kike

Kike is not even listed in Webster's New World Dictionary, so it cannot be considered an English word.

Webster's on-line version offers the following definition:

kike

Main Entry:: kike
Pronunciation:: \ˈkīk\
Function:: noun
Etymology:: origin unknown
Date:: 1904

usually offensive : jew

If it's not even an English word in one version of Webster's, then how can it be considered "usually offensive" in another? If it was jews themselves who referred to EACH other as kikes, then exactly WHO is it offensive to? Certainly not US!@

kike is a jew word

http://kpearson.faculty.tcnj.edu/Dictionary/kike.htm

To borrow from Leo Rosten's The Joys of Yiddish, "The word kike was born on Ellis Island, when Jewish immigrants who were illiterate (or could not use Roman-English letters), when asked to sign the entry-forms with the customary 'X,' refused -- and instead made a circle. The Yiddish word for 'circle' is kikel (pronounced KY - kel), and for 'little circle,' kikeleh. Before long the immigration inspectors were calling anyone who signed with an 'O' instead of an 'X' a kikel or kikeleh or kikee or, finally and succinctly, kike."

Rosten explains that for the Jewish immigrants, an 'X' was an evil sign, representing both the horrors of crucifixion and the sign of their (Christian) oppressors. Jewish - American merchants continued to sign with an 'O' instead of an 'X' for several decades, spreading the nickname kike wherever they went as a natural result. At that time kike was more of an affectionate term, or used by Jews to describe other Jews, and only developed into a racial slur later on.

http://www.egroups.com/message/patriarchy/8229

This post from SUPER KIKE Jan Diechmohle illustrates how:

It is perfectly acceptable for jews to insult Christians and call them "nazis", "goyim", "shiksas", "gentiles" and to insist that Christians "prefer sex with cows".

It is "hate" for Christians to deny that they "prefer sex with cows".

Free speech applies ONLY to jews and NEVER to Christians.

Jews insist on always having the last word.

Jews use feminism as a cover and catalyst to spread their heinous Talmud.

Is there any question that jews are controlling our electoral process now?

As a reminder and because of a mole this update is needed. Association with Hatred and Nazis incompatible with Patriarchy Membership Hopefully we won't have to deal with this troublesome issue in future. We'd better use our time for our good work opposing feminism and promoting Patriarchy. Unfortunately, we've to protect us from harm done by some who spread highly objectionable stuff and at the same time try to embarrass us by wrongly associating with us and our topics. Please read this post or at least note that it's incompatible with Patriarchy to associate with Nazi style militia of hatred; this isn't a claim but proven by strong evidence in many quotations and URLs given below. It's not compatible with membership to post on such Nazi sites or to forward any material from Patriarchy to them. The mole on our list should know that forwarding Patriarchy posts to them will result in being banned. It's advisable not to give them attention or publicity or indirectly credibility by referencing their names when avoidable. --- Those spreading hatred admit it and yet deny the truth very angrily when anybody dares to call a spade a spade and hatred by its name: >Remember and learn to hate. (Christian_Nationalist/386 ) >11. Jews would be expelled and will be bound to till the land >with their own labors under the penalty of death. (Yuriy Kirienko, often supported by John Knight and his associate, KORESHX98, post Nr. 449 ) "A Revisionist Perspective" - Holocaust denial http://www.egroups.com/message/repeal19th/17707 http://www.egroups.com/message/repeal19th/21379 http://www.egroups.com/message/repeal19th/21421 Neonazism: Praising top nazi anti-semite Julius Streicher http://www.egroups.com/message/repeal19th/21455 http://www.egroups.com/message/repeal19th/21456 The big picture showed white women in front of swastica ornaments and the text calls for a boycott of kosher food. http://www.egroups.com/message/repeal19th/18237 Racism: "GO BACK TO AFRICA NIGGERS!!" http://www.egroups.com/message/repeal19th/18314 http://www.egroups.com/message/repeal19th/19076 >"Jews are vomit of the humand kind. .. >Jew has been like that all of his >history." (Yuriy Kirienko) Such hatred shouldn't be taken lightly. Lies bashing an ethnic were used in nazi time, lies bashing other kinds of groups in other ideologies, in small scale in Bosnia etc. The procedure is alike: (1.) Spread lies and falsely allege the persecuted group would do atrocities. Use instability to spread your ideology. (2.) Real atrocities and murder begins - allegedly just a protection. It can happen anywhere if there are instability, trouble, disrooted people and an evil ideology. Systematic hatred "Remember and learn to hate" (quote) is cunningly denied by the bashers who won't allow anybody to tell the truth and bury truth by endless mud campaigns twisting facts into the opposite. Such systematic hatred is arson and dangerous. In Europe we believed it couldn't happen again but it did in small scale in Yougoslavia - first wrong allegations against Muslims by a misused nationalism - and soon thereafter former neighbours started to murder in their vicinity. The victims or their relatives often knew the murderers. For decades they had lived peacefully together. They could have never imagined it to happen. Suddenly they were enemies along ethnical lines previously unimportant. Don't underestimate the dangers of hate propaganda. Don't believe to be better than others and that it couldn't happen in your place. In case of instability it can. No people are better or worse than others. Given the same situation and troubles, all are in the average as vulnerable. Insulting false horror stories can make real atrocities possible. >3. There is no other side of the story but drenched with >human blood Jewish excrement that perpetuates it. And you >worship that pile of subhuman shit preventing people's >resistance to their murder as your other sisters >do the same destroying the brains of the kidnapped >children, feeding your filthy >Jewish propaganda into their young brains. To this highly objectionable and senseless hatred John Knight replied: >Dear Yuriy, What would you say is the level of awareness >of this problem by the Russian people, and how openly do >you believe that they discuss it? >Would you say 5% are aware, or 90%, and you say that 5% >speak out, or 90%? >Sincerely, John Knight http://www.egroups.com/message/repeal19th/19106 Note the blasphemy of associating Jesus and Hitler: www.egroups.com/christianidentity/1232 >"Subject: Jews are Traitors and Devils ... >Jesus and Hitler Told the Truth about the Jews. >88KKK, >William Forrest" (Another of the lists associated to John Knight from his cross-posting list) Christianity teaches love. JK and associates teach hatred, spread disunity and destroy reputation and good efforts. This is anti-Christian and radical blasphemy, especially that they're posing as Christians. www.egroups.com/message/Christian_Nationalist/386 : >"Weep those of your White Race who's families have been changed, or >destroyed because of their relatives who shed their lives because >of the treason and subversion of the evil Satanic Jews. >Remember and learn to hate." This doesn't remind some poeple of Nazism, it *is* Nazism, or else Nazism never existed and Hitler is a fairy tale. Even the devil sent to earth couldn't spread hatred, conflict and disunity more cunningly. John Knight's insulting rhetorics base on lies, twists facts and deny his hatred accusing everybody who dares to call a spade a spade and hatred by its name: >Yuriy didn't start this. Your TALMUD started this. If you think it's >"hatred" for Yuriy to call Jews "vomit" The seemingly scholarly refutation of his mis-quotations from Talmud posted more than half a year back to repeal were completely ignored; a learned debate wouldn't suit his purpose nor match his method of mud-slinging and twisting facts and words into their opposite. If you know a little of history you know that already during the crusades insults, suffering, prejudice and even murder have been the other way round. Mixing the good anti-feminist arguments with low level irrationality has been harmful. It's spoiling our reputation and good arguments against feminism - see the Miss Understood letter. Instead of arguments mud-slinging and threats are used: >He should at least be tickled to death with that long feather >that's stuck up his a..! (From: "Fathers Manifesto" manifesto@w..., posted to several lists) >Jan's hypocritical attempts at race baiting and censorship >are going to backfire on him, big time. (Betreff: Takeover of Backlash by Neo-nazi Militia Datum: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 15:54:10 -0700) A few days later an e-mail account of mine was closed. Coincidence? >The chutzpah of a man who would proclaim in the same post >that he wants "tolerance" at the same time that he tells >everyone that he "was busy opposing a neo-nazi" knows no bounds. > >Do you want "tolerance", Deichmohle? Then tolerate this: > >Christians do not "prefer sex with cows" and those who proclaim >from the rafters that we do [or that we are "neo nazis" for >disagreeing with your screed] have no place in our society. >Period. (John Knight, posted to many lists) "Those who proclaim from the rafters that we do" [prefer sex with cows] is by JK's insulting standard rhetoric each and every Jew. Note that he also tells that opponents [as me] have no place in society. Concerning the Nazi matter see the URLs above and decide yourself. The facts are obvious. Even in his wildest nightmare Orwell may not have described such a radical twisting of word sense as done by John Knight. "Tolerance" means tolerating other ethnics and religions, of course. John Knight demands excluding an ethnic - evoking horrible memories from both biblical times and the 20th century - and calls it "tolerance" to accept the demand to exclude them: "have no place in our society. Period." Even the devil or Hitler himself couldn't have possibly twisted words and truth more cunningly into the opposite. John Knight adds lies to lies and insults to insults. Any refutation and fact is ignored and buried with a heap of mud and hateful words, quoting out of context and twisting the meaning. >then exactly what do you call it when Jews accuse Christians of >*preferring* sex with cows. (John Knight) Another insult instead of an argument. For telling the fact I'll face more dirty insults. The hatred spread by JK is dangerous and it's dangerous to associate in any way. Any fact is buried by JK's endless repetition of hatred until the fact is forgotten. >This is about as STUPID as claiming that you are going to >build an atom bomb out of the cow dung from the cows you >claim we "prefer" sex with. (John Knight, backlash 15827) Repetitions don't make a lie true. It's the same technic as Hitler, Goebbels and the feminists used: (If you tell a lie, tell a big one. If you repeat it often enough, people will start to believe you.) Of course I never stated any such nonsense, nor am I Jewish, nor do Jews state it. Even his single short statement above contains at least three big lies. By using the Nazi tactic of repetition, telling big lies and by addressing emotion and irrationality slinging mud some weak characters are seduced and the others embarrassed as some may believe in an association which doesn't exist. Having no better argument against truth proven by URLs, lies and mud-slinging are used to silence me and to attack my credibility: >Jan trashed all Christians in this country by insinuating >that we are all "neo-nazis". And now you are trashing US??!! (John Knight, From: Fathers Manifesto, Date: Tue Jul 4, 2000 1:20am, Subject: Re: Super KIKE-REPLY) Criticizing John Knight he twists to "trashing all Christians" - who does he think he is? John Knight replies to his own mud-slinging using different e-mail-addresses as Art Books (his signature resembling our Art) to sling more mud. >Do we have to "hate" them for being such IDIOTS? ... >Why don't you explain to this esteemed forum why you are >ignoring their outright HATRED, and creating HATRED where >there is none? >Art (From: Art Books artbooks@r..., Date: Tue Jul 4, 2000 9:15pm, Subject: Super KIKES) >This two-faced Jew is stampeding all over the internet > insulting Christians by calling them neo-nazis (John Knight) It's of course JK and associates, *not at all* me, who states an association of Christianity and Nazis - see the quote above comparing Jesus and Hitler as those who allegedly told the truth. It's of course solely JK and associates who spread hatred. We preach tolerance and love. An outrageous blasphemy to consider such hatred Christian! That's an insult of Christianity and of the Christians he tries to associate such hatred with. It's very much against Christaina vales, both the Old and New Testament and strongly against the teaching of Jesus to spread anti-Semite hatred. "Two-faced" is ridiculous as John Knight twists facts and words; on an emotional and irrational level opponents are blamed for what they solely do themselves. That he uses "Jew" for trying to insult is revealing again. The patriarchal world is based on love, not hate. It is no more insulting than "Christian", "Moslem", "Buddhist" or "Hindu". All of these words are honourable and we have to do good for deserving it. >If you believe in such "christianity" then why don't you advocate >just forgiving the "two-faced" mother-fucker? I'm sure >he's an >asshole but >what's that to you...? More insults from a follower (or an e-mail-address) of John Knight using two insulting swearing words. We never were impolite and only stated facts because moral urges and demands it. >your anti-Christian ranting, and the notion that you are going to >re-establish patriarchy without ever considering the implications of >Christianity Anti-Christan ranting? Is John Knight considering him Christ himself that criticizing John Knight is anti-Christian ranting? Another blasphemy! In fact I had opposed an intolerant atheist view asking for tolerance both ways, asked that tolerance should also include Christian views. As always facts are distorted and the pro-Christian defence is misquoted by John Knight as allegedly anti-Christian whereas the Christian was misquoted as atheist. Whenever JK starts bashing you can rely on the opposite being true. Even though banned from Patriarchy John Knight managed to forward posts to his bashing lists for a series of muddy blackening. Such forwardings are not allowed. >Even so, to associate you and your type with the black plague >is a gross understatement. (JK, backlash, 15827) This is the way John Knight responds when I prove that he lies by omitting important facts and misquoting out of context twisting the sense. John Knight uses angry campaigns based on hatred, lies and mud. It's not at all hatred to tell facts and to call a spide a spide and hatred by its name. It's not at all mud to honestly tell the truth and prove giving URL's that elsewere muddy blackening is done. I've documented hatred and mud-slinging of feminism and now I'm doing the same with those hate-mongers who try to discredit us by association. >The contents of your idiotic personal threatenting posts >to me have never been revealed only because you requested >that they be held confidential. >(threat of JK) You can rely on that the opposite is true when John Knight makes angry mud-slinging. He has threatened any opponent, even from within men's rights and fathers' rights groups, whereas nobody threatened him. This is always twisted into the opposite as the hateful black-white thinking will easily allow any distortion of truth. >The Jew responded: > > Unfair, J.R. You're giving Patriarchy a bad name and oppose > >its values. > Another silly way trying to denigrate the god effort of protecting the reputation of Patriarchy. John Knight has been spreading hatred since a long time; most cleverly he denies all facts presented using endless repetitions of the most absurd and extreme mud-slinging lies ever used against fathers' and men's rights advocates; not even the most radical feminists could do that much harm. They themselves state that they spread hate - and deny it angrily and mud-throwing whenever the slightest critique is mentioned. That awfully hateful bashing stuff is clearly Nazi style as proven by the many URLs mentioned. Any refutation has been dismissed as any unfavourable fact is dismissed by JK, twisted entirely by mis-quoting out of context and other methods of manipulation and mud-slinging. As I was the only one daring to oppose the hate-spreading madness publicly I got a series of angry, illogic and absurd mud throwing attacks for weeks. Others didn't dare the mud-slinging organization and advised to ignore it; however, very obviously an increasing number of members and activists didn't ignore the source of the hatred and posted on his lists thus associating with it - that's moral suicide of the movement and must be stopped. The hatred proven by URL's given is the worst harm which can be done to men's and fathers' advocates and to opposition to feminism. It doesn't matter whether John Knight really believes it or whether it's spread and associated with us with the purpose of ruining our reputation. In any case this is much worse than anything feminists could do. Before Nazis are effectively ignored and effectively excluded from the movement no progress can be made. They have gone too far on the road of evil and hatred to be ever welcomed back. That they are spreading Nazis hatred has been proven by many URLs. Whether they believe in it or do it for embarrassing us without believing it doesn't matter. Any association with Nazi stuff on our list would be my responsibility and I would be considered criminal; besides, spreading such hatred is morally criminal everywhere and JK is committing a huge moral crime and it's blasphemy to pretend doing it in the name of God. Association with Nazis is highly anti-patriarchal and incompatible with membership on Patriarchy list. I regret that it's needed to debate such matters but it's an urgent moral demand and a matter of rotecting our reputation from harm. It's not possible to be both member of Patriarchy and to post on John Knight's bashing list or associate with such groups. (repeal, demand and any other from JK's cross-posting list or run by him, fathersmanifesto site) We need to clearly ignore them and to refuse any association nor give them any attention or credibility. It's not allowed to forward any post to John Knight or associates, either. Even though our archives are closed JK has moles or associates forwarding posts including the Miss Understood letter from a feminist. He misused it for posting and replying - omitting my comment and reply - resulting in a very harsh letter and severe damage. We have good arguments; I proved that feminism has been using much hatred against men and family. No feminist could have given a good reply or easily ignored the facts. Only John Knight's stupid bashing could defeat us - and it did. ----Original Message Follows---- >From: bleustars@ To: manifesto@w... >CC: deichmohle@h... >Subject: email abuse >Date: 10 Jul 2000 22:20:00 -0700 ... >I've already reported this for spam abuse but you might want to >inform >those that you unethically spammed my address out to, >that I will be reporting each and every count of unsolicited >email to ISP's and all other organizations. ... > >I will be reporting both of you to your ISP's for abuse as >well as that I have reported you to my mail abuse already. >Considering that one of your sites appears to endorse >stoning people to death, I imagine the case will be taken >seriously. For that matter, I will be reporting that site >to human rights watch organizations for endorsing violence. >Any emails recieved following this ethical violation will be >forwarded on to the authorities. Instead of the feminists being exposed as hate-spreading extremists, instead of feminists being reported to hate-watch-groups and sites she used JK's bashing to report our sites, ISPs etc. to hate-watch-groups and for spam complaints. As long as John Knight is disturbing our work no progress can be made; he destroys our best arguments in a way feminists could never do on their own. By the way, this has nothing to do with political correctness or self-hatred; it's a moral demand of history. We once had an old and good civilization in Germany; kings (Kaiser) were mostly far from being despots, racists or nationalists as often described today in a biased way; rather they protected Christians and non-Christians; back in the mediaeval age a king (Kaiser) wrote a latin book on birds, was speaking Arabic fluently and had - among others - Arabic advisers at his court what was quite unusual for that time. At times I feel a bit unhappy to see the long history reduced to twelve years of Nazi terror. However, concerning that terror, I'll strictly oppose any kind of association with it and I can't do otherwise either. We have excellent arguments; those who resemble Nazis are the feminists; they bash a sex, nazis bashed a race, communism bashed a class. Many good arguments exist and they may not be spoilt by such a madness. Stating any link between any ethnic or Patriarchal religion with the spreading of feminism is absurd, a persecution mania which would be a concern for psychiatrists if those bashers were doing it in private life instead of spreading hatred using political arguments. A Church refused membership to a member of JK's bashing list advising to seek professional help: http://www.egroups.com/message/repeal19th/23544 >It is strongly suggested you seek out professional help, as it is >possible someone in the mental health services may be able to help >you to see the error of your ways. Please don't associate with the bashing sites and their associates in any way. They need to be ostracized. Please make up your mind on which side you want to participate and I hope that all of you'll choose to work with Patriarchy instead of working with the bashers. It's not possible to do both and results in unsubscription. Please don't post nor forward any material from Patriarchy to their lists nor associates. Anything good which could possibly be done by them we can do better without mixing it with horrible hatred spoiling good issues. Sorry that I had to post on this topic again. If all of us ignore those who spread hatred we hopefully won't need to mention it ever again. Let's concentrate on our issue - opposing feminism. Wishing you much success in overcoming feminist ideology. Jan Join Patriarchy at http://www.egroups.com/group/patriarchy/ http://www.gabnet.com/lit/demoh10.htm Domain Critique of Feminism http://www.gabnet.com/lit/demoh15e.htm Anti-Feminist Network Activists please get a web-only-membership at our low-traffic-version: http://www.topica.com/lists/patriarchy/ Please send a copy of commented articles, calls for action and essays on theory to patriarchy@t... and patriarchy@egroups.com Other posts send to patriarchy@egroups.com only. Thank you.