|
|
|
Miscegenation
Century Dictionary defines miscegenation as:
Webster's on-line dictionary defines miscegenation as:
The Webster's Dictionary included with E-sword doesn't even contain this word, an indication that our major publishers began the process of dumbing us down regarding how serious a sin, a crime, and an unnatural act miscegenation is almost a century ago. Even though God loved Solomon and made him king over all Israel, He severely punished him (as well as both the House of Judah and the House of Israel) because he married non-Israelite, or "nikro" women (translated as "foreign women" by the KVJ translators):
If it was a sin for even an Israelite king like Solomon to marry non-Israelite women, it was certainly a sin for all Israelites to do so. And if it was a sin 3,000 + years ago to marry non-Israelite or nikro women, then certainly it remains a sin today, regardless of how much definitions change (or are changed). Who would want to change such a key word? What could possibly be gained by misleading so many Christians, as many as 275 million, regarding this serious sin, which is the only sin God calls both an abomination and blasphemy? The damage done to our culture is incalculable, and implementing the solution will be even more costly, but true Israelites know exactly what must be done and when. If we claim to be His holy people, if we are true heirs to the everlasting covenant God made with Abraha, through Jacob, if even we want to claim the title of "Christian", then we are way past due on upholding God's Law. How racially pure are the genetic descendants of Jacob, the 1 billion Israelites of the world today? Israelites in countries like Germany, France, England, and the four Scandinavian countries don't even intermarry with each other, even to this day, much less with other races, and a very good reason for this is that for thousands of years Israelite law has prohibited the offspring of an Israelite who marries a non-Israelite from even being in the community:
Deuteronomy 23:2
A mamzer shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD
But in the US, there's much media disinformation regarding the acceptability of race mixing. In Orange County, California, the local newspaper features a black on every page even though less than 1.7% of the population is black. Thus, the racial purity of Israelites in the US might be much different than in Europe. The Census Bureau's demographics survey for 2000 is very useful to measure this effect. This survey found that 97.6% of the 274.6 million Americans in 2000 were of a single race, and 2.4% are "two or more races". The 34.7 million or 12.3% who are "blacks" are actually 25% Caucasoid and 75% Negroid, which means that another 12.3% are "two or more races" but consider themselves to be a single, separate race called "blacks". The confusion here is that we don't know what proportion of the 2.4% who consider themselves to be "two or more races" are blacks. The same situation exists for the 35.3 million or 12.5% who are Hispanics, so for the purposes of this study, it will be assumed that the 2.4% contains neither blacks nor Hispanics.
American Indians An American Indian today who is a descendant of a White European who had children with an Indian 150 years ago, but all of whose other ancestors were Indians, would have 1% European and 99% Indian blood. One whose only White European ancestor lived 509 years ago when Columbus discovered America would have 0.000003% European blood and 99.999997% Indian blood. If that White European ancestor had lived 800 years ago when the Vikings settled in Nova Scotia, he would have 0.0000000001% European and 99.9999999999% Indian blood. If it were possible that his only White ancestor was Jesus Christ 2,000 years ago, he would have 7.9 x 10^-29 % White blood which would be impossible to detect by any known scientific measurement. If Moses lived 6,000 years ago and was his only White ancestor, he would have 4.9 x 10^-89 % White blood. The practice by the jews that only someone whose mother was a jew is considered to be a jew, which may trace back to Moses' time, assures that all jews have at least 50% jewish blood, which would be the worst case in which all children conceived by jewish mothers were conceived with gentile fathers. If 20% of children conceived by jewish mothers were conceived with gentile fathers, a not so unlikely possibility considering the mismatch in DNA of 20% of American children who aren't genetically linked to their fathers, then the worst case today is that jews are 90% jewish blood and 10% gentile blood. |
               |
|
Modified Tuesday, November 02, 2010 Copyright @ 2010 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party |
