This is a very
good article that if you
take the time to read, you will
realize that medical science has
no idea what they are doing with
vaccines....or do they???
If you do not read anything
else, at least read the lines I
have highlighted, then pass this
on to everyone you know!
Vaccines’ Dark Inferno
What is not on
insert labels?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15452
by Richard Gale and Dr Gary Null
The vast majority
of scientists, physicians, nurses
and public health educators’ trust
that the ingredients in a vaccine
have been individually and
synergistically proven safe and
effective. The public believes these
vaccines, aside from their specified
virus(es), are sterile solutions,
free from undesirable contaminants
not listed on the manufacturer’s
package inserts.
When the pediatrician injects a
vaccine into the muscle of a child,
the public has unquestioning faith
that this is the case.
In other words, we want to
believe that vaccines have been
generated under perfect conditions
for the safety of children and
ourselves.
Our investigation shows that most people
do not know what is actually in a
vaccine: the active ingredients listed
on product labels, inert ingredients,
and, most important, the hidden
ingredients. Even more remote is taking
the time to actually study the subject
matter, review the scientific literature
and discover the truth for oneself.
To our amazement, that truth was
easy to find. But it is a truth that
will scare the hell out of you.
Similar to eating veal parmesan, what
would happen if a video were placed on
your table and used as a living reality
recipe instead of the actual meal. This
video unfolds before your eyes every
step in that little creature’s life,
from the veal’s birth to the parmesan on
your plate. You witness how this veal
was starved of its natural nutrients,
kept in a tiny stall, grossly
malnourished and deformed, filled with
drugs—antibiotics—diseased and suffering
complete privations until finally
slaughtered, sliced, cooked and served
on your plate. Would
your appetite be the same? Would you
still desire the parmesan? Conveniently
we rarely ask the questions, where does
our food come from? How and where was it
grown? What was sprayed on it prior to
our consumption? Therefore, we are going
to re-record something that even most
top health educators and opinion leaders
on vaccines are unaware of.
That is, what goes into the
making of vaccines and what is hidden
from you that should give you a moment’s
of pause? Then ask
yourself, do you want vaccines in your
body?
To give us the most in depth, honest,
scholarly and objective examination
about the methods by
which vaccines and their hidden
ingredients are prepared we turn to the
award-winning British investigative
medical journalist, Janine Roberts, who
paints an entirely different picture
about the darker inferno in vaccines
that do not appear on product labels.
This is the same Janine Roberts who
brought to the world’s attention blood
diamonds, genocide in the Congo and the
destruction of aboriginal cultures by
the Australian government.
Roberts’ account of conversations
between high level members from the
World Health Organizatioin (WHO),
federal health agencies, and expert
vaccine scientists, who determine
whether or not a certain vaccine will be
approved or not, is horrid.
Her investigations are based on
official meeting documents and her
attendance at emergency vaccine
meetings, and confirm that our world’s
vaccine and health experts agree there
is no solution in sight to resolve the
potential and uncertain threats posed by
these hidden ingredients.(1)
The story begins with the vaccine
industrial complex’s attempt to reduce
vaccine manufacturing costs by seeking
government approval to use cancerous
cell lines in the development of
vaccines. Vaccine industry’s rationale
is that cancerous cells are “immortal.”
Current vaccine methodology relies on
animal cells, such as fertilized hen
embryos and monkey kidneys, that die
quickly in culture. Using cancerous cell
lines are also much cheaper than relying
on the purchase of animals, especially
monkeys, that need to be sacrificed for
vaccine substrates.
Roberts records two separate meetings—a
meeting of the Vaccine and Related
Biological Products Advisory Committee
on November 9, 1998, and a subsequent
gathering of the Evolving Scientific and
Regulatory Perspective Workshop less
than a year later. The conversations
were conducted at a scientific level
between top officials and expert
scientists from the FDA, Centers for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER), the National Institute of
Allergies and Infectious Diseases
(NIAID), the WHO and others, each
providing evidence and/or confirmation
that all vaccines are dangerously
contaminated.
Conversations focused primarily on the
influenza, MMR and yellow fever
vaccines, which rely on fertilized
chicken eggs for their culturing
viruses. Fertilized chicken eggs, while
ideally suited for culturing certain
viruses for vaccines, such as the
influenza and MMR vaccines, are also
living incubators for large numbers of
known and unknown viruses in the animal
kingdom.
While these do not transmit from their
animal host to humans naturally, they
nevertheless are sequential genetic
codes, which when injected into the
human body, have the potential for any
number of unpredictable adverse effects
by interfering or merging with the codes
of human cells. Vaccine research
is at best a primitive science because
it is injecting into the blood stream
foreign substances, chemical and
genetic, that would otherwise not enter
the body naturally. When we include into
the equation the enormous amount of
known and unknown genetic material and
foreign proteins that vaccines introduce
into the body, and then consider the
rapid increase in epidemics raging
across the American population—adult
diabetes in children, large numbers of
various inflammatory and immune
deficiency diseases, asthma and new
allergies, severe gastro-intestinal
disorders (eg., leaky gut syndrome and
Crohn’s Disease), chronic fatigue
syndrome, and many different
neurological disorders (eg., autism, ADD
and ADHD, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s,
etc.)—we must step back and reconsider
their causes. We should avoid the
kind of faith the vaccine industrial
complex has in its determinist,
reductionist perspective of genetic
materialism to find these answers
without taking into account the
bombardment of toxic chemicals such as
vaccine adjuvants and preservatives,
extraneous genetic material, and
pathogenic organisms and foreign genetic
fragments that we assault our bodies
from shortly after birth into old age.
For some time, it was known that the
enzyme reverse transcriptase (RT) was
present in final vaccine solutions. RT
has been used to this day as an
indicator that there is a presence of a
retrovirus. During the meeting’s
proceedings, the WHO decided to withhold
public announcement of such genetic
contamination, in this case concerning
the MMR vaccine, and made the decision
to not remove it from the market and, in
the meantime, continue safety studies at
various laboratories.
Roberts reports that Dr. Arifa Khan from
the FDA confirmed:
The RT activity
in the vaccine was associated with
retrovirus particles from two
separate viral strains: Avian
Leuokosis Virus (ALV) and Equine
Arteritis Virus (EAV). The former
was especially disturbing because
ALV is a leukemia cancer, and Dr.
Khan stated: “There was a
theoretical possibility that the
virus [ALV] could… infect the
[human] cell.”
In summary, this means the ALV
genetic code could integrate with
human DNA, hence causing some kind
of cancer.
The FDA’s reassurance that the ALV RT
activity was safe is based on laboratory
observations that there was no
viral-human DNA merger activity for “a
full 48 hours’. This
kind of assurance is almost nonsensical
and flies in the face of scientific
reasoning since cancers can take years
to develop!
As a side note, reverse transcriptase
activity is one of the stalwarts of the
HIV/AIDS hypothesis. An article,
“Serious Questions Regarding the Safety
and Efficacy of the Influenza Vaccine”
published by Canada’s Vaccine Risk
Awareness Network reports that some
studies, and even some vaccine package
inserts, “indicate that vaccinations
increase HIV viral replication.”(2)
This means all vaccines stimulate
a strong suppressive effect on the
immune system. Under stress conditions,
viruses turn hyperactive and increase
their ability to replicate.
The other risk stated by the FDA
official was the possibility of the ALV
sequence merging with the measles virus,
hence creating a completely new, mutant
and dangerous virus. (This could also
apply equally to the H1N1 swine flu and
any other flu vaccines). As an aside,
the world renown British geneticist Dr.
Mae-Wan Ho from the Institute of Science
in Society wrote that, “Vaccines
themselves can be dangerous, especially
live, attenuated viral vaccines or the
new recombinant nucleic acid vaccines,
they have the potential to generate
virulent viruses by recombination and
the recombinant nucleic acids could
cause autoimmune disease.”(3)
During the meeting, Dr. Andrew Lewis,
then head of the DNA Virus Laboratory in
the Division of Viral Products confirmed
that
“All the egg-based vaccines are
contaminated…. These fertilized chicken
eggs are susceptible to a wide variety
of viruses.” The participants also
realized that only a very small fraction
of these small contaminants have been
identified and there are likely hundreds
more to be discovered.
Roberts found a 2001 CDC report showing
that RT investigative studies for both
the ALV and EAV retroviruses were
conducted in 100 patients receiving the
MMR vaccine. They found undesirable “RT
activity in all measles vaccine lots
from different manufacturers tested.”
Their conclusion is that “this
occurrence is not sporadic and that
vaccine recipients may be universally
exposed to these [chicken] retroviral
particles.” In a separate
National Institutes of Health transcript
of a meeting, Dr. Conroy of the World
Health Organization stated that EAV
viruses are found in all fertilized
chicken eggs. There appears to be little
change in the scientific protocol for
making the influenza, MMR and yellow
fever vaccines. The current release of
intramuscular H1N1 vaccines for the
global market relies on the use of
fertilized chicken embryos. These
include each of the approved vaccines by
CSL, Medimmune, Novartis and
Sanofi-Pasteur, as well as
GlaxoSmithKlines if and when it is
approved in the US.
A late meeting of the FDA’s Scientific
and Regulatory Perspective Workshop,
without the press, was convened on
September 7, 1999 in Washington DC, and
attended by “representatives from all
the largest public health institutions
in the West.” The
following are summaries of key points
and statements raised during this
meeting as recorded in Janine Roberts
invaluable book Fear of the Invisible.
·
It was reconfirmed that vaccines are
“widely contaminated by viral and
DNA genetic code fragments, many
viruses and proteins. There was
expressed concern that these may
also contain prions (tiny proteins
responsible for incurable diseases
and neurological disorders in both
humans and animals) and oncogenes (a
gene that turns normal cells into
cancerous ones). One attendee, Dr.
Goldberg, stated, “There are
countless thousands of undiscovered
viruses, proteins and similar
particles. We have only identified a
very small part of the microbial
world—and we can only test for those
we have identified. Thus the vaccine
cultures could contain many unknown
particles.”
·
Dr. Andrew Lewis of the FDA
said that a brand-new monkey-human
mutant virus was created during the
course of creating an adenovirus
vaccine with adenvovirus-SV40
hybrid viruses. Dr. Lewis also
worried that “foreign cellular DNA”
common in childhood vaccines could
include “viral oncogenes” capable of
causing cancer.
·
The scientists presented a
question to themselves as to whether
or not an attenuated vaccine strain
could revert into a variant virus
capable of replicating so fast that
it would cause AIDS. They agreed
that they were unable to answer this
question.
·
On the question whether or
not mutation events could occur in
children after vaccination, the
answer was that “Recombination among
a variety of viruses [contaminant
viruses] and cells co-infected in
tissue culture is not uncommon.”
What this basically means is that
because it is “not uncommon”
for genetic codes of both
contaminant viruses and living cells
to recombine and create mutations in
laboratory cultures, it can
certainly occur in a child’s body
after vaccination.
·
Dr. Hana Golding, Chief of
CBER’s Laboratory of Retrovirus
Research, raised the fear that
although DNA fragment contaminants
in vaccines may be thought to be
dead, they could remain active and
dangerous. This meant that the codes
of these contaminants could combine
in vaccines and create new mutant
strains of pathogens.
·
Dr. Leonard Hayflick, a
virologist at both Stanford and the
University of California at San
Francisco raised a concern that the
common
primary culture used for making
vaccines with animals and bird
embryos has created a situation
where it is “apparent that these
cells contained many unwanted
viruses, some of which were lethal
to humans.” This was
especially worrisome of those
vaccines, such as polio, which still
relies on monkey kidney cells that
have contributed to widespread death
and illness.
·
One of the UK’s leading
vaccine expert, Dr. Phil Minor from
the National Institute of Biological
Standards and Control, noted that
some cases of polio vaccine are
polluted with more monkey virus,
SV40, than actual poliovirus.
Although the uninitiated who are not
informed about-closed door vaccine
science have been led to assume that
SV40 was no longer in polio vaccines
at the time of this meeting, the
conversations confirmed that it was
still in use. This is another
example of deception at high levels
within the vaccine industrial
complex and high government health
officials to withhold information
that directly impacts the health and
well being of citizens.
·
Dr. Rebecca Sheets from the
CBER’s laboratory responsible for
monitoring vaccine safety stated the
national health organizations had no
control over how vaccines were made.
In short, they could make
recommendations but the vaccine
industrial complex was free to act
as it choose.
·
It is impossible to remove
DNA contaminants from vaccines.
Although weight limits for
contaminating DNA were set by the
FDA as far back as 1986, vaccine
makers have never been able to reach
that goal. The CDC decided to limit
their weight recommendation to
cancerous cell lines and then
increase the other DNA contamination
allowance one hundred-fold.
However, these limits are
only “recommendations” and,
therefore, the FDA is unable to
enforce them. Vaccine manufacturers
continue to have the freedom to take
scientific measures to reduce
contaminants only if they wish.
Remember, this
level of contamination (10
nanograms) only applies to a single
vaccine. Children today are
inoculated with many vaccines before
entering school, each with unique
DNA and viral contaminants due to
the specific cell substrates used
for a given vaccine. This toxic
genetic soup is what then flows
through a vaccinated person’s body.
·
One government health
official stated, “I chaired the
committee that licensed the
chickenpox vaccine, and it [residual
DNA] was actually an issue that we
considered at that time. We looked
among recipients of the vaccine for
evidence of an autoimmune response
associated with the DNA included in
that vaccine…… Actually, we didn’t
look, we asked the company to look
and they did not find one.”
Well, of course, only such
assurances can be convincing if in
fact the company conducted the
study, for which there was no
compulsory reason to. Clearly, what
the official is saying is that
health authorities do not possess
any study documents that such a
study actually exists.
·
Can vaccine DNA contamination cause
cancer or autoimmune disease?
A meeting participant responded,
“when you consider that almost every
one of these vaccines is injected
right into the tissue…
I think you couldn’t do much more to
get the DNA expressed [to get
contaminating DNA taken up by human
cells] than to inject it into a
muscle in the way it’s being done.”
·
Again CBER’s Dr. Rebecca
Sheets:
“I think that the vast majority of
licensed vaccines, US licensed
vaccines, have not been tested for
residual DNA.”
·
A more frightening question
was raised as to whether it was
known if there has been any presence
of foamy virus. Foamy virus (HFV in
human form and its more widespread
parent SFV from monkeys), although
not infectious, is a deadly
carcinogen. To the participants’
knowledge, they did not know whether
any laboratory has ever searched for
it in vaccine preparations.
·
The meeting confirmed that a
particular cell, “which under many
conditions is neoplastic [tumor
causing]” has been licensed for the
production of both injectible and
oral polio vaccines in the US,
Thailand, Belgium and France.
Therefore,
these vaccines carry the high risk
of containing cancer-causing
oncogenes.
In order to appreciate the magnitude of
the contamination problem in vaccine
products, it is important to understand
that vaccine filtration needs to allow
the targeted virus’s passage to remain
for vaccine use. Other
particles and pathogens—DNA and
RNA fragments from other organisms (and
pathogens) in the manufacturing process,
cellular substrates, and viral
proteins--smaller than the vaccine’s
virus will remain in the vaccine.
What the content of these meetings tells
us is best expressed by one of the
leading attendants at the meeting, Dr.
Minor stated, “So even today then you
have to bear in mind that a large amount
of vaccine that’s made is made on really
quite crude materials, from an
adventitious agent point of view. It’s
not a trivial usage. In fact, when
considering what vaccines are actually
made on these days, they are quite
primitive in some respects.”
Janine Roberts summarizes her
investigations succinctly,
“In other words, the vaccines we
give our children are liquids filled
with a host of unknown particles,
most of which came from the cells of
non-humans: from chickens, monkeys
and even from cancer cells. Truly we
do not know what we are doing or
what are the long-term consequences.
All that is known for sure is that
vaccines are a very cheap form of
public medicine often provided by
governments to assure the public
that they really do care for the
safety of our children.”
The conclusion that can be drawn from
these meetings convened by our national
and international health officials in
vaccine science and safety is that
vaccines are virtually genetic
experiments, capability of
causing mass cellular destruction, being
injected into the world’s population,
especially children. There remain so
many unanswered questions about vaccine
science. This includes the forthcoming
swine flu vaccines that will include the
contaminants mentioned above, if we take
any of these meeting attendees’ words to
heart.
If we are to express any awe and wonder
it should be towards our body’s natural
immune system and its ability to defend
itself from the onslaught of vaccine
brews. It is not vaccination that is a
miracle of science, as the vaccine
industrial complex, government health
authorities and their congregations of
believers are too eager to proclaim.
In fact, the real miracle is the body’s
ability to protect itself, in most
cases, from the invasion of vaccines.
Yet, even this statement is now
turning suspect given the dramatic rise
in multiple illnesses and inflammatory
conditions across the age spectrum.
As with all living systems, whether it
be a natural habitat in the wild, the
planet’s climate system to support life,
or the body’s immune system, a tipping
point is eventually reached. Today, with
the majority of the public still buying
into the false promises of vaccination’s
efficacy and safety, the vaccine
industrial complex remains an
extraordinarily lucrative business. More
and more vaccines are now being
developed for a wide variety of diseases
and infections— Chlamydia, herpes
simplex type 2, West Nile virus,
Epstein-Barr virus, and others—that will
only add to the overload of vaccines
already recommended, especially to
children who are officially recommended
to receive 36 separate vaccinations by
the time they reach 18 months of age. As
these new genetic poisons are added to
the national health agencies’
recommended vaccination schedule,
a tipping point may be reached that will
result in a more serious pandemic,
a pandemic of Vaccine Disease,
manifesting in myriad illnesses
dependent upon each vaccinated person’s
genetic predisposition and the
robustness of the immune system, than
any epidemic threat posed by wild
infectious pathogens, including the H1N1
swine flu, that could unfold in our so-called
developed, hygienic society.
Richard Gale is the
Executive Producer of the
Progressive Radio Network and a
former Senior Research Analyst in the
genomic industry. Dr. Gary Null
is the host of the nation’s longest
running public radio program on
nutrition and natural health and a
multi-award-winning director of
progressive documentary films, including
Vaccine Nation and Autism: Made
in the USA.
Notes
(1) The following quotes and events were
taken from Roberts, Janine. Fear of the
Invisible: How Scared Should We Be of
Viruses and Vaccines, HIV and AIDS
Impact Investigative Media Productions:
Bristol UK, 2009; and from an interview
with Janine Roberts. The Gary Null Show.
The Progressive Radio Network and
WNYE-New York on August 19, 2009.
(2) “Serious
Questions Regarding the Safety and
Efficacy of the Influenza Vaccine”
Vaccine Risk Awareness Network.
http://vran.org/about-vaccines/specific-vaccines/influenza-vaccine-flu-shot/influenza-nursing-home-deaths/
(3) Ho, Mae-Wan,
Cummins, Joe. “The vaccines are far more
deadly than the swine flu”. Global
Research. August 21, 2009.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=mae+wan+ho+global+research&aq=o&oq=&aqi=g10
|
