|
| |
>"Kenneth Collins" <k.p.collins@worldnet.att.net>
wrote in message
>news:mHCc9.6244$jG2.446940@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> John Knight wrote in message
>> <73tc9.38347$Ic7.2598180@news2.west.cox.net>...
>> >[...]
>> >Why should you want to force yourself on White Christian
Israelites
>> who
>> >don't want to have anything to do with you?
>>
>>
>> Mr. Knoght, it's 'hilarious' that you 'think' that you could
get-on
>> without all the work done by the folks whom you disparage.
>>
>> Without all of us, working together, any of us would be left
>> struggling not to starve to death.
>>
>> There'd be no 'technology', so we couldn't 'meet' online to
exchange
>> ideas.
>>
>> Without all of what you term 'muddy' blood shed, including the
work
>> of women who 'fought' the wars in its factories, America
wouldn't've
>> made it through all the wars it's had to fight [and those it
didn't
>> have to fight, but fought anyway].
>>
>> So, you're sittin' there, typing out your anti-this and anti-that
>> ideas, supported, even as you sit there, by the sole virtue of all
>> that 'muddy' stuff that gave-all that you might have the
opportunity
>> to Live.
>>
>> Your 'blindness' to such is illogical, no?
>>
>> Yup.
>>
>> k. p. collins
> I was discussing Geo-Politics, not the dynamics of circumstantial
> male-female disengenuousness.
>
> But, since you've brought it up, there're folks, both male and
> female, who'll mistreat others - of course.
>
> My view on all of this is that it reflects exceedingly-tragic
> dynamics that're passed down intergenerationally. Folks 'complain'
> about this or that, when it's actually what they 'sought-out' - not
> entirely, but at least in part, because they're 'sub-consciously'
> wanting to recreate their birth-Family's familiar stuff.
>
> You know - folks call it 'chemistry', when it's just what, in the
> work I do, is referred to as 'blindly'-automated "TD
> E/I-minimization", that activates the biological reward mechanisms -
> so it, literally, 'feels good' because all the interactive 'tools'
> that one acquired as a Child are 'going to be real useful'.
>
> It's why some men [women] will just not get-involved with any woman
> [man] who'll actually treat them with respect - "no chemistry", which
> really means that she [he] doesn't co-operate in the old,
> long-familiar stuff that the guy [gal]acquired as a Child - no
> biological reward.
>
> It's all so exceedingly-tragic - self-perpetuating
> can't-make-it-work-ness.
>
> Since you brought it up, that's what you're talking about.
>
> Get a Life!
>
> Take yourself to task with respect to what it is that you 'look-for'
> in a woman.
>
> The 'secret' is, that, if your heart is determined, and the woman's
> heart is determined, all you have to do is interact in the
> steadfast-siprit of that, and as you do, all the old, long-familiar
> stuff that would, otherwise, send 'love' [the 'chemical' kind] down
> the tubes, is displaced, and that which the two of you determined to
> happen, just happens. [It's not 'easy', and it takes years because
> you've got to let the old-stuff 'die', and construct new-stuff, and
> the 'stuff' is the real stuff through which nervous systems encode
> 'learning', and nervous systems do such microscopic-bit, by
> microscopic bit, which is why your 'determination' needs to be
> Steadfast. But that's all it takes - times two.]
>
> It helps if [a lot] you both understand the underpinning nervous
> system dynamics. [I have aan old hypertext 'book' that explains it
> all. Runs under [ms]DOS and Windowd. About 350K as an attachment.
> I'll be happy to send it to you, if you want it. Msg privately.]
>
> Anyway, it's like this: If a guy goes around wearing a sign that
> says, "Treat me as if I'm an ATM, then that's likely to be what
> happens.
>
> So, don't 'complain' when it does.
>
> You've got Free Will.
>
> Use it, or lose it :-]
>
> Anyway, don't post anything more to me that 'trashes' other folks.
>
> It's flat-out inexcusable that you impose my name within such.
>
> k. p. collins
| |
|
