joined with a "Turkish" people of Southern Russia (the Khazars), who also "became jews," and BOTH make up the present day "jews." Mr. Wells concludes, "The main part of jewry NEVER WAS IN JUDEA AND HAD NEVER COME OUT OF JUDEA!" (emphasis added)'

'Prof. Roland B. Dixon, of Harvard, wrote in 1923, "The most important single factor, however, in the differentiation of these jews of the Asiatic borderland...WAS THE CONVERSION TO judaism IN THE EIGHTH CENTURY OF THE KHAZARS. In these (Khazars )...We may in all probability see the origin of the great mass of the east European jews of today."'

'Nathan M. Pollock, A Khazar-jew, spent 40 years researching the origin of his fellow "jews". He says that six out of ten in Palestine, AND NINE OUT OF TEN IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE (AMERICA) ARE NOT REAL jewS, BUT DESCENDANTS OF THE FIERCE KHAZ AR TRIBES WHICH ROAMED THE STEPPES OF SOUTHERN RUSSIA MANY CENTURIES AGO." He states that the names Halperin, Halpern, Alpert, Galpern, etc. are 100% Khazar. Also Kaplan, Caplon, Koppel, Kogan, Kaganovich (Russianized) and similar derivative names. (THE jewS THAT AREN'T, San Diego Union. Aug 28, 1966) His findings, and many others too numerous to list in this tract, corroborate the Khazar ancestry of most modern "jews."'

'The Khazar-jews of Europe and America have always had an affinity to their Mongol brethren of Asia. The jewish movie "czars" of filthy, corrupting Hollywood are often called "moguls," a term dating back to the Khan "Moguls," or "rulers," of Genghis Khan. It is simply a Mongol identification, NOT an Israelite one.'

'In Harmsworth's HISTORY OF THE WORLD is a section on "The Hebrew Peoples" written by Dr. H. Winckler, L.M. King, Dr. R. G. Brandis, and H. R. Hall. On pages 1781-4, Vol. 3 they show that, "judaism was not evolved in Judah; it was in Babylon th at judaism first became that which it was and still is." In other words, judaism, rather than being the religion of ancient Israel, as you tell your flock, IS THE RELIGION OF ISRAEL'S ANCIENT, PAGAN ENEMY, BABYLON!'

'In the same book above the same authors say the distinction between Israel and Judah "can best be expressed in the phrase, which may sound paradoxical, but yet aptly characterizes the true relationship of the two people: THE ISRAELITES WERE NOT jewS!" (emphasis added)'

Taken from Stormfront's Theology section: 'by a Jew himself, Mr Alfred M Lilienthal in
his book "What Price Israel":

"The Jewish racial myth flows from the fact that the words Hebrew,
Israelite, Jew, Judaism, and the Jewish people have been used
synonymously to suggest a historic continuity. But this is a misuse.
These words refer to different periods in history. Hebrew is a term
correctly applied to the period from the beginning of Biblical history
to the settling of Canaan. Israelite refers correctly to the members
of the twelve tribes of Israel. The name Yehudi or "Jew" is used in
the Old Testament to designate the descendants of the fourth son of
Jacob, as well as to denote citizens of the Kingdom of Judah, particularly
at the time of Jeremiah and under the Persian occupation. Centuries
later, the same word came to be applied to ANYONE, no matter of what
origin, whose religion was Judaism." (Author's emphasis).

The Khazar jews and their descendents today comprise 90% of all
jews in Israel, the Shepardic jews being the other 10%. The Zionists
after WWII conspired to allow for the term "jews" to be applied to
any and all persons claiming a true heritage to Israel regardless of
blood line or other qualification, the "right of return" could be based
on essentially any claim -spiiritual, physical or religious. In other
words a "jew" is anybody WE say a jew is and the WORLD
bought it!

Today the duped and deceived continue to advance this mythology
by buying into this outrageous claim, unfortunately many supposed
Christians also advance it like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, to
the great delight of the "jew" imposters themselves.

Abraham and his descendents were NOT "jews" nor was Moses
nor King David or even all those so called "jews" during Jesus's time
on the earth. *Some* members of the descendents of Jacob were
called "jews" and this unfortunately became a slang word applied
to any and all who embraced it's tenets.

The failure of modern educators and Christian theologians, (not to
mention the followers of modern day Judaism) to illustrate this disception
has allowed great confusion and even "blindness" to cloud all those
who believe in the Zionist myth of a "jewish" origin to the Scriptures.

Of course having been informed of their erroneous thinking, and then to
continue to base their arguments on THAT premise can lead to only one
conclusion: They are *willing* lackeys of the jew deception and seem to
even thrive on it.....'

The Jew Arthur Koestler wrote a very revealing book about the Khazar ancestry of today's so-called jews. His book is "The Thirteenth Tribe," and it is a must-read for anyone interested in the truth! (BTW, Koestler was counted a traitor amongst the jewish society, and he and his wife were mysteriously found dead, both shot in the head, in his London apartment a few years after the book was published…)
His book proves, most excellently, that our modern day 'jews' have very little true Semitic blood in them at all!

Furthermore, in H.G. Wells, "The Outline of History," on page 666, in the second paragraph, he states "Behind the Hungarians and Bulgarians thrust the Khazars, a Turkish people, with whom were mingled a very considerable proportion of Jews who been expelled from Constantinople, and who had mixed with them and made great settlements of Jews in Poland and Russia. Behind the Khazars again, and overrunning them, were the Petschenegs (or Patzinaks), a savage Turkish people who are first of in the ninth century, and who were destined to dissolve and vanish as the kindred Huns did five centuries before."

Taken from the Khazaria Info Center (www.khazaria.com), Jewish History in Eastern Europe:
'Jewish Genetics: Abstracts and Summaries
A collection of abstracts and reviews of books, articles, and genetic studies
"This section is the most comprehensive summary of Jewish genetic data. In recent years, advances in genetic technology and the broadening in scope of genetic studies to encompass more ethnic groups have allowed scientists to come to more accurate conclusions. Nevertheless, not all questions have been answered fully, and followup studies are necessary. At the present time, it is known that Eastern European Jews have a significant Eastern Mediterranean element which manifests itself in a close relationship with Kurdish, Armenian, Palestinian Arab, Lebanese, Syrian, and Anatolian Turkish peoples. At the same time, there are traces of European (including Western Slavic) and Khazar ancestry among European Jews. Ethiopian Jews mostly descend from Ethiopian Africans who converted to Judaism, but may also be related to a lesser extent to Yemenite Jews. Yemenite Jews descend from Arabs and Israelites. North African Jewish and Kurdish Jewish paternal lineages come from Israelites. Additional research is necessary, and it will certainly take several more years to sort it all out. All existing studies fail to compare modern Jewish populations' DNA to ancient Judean DNA and medieval Khazarian DNA, and many of them focus on paternal ancestries rather than maternal ancestries, so the extrapolations and assumptions made by geneticists may not necessarily be correct. Studies that do take into account mtDNA show that many Jewish populations are related to neighboring non-Jewish groups maternally.'

Basically, her entire flawed argument is easily proven wrong, from the very beginning of, and all throughout, her article, as she wrongly asserts that today's so-called Jews are the twelve tribes of the Bible, i.e. God's chosen ones.

Of course, the fake jews love to mix with white women, and have for centuries. CI is not saying that today's jews are all Khazars. For the most part, they are a mixed blooded people, but they are not the true Israelites or the Biblical tribe of Judah, which is one of the twelve tribes of Israel.

God's people hear His voice and they follow Him. Who has been following Christ for the last two thousand years? White Christian Israelites.

http://www.jonentine.com/reviews/sfexaminer_winokur.htm

And, as far as Entine, Belser's major source, he is a self-proclaimed 'mild mannered Jewish liberal.'
Scott Winokur says, when interviewing him about his book, Taboo, "I asked Entine if he regretted anything about his controversial book. Tears came to his eyes; they seemed genuine.
"I learned about the insensitivity I have naturally as a white man," he said. "I don't think the book is sensitive to the nature of being a minority and being put into a box to what it means, every day, to be black in America. You can be a brain surgeon or basketball player, and people treat you the same way." "
Entine also states "What I'm saying is that the success of any athlete comes from hard work, but I want to acknowledge the evolutionary advantages of blacks..." And, "Science does not support the notion that blacks are less intelligent."

Please note that Miss Belser is quite confident and comfortable with the words of a liberal JEW who had genuine tears in his eyes for the 'poor Negroes,' and who plainly states 'science does not support the notion that blacks are less intelligent...' But notice what she has to say about sincere white people – who, if she were correct (which she is not), would be simply mistaken in what they believe.

Below are two of Miss Belser's quotes, showing her rather strange prejudices towards CI.

"The appeal of the theory to die-hard Christians is easy enough to understand; it permits them to eat their metaphysical cake and have it, too: i.e., they can oppose the Jews -- since the Jews of the last 1300 years are supposedly not the "real" Jews -- while keeping Jesus (who was a Jew but not a "Khazar," etc....)"

"In fact, such people often inadvertently class themselves with outright cranks, such as those in the Christian Identity camp, whose take on such questions would be amusing if it weren't tarring us by association."

If it were not so sad, it truly would be laughable that R. Belser stakes her whole argument, and slanders sincere white Christians, on the words of a liberal Jew who assures us with genuine tears in his eyes that science does not support the notion that blacks are less intelligent!

Mr. Entine says, "I learned about the insensitivity I have naturally as a white man"; let us hope Miss Belser realizes (no tears necessary) her insensitivity towards her white kindred

Another article worth reading on this subject can be found here:

http://www.dowz.net/letters/29feb04steven.html

Copyright @ 2010 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party