Etymology of "Racism"
In the entire Holy Bible, the
phrase or concept of "racism" is not mentioned even once. Instead are
God's commandments and statutes prohibiting the mixing of the holy seed with the peoples
of the lands. As late as 1945, dictionaries like The New
Century Dictionary also didn't have a definition for "racism", or
"racist".
Oxford English Dictionary, Second Edition,
Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989
racism [f. RACE sb.2 + -ISM;
cf. F. racisme (Robert 1935).] a. The theory that distinctive human characteristics and
abilities are determined by race. b = RACIALISM.
1936 L. Dennis Coming Amer. Fascism 109 If .. it
be assumed that one of our values should be a type of racism which excludes certain races
from citizenship, then the plan of execution should provide for the annihilation,
deportization, or sterilization of the excluded races.
[note: by this definition, if a person believes
Negros are black, he's practicing racism]
racist ('reisist), sb. and a.
[f. RACE sb.2 + -ist.] A. sb. = RACIALIST sb.
1932 M. Eastman tr. Trotsky's Hist. Russ. Revol.
i. 27 This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of the
Slavophiles, but also the latest revelation of the 'Racists'. 1934 H. G. Wells Exper.
Autobiogr. I iii. 107 So much for the Hitlerite stage of my development, when I was a
sentimentalist, a moralist, a patriot, a racist.
New Century Dictionary
It was Webster's Dictionary
which appears to be the first dictionary to include this concept in the English lexicon.
Their first definition wasn't nearly as vitriolic as the latter ones:
"racial prejudice or discrimination"
But then as jews like Noah
Webster felt more comfortable about the unlikelihood of the visitors called jews of being
expelled as they've been 86 times before us, Webster's definition got more vitriolic:
"program or practice of racial
discrimination, segregation, persecution, and domination, based on racialism"
Now, rather than just meaning
"prejudice", this relatively mild word is displaced with with a
"program" which is based on "persecution and domination".
Similarly, the words
"sexism" and "sexist" are not to be found anywhere in the entire
Scripture, and also were not in the 1945 edition of the New Century Dictionary:
But Webster went right for the
jugular this time and pronounced that sexism was:
"economic exploitation" and
"social domination" of women, by (of course) men.
Now we get to the nitty gritty.
It's with his new concept of "anti-semitism" that Noah Webster reveals his not
so hidden agenda. New Century Dictionary defines "anti-semitism" as
"one hostile to the jews", but Noah makes this giant leap of faith
"disliking or fearing Jews and Jewish things".
The concept of "anti-semitism" is not
mentioned even ONCE in the entire Holy Bible. "Fear of the jews" is
mentioned numerous times, yet New Century Dictionary doesn't include this as a part of its
definition. Being hostile to the jews is an antonym to fearing them. How can
one phrase have such contradictory definitions as "hostile to" and "fear
of"? And why does Webster's definition suddenly add "jewish things",
a concept not mentioned by Century NOR Scripture?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racist
<<<United Nations uses
a definition of racist discrimination laid out in the International Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and adopted in 1966:
- ...any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour,
descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or
impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and
fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of
public life>>>
"Reverse" Racism by
Governor Gilmore
77% of Americans support
NOFEAR and DISAGREE with racist anti-White
"leaders" like Gov. Gilmore
Where does racial
pride end and racism begin?
go only to the lost sheep of
the house of Israel.
Governor Gilmore is
a HYPOCRITE!
If he believes it's right
to insult an organization which represents Americans of European descent who represent
almost three quarters of his constituents, then he MUST insult other "racist"
organizations "equally".
He MUST rescind any
and all support for the NAACP. This is at *least* as *racist* an organization as
NOFEAR, and they represent only 12% of Americans, at most.
He MUST rescind any and all
support for the jewish Anti-defamation League (ADL). This is the most *racist*
organization of them all, and they represent only 1.9% of Americans.
He MUST rescind any and all
support for the National Organization of Women (N.O.W.), as the
most worthless, biased, and destructive organization on the planet, who represent only 2%
of Americans..
Could this governor
be at all surprised to discover that 77% of his own constituents agreed with his original
proclamation and disagreed with his rescinding it?
Only 73.9% of
Virginia's population are White, which means that 3.1% who support NOFEAR are either
Blacks (who are 20.4% of the population), Asians (4.3%), or Other (2.7%).
Furthermore, 4.7% of
Virginia's population who are classified as White are actually Hispanic, which means that
only 69.2% are Caucasian, making non-Caucasians 7.8% of those who support NOFEAR.
- White = 73.9%
Black = 20.4%
Asian = 4.3%
Other = 2.7%
Is it possible that 20% of
Blacks support NOFEAR, and thus make up 4% of that 7.8%? Or that half the Hispanics
do, making up another 2.4%, and that the remaining 1.4% are mostly "Other"?
If so, then exactly
which minority group was the governor pandering to when he frustrated the will of three
quarters of his constituents, became a traitor to his own race, and rescinded the
proclamation? Certainly not the few percent who are Other, nor the few percent who
are Hispanics who oppose NOFEAR, nor the few percent who are Asians? The main
opposition he must have been intimidated by are the less than 18% who are Blacks who
oppose NOFEAR.
Since when, in this
land of the free, home of the brave, did an 18% minority, an emotional minority which is
still poorly educated and has been misled for decades by FALSE media hype, get to dictate
such policies based solely on their race, or their perceived hate for another race, or
their willingness to pretend that they're insulted when Whites display the same pride for
their own race that Louis Farrakhan displays for his?
http://www.pilotonline.com/news/nw0511pro.html
| News / Virginia |
|
|
Unwittingly, Gilmore OKs supremacists' history
month
By WARREN FISKE, The
Virginian-Pilot
� May 11, 2001
RICHMOND -- An embarrassed Gov. Jim Gilmore on Thursday rescinded a proclamation he
unknowingly made on behalf of a white supremacy group.
Each year, the governor routinely signs hundreds of honorary resolutions at the request
of civic groups. On Wednesday, he inked his name on an innocently worded decree declaring
May ``European-American Heritage and History Month.''
Much to his horror on Thursday, Gilmore learned from reporters that the resolution was
requested by the National Organization for European-American Rights, or NOFEAR, an
anti-minority group led by former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke of Louisiana.
Gubernatorial aides said the proclamation slipped by them. One described Gilmore as
``quite angry'' about the incident.
Gilmore issued a written statement voiding the proclamation. ``A simple mistake was
made and I can assure you we will be more careful screening these types of requests during
the remainder of my administration,'' he said.
Gilmore denounced Duke for espousing ``racist attitudes'' and said Duke's organization
``masquerades as an advocacy group for diversity but preaches exclusion and hatred.''
``My aims and goals as governor of Virginia are 180 degrees different from theirs,''
Gilmore added.
Ron Doggett, president of the 300-member Virginia chapter of NOFEAR, issued a press
release Thursday morning hailing the proclamation. His joy was short-lived. During an
impromptu news conference outside the governor's office later in the day, he accused
Gilmore of ``insulting all Virginians of European ancestry.''
Gilmore was quick to say that he has nothing against European Americans or
appropriately celebrating their accomplishments.
Reach Warren Fiske at (804) 697-1565 or fiske@richmond.infi.net
POLL
RESULTS
Was Gov. Gilmore right in
retracting the European American Month proclamation?
Yes, because of the group that
sought it
 17.17%
Yes, because it was a dumb idea
5.84%
No, the idea is OK, despite its
source
5%
No, we SHOULD honor European
Americans
71.99%
Total Votes:
1660
|
